From Steve's post on the log thread I was wondering about his computer and how was getting power readings. So I thought it would be good to have a gear list thread.
Bike:Frame:Forks:Gruppo:Wheels:Tyres:Handlebars:Stem:Computer:
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 25 April 2010 14:25 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: Bike 1 BMC SLT01Frame: BMC SLT01Forks: Matched Easton EC90Gruppo: SRAM ForceWheels: Mavic AksiumTyres: Vittorio Pro SlickHandlebars: Easton EA70Stem: FSA something or otherComputer: Garmin Edge 705 with HRM and Cadence
Bike: Bike 2 - Surly Cross CheckFrame: Surly Cross CheckForks: sameGruppo: Shimano Everything, 105 Leavers, Tigra from mech, ultegra chainset (50-38), 105 Rear Mech, SRAM 11-32 cassette, Dura-ace octolink BBWheels: Cistom Salsa Delgado Cross on White Industries M15 hubsTyres: Schwalbe Durano front, Schwalbe marathon rearHandlebars: who knows?Stem: who knows?Computer: Shares the Garmin with other bike, no cadence
Bike: Bike 3 (Sisters attic back in London) Eddy Merckx Alu TeamFrame: Eddy Merckx Alu TeamForks: something carbonGruppo:Campagnolo chorus 9 speedWheels: I forget but some very light but fairly nomark wheels Tyres: Tufo CS-22Handlebars: who knowsStem: who knows but it is a quill stemComputer: none
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 25 April 2010 14:43 (thirteen years ago) link
I just built this up a month or two ago - it's the first new frame that I've had since 1992, after getting back into biking four years ago. Stripped most everything off the old Lemond that I bough used three years ago. First geared bike I've built totally by myself, minus pressing the headset cups. It's basically exactly what I want for the type of riding I do and I love it so far.
Bike: One of three, the only one I really ride
Frame: Surly Pacer, green, 58cm
Forks: same
Gruppo: 9 speed Shimano 105 save for a Tiagra triple crankset (due to stripping out the drive side arm of the 105 one); I think the cassette is 11-25 but actually not positive. SRAM chain.
Wheels: Shimano 105 hubs, Salsa Delgado cross rims 32 spokes up front, 36 in back. Sturdy enough for my fat ass.
Tyres: Continental Ultra Gatorskins, 28mm
Handlebars: Salsa Bell Lap
Stem: some generic one
Computer: the cheapest wireless one I found at Performance Cyles a couple years ago - no cadence, no wattage, no heartrate, just speed and distance
― joygoat, Sunday, 25 April 2010 14:58 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: roadieFrame: cannondale caad9 aluminium, 2009 (so no BB30), 56cmForks: cannondale slice ultra carbonGruppo: shimano ultegra 6700 double, 175mm cranks, 12-25 cassetteWheels: shimano RS80 carbon-laminate clinchersTyres: michelin krylion carbon belt, 700x23Handlebars: easton EC70 carbon, 44cmStem: cannondale one that came with the bike, alu, 100mmComputer: cateye v3 w/ HRM - current/avg/max for speed/HR/cadence, calories, time moving, distance, time/date, lap splits
Bike: SS commuterFrame: giant bowery '72 aluminium, largeForks: giant cro-mo blade w/ alloy steererGruppo: lasco track cranks, 48x17 gearing, OEM brakes, KMC chainWheels: giant OEM rims + 32-spoke high-flange hubsTyres: kenda kriterium, 700x25Handlebars: OEM track drop barStem: OEM alloyComputer:
― Marissas now living will never her (haitch), Sunday, 25 April 2010 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: roadieFrame: 2005 focus cayo, full carbonForks: focus carbon forksGruppo: ultegra rear mech, chainset and shifters, 105 brake callipers and front mechWheels: mavic aksiumTyres: schwalbe stelvioHandlebars: FSA headsetStem: FSA OS190Computer: some cheapo sigma
― cozen, Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:00 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: 2009 Bianchi 928Forks: Bianchi Carbon - 1-1/8"Gruppo: Dura-Ace 7801/Ultegra 6700 mixWheels: Easton CircuitTires: Conty GP4000SHandlebars: FSA Omega Compact Stem: FSA OS-190LXComputer: Garmin Edge 305
aw fuck it, here's my ENTIRE rig:Type Brand Model Added On Dist(mi)Cassette Shimano Ultegra CS-6700 12/25 Since Beginning 4,081Chain Shimano Ultegra CN-6700 03/25/2010 911Chainrings Shimano Ultegra SL 53/39 Since Beginning 4,081Fork Bianchi FF38 FORK FULL CARBON B4P - 1-1/8" Since Beginning 4,081Crankset Shimano Ultegra SL FC-6750 Compact Since Beginning 4,081Front Brake Shimano Ultegra BR-6700 Since Beginning 4,081Front Derailleur Shimano Ultegra SL FD-6700 03/25/2010 911Front Wheel Easton Circuit Since Beginning 4,081Handlebar FSA Omega Compact Since Beginning 4,081Headset FSA Orbit CE Plus Since Beginning 4,081Pedals Shimano Ultegra 6620 SPD-SL Since Beginning 4,081Rear Brake Shimano Ultegra SL BR-6700 Since Beginning 4,081Rear Derailleur Shimano Ultegra RD-6700-SS Since Beginning 4,081Rear Tire Continental GP4000S 03/29/2010 726Rear Wheel Easton Circuit Since Beginning 4,081Saddle Specialized Toupe 143mm Since Beginning 4,081Seatpost FSA SLK - Carbon - 31.6mm Since Beginning 4,081Stem FSA OS-190LX Since Beginning 4,081Bottom Bracket Shimano Hollowtech II Since Beginning 4,081Rear Shifter Cable Shimano Ultegra 02/14/2010 2,049Front Brake Cable Shimano Ultegra Since Beginning 4,081Shift Levers Shimano Dura Ace ST-7801 Since Beginning 4,081Rear Brake Cable Shimano Ultegra Since Beginning 4,081Front Brake Pads Shimano Ultegra R55C3 Since Beginning 4,081Front Shifter Cable Shimano Ultegra Since Beginning 4,081Rear Brake Pads Shimano Ultegra R55C3 Since Beginning 4,081Front Tire Continental GP 4000S 04/08/2010 477
