Sleater-Kinney breaks up

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1139 of them)
(ignore my first postt; lunch was awful)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 18:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm trying to think of the sleater-kinney track that's as much of a 'lecture on gender politics' as "1963" or "you can't do that"

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link

I certainly know what you're getting at here; I think we all know the difficulty of wanting to get into a band but being stymied by a parade of dubious-looking records you've never heard of in the used bin. "I know these can't all be good," we think. However, it seems like a kind of weak argument against making more records, especially given the context of an indie band like Sleater-Kinney, whose new fans are going to come from word-of-mouth, older sisters and brothers, and magazine writeups about how if you like Band X of Today you totally need to go listen to Dig Me Out, The Hot Rock and/or The Woods.

There's a tendency for a band's latter works to get a consensus nod as "great" when in fact there are stronger earlier works - it's just how the indie system works, latter albums get more press and sell more. Sometimes history corrects itself, but sometimes the same lines get repeated over and over. I've been burned a couple times picking up a band's "definitive" work and not being too impressed, only to find later that 2 or 3 albums prior they hit their peak. That said, the Interweb has changed this a bit, you can get a hold of an entire discography in an afternoon and figure out what's good yourself. Just saying that if the first thing I ever heard from Sleater Kinney was The Woods or All Hands On The Bad One I probably wouldn't go poking around any further in the pile...

re: X should just break up - Well in truth it's all Monday morning quarterbacking innit? Though the general progression is usually entropic, nobody can really tell when a band's dead, dying, or on the verge of a major breakthrough. There really is no argument for not making a record, you never know what's going to happen.

But, alas, kvetching is fun!

I wouldn't get bent out of shape if someone said The Fall should've broken up after Dragnet. It's not like you've got that time machine working yet and even if you did, the band's not likely to obey your call for their cessation unless you said hey I'm from the future and they were intimidated by your sci-fi prowess and decided better break up now rather than face the potential scourge of angry mobs of future time travellers...

Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link

There's a tendency for a band's latter works to get a consensus nod as "great" when in fact there are stronger earlier works - it's just how the indie system works, latter albums get more press and sell more. - ok i'm not sure where exactly this statement might apply but decidedly not to indie in the united states.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link

If you do end up flipping Beatles '65 over, though, you immediately get blasted with some more awesome wtf weirdness - "Honey Don't." Then "I'll Be Back," which harkens back to the trilogy of tunes that started the thing, BUT probably the best of all these tunes! They just sneak it in there on you. Then, you get the "I Feel Fine"/"She's a Woman" single - nothin' wrong with that. And topping it all off, yet another wtf Carl Perkins cover weirder than the first - too much!!!

(x-post)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 18:37 (seventeen years ago) link

You all are making me listen to The Woods again.

There's a tendency for a band's latter works to get a consensus nod as "great" when in fact there are stronger earlier works - it's just how the indie system works, latter albums get more press and sell more. - ok i'm not sure where exactly this statement might apply but decidedly not to indie in the united states.
-- j blount (jamesbloun...)

I'd rather listen to Bad Moon Rising than Daydream Nation or Goo. Do you think Cat Power is going to be remembered for What Would The Community Think rather than You Are Free or (god forfend) The Greatest?

Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 18:53 (seventeen years ago) link

um judging by college radio, indie rock karaoke, and um the indie audience and indie mythology - yes yes yes??? 'do you think pavement are going to be remembered for slanted + enchanted rather than terror twilight? do you think evol is namechecked more than nyc ghosts? do you think chronic town is held in higher regard than around the sun? do you think olivia tremor control got more press than circulatory system? when people talk about patti smith they always talk about gung ho but how often do they bring up horses? and why do you think people go on and on about candy apple grey while zen arcade toils in obscurity? why is 'waiting room' fugazi's least known song? how come when people go on about sleater-kinney they always talk about the woods but never bring up 'i wanna be yr joey ramone' or dig me out?'

