The Inevitable Montreal Expos Relocation

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (114 of them)
the bullets were baltimore-based first, though.

as for the skins, they should change the helmet logo back to the 60's "r" and call themselves the washington servicemarks. washington's legal population would applaud!

i like "nationals" just fine. the logo is pretty weak and i'm not wild about the proposed unis or resurrecting the "w" hat given the current political climate.

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 14:29 (nineteen years ago) link

So the Nat'ls are going to play in All-Star uniforms throughout the season?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 00:50 (nineteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...
linda cropp, political genius?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:30 (nineteen years ago) link

maybe?

especially if tony williams doesn't run, she's got to be a favorite if the mlb accepts the newly amended proposal. she could then claim responsbility for holding mlb accountable to the people of dc AND bringing a team to dc.

a lot of ifs there, though.

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:23 (nineteen years ago) link

thirteen years pass...

Stephen Brunt, who I view as a pretty smart analyst, was on the Fan yesterday talking about this. (Weird to say, but I lived one street over from the Brunts as a kid; we played street hockey. Lost track of him after high school, then one day he was everywhere sports-related.) He said that for the longest time, right up till six months ago, he was certain Montreal would never get another team. He's revised that, and now he thinks it will happen.

clemenza, Saturday, 22 December 2018 01:02 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.