― Josh, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― dave q, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Yes, PC started in academia and the media and kept the denizens of those zones busy bickering while the politicians and corporations carried on business as usual with their same-old New World Order. And of course people were bound to realise mere lip service was being paid to the notion of equality. But I see the anti-globalism impulse as an evolution of these ideas, not a repudiation of same.
Anyway, this thread is rather Miltonesque: testing the virtues of a virtual Paradise could hardly be called anything else.
― suzy, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― anthony, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
("Retarded" in the kindly American sense, of course...)
― mark s, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― gareth, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― jel, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
One of the fondest memories of my life in regulated group situations was in my co-op. We go by roberts rules and thus can "move the question" at which point a vote is taken on if we are to end the discussion and vote on the motion. Think fillibusters and how to beat them in Congress. Anyway, some hippie assholes decide this is "undemocratic" and bring up a motion against this procedure. We move the question. The next week, the same thing happens. My point, as it relates to this discussion? Fuck hippies.
Also, lynching was not about speech but organized and institutionalized racial terror and oppression for the purpose of maintaining a particular political economy with black ppl. on the bottom. Also, Momus should take a good look at who Falun Gong are before he starts praising them. Irony time: momus cries fascist at innocent moderation and the FG are racial purists. Who also encouraged a twelve year old girl to self immolate.
― Sterling Clover, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Geoff, Friday, 10 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― I, Monday, 31 October 2005 14:58 (nineteen years ago) link
― jdubz (ex machina), Monday, 31 October 2005 15:06 (nineteen years ago) link
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:2j5flSKw_GNYeM:http://images.newsfrombabylon.com/articles/09-2005/09-24-2005/104_0421.JPG
― and what, Saturday, 23 June 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link
What a retarded thread. and what, why the revive?
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Saturday, 23 June 2007 18:28 (seventeen years ago) link
You see where moderation transparency gets you?
― onimo, Saturday, 23 June 2007 19:39 (seventeen years ago) link
It doesn't read like mark s's usual style of writing.
― Bob Six, Saturday, 23 June 2007 19:42 (seventeen years ago) link
Interesting
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 17 March 2010 18:17 (fourteen years ago) link
sfgate seems like a good place for that news
― iatee, Wednesday, 17 March 2010 18:25 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/dec/12/ban-pastor-jones-extremists-violence
"What about principle. The right to free speech." We have laws that protect our right to free speech. We also have laws that prevent incitement to racial and religious hatred. Occasionally, a difficult balance has to be struck.
the takeaway: "It's a no-brainer."
"let's have a heated debate"
― Breakin': Based on the Novel "Two" by Electric Boogaloo (history mayne), Monday, 13 December 2010 09:30 (thirteen years ago) link
And I wonder where this debate would be if it was a Muslim cleric planning to come to the UK and start burning Bibles.
actually this might be the hilarious takeaway. yes, what if there were preachers in britain inciting racial and religious hatred, what a crazy parallel world that would be.
― Breakin': Based on the Novel "Two" by Electric Boogaloo (history mayne), Monday, 13 December 2010 09:32 (thirteen years ago) link
Greenwald on the DOJ prosecuting unpopular speech:
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/09/04/speech/index.html
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 4 September 2011 17:08 (thirteen years ago) link
David Frum's "b-b-b-but Lincoln did it" response on twitter is pathetic.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Sunday, 4 September 2011 17:12 (thirteen years ago) link
Greenwald has the full weight of the US Constitution and unanimous Supreme Court rulings on his side. On the opposing side there is nothing but fear or subservience to power. Not hard to choose between these two, imo.
― Aimless, Sunday, 4 September 2011 17:30 (thirteen years ago) link
greenwald accusing lincoln of 'extremism and lawlessness' on twitter hardly less ridiculous, and hurts his argument. though this was one of the better greenwald posts in a while.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, 4 September 2011 19:27 (thirteen years ago) link
but it was lawless, Blanche.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 4 September 2011 19:49 (thirteen years ago) link
That riposte was weak even for Frum.
