Britney Spears: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (280 of them)
haha - and show me where i consider anyone else's posts legitimate! (note: not limited to this thread!)

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Right, so why single out mine?

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, if you like her music, then you like her music. But the cynic in me still suspects that Britney wouldn't exist if it wasn't for her image. If it's rockist to wish artists were judged on a level playing field, then color me rockist.

darin (darin), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I already had.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

becuz yrs are esp. daft

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:45 (nineteen years ago) link

But the cynic in me still suspects that Britney wouldn't exist if it wasn't for her image.

You could say that about at least 50 percent of rock musicians though, even the ones that rockist critics adore.

Leon the Fratboy (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

surely not the beatles nicole! and god knows charlie parker's carefully cultivated (but not 'manufactured' - no way!) image has had nothing to do with his critical reception! bob dylan really was circus folk yknow

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

(x-post)
i don't think three-quarters of the successful musicians in rock, pop, hip-hop, r&b, country or reaggae would "exist" in the same way if they weren't good looking. of course that's true of britney. it's also true of mick jagger. so in a sense, everyone IS on a level playing field because they're all better looking than any of us and most of us have fantasies, somewhere in our dirty little minds, of fucking most of them.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

The level playing field is supposed to be The Market, isn't it?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Hahaha I love Britney (and Avril and Madonna and Courtney Love) threads!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I love Britney's music. I enjoy it. The enjoyment is irony-free. She is wonderful. It is not complex. Classic.

Atnevon (Atnevon), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 23:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Hurting you're stuck in this wilful blindness schtick. Did you actually read that Yay Kelefa thread you were posting on? There was a very detailed discussion about Britney there which broke down a lot of these issues.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:21 (nineteen years ago) link

The level playing field is supposed to be The Market, isn't it?

Not when the market owns the market. And this is pretty much why I have problems with her music and her peers. It's like embracing Philip Morris or something. But I guess rooting for the underdog = rockism now too.

darin (darin), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:41 (nineteen years ago) link

No, it would be like smoking Marlboros. Get your fuckin' metaphors straight.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I was comparing Philip Morris to major labels. I'm talking about markets, hence the metaphor. Chill dude.

darin (darin), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:53 (nineteen years ago) link

The problem with the whole "we can't like Britney because of the market" is that there's no longer any necessary link between enjoyment and expenditure. If your beef is with the record company monopoly which stands behind Britney, don't buy music put out by that record company (but, if you're sincere, don't buy any of the records).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I agree with that.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:06 (nineteen years ago) link

So do I. Hurting, could you explain your problems with anti-rockism; you seem to be, if not a rockist, at least an anti-anti-rockist, and I would like to understand what the problems are in the anti-rockist approach.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:09 (nineteen years ago) link

SHE DOES NOT HAVE ANY GOOD SONGS.
THE NUMBER OF GOOD SONGS SHE HAS IS ZERO.
SHE IS FUCKING TERRIBLE.
SHE ALSO IS NOT VERY HOT.

Mr. Snrub, Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:26 (nineteen years ago) link

My main problem here was that I couldn't say "dud" and be taken at face value, that I have to actually *explain* what I mean by words like "boring", when no one on this thread has actually provided a complex justification of why they like Britney.

Some things I don't like about what I perceive as the anti-rockist approach:

1) That it tends to lead to judgments like the one I just described.

2) That it seems to over-emphasize top 40-type stuff (of which there is very little that I enjoy right now, no matter how hard I try).

3) That it seems to imply that I ought to spend more of my time listening to top 40 radio in order to avoid making rash generalizations, when I have enough other music I'm interested in pursuing to occupy all of my spare time. I don't feel the need to hear every new single to generalize that I don't like most of today's pop music. Granted there are occasionally new singles I like -- usually R&B or hip-hop. Admittedly, one or two of Britney's songs at least have beats I like, but I can't stand the singing.

4) That it seems to absolve its proponents of their own prejudices, which may include, as I have said before, actually liking pop music more than they would because it helps them prove to themselves that they are open-minded free thinkers.

5) That it seems to do away with the idea that any music can be truly "great" or "important" or more than just a matter of taste.

That said, I agree with many anti-rockist ideas, i.e. that albums are not necessarily better than songs, that it's delusional to think one can avoid commercial influence, that rock is not better than other genres, that "authenticity" is a foolish thing to prize in music.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Cool. I'm perfectly happy with someone saying they don't like Britney - it would be suspicious if everyone did. I only worry when people give reasons like 'she's a product' or 'she's an empty image' (I'm not saying you do that). I also think anti-rockism shouldn't velus top 40 stuff over anything else, and as long as you are not dismissing it for being 'commercial' I don't see why anyone would have a problem. I believe there are 'great' albums, but I do actually have a problem with the idea of an 'important' album - I don't know what that means, mostly. Thanks for responding - it seems to me that a lot of your concerns are not with anti-rockism, but with the prevalance and strength of anti-rockism on this board, in which case I understand.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Fair enough. Yeah, to be honest, I'm not even comfortable with the word "important" -- I'm not sure what I mean by it.