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:10 (seventeen years ago) link

i have to admit reading the 900th 'a look back at all shook down' piece (300th on stylus, selfpromoted 9 million times on ilm) i do sometimes wish 'how come noone ever talks about how great let it be is?'

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:11 (seventeen years ago) link

I now what Blount is saying, although a couple of his (your) examples are nonsense: who thinks "gung ho" is patti smith's masterpiece and forgets about "horses," and "zen arcade" hardly toils in obscurity. But it definitely happens. My gut tells me its a consequence of when people enter into fandom.

(Not to break up the flow, but - anything to salvage from the first, self-titled LP? Not a word about it yet...)

pleased to mitya (mitya), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm a little mystified too about the idea that it's a band's later works that get canonized. Obviously there are huge examples of this - like having Revolver thru Abbey Road being the great rockist albums for ages while generations increasingly ignored the Beatlemania records, until popism made inroads and put A Hard Day's Night back into circulation. But, at least in indie there's a tremendous tendency to up the debut, perhaps partially for cool points: "Oh, yeah, their early, obscure stuff that only the elite know about, that's way better." It also fits well with narratives of "They sold out later, they got more poppy, Outlandos d'Amour is their most jagged and punky thing"... certainly James is right that "Joey Ramone" and "Dig Me Out" are the easy namecheck Sleater-Kinney songs, although I think this may also have something to do with people just gradually paying less attention to the band.

Just saying that if the first thing I ever heard from Sleater Kinney was The Woods or All Hands On The Bad One I probably wouldn't go poking around any further in the pile...

Well, I can sort of understand that and it's your opinion after all. I think a lot of people got an instant "holy shit, this kicks ass!" reaction off The Woods, and certainly not all of them were previous fans shocked by a new direction - my friend Indy got into the band through this album. All Hands is certainly more of a fan's album, but then, I dunno - I just finished up listening to it and it's pretty solid. I could see somebody buying it and it being the only thing they needed from the band for a long while - that's what happened for me, after all! Whereas Dig Me Out is the kind of album where if you love it you immediately go "What else do they have that I can buy?"

Incidentally, my heart goes out to Tim Ellison for steadfastedly discussing only Beatles '65 in this thread and leaving it up to the reader to determine whether it's all meant as a complex analogy to the tracklist of All Hands On the Bad One, or if he just really wants to talk about Beatles '65. OTM about "Mr. Moonlight" and "Rock N Roll Music" in any case.

mitya - somebody was upping "A Real Man" upthread - I guess this is the next record for me to listen back through in my Sleater-Kinney mourning period. Will comment later tonight...

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:23 (seventeen years ago) link

s/t = can't buy a thrill (first album with different personnel, very different from the later work but very good)
call the doctor = countdown to ecstasy (it all comes together, old personnel lingers, dominant personalities find their voice)
dig me out = pretzel logic (the 'consensus' great album, the breakthrough)
the hot rock = katy lied (taking the sound to another place, dark/sinister undertones?)
all hands on the bad one = the royal scam (the album for the fans? a little angry and bitter here)
one beat = aja (poppiest one yet, a return to prominence after the previous alleged 'misstep')
the woods = gaucho (the difficult one, the distillation/eliciting of a certain part of their sound, considered by many to be the best and others to be impossible to listen to)

gear (gear), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:31 (seventeen years ago) link

that won't hold any water upon closer examination

gear (gear), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:31 (seventeen years ago) link

i think the voices need a little bit more discussion here. the lyrics, guitars, etc. are all well and good, but i've always thought of them as a vocal band first. the play between corin and carrie's voices is one of the most sonically remarkable things in recent rock music. corin's the dominant personality, obviously, but s-k would sound very different and much less interesting without carrie's flattened counterpoints. the chorus to "joey ramone" is still one of the most fearsomely weird things i've ever heard, and ditto "stay where you are" which sounds like an infinite number of howler monkeys at the exact moment they finally spontaneously compose "ode to joy." the twinned-twining voices thing reached an apex on hot rock that i don't think they ever bettered. although the outright robert plant-isms of the woods are pretty striking in their own way.

