RFI: Border Community - Nathan Fake, James Holden, The MFA, Petter etc.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (575 of them)
I've never seen Mayer live so my opinion is only based on Fabric 13, Immer and Neuhaus (plus a couple downloaded sets). He comes clean and admits he's more of a Selector than Mixer.

Do you mean his admission that he likes to play tracks out? Because as far as I know, none of those was recorded live so it's not like it's even possible the mixing is going to be fucked up unless it's pure laziness or a broken computer.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:57 (eighteen years ago) link

I think he had some quote like "I like to mix in the part of tracks where the producer leaves space and says 'here, mix now'" which makes sense to me, I'm not sure he ever said "I'm shit at mixing but you know, I'm more of a track selecting type of guy!"

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Ronan: I prefer seamless mixing because of the interplay between 2 (or more) different songs creating something new when overlapped. When done correctly, this can be very powerful. I bought Renaissance in 1994 when i was living in London and spent many nights out enjoying impecable dj's like Justin Robertson, Billy Nasty and Laurent Garnier. Their "skills" in blending tracks together are what inspired me to buy turntables. I'd have to have the Fabric 13 mix in front of me to remember the bad transitions.

xpost: i don't hate Mayer. In fact, i really enjoy Fabric 13, Immer and the other mix of his i have, however, his ability to mix records together is subpar.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:01 (eighteen years ago) link

your first sentence definitely does nothing to exclude the type of mixing done by Michael Mayer, not by any means whatsoever.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link

biz, do you mean actual technical ability, or just that you don't like that mixing style? Mayer just doesn't overlap tracks that much. I haven't seen him live, but on the live mixes I've heard it really sounds like he just plays a track and then cues in the next one with some minor fading at the right point. That doesn't mean he can't mix records through layering, just that he's not doing it.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah live he doesn't seem to overlap a huge amount but there are some good overlaps on Fabric 13, for example the one into "Bring Me Closer" by Richard Davis is totally seamless. I'm sure there are others. It's just a different style though, when I saw him he would quickly mix tracks and change the tone kind of sharply quite alot but it made for a really good DJ set, it did feel a whole by the end, but it also had loads of little peaks/troughs through the night and loads of different types of crowd reaction.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Also, where the hell can I buy "The Sky Was Pink" in the US or anything else off Border Community? I can't even find a good UK store for this stuff that'll ship to me even though their distribution company claims to have copies..

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:16 (eighteen years ago) link

well, if he has the technical ability to blend the tracks, i don't understand why he doesn't do that. As a producer, he should take the songs he wants to mix and do re-edits so they can be properly mixed in the set (like that devil Sasha!). He is getting paid loads to be a DJ. DJ's don't just pick songs and blend the intro's over outro's, in my opinion.

Ronan, by your description above of a set you witnessed from Mayer, we're saying the same thing about his mixing ability but you translate that into a specific style while i see it as lazy DJing. It's one thing to pick great songs, it's another to be able to sequence them in a seamless mix. I don't consider a person who just selects good songs to be a DJ. I know my opinion is not popular but that's the way i feel about it.


xpost: Border Community have all their releases available to purchase in MP3 format at www.bordercommunity.com

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

You can buy downloads from http://www.3beatdigital.com/labels.php

jeffery (jeffery), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:21 (eighteen years ago) link

you don't understand because you think one style if the be all and end all. do you think Mayer's the first do have that style or something?

honestly your definition of quality excludes so many DJs, probably every disco "legend", that I'm not sure how it stands up at all.

also how is one style "lazier" than the other? Where does "hard work" come into talent exactly?

