"Aliens" : Some nice effects, but actually kind've a crap film.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (795 of them)
you never know when an angry alien mama might come a-knockin'! (xp)

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, but the manufacturers of Space Age John Deere equpiment (or whomever) probably wouldn't have anticipated such an instance.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:04 (nineteen years ago) link

But why would a space-age forklift come equipped with one?

Space-age palette wrapping is a motherfucker.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:05 (nineteen years ago) link

for welding shit! lift big heavy shit and weld it, it's a design miracle really.

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh, the stupidest part about #4: how they crash a spaceship at the end, causing a gigantic explosion that probably destroyed an entire country and created a dust cloud that'll kill millions of people (as, it is said, even a small asteroid impact would do in real life) -- and they're all, "You did it! You saved the Earth!!"

morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:08 (nineteen years ago) link

...othewise you'd have to lift stuff hold it while another guy came with like a footstool and the torch, totally inefficient

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Hahahahahahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:09 (nineteen years ago) link

btw i saw eurotrip tonight which was pretty funny. slocki do you like EUROTRIP??

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:10 (nineteen years ago) link

also i drank a lot of wine

g--ff (gcannon), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:11 (nineteen years ago) link

the last time I smoked weed was when I saw O Brother Where Art Thou? in the theater and I loved it!

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:28 (nineteen years ago) link

I noticed this earlier, but didn't have time to respond since the thread was moving so fast.

I would argue that it's a great deal more difficult to make an effectively scary, suspenseful horror film than an action movie (wherein all you really need to please certain folks, as noted, are "cool guns").

I would argue that that's bollocks. While we're being reductive, we could just as easily boil horror movies down to "sexual guilt." Formulas are formulas, and they exist because they work on a base level. Your base level may be different than mine, but I wouldn't hold horror movies up as a higher art then action movies. In fact, just typing that seemed silly to me. Really... come on.

Then there's this:

Seems to me, at least, the first one was genuinely suspenseful and NOT FOR EVERYONE , whereas this one went for the wider audience buck. That seems kinda crass to me.

Alien was the third highest-grossing movie of 1979, right between Star Trek: The Motion Picture and The Muppet Movie. Don't argue that the second movie sold out. DON'T TRY IT.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Ok, this site reports it as the 4th highest-grossing movie of 1979.

http://www.fact-index.com/1/19/1979_in_film.html#Top%20Grossing%20Films%20of%201979

My point remains the same.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Are you suggesting that both films were suitable for all audiences?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Alien = intelligent, well-written, genuinely suspenseful horror film made for adults.

Aliens = Flimsy, cliche-ridden, poorly patched together whizz-bang blam-o action pic designed to sell popcorn. Bring the kids, hey, it'll be fun!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Are you arguing that the second Alien movbie *was* suitable for everyone? Keep in mind, you just watched it on TNT.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I bet a lot of fucked up parents brought their kids to both films. Don't be that parent, Alex!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Compared to the first film -- which was very definitely not a kid-friendly movie.

I remember sitting infront of a father who brought his FIVE YEAR OLD SON to "Natural Born Killers". WHAT PART OF THE TITLE, "NATURAL BORN KILLERS", MADE YOU THINK THIS FILM WAS SUITABLE FOR YOUR FIVE-YEAR OLD?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:49 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused. You still seem to be saying that the first Alien movie was "not for everyone," because... it's horror by genre? And the second one was more for... fun? The second movie is scarier and more traumatizing in many ways.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Again, I turn to my man Rog:

The ads for "Aliens" claim that this movie will frighten you as few movies have, and, for once, the ads don't lie. The movie is so intense that it creates a problem for me as a reviewer: Do I praise its craftsmanship, or do I tell you it left me feeling wrung out and unhappy?

It has been a week since I saw it, so the emotions have faded a little, leaving with me an appreciation of the movie's technical qualities. But when I walked out of the theater, there were knots in my stomach from the film's roller-coaster ride of violence. This is not the kind of movie where it means anything to say you "enjoyed" it. ..

I don't know how else to describe this: The movie made me feel bad. It filled me with feelings of unease and disquiet and anxiety. I walked outside and I didn't want to talk to anyone. I was drained. I'm not sure "Aliens" is what we mean by entertainment. Yet I have to be accurate about this movie: It is a superb example of filmmaking craft.

If it does this to a man who has seen 20,000 movies, what will it do to the average filmgoer? Or to CHILDREN?

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:55 (nineteen years ago) link

If it does that to a man who wrote a script for Russ Mayer, even.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:56 (nineteen years ago) link

which was very definitely not a kid-friendly movie

Which made these (released prior to the second film) even more mysterious:

ihttp://www.toyzine.com/magazine/articles/alien/alien+box_lg.jpg

I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused. You still seem to be saying that the first Alien movie was "not for everyone," because... it's horror by genre? And the second one was more for... fun? The second movie is scarier and more traumatizing in many ways.