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 4 September 2011 20:06 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/09/the_vile_anti_muslim_video_and_the_first_amendment_does_the_u_s_overvalue_free_speech_.2.html
― Mordy, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 14:54 (twelve years ago) link
Google itself approached the controversy in the spirit of prudence. The company declined to remove the video from YouTube because the video did not attack a group (Muslims) but only attacked a religion (Islam). Yet it also cut off access to the video in countries such as Libya and Egypt where it caused violence or violated domestic law.
don't be evil lol
― paradiastole, or the currifauel, otherwise called (thomp), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago) link
I forget which thread in the last 10 days boasted an argument between a britishes and American concerning "hate speech."
― taking tiger mountain (up the butt) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.voanews.com/content/Indonesia-blasphemy-protocol/1514420.html?utm_content=wall-post&utm_campaign=en&utm_source=voice-of-america&utm_medium=facebook
― timellison, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago) link
I heard somebody on NPR the other day saying their should be a UN convention on blasphemy. Not sure exactly what he meant, but apparently it is a thing:
http://www.iheu.org/belief-groups-unite-oppose-un-blasphemy-law
― o. nate, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:05 (twelve years ago) link
Maybe it was this guy: Jeremy Bowen, Middle East editor for the BBC and author of "The Arab Uprisings".
In the wake of the violence sparked by the now infamous video insulting Islam, Bowen thinks an international convention on blasphemy would be an excellent use of the United Nations. But, as he points out, the U.N. has struggled for years to come to an agreement on how to define "terrorism," so such an amorphous term as blasphemy would presumably pose an even greater struggle.
http://www.thetakeaway.org/2012/sep/24/united-nations-considers-middle-east-unrest
― o. nate, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:18 (twelve years ago) link
― taking tiger mountain (up the butt) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:00 PM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
these are always great
― la goonies (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:14 (twelve years ago) link
outlawing blasphemy is absurd. every religion is blasphemous to another religion.
― gesange der yuengling (crüt), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:17 (twelve years ago) link
it was towards the end of this thread: 7 years of prison for pussy riot?
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:24 (twelve years ago) link
that was me and that was a month ago
― stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago) link
i used a variation of "racial hatred all gone yet?" on a friend recently, so thanks
― la goonies (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:39 (twelve years ago) link
I saw this transition in yesterday's NYT story on Obama's UN speech:
The president worked to explain — before a sometimes skeptical audience that has never completely bought into the American idea that even hateful speech is protected — why the United States values its First Amendment so highly.
― taking tiger mountain (up the butt) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago) link
god your newspapers suck
― paradiastole, or the currifauel, otherwise called (thomp), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 23:11 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/some-police-unions-calling-on-officers-to-boycott-beyonce-concerts/
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 21:16 (eight years ago) link
Thread
― Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link
thought this would be a revive about metal polls
― Szechuan TV (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link
Did I miss some hi-q ilm action? cmon man you know I rely on youse to give me a nod on that shit.
― Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link
your free speech ends where my penis enlarger begins
― somewhere btwn Gabriel Garcia Marquez and early Evel Knievel guy (contenderizer), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 23:03 (eight years ago) link
Hi contends btw
― Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 February 2016 23:46 (eight years ago) link
hallo, dags!
― somewhere btwn Gabriel Garcia Marquez and early Evel Knievel guy (contenderizer), Thursday, 25 February 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link
dagby?
in Beyonce's video there is non-violence even the word meme HANDS UP DONT SHOOT is non-violent yet here we have a state power structure suppressing it by falsely portraying Beyonce as an agent of violence essentially making some viral form of pro-status quo state propaganda. as individual the police unions can say whatever they want but as public service members, as people that walk around with guns and the power to lock you away from your family, they have a responsibility to not act like idiots and make things less safe by saying things like this. for me the limits of free speech is when you are making things dangerous for others.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 25 February 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link
Beyonce is not showing anything violent these days we have murders on afternoon daytime TV news bumpers. Beyonce is performing. these people are just idiots that don't get art. the problem is they can legally shoot someone and get away with it.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 25 February 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link
ho-leee fuc-king shit
https://theintercept.com/2016/03/23/university-of-california-adopts-policy-linking-anti-zionism-to-anti-semitism/
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 11:53 (eight years ago) link