This is yet more Joe Satriani Guitar Magazine monthly bullshit. No place on a dance thread.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link

do you mix? it's harder to mix 2 songs together for 2/3 minutes than to fade one in. what about that don't you understand? it's lazy to let a song play out and fade the next in then collect your pay. mixing well is hard work. From all accounts, including yours, Mayer is a lazy mixer with great taste.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:26 (eighteen years ago) link

like cola

cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:28 (eighteen years ago) link

you live in Seattle right? why don't we meet up and fight over this topic? i'd love to play you examples of what i think are amazing mixes and then contrast them with mixes i enjoy to listen to but don't enjoy the technical "mixing" on. you can play me Disco legend trainwrecks and tell me about how the music speaks for itself.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

let's talk about Holden's Balance 005 mix. amazing track selection and incredibly skilled mixes.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:34 (eighteen years ago) link

Biz you are a moron. By your rationale it was "lazy" of McCartney or someone not to put a big guitar solo into "Yesterday", or Beethoven should have made his symphonies thousands of notes longer because it was harder.

Honestly no point arguing further with someone who has such a facile grasp of "talent/quality", it is EXACTLY like discussing music with a metal fan.

Another DJ excluded by your definition, Jeff Mills! Not saying anyone is beyond reproach but just to show the variety of DJs who don't do long overlaps.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:21 (eighteen years ago) link

do you mix? it's easier to fade in a track at the end that it is to blend tracks. therefore, it requires more skill to match the tempo/key and overlay tracks than it does to start a record over the last 16 beats of the previous record. why is that so hard for you to understand?

btw, i hate Jeff Mills' mixing style. doesn't mean he's a shitty dj, but i don't like his style.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:38 (eighteen years ago) link

why is it so hard for you to understand that "skill" as you define it is nothing to do with quality.

it's also difficult to play 4000 notes in 3 seconds on a piano but that doesn't mean it sounds better.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:40 (eighteen years ago) link

so, ronan, what are the stakes in your refusing to acknowledge "long blends" as a sign of quality? what do you miss out on, when you cut mayer slack for his uninspired dj'ing, in appreciation of his inspired track selection?

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:45 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not refusing to acknowledge them as a sign of quality, I'm refusing to acknowledge them as the definitive or only praiseworthy way of mixing.

Also it's not cutting Mayer slack for "uninspired djing", you're being too absolute, he can actually mix and he does mix, he just doesn't frequently do long extended segues.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:46 (eighteen years ago) link

i don't think i'm being too absolute! i mean, he really does nothing interesting as a dj, except he is a tastemaker.

it'd be like talking about gilles peterson's dj'ing.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:48 (eighteen years ago) link

see again, "does nothing interesting" is subjective, "is crap at mixing" is not so subjective. he actually isn't crap at mixing! there are lots of good transitions on Fabric 13, almost all of them are good.

I still can't see how stylistically the way he mixes is somehow inferior, why is it so hard to believe that someone might choose an "easier" way of creating art (in whatever sense creative processes can be dismissed as "easy") because they believe it to produce superior works?

It's verbatim the same argument as criticising the Beatles or something because their songs are "easy to play".

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Why didn't John Lennon use nuclear physics instead of a guitar

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Utilizing a technique that doesn't require as much skill doesn't mean you aren't talented, it just means you're doing something that is, in fact, easier. I don't think anyone is calling Mayer out as untalented, only saying that there are certain talents he doesn't employ that he may or may not have. I haven't heard a live set where he did a lot of intermixing. Also, Fabric 13 is not live.

Can we spin this off into the "Mayer is a crap DJ" thread, I really want to figure out where I'm going to order actual Border Community vinyl from, even gemm is looking good by now.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Ronan, i'm going to ignore the moron remark and move on. Sasha and Digweed's "Communicate" mix consisted of loads of dark, linear progHouse tracks that were overlayed in the mix quite a bit. I don't rate Communicate very highly even though the mixes were long. I dislike the track selection, and only listened to it the week it was released. Mayer's Fabric mix has been caned at my place yet i find the mixing lackluster. Mayer's "skill" as a DJ is purely in selecting the tracks, not in his ability to overlay tracks in a long mix. I enjoy his selection but his mixing falls short in my opinion. I've continuously stated these ideas as my opinion and my preference, not as the definitive chart to grading DJ mixes. Plenty of Dj's who can produce long mixes between tracks have shitty track selection. Plenty of DJ's with great track selection can't mix. It goes both ways and i'm simply stating my belief that a person who can choose the best tracks and fit them together in a seamless mix is the better DJ. This breaks down to 2 simple catagories: Selecting and Mixing. As i see it, Mayer only has 1 of those down. You obviously don't DJ and if you do, you probably can't match beats, which is the only reason i see for you defending unskilled DJ's. Anyone can choose great songs. Most of the folks who post on ILM have great taste, but can they sequence those tracks in a seamless mix?

