Damn Student Loans

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (466 of them)
I mean, hell yes I'd like to see an aid system that treated collegiate education as sort of an indepedent right and not a service that's purchased by a family for their children, but geez, I'm not sure just sort of sneering at people who could afford it is the way to get there.

It's Friday afternoon, nabisco. And I'm not an argumentative person. I'm sorry if I upset you. I suppose I do get a bit jealous of the very wealthy. As my mom always says, 'Life's not fair.'

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Friday, 2 May 2003 18:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jesus, Ally, I hate to say this but my comments here are actually not all about you. You've already demonstrated that you wound up in a really difficult aid category and got screwed over because of it. You used this as a basis to talk about the system in general, which is what I'm trying to discuss. It's not all a coded remark about you personally.

Sarah: I should also probably explain where I'm coming from with this. I was lucky enough to finish high school in a state with good public schools: I could have gone to the University of Michigan for free, saving myself and my family loads of money and coming out without an ounce of debt. I often think I should have done that. But I went to an expensive private school instead and have come out saddled with debt. I try not to complain too much about that debt because I made, at some point, a decision that it was worth it for the benefits of attending that expensive private school, a decision I'm hoping will turn out looking like the right one. And yeah, half of the people I know from school just had their tuitions paid flat-out by family and don't have to worry about any of this, but if I let this bother me very much I'd have put a gun to my head before I was done with my freshman year.

In my case, the benefits of going to the expensive private school aren't actually that huge, name-wise: the University of Michigan is a good enough school that having Northwestern on my diploma instead actually isn't conferring that huge of a boost to my prospects. (Not like, say, Indiana vs. Harvard or something.) I do think the federal aid system needs to move in the direction of recognizing that an education at a selective school really is substantially more valuable than the equivalent education at a state school, which it does in part now but not nearly as much as I think any of us would like. On the other hand, making sure everyone who merits admission to an Ivy can afford it doesn't actually correct this problem. What would correct it, as mentioned, would be a much greater investment in raising the standards of state schools and the numbers of good ones. People wouldn't need or even want to beg for enough aid to afford a luxury school if the bulk of them had decent state schools available to them. (Move to Michigan, everyone!)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 18:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

Some of the details of graduate student loan debt brought up on this thread leads me to think that my guesstimate about what it would cost me to go to a reputable graduate school for philosophy were probably right, so thanks for the confirmation. I decided to forget about graduate school for philosophy, largely for financial reasons (that I would have to give up my current standard of living, go massively into debt, and come out in what I suspect will still be a very shakey job market for philosophy professors). Not that I don't reconsider frequently when work gets especially hellish and I feel my brain atrophying.

Rockist Scientist, Friday, 2 May 2003 19:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Sorry, Ally, that was snippy, I apologize. I think I just react badly to these lines of talk you see different places that like to say some kids get everything paid for by "mommy and daddy" -- oh but plus they're all rolling in government dough, the horrible little bastards. And I say this as someone whose expected personal contribution for grad school amounts to more than half of my current full-time salary.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 19:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Uh, yeah, it was pretty fucking snippy. Heavens forbid I respond to your relation of personal experience (which actually seemed to have fuck all to do with the federal aid system, no offense--but your comment up thread about taxes seems to indicate a lack of experience with it, which is fine) with my own seemingly on-topic relation of opposing personal experience. Oh! I forgot! When I do that on ILX, it's all about me! Yet another interesting thread that I'm done with. In the future, I will reply to all serious discussion with statistical evidence and quotes from interviews with government officials, or not at all.

If anyone does have some good advice for me on how to get any help with this, please email me? I mean, I reckon I can get through the year-of-dependence, as I've decided just now this is called, but it's just looming over my head, the fact that I don't really know how to do anything at this point, I feel my hands are tied. Any non-govermental loan pointers or tips, etc. would be appreciated muchly.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 2 May 2003 19:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

Actually, fuck it, I take back my apology. Get a fucking grip.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 20:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

If it, for some reason, wasn't clear, the "all about you" had to do with (a) my questioning the impression here that rich kids are wallowing in federal aid and (b) your responding by talking about you vs. some guy in your class and asking "Is this really that hard to comprehend?" like I'm some sort of idiot.

