the USA, Israel, and national interest

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1629 of them)
I may have said this already, but my current thinking on this question is on social constructivist lines - it is not that supporting Israel advances some objective US national interest (or some elite interest, if you go down the Chomsky road), but that supporting Israel has become in and of itself a core US national interest.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link

What does that mean though - it just is because it is because it is?

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Israel is a long-standing US ally in the region, and I don't think there's any question that the US is going to continue to support Israel. However, that doesn't mean that the US always has to go along with the most hardline elements in Israel when it comes to dealing with the Palestinians. Arguably, the harmful effect of AIPAC is not that it encourages support of Israel but that it encourages blind support of the most hardline positions taken by Israel. Just because the US is committed to supporting Israel doesn't mean that it should give up its ability to be an influence for positive change in the region. There are still carrots & sticks that can be applied in dealing with an ally, but it requires an open atmosphere in which constructive criticism can take place.

This is an interesting recent commentary by George Soros that makes many of these points:

On Israel, America and AIPAC

o. nate, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I think Christianity weighs in massively on this issue. The Xtians identify strongly with the Jews (for some reason). Plus we're still dealing with "The Greatest Generation" and they seem to feel that protecting jews is a moral requirement for Americans. Understandably so. We're proud of ourselves for our role in WWII and we have many people in power who still view Europe and the rest with suspicion. We don't understand how Nazi Germany ever happened in the first place, so we just assume there's something wrong with Europeans. We think of Europeans as generally anti-semetic and our underdog reflexes kick in. except that now we're the top dog and our little friend is turning into a thug.

King Kitty, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I dig Soros a lot. the Israel lobby hates him ("self-hating Jew" etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

The tightwing Xtian fundie love of Israel is very clearly the result of their belief in batshit eschatology/Book of Revelations type stuff.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

haha rightwing

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

It benefits no one to look at this question in isolation from facts on the ground Hurting. It seems bizarre to me that at the first mention of Israel in a discussion about US strategy in Iraq you shout "derail"

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Christianity = Judaism + Platonic philosophy so I don't see why the Xtians shouldn't feel affinity for the Jews. Or the Greeks.

Bnad, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Trace Israel is a big messy subject, with a lot of nuances that frankly have nothing to do with Iraq.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Do NONE of them have to do with Iraq??

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

It's like global whack-a-mole

King Kitty, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

(Side note: of all the bizarre things Israel does that leave all notions of conventional ethics/"fairness" completely in the dust, I actually found the recent withholding of taxes one of the weirdest and most galling: taxing people, robbing them of the net, and essentially forcing them to finance their own distruction? Because they voted "wrong"?)

nabisco, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Pardon, destruction.

nabisco, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer obviously there are points where the US relations to both Iraq and Israel overlap and inform each other (nuke threat comes to mind), but I think it is possible to discuss one without delving into all the issues inherent in the other.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

What does that mean though - it just is because it is because it is?

That is kind of what I mean.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Trace Israel is a big messy subject, with a lot of nuances that frankly have nothing to do with Iraq.

But some Israel stuff is relevant to Iraq. One of the reasons for the invasion was to transform Iraq into a friendly state that would radiate friendly democraticness through the region, with this seen as being good for Israel.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

It benefits no one to look at this question in isolation from facts on the ground Hurting. It seems bizarre to me that at the first mention of Israel in a discussion about US strategy in Iraq you shout "derail"

-- Tracer Hand, Wednesday, May 16, 2007 1:48 PM (45 minutes ago)

That's because I'm an Israel lobby shill.

I cried derail because *I* didn't want to derail the thread with an in-depth discussion of why I don't think Israel is the main issue here, and why I think it's ridiculous to say that the U.S. asks Israel "how high?" etc.

The "facts on the ground" certainly include Israel, but it's ludicrous to put Israel's priorities at the top of the list when there are so many more obvious "facts on the ground" reasons for our staying in Iraq.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Trace Israel is a big messy subject, with a lot of nuances that frankly have nothing to do with Iraq.

But some Israel stuff is relevant to Iraq. One of the reasons for the invasion was to transform Iraq into a friendly state that would radiate friendly democraticness through the region, with this seen as being good for Israel.

-- The Real Dirty Vicar, Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:14 PM (24 minutes ago)

Ok, it was seen as good for the Kurds too. But that doesn't make the Kurds the prime movers.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

israel was not why we got into the war in iraq in the first place, but it seems more and more to me that it's one of the justifications for why we're staying. mainly I guess cause I red it on the salon by gleen grennwalters:

The centrality of the Middle East for many "religious conservatives" is due to several factors: some religious conservatives see war against Muslims as a religious battle in defense of Christianity, some see it as necessary to secure the existence of a "Greater Israel" which many Christians believe is a prerequisite for the return of Jesus, while still others see bellicosity as a test of loyalty to the Cause or even as proof of one's belief in the exceptionalism of the tribe, whether the Tribe is "America," "Christianity," or "conservatism."