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:16 (eighteen years ago) link

...because they'd have to in order to prove their skill and worth! jaysus, biz.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:30 (eighteen years ago) link

if they wanted to get paid and promote themselves as DJ's, then yes, they would!

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:33 (eighteen years ago) link

You obviously don't DJ and if you do, you probably can't match beats, which is the only reason i see for you defending unskilled DJ's. Anyone can choose great songs

If anyone needed further proof that your over emphasis of mixing is macho rubbish then there it is.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:35 (eighteen years ago) link

if they wanted to get paid and promote themselves as DJ's, then yes, they would!

-- biz (b...), August 25th, 2005.

dude the only reason anyone's arguing with you is because your idea of what constitutes good sequencing and seamlessness is so... i dunno...one dimensional. dullsville.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:39 (eighteen years ago) link

i couldnt care less about good mixing on mix cds et al (i heart beatsinspace although sweenys mixing is quite horrible at times), but at the club a botched transition can ruin a night, so i kind of see where biz is coming from

fe7 (FE7), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyone can choose great songs

I disagree. Most dance DJ's can learn basic technical mixing (beat matching and phrasing) in a month or two. Great track selection, at least in dance music, is something that can't be "taught" and requires years of work to master.

I'll take a few botched transitions over uninspired track selection any day, whether at the club or listening to a mix CD.

jeffery (jeffery), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:56 (eighteen years ago) link

we're losing focus here. "Macho rubbish"? WTF? What is macho about mixing tracks together? It doesn't require strength or a penis and i haven't come close to suggesting anything resembling that. Dj's who can't match beats or people who don't understand what it takes to match beats place less emphasis on the importance of matching beats. My perspective on this whole debate comes as a 30+ year old, former DJ who has been involved in electronic dance music since 1990/91. My style involved long mixes until i wanted to transition to another genre/tempo or create a different mood. I appreciate a DJ who can mix well and i enjoy good radio shows (like Riz on KEXP) but i don't want to pay to see a BIG NAME fade in tracks, no matter how good those tracks are. What is macho about that? I'm also not following your Beatles/Metal/Piano analogies. Layering 2 tracks is in no way similar to adding unnecessary guitar solos or playing too many sounds in a measure.

xpost: what is my idea of good sequencing and seamlessness? the perfect example is Disc 1 from Northern Exposure. Orb/FSOL etc. What is one dimensional or dull about that? Have you heard that mix?

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:56 (eighteen years ago) link

oh god it's like 1998 all over again.

DELETE DANCE MUSIC KTHNXBYE

Barnaby (Barnaby), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Jeffrey, i disagree with your statement. You can't "teach" someone to have good taste. Either they have an ear for a good song and can tell it's tone/vibe or they can't. I just don't believe you can teach someone to have good taste.

fe7 brings up a great point about Club vs. Home listening. At home, fade ins and bad mixes are less annoying. Hearing a DJ wreck a couple mixes will make me leave the club, no matter what his name is or what label he's representing. This feeling was even more extreme when i was taking ecstasy. I guess you had to experience a set by Sasha in the mid-nineties on E to understand his ability to work a crowd with his mixing skill. I doubt Mayer could ever come close to that type of performance.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:02 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost i'm sure it's cool. i haven't heard it. it is your argument that is dull and one-dimensional was my point.

why should mayer want to replicate "that type of performance." the point is he has his own thing going on and generally it's pretty awesome.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Jeffrey, i disagree with your statement. You can't "teach" someone to have good taste. Either they have an ear for a good song and can tell it's tone/vibe or they can't. I just don't believe you can teach someone to have good taste.