I was apologizing to keep this a discussion rather than a catty insulting argument, but hey, no luck there. "Heaven forbid" you take a fucking apology in kind.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 20:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

(NB I am some sort of idiot, actually, but not the sort for whom "I got screwed and the guy next to me apparently didn't" is necessarily going to justify the sweeping assertion that wealth regularly makes people eligible for more need-based aid.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 20:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

(It's a pretty disingenuous assertion, too, because as you've said yourself half of the reason you've getting screwed over is precisely because you do draw a great big salary that the government expects you to spend on your education; from what I can tell, you could pay the government's entire expectation -- which by the way, includes estimated housing costs in addition to just tuition -- and still have disposable income left over than I make overall.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 20:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

but ideally you shouldn't have to work for money whilst you study.

Ed (dali), Friday, 2 May 2003 21:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Of course you shouldn't -- not full-time, and especially not for undergraduate work! This is a shitty thing about applying for it: it bases itself on your present earnings, without any consideration for the fact that your earnings should theoretically drop while you're being schooled. The same thing will be the case if Ally files as an independent, only thankfully they'll no longer be taking into account "parental contributions" that aren't actually going to be coming from the parents.

My point's simply that it's alloted based on what you or "your family" can afford; the more you have, the less you get.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

NB: I am going to track down my old roommate to ask about the independent status thing, because he was in a similar situation -- parents expected to contribute X amount, who were not actually willing or prepared to contribute that amount. I asked about tax status because he managed to adjust his filing and his legal status such that their income was no longer taken into account. I'm not sure what "extraordindary situation" he managed to fall under, but he did it -- so Ally, I'll see if he has any sort of roadmap here.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

In any case, let's just pretend I never posted anything at all to this thread, because I'm just fucking cranky today and some minor comments on here just got way way under my skin. The funny thing is that it's not even like I want to go out of my way to defend the current aid system, which basically asks how much money you and your parents have and kicks in accordingly; obviously a system like that is going to be shit-poor at responding to people's individual situations. I just know far too many people whose criticisms of that system seem to be wrapped up with some kind of annoyance that other families just have the money to send their kids to expensive schools, and that rhetoric, as I've displayed here, drives me nuts.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 2 May 2003 22:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Really! I never know that about Hampshire. How, then, would people from wealthy families be qualifying for so much school and federal? Is this one of those tax-reporting tricks that only the wealthy know about, like "after taking into account these deductions and adjustments, my millionaire father's taxable income is approximately $2?"

I'm not following, nabisco -- if it's something obvious, blame the heavy drinking I've done today/tonight. Not everyone who went to Hampshire was a wealthy kid -- the ones who got the major aid, for instance, weren't. Hampshire's essential approach was to sprinkle small amounts of work-study over a large portion of the student body, and then to take a small number of kids from non-wealthy families and give them full- or close-to-full scholarships. That way they could point both to "oh, 75% of our students have financial aid" and "we gave out such-and-such number of full scholarships last year," even while the bulk of the student body was paying tuition, room, board, and expenses out of pocket.

It's a large reason why the freshman attrition rate was as high as two-thirds.

Tep (ktepi), Saturday, 3 May 2003 03:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nobody should feel bad for law school students and their massive loans; they make plenty of money from the get-go, and the top tier of firms will pay off the loans entirely after a few years. (If they're public defenders or something, then yes, please feel sorry for them.)

no offense, Nabisco, I like you and yer posts generally ... but the above is pretty darn ignorant. the above is only true only if you went to one of the top law schools (like Harvard, Yale, Stanford, or Chicago) -- if you went anywhere else, and didn't graduate in the top 10% of yer class and/or got onto law review, the law firms that pay top dollar nowadays will tell you to go pound sand. i went to an OK public law school, did OK but not spectacular (i.e., graduated top half of class and made a journal), graduated when the market was still hot, i didn't get a job with any Wall Street/Big Law firm, and i don't make anywhere near what folks in those firms make. nor do most freshly-minted attorneys.