But I would like to add that I think certain types of music are more complex or have more to digest or more to offer than others. Standing up to more repeated listenings doesn't necessarily make something objectively better, but I'll always have a deeper love for music that I find more engaging and complex, as opposed to fun songs with hot beats, even though I do like the latter.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:47 (nineteen years ago) link

name one anti-rockist that values top 40 stuff over anything else

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:07 (nineteen years ago) link

That's not what I said.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:11 (nineteen years ago) link

As I type this, I am working on a software program that, when I read ILM, censors out any post which contains the word "rockism."

And it can be yours too for the low price of $14.95.

My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:21 (nineteen years ago) link

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:25 (nineteen years ago) link

(Looks like the test spyware works)

MC Transmaniacon (natepatrin), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:26 (nineteen years ago) link

ok name one person this - "That it seems to absolve its proponents of their own prejudices, which may include, as I have said before, actually liking pop music more than they would because it helps them prove to themselves that they are open-minded free thinkers" - applies to and provide an example, any example, of how

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:27 (nineteen years ago) link

also name one person on this thread who's pro-britney argument is less complex than 'i don't like britney cuz i think it's boring. why do i think it's boring? cuz i don't like it!'

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 18 November 2004 02:29 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just saying no one on this thread has said anything much MORE complex than "I like it cause I like it" about Britney -- which, by the way, is fine.

As far as the absolution from prejudice bit, well I can't actually see inside anyone's mind and tell you the process behind their likes and dislikes. But I have been confronted numerous times with the argument (from anti-rockists) that anti-rockism is about "being more aware of one's (rockist) prejudices, (rockist) reasons for liking or disliking something, etc." So if you're an anti-rockist, you have super-awareness of musical prejudices that makes you, ultimately, a less tainted listener.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 03:56 (nineteen years ago) link

so wait if you "can't actually see inside anyone's mind and tell you the process behind their likes and dislikes", then what are 90% of your other posts (eg. "(anti-rockism) seems to absolve its proponents of their own prejudices, which may include, as I have said before, actually liking pop music more than they would because it helps them prove to themselves that they are open-minded free thinkers") re: this subject about???? and name one anti-rockist that "over emphasizes top 40 music". you're the one saying this, i'm just asking you who it is exactly you're saying it about (i'm beginning to suspect the answer is 'nobody that actually exists'), or what exactly prompted you to say or think it. surely if these tendencies are prevalent in the anti-rockist argument than on a board (nevermind thread) with plenty of anti-rockism (ask the times!) it shouldn't be too hard to provide an example of what it is you're talking about.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 18 November 2004 04:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Hurting if you're interested, this is what I wrote a few years ago about why I like "Born To Make You Happy".

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 04:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Cinniblount, the best example of what I'm talking about is what you've been doing since I first posted on this thread.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 04:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Tim, I really, really like your writing, but I don't get your piece. It seems like you're praising the song for having the same childish view of love expressed in about half a million other love songs. Most of the more interesting reflections on love here are coming from you, not the lyrics. Sure, even the adult longs sometimes for that sense of love, but that very sense is the typical stuff of teen love songs.

I could certainly tell you what I don't like about this song -- the cliched lyrics, the rhyming couplets that sound like they came from an internet love song generator "since you've been gone"/"carry on," "give you my world"/"be your girl", "you and me/way our life should be," etc.

The only thing I do find interesting at all is the subtle creepiness of her saying "I was born to make you happy."

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 05:04 (nineteen years ago) link

For me ne of the key aspects of that song's success (and this is true of a lot of Britney stuff and a lot of stuff i like generally) is that it does something quite unusual and unexpected with its stereotypical lyrics - Britney's performance makes the song for me.

I'm fascinated by popular culture which attempts to describe the experience of adolescence because we all live our adolescence via a constant negotiation between our own personal experience and the cultural stereotypes which surround us - 2 and a half years on from being a teenager, I find it difficult to tease apart the reality and the myths in my own memories of the period. The importance of these myths to me as I was growing up (despite their strong differences to my own experiences) renders a lot of this stuff somehow very personal-feeling to me.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 05:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Hmm. The first paragraph of your last post I guess is subjective so I don't want to belabor it (though I personally don't find anything unusual about what she does with her nearly ready-made lyrics and sentiment).