Reread my post, that's exactly what I said. You can't teach selection.

jeffery (jeffery), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I doubt Mayer could ever come close to that type of performance

well, i doubt he's trying - what i was trying to goad ronan into admitting upthread is that mayer is aiming away from the club scene, or, at least, playing towards a different style of clubber.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:13 (eighteen years ago) link

I'll take a few botched transitions over uninspired track selection any day, whether at the club

really? cause you might be pretty pissed if you spent $50 to get into the superclub, another $50 on really good pills / orange juice / bottled water ...

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:17 (eighteen years ago) link

i mean, paul van dyk might be the olive garden* of djs, but at least you know what's going to be on your plate.

* = for foreign readers, the olive garden is a chain of low-end american-italian restaurants renowned for their tacky decor and bland, heavy, unadventurous cuisine.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:20 (eighteen years ago) link

i dont know, ive never been let down by mayer, and im definitely anti my-fave-tracks-in-random-order style djing (hi dere aksel). he never messed up a transition. maybe i was just lucky. xp dont you diss pvd!!

fe7 (FE7), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:24 (eighteen years ago) link

yep, that's exactly what you said, jeffrey. i'm zoned in on defending myself right now so i read your post incorrectly.

andrew, i don't get why my argument is dull and one dimensional. in my opinion a DJ should be able to match beats, mix in key and select great tracks. Mayer only does one of those things well. I enjoy his mixes but i don't think he's a good DJ. Is that one dimensional?

Is it passe for a DJ to try to take the listener on a "journey"? I know it's a terrible cliche but most DJ's i know still mix with this in mind.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:30 (eighteen years ago) link

take Fabric 13 for example. Mayer should have had time to find tracks the mixed together well and created a vibe but there are several transitions that are either fade-ins or trainwrecks.

Hearing a DJ wreck a couple mixes will make me leave the club, no matter what his name is or what label he's representing.

So if Mayer had played the Fabric 13 set out and you were there, you would have left in disgust at the shoddy mixing?

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:32 (eighteen years ago) link

i would have!!

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:33 (eighteen years ago) link

you're damn right!! and snore-some track selection, too!!

when i saw mayer he played very uptempo electro and melodic techno - things like LFO's "freak".

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I wouldn't have left in dusgust, but I'd have been a little bored and switched from mad-tranced-out-dancing mode into trolling-the-crowd-and-socializing mode. I think that's probably more a function of the track selection than the mixing though. Lord knows I don't mind a little slip up here and there as long as the dj is going for it (Jeff Mills I'm looking at you)

tylero (tylero), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm trying to remember details of that show, Vahid...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:36 (eighteen years ago) link

good question Ricky. Using my own words against me. The answer is no, i wouldn't walk out on that set. To be fair, it's the repeat listens that have elevated my appreciation of that mix. I will have to listen again to specifically name the mixes i don't like but i think my previous statement of trainwrecks on that mix was a bit out of line.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:38 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost, biz. it's funny that you mention taking the listener on a journey because that may be the very language mayer has used in interviews explaining why he picks the tracks he does. he prefers individual tracks that do just that, which is why he prefers to let a track do what it does as long as it can before he works in the next. and it's his way of showing respect to the producers. and the mixes of his i've heard i think he's accomplished this all very well, even if it doesn't fit your narrow definition of "seamless." and the one time i've had the opportunity to see him live i had a blast and danced my ass off. the "journey" his style of mixing takes you on is different from what you prefer. that is all. he does more than one thing well. i think we're just arguing taste, which is pretty pointless.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:41 (eighteen years ago) link

I like the Indian lunch buffet down the street much more than Olive Garden. It's cheaper, the naan is free and the dosai is included. Just don't ask for an iced tea, you'll get water and you'll like it.

jeffery (jeffery), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:43 (eighteen years ago) link

well, i'm definitely seeing Mayer the next time he comes to town. my definition of "seamless" is narrow because there is only 1 definition of a seamless mix: when you can't hear where one track ends and the next one begins. Mayers mix points are very obvious. I'm sure seeing him live is fun, but....what were we talking about again? indian food? nothing beats Taste of India on Roosevelt. Bottomless Chai!

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:48 (eighteen years ago) link

mmmmmmm naan. xp

tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:49 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.