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 3 May 2003 03:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Fair enough, I am probably slanted on that one by location.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 3 May 2003 03:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Delurking specifically to address this one post, then I'll stop bothering any of you (because I'm certain I now bother a great deal of you guys):

While I was earning my economics degree, for the first two years of my college education, I went to a private, "well-regarded" university (I don't know how truly well-regarded it is -- it was Trinity University, fyi). Then, when the loans multiplied so scarily fast that I didn't see myself catching up to them in the five year period I had set up at the beginning, and when my dad's health started deteriorating to the point where I was starting to be responsible for a hell of a lot of things, I finished up my degree at a public university (the University of Texas at San Antonio). Well, what I found was that the education I got at the private institution was really not that top-notch, and I actually had better professors, better facilities, and a generally better education at the public university.

Just to break it all down to you: The tuition at the private university I was attending was $20,000/year. I got a scholarship at the end of my high school career that covered half that tuition, while a series of loans I took out paid for the rest. It's simple math really -- I owed $20,000 by the time I transfered to a public university. Tuition at the public university was $2,000/year. In exchange for taking special care of my father, my parents paid for the tuition as we went along (and my family's not wealthy -- we're probably on the borderline between "working class" and "middle class", so it's not as though I was being spoiled by this, and besides, I decided to be a commuter student because I had to stay in a dorm for the first year of college and it sucked).

I have a job that could be considered a career now, so with the money I'm earning I can pay off my student loans and help out with utilities around the house. (I'm still living here because my mother certainly couldn't take care of my father alone and I'm not about to do what's expected of me by society and leave my parents in the lurch. Besides, it allows me to save bigtime money-wise and thus be able to tackle my student loans, which in just one year are already halfway paid off.) What I'm discovering right now, being Out There in the Real World, is that most employers don't really care that much where you graduate from. What they look for is whether the school's accredited by the usual suspects, what your GPA is/was, what your extracurricular activities was (so thank God my private university had us do volunteer work and my public university had a couple of organizations I got involved with). I know that when the HR director at my job looked at my collegiate history, she was more impressed with my GPA than with my choice of college.

I think that if you're looking out for your finances while you pursue the dream of higher education, you should stick with a good public university or a less expensive private university, and make sure you get really good grades. Then, when finding a place of employment, search for one that will pay for a graduate education, and go to a good school then. I'm going with a degree that has more of a chance to earn me more money and that I somehow feel is more suited to me (the computer science degree), but while I'm an undergrad I'm quite happy to go to a public university. However, it would be very nice to earn my master's at MIT or Stanford, so that's what I'll be angling for, and I'm convinced I will be able to swing it when the time comes. Hopefully my mother can come with me wherever I go, so I can help take care of her (her health is fairly bad, too).

Or you could take out multiple loans to go to wherever you want to go to. Whichever, really. It depends on how much you want to work to get your degree. And believe me, those people who goof off during college and don't take education seriously will really suffer in the long run. As one of my old advisors said, "You can either choose to have fun for four years and work hard for the rest of your life, or work hard for four years and have fun for the rest of your life."

Dee the Calmer, Less Insistent Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 3 May 2003 17:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dee, I'm not sure I've seen anything that indicates you're in any way unwelcome here. Obviously I don't read every word here, so I am not telling you you're wrong, but it's not an impression I've had.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 3 May 2003 18:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Eh? You don't bother me, Dee! And I'm sure others agree as well. But post as you feel comfortable. (Alternately, what Martin said.) And a very thoughtful post you have as well.