anyway, i think it's a little hard to classify the singing. it has punk in it, and metal, and that detached indie cool (especially carrie), but can also be pretty in a surprisingly conventional way (although even then there's always a sense that corin is sort of barely restraining herself). i'm not sure how well either one of them can carry a tune, per se, but they're some of my favorite singers.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:42 (seventeen years ago) link

um judging by college radio, indie rock karaoke, and um the indie audience and indie mythology - yes yes yes???

How about outside yr indie fishbowl?

you think pavement are going to be remembered for slanted + enchanted rather than terror twilight?

That would be the difference between a "tendency" and a "certainty."

do you think evol is namechecked more than nyc ghosts?

No, but I've read loads of press focusing on Daydream Nation and beyond as the locus of their "great work" and heard current SY fans dismiss the earlier "amatuer" stuff.

do you think chronic town is held in higher regard than around the sun?

How many people who own an REM CD even know what the hell Chronic Town is?

when people talk about patti smith they always talk about gung ho but how often do they bring up horses?

Well, Patti was always on a major label, so not really applicable here...

and why do you think people go on and on about candy apple grey while zen arcade toils in obscurity? why is 'waiting room' fugazi's least known song?

I don't know, why do you think they call it dope?

how come when people go on about sleater-kinney they always talk about the woods but never bring up 'i wanna be yr joey ramone' or dig me out?'

Time will tell...

(Not to break up the flow, but - anything to salvage from the first, self-titled LP? Not a word about it yet...)

"A Real Man" = classic

that won't hold any water upon closer examination

But it sure was fun!

Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I always get so jealous when blount talks about indie rock karaoke... wish we had that in L.A.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:45 (seventeen years ago) link

that won't hold any water upon closer examination

-- gear (speed.to.roa...)

Nothing holds water upon closer examination.

M. V. (M.V.), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:47 (seventeen years ago) link

indie rock or discussions of it don't exist at all outside the indie fishbowl so do plz tell me in what reality yr statement makes on ounce of sense (i'm guessing maybe 'britain')

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:49 (seventeen years ago) link

how many people who own an rem cd even know what the hell around the sun is?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Wasn't Willem DaFoe in that?

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 23:55 (seventeen years ago) link

no that was 'off limits', where dafoe played an american cop in 1968 saigon (which was CRAZY for a dude to be)

gear (gear), Thursday, 29 June 2006 00:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Does anything exist outside the blount fishbowl?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 29 June 2006 00:10 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.stylusmagazine.com/

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 00:18 (seventeen years ago) link

why don't you have your mod buds change that post too? You crazy insiders.

timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 29 June 2006 01:11 (seventeen years ago) link

i love this picture. carrie's like "MY band, bitches. move it or lose it."

http://www.aversion.com/bands/sleaterkinney/images/sleater-kinney.jpg

aimee semple mcmansion (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 29 June 2006 02:47 (seventeen years ago) link

indie rock or discussions of it don't exist at all outside the indie fishbowl so do plz tell me in what reality yr statement makes on ounce of sense (i'm guessing maybe 'britain')
-- j blount (jamesbloun...), June 28th, 2006.

That's correct, no one outside indieland knows about Sonic Youth (whose Rather Ripped was featured in the weekly Best Buy circular last week), Cat Power (who is frequently namedropped in the New Yorker when she's not dropping trou there), or Sleater-Kinney (who get coverage in obscure indie publications like Time and Rolling Stone). You're right, I must be on Mars and how does Britain have fuckall to do with this?

