Laughing at the proles: C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (151 of them)
Oasis fans are unnatural. But that doesn't make me an Oasis-phobe, I'm just totally misunderstood!

x-post

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Now if you substitute "Belle and Sebastian" for "Oasis"...hey why are you looking at me like that?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link

denigrating someone for assholish behavior = classic. Denigrating someone for assumed assholish behavior = dud

I entirely agree with this.

Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Boy, I Got Out There?

Well did you evah

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Pash, not that I have too strong an opinion either way, but what do you think about certain bars banning anyone wearing Rockport, Burberry, or Aquascutum from entering?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:39 (nineteen years ago) link

The problem, as ever, with language like this is separating behaviour from appearance. I'm pretty sure Norman uses the term 'charvers' to describe people who act in a certain, anti-social way, robbing and ruining things in his neighbourhood. Other people seem to apply it to anyone who looks a certain way, or comes from a certain kind of home. It's excatly the same with 'neds' - orignally it was used to describe louts, but for so many people, kids from council estates wearing sports gear and hanging around in gangs = neds. The two get mixed up and the whole thing starts to look pretty ugly.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:39 (nineteen years ago) link

'Cor, it's ace!

(Do I want the Red Planet one or the Rolando one or what? Are they the same thing?)

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I think the Martian is a/k/a Red Planet.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I see what they've done there! Thanks, N.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Is there a Rolando mix or something? I checked discogs and can't find it, but might be worth a look. I like Rolando so maybe.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

i thought it was 'spides' in ireland, or is that more of a belfast thing?

zappi (joni), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Gregory Henry, are you, er, well, is that your name?

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I come from a working class backround so I when I sometimes make fun of "white trash" etc. I feel like it's okay -- but if I hear someone who I know is from a more middle or upper class backround do it I get annoyed. I realize this is totally hypocritical and irrational.

I don't know that it is. It grates on me for a white guy to quote Chris Rock's "I wanna join the KKK" stuff. You get the privilege to make fun of your own class/ethnicity/religion, where other people don't.

To answer Jerry's initial question - it's OK because there's often an implied "the poor deserve to be poor, it's of their own doing" angle, that most people wouldn't think of saying about ethnic groups.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

the poor deserve to be poor, it's of their own doing

This implication really pisses me off.

Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't know that it is. It grates on me for a white guy to quote Chris Rock's "I wanna join the KKK" stuff. You get the privilege to make fun of your own class/ethnicity/religion, where other people don't.

Yeah, but class is mobile and race isn't, really. At what point can someone no longer pull the 'hey, I'm working class' line?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

How mobile is class? You're always bound by your family, your birthplace, your education, your accent.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 29 April 2004 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not saying it's totally mobile - I'm just saying if someone has come from a working class background but has managed to get a college education etc., then I think it's a bit rich for them to make the "hey, I'm working class too - I can diss those who didn't make it all I like" excuse.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

The problem is that class is both a mental state and an actual financial state. I think the middle class see it as mobile (ie: "I'm not priveleged, anyone can be like me with hard work"). A (much richer) friend of mine says its an aspirational thing, your aspirations are what determines your class, thus I'm at university- I'm middle class. This just seems vastly flawed to me.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

(vague-ish x-post)

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

I think the middle class see it as mobile (ie: "I'm not priveleged, anyone can be like me with hard work"

Wow! Can you not at least say 'tend to'. I don't remotely believe that I'm not privileged.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't see how.

Could inter-class tensions be on a more level playing field than racial ones? I mean am I betraying the fact I live in a young country by wondering if there are even half as many racial slurs against white people as there are classist slurs against the rich?

I'm not for a second saying this justifies anything, just asking a question really. Just that class seems to be almost an either or sometimes, "you yob" or "you snob" type deal.

It's funny actually, when I think of meeting guys out at clubs who looked like stereotypical "knackers", on e, and they're like "where are you from then?"

"Oh you fucking posh cunt! *big smile*"

"haha, I guess I am *big smile*"

"You probably think I'm a total scumbag? Are you in college you lazy shite? *big smile*"

"Yeah I am! Nah I don't think you're a scumbag!"

etc etc etc

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, but you're on drugs Ronan.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Gregory Henry, are you, er, well, is that your name?