The first film was more of a classic horror film written with a degree of sophistication and unflinching, realistic gore (relatively speaking) that was inarguably not child friendly. The second one, though still violent and gorey, reads more like a western shoot'em up. It's not exactly Spongbob Squarepants but it's easier on the sense than the first one.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 05:59 (nineteen years ago) link

The first movie is slower and more boring to children. That's all I'll give you.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:04 (nineteen years ago) link

boring to children

http://www.filmfodder.com/movies/reviews/alien/images/alien.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:06 (nineteen years ago) link

The second movie is every ounce as violent! What ARE you arguing?!

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:08 (nineteen years ago) link

It's still violent, but the tone is different.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:10 (nineteen years ago) link

No, I got that, but why do you think that matters? To what end?

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:12 (nineteen years ago) link

In the same way that violence in cartoons isn't perceived as traumatic. The violence in the first one was just more shocking. In the second one, it's more of a roller coaster ride. The violence isn't taken quite as seriously.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not too worried about its suitability to children. That was a tangent. I'm curious as to why you think this tone makes it a more worthy film.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I feel the need to be more accessible to a wider audience with the second film comprimised the intriguing tone of paranoia and fear of the first film. The second film was an adventure, where the first was a nightmare.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Nightmares (when effectively done) are simply more interesting than adventures...which are a dime a dozen (especially when poorly written and rife with cliche like Aliens).

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I feel the need to be more accessible to a wider audience with the second film comprimised the intriguing tone of paranoia and fear of the first film. The second film was an adventure, where the first was a nightmare.

I don't think this is a particularly good argument, but I must pause to say that I like the first film better, easily. I like the pacing and the dialogue better. I like the tone better. I just don't think that that's a good jumping-off point to argue that the second film is bad.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:25 (nineteen years ago) link

We're going to have to agree to disagree on that point, then.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:33 (nineteen years ago) link

The second film is a nightmare though. I mean maybe it would have been better if there was only one alien and the marines were armed with pithy existential quotes but then you wouldn't have had the scene where Ripley pisses the queen mum the fuck off by machine-gunning and then torching her unborn spawn.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I have to answer my own question above:

If it does this to a man who has seen 20,000 movies, what will it do to the average filmgoer?

Answer: thrill the shit out of them.

Harold Media (kenan), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Gear OTM, plus everyone calling Aliens clichéd seems to have forgotten that many of these "clichés" weren't in fact all that overused back then -- the '80s was the decade for goofy one-liners, and this movie was just one of many to fall in line that way. I like the two movies equally, in different ways -- in the horrible, claustrophobic horror movie way, and in the horrible, claustrophobic action movie way...

(also, Newt was traumatised,FFS. What were you expecting, Alex, some nice, likeable, well-adjusted kid? Of course she wasn't fucking likeable...)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:57 (nineteen years ago) link

(actually, the 80s just set up the 90s nicely for goofy one-liners, really)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:58 (nineteen years ago) link

(wow, my tone was a lot harsher there than I intended. I'm just saying, have you ever encountered kids with post-traumatic stress? in other words)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 20 August 2004 06:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I find myself agreeing with alex here. I remember seeing this at the cinema when it came out, and being thrilled mightily by it. Last time I saw it on tv, the dialogue... ugh!!! It just killed it for me. That "get away from her you bitch" (or whatever) line especially - in the cinema, people were actually cheering! When I last saw it I was like, "oh, for FUCK's sake!1" So corny!!

The actress who plays vasquez, I forget what she's called, she was in "near dark" and IIRC terminator 2 as well? K-ROWR!!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 20 August 2004 07:08 (nineteen years ago) link

This thread made interesting reading until someone, rather amusingly, thought the welding torch on the loader was a flame thrower !?

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 07:45 (nineteen years ago) link

ALEX WHAT FUCKING CLICHES ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Haven't read the thread, but yes Aliens is the most disappointing movie I've ever seen.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link

it owns.

foolish elvens.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:45 (nineteen years ago) link

cliches? the end where the mother alien *gasp* isn't dead but is holding onto the ship zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah what a boring scene

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Ok, but was that a predator ship?

())(())()()()(()(LASER)()()()LA(Z)E(R)()()()((L)()()(A)(S(E)R()()()) (ex machina, Friday, 20 August 2004 12:49 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah i mean before Aliens it was done *soooo* many times

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:50 (nineteen years ago) link

i was so sick of confrontations between angry maternal types in exoskeletons and huge mother aliens by that point

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:52 (nineteen years ago) link

i know it was getting beyond a joke wasn't it.

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:52 (nineteen years ago) link

er, more like the "oh goody baddies are dead let's go home oh wait they're still here *bang* now they're dead seeyalater chzthxbye" kind of lazy cliche seen in every horror movie ever.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 20 August 2004 12:54 (nineteen years ago) link

yes but at the time of the release of the film it wasn't really a cliche was it, especially in the setting and the specifics of the scene (ie alien coming out of bottom of ship sticks tail in android and rips him in two)

you can't say that thats a cliche can you?

The trouble is films since Aliens have robbed it to fuck and now admittedly watching it again it some parts seem cliched but you have to realise it was unique at the time and was, and remains to be, an absoloute classic

Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 20 August 2004 13:07 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.