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 12:14 (seventeen years ago) link

also if we're talkin good stuff on the first album, "be yr mama" fuckin kicks out the jamz.

you make chatting lame (teenagequiet), Thursday, 29 June 2006 12:26 (seventeen years ago) link

the most fervently beloved devotion-inspiring cult band ever, or at least in my lifetime of music geekdom. absolutely no middle ground, either you worship @ their altar or wander the desert of disbelief.

not saying this is bad or wrong, just think it's interesting that nobody ever seems to be mixed or on-the-fence abt sleater-kinney.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 29 June 2006 12:55 (seventeen years ago) link

gypsy mothra is right that the voices deserve discussion. The most distinctive/offputting thing about the band. More or less popular without the Tucker banshee wail?

I also love the use of the contrasting voices on Hot Rock, that's what makes that record great to those who love it, and why "Burn, Don't Freeze" makes a lot of the POX lists (since B,DF is the apex of that technique by the band). What does it mean that on The Woods there is barely any difference between the two voices? Brownstein seemed to have completely appropriated Tucker's style on a bunch of the songs.

Vornado (Vornado), Thursday, 29 June 2006 12:58 (seventeen years ago) link

the most fervently beloved devotion-inspiring cult band ever, or at least in my lifetime of music geekdom. absolutely no middle ground, either you worship @ their altar or wander the desert of disbelief.

*holds up sign for "camp middle ground"*

aimee semple mcmansion (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:01 (seventeen years ago) link

nobody ever seems to be mixed or on-the-fence abt sleater-kinney.

-- m coleman (writeco...), June 29th, 2006.

HI DERE

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:03 (seventeen years ago) link

SK POXI

One more hour
The drama you've been craving
Little Babies
Dance Song '97
I Wanna Be Your Joey Ramone
No Rock n' Roll Fun
Get Up
Oh!
Step Aside
Sympathy
What's Mine is Yours

gooblar (gooblar), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Wow, what dreck that Stylus piece is. I don't care if you love/like/hate the band, that was bizarre, horribly written, and yes, misogynist, piece of tripe.

meeterhead (meeterhead), Thursday, 29 June 2006 13:54 (seventeen years ago) link

*holds up sign for "camp middle ground"*

HI DERE

hey kids let's start a tribute band! I'll dress in combat-boot drag. coming soon to BBKings' on 42st: The Your Joey Ramones

m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 29 June 2006 14:02 (seventeen years ago) link

so edward were you gonna answer my question? or was 'in time magazine: the final arbiter of rock legacies' yr answer? i remember time doing a big 3 pg feature on s-k circa the hot rock, are you telling me they got a cover or something for the woods???

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 14:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Since yr question was rooted in the logical fallacy indie rock or discussions of it don't exist at all outside the indie fishbowl, no, I wasn't planning on it...

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:02 (seventeen years ago) link

what's the world like outside yr indie fishbowl?

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Overcast, slight chance of rain. And you?

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Sunny

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:10 (seventeen years ago) link

Nice.

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:11 (seventeen years ago) link

so again where is this piece in time or rolling stone or the new yorker talking about sonic youth or the replacements or rem or pavement or cat power or sleater-kinney's glory days and referring to nyc ghosts or all shook down or around the sun or terror twilight or the greatest or the woods? i'm wondering - again - where exactly it is that indie rock bands with long careers are routinely memorialized for the later stuff. when i suggested this didn't apply in any indie circle or any indie press or any indie mythology you went 'well i certainly didn't mean amongst people that care remotely about indie rock, i meant in time magazine and rolling stone' (why exactly time and rolling stone matter or have a bigger impact on an indie band's legacy you didn't make clear so i'll give you that opp now too) - which time or rolling stone did you mean exactly? i'd really like to read the glossycrit plaquework on terror twilight plz!

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:18 (seventeen years ago) link

If you need me to point to specific evidence that mainstream media covers Sonic Youth, The Replacements, REM, Pavement, Cat Power, and Sleater-Kinney, then I don't know what to tell you, maybe you should read more in waiting rooms. If you're going to deny that the mainstream media tends to view indie bands' careers as progressions from noisy amateurs on small labels to mature relevent artists on major labels, and that people with the $$ and power have influence over what gets written into history, then yeah we live on different planes of existence.