(in th' midst of his posting some stuff that some CATO foo said about Giuliani being authoritarian and militaristic and shit is like the most important thing about him for his supporterz)

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

That makes sense, although it brings up the larger question I can never resolve: "Does the Bush administration sincerely believe in its Christian missions or does it cynically use the evangelical/millennial stuff to garner support (or both)?"

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Hurting 2 - I'm not saying Israel was the prime mover, but I'm not saying they are irrelevant either. The Kurds are pretty irreleveant - they may have gained as a result of the invasion, but it will be "See you round, suckers" time when the USA pulls out. Protecting Israel will remain a core US foreign policy goal and actions in and around Iraq will reflect that.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Thursday, 17 May 2007 09:41 (sixteen years ago) link

INTERESTING

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

three months pass...

Walt was on Terry Gross just now. He was pretty reasonable and nuanced, much moreso, even, than he was in his own article in the LRB, which makes me wonder if he's either learned to be moreso, or if Mearsheimer is harsher.

They followed with Abe Foxman, but I had to turn it off because I couldn't stand listening to the man hyperventilate. He distorted everything Walt said, but I think he really believes his own distortions. I still came away thinking Walt overemphasizes the role of the Israel lobby and the impact of our support for Israel, but Walt maybe brought me a bit closer to his viewpoint.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Looks like it's archived:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14154082&ft=1&f=13

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Here's the Foxman part:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14154089

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

"There are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East - the Israeli defense ministry and its 'amen corner' in the United States." Pat Buchanan - September 15, 1990

bnw, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

pat buchanan is such a monumental jackass

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry, i mean "patrick j. buchanan" lol

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

still lolz @ "amen corner"

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

a year after making that quote buchanan, when running for president, visited a confederate cemetery but wouldn't cross the street to visit the black cemetery

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

oh he's a total asshole no argument there

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Pat Buchanan is one guy who actually gets fairly labeled an anti-semite

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 01:01 (sixteen years ago) link

one year passes...

This shit never gets old, huh?

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 28 December 2008 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Medics said civilians had been hit, but the majority of the victims appeared to be members of Hamas, branded a terror group by Israel and the West.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Israeli_air_strikes_kill_over_200_1227.html

a mountain climber who plays an electric guitar (gabbneb), Sunday, 28 December 2008 21:21 (fifteen years ago) link

a friend of mine just got back from israel. she spent a week consulting for a secondary school that's expanding their curriculum and building a new site. apparently it's close enough to gaza that rockets fall on the school all the time. apparently the kids don't like to be outside at all, even though they have beautiful landscaped park space all around the school.

well, anyway, nice to see both sides here stooping to each other's level.

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:38 (fifteen years ago) link

tsk, tsk Israel. attacking Hamas after Hamas declares the cease fire is over and drops rockets on your cities. fuck you. show some restraint.

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:48 (fifteen years ago) link

it's true; restraint never accomplishes anything.

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:50 (fifteen years ago) link

who cares whether it does or not? this shouldn't even be a conversation. palestinian leadership is fucking retarded at the moment. why didn't they work the cease fire and try to parlay that into a better solution? why the fuck do they move to rocket shooting every fucking month?

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link

are the palestinians a bunch of children who aren't responsible for their actions?

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link

jews did 9/11

peace

cankles, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:53 (fifteen years ago) link

in fact, as i was looking at my colleagues pictures of the bomb shelters at the school, i was thinking that they should probably just build a missile base instead of a new school.

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:54 (fifteen years ago) link

well anyway this new round of bombing will probably show the palestinians the error of their ways

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:55 (fifteen years ago) link

you know israel is a democracy right? you can't remain in government and not retaliate when you're attacked. otherwise you don't get to stay in power for much longer.

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i know a little bit about israel

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link

though i did cancel my plans to go there this summer (well before any of this happened)

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link

ok. so they didn't retaliate to get the Palestinians to stop. they retaliated, mostly, because they have to if they want to keep their jobs. they basically ignored Sderot for 5 years. eventually you can't ignore them anymore.

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm trying to say, this isn't like two kids and you expect the older kid to act more maturely. israel is a country, and countries and politicians have to act a certain way in the world. they didn't 'stoop down' to anything. they are a fucking country. if mexico was bombing texas, we'd burn them to the ground without a second thought.

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link

"we'd" = the US.

Mordy, Sunday, 28 December 2008 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.