As far as the second paragraph, I feel like you're more getting into Britney's music as an object of cultural inquiry than as songcraft, music, or whatever. There's nothing wrong with doing this, but it could just as easily be done with a song you don't like. I don't think it's valid to say that a song is good because it's a good starting point for exploring adolescence in our culture.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 05:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Hurting I meant that it was viscerally fascinating for me - I'm drawn to this stuff on an emotional level because of the cultural cues (not all songs about adolescence will do this of course, it's about the intertwined operation of the music, the performance, the lyrics, the moment in time I hear it, the video clip, the film tie-in, and so on right down the line). This is not an argument for why you should like Britney of course, I'm just trying to show the workings behind my appreciation of Britney so that you know we're not all sitting here thinking "Britney rocks rockism sucks" over and over again.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 05:44 (nineteen years ago) link

No way dude, I don't get your point. Britney SUCKS! Rockism ROCKS!

Seriously, if you connect with the song on an emotional level, more power to you.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 05:51 (nineteen years ago) link

A ways up thread...

I believe there's these things called 'turning off the radio' and 'iPods' and the like which can help you in this regard.

-- Ned Raggett

Ned I'd have to go one step further there and suggest we experiment with not turning the radio on in the first place.

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 18 November 2004 07:07 (nineteen years ago) link

haha what have i 'been doing since you first posted on this thread'??? is asking someone to clarify or explain what they mean some grand anti-rockist plot? show me one example of anything you're talking about when you're talking about anti-rockists. how is 'what are you talking about?' an outrageous request?

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 18 November 2004 07:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Replace your mental image of Britney with oh I don't know... Bea Arthur. How do you think that would fly?

ihttp://www.popcultureshock.com/reviews/2820/2820_2.jpg

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Thursday, 18 November 2004 09:52 (nineteen years ago) link

i prefer john coltrane or gustav mahler.

debden, Thursday, 18 November 2004 10:05 (nineteen years ago) link

The Britney entity has meant a suprising amount to me.

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Thursday, 18 November 2004 10:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I'll always have a deeper love for music that I find more engaging and complex, as opposed to fun songs with hot beats

Why is it that repeatedly, time and time again, people can't seem to understand that 'engaging and complex' is not mutually exclusive with 'a fun song with hot beats'? I mean Tim linked to that Born To Make You Happy article which is one of the best examples of disproving that, but noooo, the rockists must insist on sticking their heads in the sand.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 18 November 2004 11:32 (nineteen years ago) link

and Hurting and darin have not once managed to criticise Britney's music beyond making vague noises about her voice! Listen, you can't get offended that no one understands why you don't like Britney if you don't elaborate.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 18 November 2004 11:33 (nineteen years ago) link

The best part of arguments like these is no matter how eloquent the opposition can be, they struggle far harder to comprehend the positives than the other side does with them.

B.A.R.M.S. (Barima), Thursday, 18 November 2004 11:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Hurting, the reason that most of these posts are just "yay Britney!" and stuff is because they were written in 2001. ILM was a different place now: back then it was mostly a close community of like-minded ppl, now it's a pretty gigantic forum of tons of diferent ppl with diferent viewpoints. Thus, you're more likely to get called on stuff now than you were then.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 18 November 2004 11:53 (nineteen years ago) link

What grounds would you card-carrying non-rockists accept as valid for criticising Britney Spears anyway?

I don't hate her, but I don't like her much either, it's just a general shoulder-shrugging indifference. I don't have any profound non-subjective reasons for my indifference. Off the top of my head, I'd say: her personality as I perceive it doesn't attract me much; she has a very bland California-type beauty that doesn't appeal to me; the song structures are predictable; the lyrics are pretty banal, and even if they weren't, they're talking about things that don't interest me; the songs don't fuck with the genre, they smoothly go along with the genre; the whole ambience of the songs/image etc smacks of an unimaginative narrow minded vision of the world/America/adolescence/sexual relationships, etc.; I don't like that she's such a big Bush supporter; her voice doesn't sound particularly bad to me, merely ordinary and uninteresting; I'm not much interested in the gossip mag celebrity culture she's part of and typifies; she's a photofit celeb of the late nineties... etc., etc.

I'm fully aware that some of those judgement criteria can be labelled as "rockist", and I don't much care, I don't see them as anything higher than personal preference and I'm certainly not claiming Spears is less authentic than the people I like, merely less interesting to me.

F.R. Leavis, Thursday, 18 November 2004 11:56 (nineteen years ago) link

For the record F.R., I don't care much about Britney either, and if she had come along a bit sooner I guess I would have been young enough to even hate her for a while, but:

the songs don't fuck with the genre, they smoothly go along with the genre

So I take it you've never heard the one with the Ying Yang Twins and the banjos?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 18 November 2004 12:06 (nineteen years ago) link

"I don't hate her, but I don't like her much either, it's just a general shoulder-shrugging indifference."

otm

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 November 2004 12:06 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.