Pretty much, Enrique - Henry's a middle name {see e-mail} and I guess people mostly call me Greg, but whatever. Why?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:07 (nineteen years ago) link

I agree with that, N., it would annoy me less for someone who did the rags-to-riches thing to make a classist joke than someone who was born privileged. But, in my experience, it's a lot less likely for the former to do so.

Anyway, I'm with the "make fun of everyone equally" side, if only that happened.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:07 (nineteen years ago) link


I think the "tend to" was implied N, as the bit in speech-marks was a

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't work out if I just come from a certain strata of the middle class that is totally above making snobby remarks about the working class, or if it's just that I come from a nice family!

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Hah.

I'll be honest, I had (have?) this massive chip on my shoulder about class issues for about five years. It just still comes through in the way I speak sometimes, no disrespect intended. Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes N, that was an x-post.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry I forgot the.com

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

What's the class equivalent of the Chappelle Show? Roseanne, maybe?

Both of them seem to make their jokes at the expense of audience assumptions (of ethnic stereotyping or class) rather than ethnicity or class itself.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Chappelle was great on Charlie Rose last night, btw.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Ronan, you have lost me - what was your joke?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:15 (nineteen years ago) link

killjoy.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Did he bring up the police not figuring out who killed Biggie and Tupac? He's mentioned that in every interview I've seen.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

not specifically, although I think he did mention Biggie and Tupac at some point.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Dan OTM about American race issues being class issues in disguise. However something like Roseanne is really all about the black humour in working families (check out the 'Chris' stories or anything my mom says) and that funmaking and smartarseness are coping strategies.

Pashmina OTM about the original charvers. There are people in this world who try to make a virtue of their stupidity while insulting your intelligence and those are the people I have the least time for ever. But when working-class leavers denigrate those who remain, especially in the media, they're just trying to prove to their posher bosses that they're basically not some trained monkey and to get the 'we accept you, one of us' thing. Yucky.

Oi! Reynolds, Morley and Penman disciples and Bracewell wannabes, I can't believe I'm owning you on books - the absolute master texts for townie vs. collegebound 'rivalry' are Simon Frith's Sound Effects and Paul Willis' Learning To Labour, esp the latter, still totally relevant today despite being 30+ years old. There's a lot of merit in payback time for adolescent town v. gown thing and you can't exactly argue that this relationship does not carry on in the media in later life.

Oh and by the way when I hear middle-class kids who haven't quite grown up yet moaning about how they're only in the 90th percentile of the elite going mad about people in the 99.9th percentile (NOT a Wu-Tang ref, guv, honest) because it isn't THEM I say y'all are having a fit of PLEB RAGE. I think it's also behind why posh kids speak like Damon Albarn.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Was that 'Reynolds disciple' supposed to refer to me? This is the first book of his I've read!

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 21:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't see how the mobility thing makes much of a difference, it's possible but it's not all that easy for a hell of a lot of people. Besides, using the mobility argument to defend making fun of the poor does still imply that there's something to make fun of but that it's ok because those people could move from the group. Racism wouldn't (and shouldn't) be any more acceptable if black people could change their colour and move into different ethnic groups because the entire point is that there's nothing wrong with being black in the first place, it should work the same way here.

lupine lupin (lupinelupin), Thursday, 29 April 2004 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I didn't invoke the mobility thing to say it was OK to make such comments - it was to just to say that I didn't think there was a simple equivalence between Chris Rock making KKK jokes and people who were born working class being snobby about trailer trash.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

N., in fairness, I probably fit that label more than you in terms of what I'd like, though I know what does it for Smiths fans, but you're like him in many weird coincidental ways I think we've discussed in the pub while drunk.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2004 23:23 (nineteen years ago) link

actually, i was thinking this morning while getting ready for the plane, im not sure its pinefoxes inane rudeness and autistic inability to engage with other people that is what is particularly disappointing, but the almost complete lack of intellectual curiosity. a particularly underwhelming trait.

perhaps n or jtn could copy and paste this in italics or something in one of their posts, otherwise the pinefox might not get to read it

gareth (gareth), Friday, 30 April 2004 06:42 (nineteen years ago) link

also, what n is getting at above makes a lot of sense. there is something problematic about people from working class backgrounds that have "escaped" (and even that is a somewhat difficult term in this context, are we talking escaping the people they grew up with?) then employing class based humour, a kind of best of both worlds schtick, with the get out clause of "oh i used to be that, its ok", theres something of the pulling up the ladder behind you about it

perhaps for this to be ok there needs to be still some kind of affinity/connection/affection/identification with your background (which i guess means you havent escaped it as such, you still see yourself as being of that upbringing, but even then i think you would have to actually engage with your past actively, otherwise you have cut all ties, camped to the other side etc)

gareth (gareth), Friday, 30 April 2004 06:47 (nineteen years ago) link

God, why did this thread turn suddenly so interesting right on a day when the bloody Americans have demanded that the report of all reports be due on Tuesday, totally ignoring our time-honoured tradition of Bank Holidays? Grrrr.