I really can't contribute anything to this discussion in practical terms -- my parents set aside college money for me starting at birth, and a combination of regular payments to the fund and some shrewd investing meant my entire experience at UCLA was paid for and then some, as I also received some academic scholarships as well. My graduate experience was covered by a four-year fellowship that handled all costs and guaranteed TA work as well; it was when this ended, in combination with other reasons, that I realized the academic life just wasn't one for me, and so I left rather than accumulate debt in pursuit of something that was driving me nuts. I may not be getting the high-flying job or anything, but I am comfortable, I can indulge myself as needed and I have no debt hanging over my head from schooldays -- but I also realize that this was initially as a result of a combination of particular factors that I had no control over, and I am grateful for it. Some of the stories I've read here just plain anger me, the more so because people I consider friends are suffering as a result.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 3 May 2003 18:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

You think? I thought I made a total ass of myself in a post I made about a week or two ago. Eh, if anyone's offended by what I say, I will automatically declare myself the arch-conservative of this forum and say, "We shall agree to disagree," or something to that effect.

At any length... *hugs*, and Ned, your parents were s-m-a-r-t.

Delurking a bit more now, obv.

Dee the Sensitive Semi-Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Sunday, 4 May 2003 01:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

And to add a bit:

I think student loans suck ass in general. Only if you pay more than what the statements say you owe can you actually find anything advantageous about them.

I didn't qualify for jack when it came to financial aid the first go around. All I had to pay the tuition were my scholarship and the loans I took out. I found that only the super-poor and those who knew how to work the system (e.g. lying on their tax returns) got all the benefits. Maybe some of you who've posted before could've qualified for a lot more than what you're getting. Ally, you seem to me to be an individual who would qualify for tons of stuff, if not now, then a bit later. There are tons of scholarships out there -- get someone in the financial aid office on your side! I had a good friend in financial aid who found for me some loans with low interest rates. (It was the best she could do for me at the time.)

I'm not bitter about any of it, though. I value my education now, and would choose a degree over no loans any day of the week.

*hugs to everyone*

Dee the Sensitive Semi-Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Sunday, 4 May 2003 01:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dee, You should post more! Who cares if not everyone agrees with everything you say?

I must confess that my parents had a college fund for me too, but they blew it all on furniture when I was 6. Oh, we'll pay it back some day. And then they got a divorce. So, maybe if they hadn't bought that furniture and had stayed together, I would have been one of those kids whose parents paid their way. Life's just funny like that.

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

My own experience, for whatever it's worth: I went to college late, after getting a psychiatric nurse's license. When college accepted me, I took two classes the first semester and a full course load the second, and I worked forty hours a week that whole first year, paying as I went: no loans at all. It took ALL of my money (I was making about twenty-four hundred a month, and paying the college twenty-one), and it was very hard, but it was also the smartest thing I ever did, because when I did start borrowing money, I only had three years left. This meant that I never reached the fourth year borrowing level, when they make the biggest loans.

So, whatever else you do, I'd say pay them as much as you possibly can while you're attending. It also made me study much harder as screwing up a class doesn't seem real practical when you know that each class session is actively costing you two hundred and fifty dollars.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's sound advice, J0hn. When I went off to school, I had no real concept of big money. I had gotten a little money for birthdays and christmases in the past, but could not fathom my loan amounts. Plus, I knew I wouldn't have to deal with them until later and assumed I would be making lots of money on the other end so it wouldn't be a problem.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dee, no one thinks you've made an ass out of yourself. I remember saying something that may have been vaguely nasty to you a few threads back, but I hope that didn't give you the impression that I or anyone else was taking any of that political B.S. seriously. Tempers can flare on this board like they can on any board, but you seem to be a very reasonable, articulate person, so please don't feel like you need to keep your posts to a minimum. On the other hand, your compliments on the subject of Bill O'Reilly, that we can probably do without...

