a specific complaint

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (259 of them)

kate was hated by a lot of posters, many of them british. personally i didn't really have anything against her and am saddened by this because for all the ranty handwringing she is passionate about music and often brings good content to ilx, also her recent genderfuck WDYLL pic is truly one for the ages

tuomas doesn't do himself any favours, even if inwardly i applaud his anti-ban zeal

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Laurel was implying

Pretty sure I didn't imply anything.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

I am anti-SB but Tumoas you make me want to rip out my eyeballs every time I see you posting on one of these SB threads. At this point it's obv that the system isn't going to change so why even bother? Don't you find it exhausting?

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:36 (fourteen years ago) link

keep fighting the good fight tuomas

suggest ban sucks

max, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:36 (fourteen years ago) link

lol who is masonic boom?

Lamp, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

sum british chick i guess? is this an ilm thing?

Lamp, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

<3 Laurel

sarahel, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Tuomas, I think a lot of her SBs were for aggressive flame-outs at people - and I'm speaking as someone who gets on with Kate but she has been involved in a lot of pretty ugly fights here over the years, the rights and wrongs of which aren't really to be debated here. I like Kate a lot but I think even she'd admit she has an aggressive side.

The timing of this is really unfortunate given that Kate's actually been really quiet and a fun poster of late. It's a similar situation to Louis, she'd been sitting in the high 40s for a long time without accumulating any further SBs, and then it only took a couple to push her over the edge. I doubt she'll be treated any differently from the way LJ was.

You may now return to your 300-post clusterfuck of wilful misreading and stirring.

Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link

the system can change enbb dont lose heart - nothing will ever be right around here til my powers of sb count 10x

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:39 (fourteen years ago) link

I liked her Sea Arches thread from yesterday.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:41 (fourteen years ago) link

i wonder how many suggest bans tuomas racks up on threads discussing suggest bans

probably more than I did when I was being more annoying about the same topic!!

do mods keep suggest bans for things like posting about pubic hair on ILTMI, or are those suggest bans removed because it's ILTMI? not that anyone suggest banned kate for that, it was just something I was curious about; half the time when I read ILTMI threads I'm like "wtf, this is just begging for a suggest ban. oh wait, we were warned that this was TMI."

I have all the print out about Dimebag and his murder (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:41 (fourteen years ago) link

you know guys the important thing is that we all rally together to sb the multiplying faux naive style over posters what have flourished in this nu era of ilx niceness

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link

lol Joe

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Tuomas, I think a lot of her SBs were for aggressive flame-outs at people - and I'm speaking as someone who gets on with Kate but she has been involved in a lot of pretty ugly fights here over the years, the rights and wrongs of which aren't really to be debated here.

I know that, but as far as I know most of those fights took place long before the SB system was installed. That's why I'm baffled that she was banned now, when it looks like she hasn't been that aggressive for quite a while.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:43 (fourteen years ago) link

look when kate returns it will be as ilx's xmas present, think of it that way

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

xp - yeah, I hadn't noticed her post anything remotely aggravating in the past few weeks or so.

sarahel, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

keep fighting the good fight tuomas

suggest ban sucks

― max, Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:36 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

^^^OTM, nobody is forcing you to click on the thread

bnw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

u can sb people for old posts is one kink in the sb system

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link

what's wrong with faux naivety? I don't know?

I have all the print out about Dimebag and his murder (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

hey what do you know, tuomas is baffled by something

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

i know when im felled by the will of the tards im coming back w/an all new usrname

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

wait, what does icey mean?

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

do mods keep suggest bans for things like posting about pubic hair on ILTMI, or are those suggest bans removed because it's ILTMI? not that anyone suggest banned kate for that, it was just something I was curious about; half the time when I read ILTMI threads I'm like "wtf, this is just begging for a suggest ban. oh wait, we were warned that this was TMI."

Good question. I think it's a bit suspicious that Kate got SBed soon after starting a pubic hair discussion on ILTMI. If she was SBed for that, then it's just plain wrong. But I guess we'll never know.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

is the will of the tards a reference to swine flu?

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (fourteen years ago) link

you know guys the important thing is that we all rally together to sb the multiplying faux naive style over posters what have flourished in this nu era of ilx niceness

ppl shld do this imo still dont really no who this poster was tho who got sb'd

Lamp, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm gonna sb Lamp for posting from a teenager's cell phone in a second.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link

suggest banned Lamp for his faux naive style

I have all the print out about Dimebag and his murder (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link

another way of dealing w/the nu faux naive contingent is just to be mean - i never really trucked w/that but im starting to realize these posters such as chaki and tombot... they had a purpose

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Here here

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Miss the hell out of Tombot.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:49 (fourteen years ago) link

yep,joe otm

Finlandia Jones and the Sugban Crusade (carne asada), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

The poster won't find out what exactly is "wrong" with him, and hence might not change his ways when he returns.

lol

Don't you find it exhausting?

megalol!

goole, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

51 / 4435 = 1.1%

bnw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah yeah tell it to max baucus, d-mt

goole, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

xp ice cr?m: who are you referring to when you speak of this new faux naive contingent?

sarahel, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:54 (fourteen years ago) link

just u know people who ask questions abt every lil damn thing

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

like what? do you have an example?

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:59 (fourteen years ago) link

its ok ilx will proscribe them a 3year course of abuse and bans and they will come out unscathed but for a weird/shitty username ~_~

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:59 (fourteen years ago) link

LOL! <3 Mr Que

sarahel, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:00 (fourteen years ago) link

lol im sayin louis if you showed up here today w/yr original shtick everyone would just shrug

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:01 (fourteen years ago) link

another way of dealing w/the nu faux naive contingent is just to be mean - i never really trucked w/that but im starting to realize these posters such as chaki and tombot... they had a purpose

― ice cr?m, Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:48 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

the sad thing is, u begin to see there is only one destination--either u are so mean that u end up flaming out and getting banned or leaving--or u are so annoyed u phase urself out--either way, ur done w/ ilx

max, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link

r*i*p

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I know that, but as far as I know most of those fights took place long before the SB system was installed. That's why I'm baffled that she was banned now, when it looks like she hasn't been that aggressive for quite a while.

I'm pretty sure I didn't SB kate, but I'll bet that most of kate's sbs were for the Pitchfork thread.

― kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:30 AM (28 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^

Nuyorican oatmeal (jaymc), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

joe ice is right no1 really gets abused on ilx just maybe sb'd or whiney yells @ them

Lamp, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link

in a way, we are all crazy customers, ilx is the store, and IMP is the complaints department

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

suggest ban doesnt even seem that mean or exclusive anymore really more like temp parole

Lamp, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link

btw seriously people DON'T SB TUOMAS because the 80's thread is actually shaping up quite nicely

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

xp when are our overlords going to realise that life means life

Louis Cll (darraghmac), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link

its funny to think tombot was originally elevated to mod status cause he served kate in manner teh britishes couldnt bring themselves to

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.