All I would really like to say is that N. and Ronan have said things which have really made me think. (Is this because they're also middle class, privately educated bastards?)

Class issues become more than just a (potentially mobile) money issue when you have two distinct and often inherently unequal cultures living side by side. In the US, this isn't as much masked by the race issue as exacerbated by it. In the UK, you have two markedly different and distinct cultures who have been living side by side (or rather one on top of another) effectively since the Norman Conquest (operatively since the Tudor era, but hey, what's 500 years between classes?).

A lot of my "classist" jokes are knee-jerk reactions of one sort or another - because I've developed a perverse reactionary "say what people would expect the toff to say becauase they're going to demonise you anyway" twitch. Because even when I say what I actually believe, people don't read what I'm saying, they just read what they would expect Someone Like Me to say. (Ronan's description struck a real chord with a younger me, even though I wasn't on drugs.)

Anyway... I've got to preserve my place in the class structure and get back to work now.

Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 30 April 2004 07:12 (nineteen years ago) link

The sentiment sucks; the website is wank. But the extreme behaviour described - utterly wank. The problem is the extrapolation of characteristics beyond this. Trisha and Kilroy acquire voyeuristic status as windows on what the working class are like rather than windows on a peculiarly 'touched' part of the underclass. It's also ultimately a shutting down of empathy, which is the conveyor belt of a better world. This is also seen in working class attitudes too - the teenage mother is either too stupid to get proper contraception (mc) or a slag or after a council flat (wc) rather than someone who you must try and enter the mind of someone who sees their entire life as a mother being the only horizon she's been offered, the only world she's ever been brought up to see had any meaning or possibility to her.

There are, then, cunts whereever you go. I think middle-class cuntishness towards the proles is getting worse though - and at the risk, I see Loaded culutre to blame, where politics got taken out of things, and anything was good for a laugh, and woe-betide the po-faced cunt who raises an objection (porn is cool and rocks, and don't fucking spoil it by reminding us of E. Europe human traffickers, you po-faced cunts). There was a quiet reserve which whilst looking down on the lower orders, wouldn't have laughed at them; it wasn't needed. The middle-class had won. The working class were for manual labour and for being repositories of all that was wrong, but not comic material; comedy is interesting as I think for most of the 20th C, most of British humour has been resolutely working-class in nature. Maybe the alternative comedy broke that back perhaps? Unintended consequence of lefty-gagmerchants being denigration of working class?

(cf debate about middle-clas left and rootedness in politics of reason, rather than empathy; vulnerable to sudden shifts (witness the Hitchens boys))

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 30 April 2004 14:48 (nineteen years ago) link

As usual I agree with Dave. And also with Norman. I think we should hold hands and run through the Ferrier Estate together, and then go and establish a humorous website called www.sloanetwats.com

I think council estate residents, chavs, pramfaces, dole scroungers, whatever the condescending nu-media working class chooses to call them, represent a level of "acceptable poverty" that makes them fair game - I can't imagine a similar level of barbed humour being considered acceptable when talking about, say, the homeless, or pensioners living in squalour, or even asylum seekers (although the latter is becoming regrettably less so).

I could expand on this and say it possibly has something to do with the British welfare state but I am hungover and it would probably be bollocks anyway.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 30 April 2004 15:13 (nineteen years ago) link

How do you pronouce "chav"? Is it short for something? What does it mean exactly?

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 1 May 2004 01:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Gosh, class is quite the invisible issue on ILx.

Most of the time I assume its invisibility is benign, then some assholish shit like this starts up.

Dickerson Pike (Dickerson Pike), Saturday, 1 May 2004 03:49 (nineteen years ago) link

I guess chav rhymes with have. Never heard the word before this week.

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 1 May 2004 10:54 (nineteen years ago) link

me either.
stealth marketing.
it's spreading.
north.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 1 May 2004 11:31 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.