That said, the situation isn't as dire as it was 10-15 years ago. I'm *glad* people are still talking about Bad Moon Rising and EVOL 'cause for years they were ignored and/or dissed. The improving conditions probably have something to do with widespread reissues, high availability of music via p2p / eBay / Amazon, and the wealth of info available on-line.

But when given a choice between interpreting an artist's career as artistic progression of growth vs. entropic decline into diminishing returns, the mainstream tends to support the former view while indie folk support the latter. It's like you've never read a review by Christgau or something. If you say, "Well, who cares what they say," that's a different argument than, "It doesn't happen at all."

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 16:52 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm not saying the msm doesn't give press to indie rockers, i'm saying in my experience i've never seen in the new yorker or time or rolling stone any rock canon 'this was important' stakes attached to nyc ghosts or all shook down or around the sun or the greatest or the woods. maybe i'm reading the wrong waiting room material but when i see 'top 100 boring bullshit' lists it's always murmur or slanted and enchanted or daydream nation or let it be, apparently you read different lists or pieces and so i'm asking you again where can i read these memorials to all shook down, etc.? interesting you bring up xgau since he's the only example of someone doing what you claim is the routine, but call me crazy i don't think 'sebadoh only got good with the sebadoh' reflects cw.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link

i think blount is right but it doesn't only apply to indie, or to music even! whatever work of art happens to have the broadest appeal, or hit at the right time in the right place, that's the 'consensus' pick that everyone remembers. like, 'if you only have to own one record/dvd/book by so and so, it should be this one'. those lists are made by and for surface skimmers, who don't really give a fuck about art anyway, they're just tourists.

gear (gear), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:16 (seventeen years ago) link

look next to your name, james:

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

you're right - it is weird how everyone only talks about the new billy joel and completely overlooks the stranger and nylon curtain.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:30 (seventeen years ago) link

i bet that recent live album he did (from a month of sell outs at msg) sold better on release than either the stranger or nylon curtain.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:33 (seventeen years ago) link

also six months from release "the greatest" is not far from topping scans on chan's biggest selling album, "you are free." but keep talking about how nobody cares about anything except "dear sir" or whatever.

still beats talking about sleater-kinney (sorry folks!).

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:37 (seventeen years ago) link

anyhow it occurred to me instead of going back and forth with 'no, the crit cw is slanted + enchanted is the essential/most important/best pavement' vs. 'no the crit cw is terror twilight is the essential/most important/best pavement' there's an actual place that actually tallies and calculates the crit cw - acclaimedmusic.net! and here's what they've come up with -

album all-time rank

slanted and enchanted 114
terror twilight 1604

daydream nation 82
sonic nurse 1526

murmur 58
up 1346
(around the sun and reveal apparently didn't rank in the top 2000 and hence weren't ranked at all i guess)

let it be 228
pleased to meet me 761
(all shook down and don't tell a soul didn't rank)

dig me out 577
one beat 1026
BUT IN FAIRNESS TO EDWARD HE MAY WELL BE ONTO A POINT
the woods 616

the greatest and you are free beat moon pix too (the inside scoop from el scandalo knows of what he speaks)!

by and large though i still hold that with indie rock the cliche is 'the early stuff is better'. to quote 'still at the top of his game'/'rock n roll's roger clemens' billy joel - i may be wrong you may be right.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:47 (seventeen years ago) link

Perhaps related to the "it's not their best but it's the one everybody owns" phenomenon?

by and large though i still hold that with indie rock the cliche is 'the early stuff is better'.

Yeah, we agree there. All I'm saying is that mainstream folk looking at indie from the outside don't always see it the same way, and given that they have the larger audience they can end up writing the history books...

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:53 (seventeen years ago) link

which is related "it's not their best but it's their most accessible" phenomenon

gear (gear), Thursday, 29 June 2006 17:57 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.