Anyway, back to the discussion of student loans. I'm still waiting to hear from Eugene Lang to see what the damage is going to be... I can hardly stand the anticipation.

justin s., Monday, 5 May 2003 20:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

Er, um, damnit! I wrote "kidding" after the comment about Bill O'Reilly, but for some reason the HTML took it away. That certainly changed the tenor of that post, didn't it? Yeah, well. Read that last line with tongue firmly in cheek if you will.

justin s., Monday, 5 May 2003 20:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

the work-while-you-study option isn't always viable. that was how i did undergrad -- and saved myself a lot of undergrad debt. however, it isn't as viable for some postgrad studies such as law. for instance, law schools regularly advise students to not work at all during their first year -- which makes sense, since any law student can tell you that 1L is the toughest, but as sensible as that might be it still can be a hardship for students of modest means. and full-time law students during their second and third years are prohibited by ABA accredidation from working more than 20 hours/week (though enforcement of this is often lax). there are some l-schools that do offer part-time JD programs, and there are students who take advantage of them -- though i don't know how they do it, balancing work and law school must be hell on earth.

Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Justin, where are you going to school now if you don't mind my asking? My advice to you would depend on what you are hoping for. Is it the opportunity to live in NYC? If this is the case I would suggest waiting it out at your present school and then moving to NY after graduation for job or graduate school. Is there something specific about Eugene Lang that attracts you? The program, the professors, etc. If that is the case I might suggest transfering.

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

I am nervous about the upcoming loans but the work-as-much-off-during-school-as-possible philosophy makes a lot of sense, at least in reducing the load. I'm really grateful my parents saved hard, though, as that helps a lot(the amounts they think can come straight out of income are insane!).

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 22:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Mary, that's a very valid question, and I've been ruminating over it for the longest while. The opportunity to live in NYC is very attractive to me, because I currently go to school in suburban Long Island, not much different than where I grew up except that the rich folks are richer and the young asshole guys all have Italian accents instead of Irish ones. However, the school that I'm hoping to attend is definitely the biggest factor in my decision. It has excellent programs in the social sciences and writing, far surpassing the school I'm going to. NYU or Columbia may have better programs, but they lack the small, intimate feel of Lang (with its 600 students) not to mention that they are ungodly expensive. I feel secure in my decision to transfer, although the money issue has been weighing on my mind.

justin s., Wednesday, 7 May 2003 03:27 (twenty years ago) link

I had a similar experience. I went to school for a year at Univ. of VA, then transfered to Barnard College in NY. Wanting to leave VA and come to NY played a big part in my decision. However, my parents pretty much picked up the tab, I'm not sure what I would have decided if I would have had to do it myself. I also went to graduate school in NY (NYU) and I ended up taking out some loans for that. I agree that Lang is a great school. Another thing to take into condsideration is the NYC rents, if Lang doesn't provide student housing.

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 03:58 (twenty years ago) link

two months pass...
i no longer have a student loan. it has been vanquished.

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:02 (twenty years ago) link

Hurrah for Gareth!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:05 (twenty years ago) link

Now I appoint you the task of my debts, Sir Gareth. Henceforth and verily, I annoint you my champion. Go on strong man.

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:12 (twenty years ago) link

What do you know? I did start this thread. I hate them. Damnity damn damn do I ever hate them. I suppose I should go pay a few now that are lurking in my purse. Blah.

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:32 (twenty years ago) link

yay Gareth;)

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:59 (twenty years ago) link

Yes yes yes. Consolidate! And then defer and defer and defer and THEN go on the Income Contingent Repayment (based on what you make, not on the amount of the loan). Have fun!

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:29 (twenty years ago) link

Congrats Gareth! I bow to your fortune.

I've deferred the hell out of mine. Course, all I want to do is keep consolidation, then give them a huge check. While watching their faces drop in shock.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 31 July 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link

Not long to go on mine.

Matt (Matt), Friday, 1 August 2003 00:17 (twenty years ago) link

my offer to exchange my big, shiny student loan with other ILXors' small, drab loans still stands.

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 1 August 2003 00:52 (twenty years ago) link

nine months pass...
i am a parent of woman in her early forties. it was her decision to
wait until she was about 25 to go to college. you would think that
a person her age, not married (still not)no children (thank goodness,still none) would be able to stay out of debt. no such
luck, i think (if she is telling the truth) she owes about 65K.
Her father and I are retired and are living on a very limited income.
we worry about her. because we know she cannot pay this debt. she
is now trying to be a massage therapist. with her record, it will
surprise me if she makes enough to pay off this loan. knowing her
as i do. i doubt very seriously if she even trys. but she is a pretty woman and we love her.

i know it has been a long time ago, but as i read your comments,i
think back when my husband and i first started. we thought when
we finally made 10k a year, we were rich. i wish we had the opportunites that you young people have today. the information is
out there, read, research, talk to successful people. own up to
your responsibilites. you made the debt, pay it. stop whinning.

Doris H. Daniel, Thursday, 13 May 2004 03:41 (nineteen years ago) link

four weeks pass...
has anyone refinanced their loans?

does "refinancing" just mean getting a consolidation loan? If you do this, can you still defer if you lose your job? who is the best person to do this through, or are they all basically the same (ie: what is the difference b/w salle mae, direct loans (government run) and collegeloans.com?)

sorry for all the questions.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 17:00 (nineteen years ago) link

three years pass...

My loans are gonna default in a few weeeks because then it will be 270 days past due.

ian, Monday, 30 July 2007 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

dude get one (1) forbearance, otherwise it'll be a pain in the ass

daria-g, Monday, 30 July 2007 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think you can get a forebearance for longer than 6 months

remy bean, Monday, 30 July 2007 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Not true at all -- there are lots of forbearance types, lots of them up to 12 months, depending on your lender.

I doubt Ian would be sharing this bummer if he hadn't exhausted most of the obvious options, so there's not much to say except that that REALLY sucks, and I'm REALLY sorry...

...but on the other hand, dude, don't let it happen! Defaulting on a student loan will screw you thoroughly and for a long time, practically like a minor bankruptcy. Like potential wage-garnishing, can't get certain jobs in certain states, credit-fucked, can't apply for loans for any future schooling, government won't give you any money (even your tax refunds), royally screwed, PLUS -- more serious than any of that -- you'll suddenly owe the entire balance of your loans on a pay-right-now COLLECTION basis, so in addition to the original credit-screwing, you'll also have collection agencies calling you up and demanding what I assume will be thousands of dollars on the spot.

That probably doesn't help with the bummer, so, you know ... that so sucks!

Okay, but dude: seriously, spend every second of the next two weeks bugging and begging the crap out of everyone involved to avoid it! They're actually pretty helpful with keeping you from defaulting, in part because they don't want to sell your debt at a loss, and in part because the law makes them be. So:

1) go after ANY forbearance time you have left, even if it's only a few months -- that still sets back the clock on default
2) see if you have any options with consolidating the debt off to another lender, even if it's kind of a crap deal -- you're WAY better off starting over on worse terms than defaulting! and I'm guessing your mailbox is stuffed full of offers: check to see if any of them aren't too skeezy
3) your mailbox is probably also full of letters from student assistance non-profits. call every one of them and see what they can do for you.

Honestly, if you set aside a weekday and spend the entire day on the phone calling everyone you possibly can ... you will spend a lot of time on hold and maybe have to swallow a shit interest rate, but I'm pretty confident you can keep from defaulting! Just don't get all stressed out and figure you're screwed -- I've kinda screwed myself up assuming that in the past, but if you just keep on everyone's ass, you can get out of it.

P.S. Thank you for reminding me to double-check that my stuff is in order!

nabisco, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 00:30 (sixteen years ago) link

PPS -- Sorry, I said COLLECTION agencies, but that may not actually be true, and instead you will have THE GOVERNMENT on your ass about this stuff. I do not know exactly how it works, and I don't ever want to know exactly how it works, and I don't ever want YOU to know how it works, seriously.

nabisco, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

ian: IF you can, can you make at least ONE payment to them by the deadline? i am not entirely sure if this is so, but if you can do that then that MAY delay the loan servicer from defaulting (for another month, perhaps).

Eisbaer, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

nabisco... (you guessed it) otm!

there is usually something you can do. if you call them and explain and show that you would like to work something out so they eventually get paid, they should work with you. i don't have firsthand experience with this exact situation, but i think they are generally willing to help when you step forward and ask what you can do to keep this from getting worse.

tehresa, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.