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:30 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: everything bikeFrame: cross-checkForks: dittoCranks: garbage and mismatchedShifters: Shimano DA bar-end shiftersF-Der: TiagraR-Der: TiagraCassette: 9-spd, no idea what the range isPedals: ATACWheels: stock (alex rims to...deore lx?)Tires: Panaracer T-Serv 28c (i think?)Handlebars: Salsa Bell LapStem: Ritchey (stock)Seatpost: lol whutSaddle: Selle AnatomicaBartape: fancy Fizik stuffBrakes: Tektro v-brakesLevers: Cane Creek linear pull levers (real nice)Computer: nope
― GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:47 (thirteen years ago) link
Shasta please tell me that's c-and-p'd from a spreadsheet on your computer
― GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:48 (thirteen years ago) link
close, from my training analysis software.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 25 April 2010 20:37 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: Focus Cayo Expert 2008Frame: 58cm full carbonForks: Focus carbonGruppo: FSA brakes, FSA Gossamer chainset, Shimano Ultegra Front mech, Dura-ace rear mech, Dura=ace shiftersWheels: Fulcrum Racing 3Tyres: Schwalbe UltremoHandlebars: FSA Omega compactStem: Ritchey alu 90mmComputer: Cateye Strada
Bike: Bob JacksonFrame: Vigorelli Reynolds 653Forks: Reynolds 653Gruppo: Sugino 75 chainset, Phil Wood fixed cogWheels: Mavic Open Pros on Phil Wood high flange hubsTyres: Schwalbe UltremosHandlebars: Nitto noodleComputer: n/a
― Mark C, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:35 (thirteen years ago) link
I left pedals out of this, oh well
BMC has Look Keo Classic, Surly has Steel eggbeaters
What training software do you use, steve?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 26 April 2010 15:13 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: OnlyFrame: c. 1985(?) Eddy Merckx Corsa 56 cm (Team Faema colors) Columbus SL tubing if the internet is to be believedForks: Merckx steel fork w/ aero crownGruppo: Campagnolo Victory. Seatpost replaced w/ a Selcof, and brakes are Shimano 600 6207 Series.Wheels: Mavic Open 4 CD rims and Record hubs, 36 spokeTyres: Vittoria Zaffiro Slick, 700x23Handlebars: 3ttt CompetizioneStem: 3ttt quill stem w/ Eddy Merckx pantographComputer: n/a
Currently unable to ride, as the rear derailleur just broke (stripped threads on lower pivot bolt/pulley cage)
― naus, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:25 (thirteen years ago) link
thread wd be ace w/pics above the details
― cozen, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:29 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike is a 2007-version Kona Zing Deluxe (bought at a huge discount in Dec 2008).Frame: Dedacciai Nero Corsa (Carbon)Brakes/Gears: Shimano 105 (10-speed cassette 12-25)Cranks/Rings/Headset/Seatpost/Bars: FSA (rings 53/39, bars oversized and flattened to an oval)Pedals: Egg Beater SLWheels: Mavic AksiumTyres: Vredestein Fortezza Tri-Comp 23mm
The tyres are the only things I've changed so far (and I've changed both of them twice already).
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:17 (thirteen years ago) link
Oh, plus Cateye Strada Wireless computer.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:18 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: yep. Ridgeback Comet 2004 (maybe 2003? Bought it new July '04 anyway)Frame: Aluminium, I guess.Forks: Yep.Gruppo: SS conversion with a Surly Singleator. The bike's original 48T chainring, and an 18T on the back.Wheels: Shimano R500. They were on offer and I thought they'd look cool, and be a bit faster, also spokes kept breaking on the originals.Tyres: Schwalbe Marathon Plus, 700x25. These are great. Pedals: Shimano PD-M520Handlebars: Yep. Flat ones, at that.Stem: Yep. The old-style kind.Computer: Nup.Also SKS mudguards and a Topeak luggage rack.
― ketchup scam (useless chamber), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:37 (thirteen years ago) link
Recent-ish upgrades:
Rear Cassette = 11/23 (racing)Front Wheel = Reynolds Attack 32mm Clincher (craigslist score)Rear Wheel = Bontrager (well it's really a HED 50mm rim with DT Swiss hubs and bladed spokes) Aeolus 5.0 Clincher (craigslist score)Front Brake = Dura-Ace 7900 (for extra fat mantis stopping power, another craigslist score)
Also changed my bar tape from the stock to Cinelli cork... holy shit. Why didn't I do this right away? Crazily amazing difference in comfort.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 15 July 2010 05:08 (thirteen years ago) link
We're talking about an entry-level bike here, so be kind.
Bike: roadFrame: KHS, 7005 alloy, 58cmFork: CRMOGruppo: Shimano Sora, triple, 24-speed (of which I use five at the extreme most)Wheels: formula alloy hubs, rims some indeterminate alloy that's way heavyTires: Michelin Krylion carbonHandlebars: some standard-issue alloy, wrapped in Specialized S-wrap Roubaix, which seems to retain squishiness even after a lot of sweat and is fairly easy to clean off, would buy againStem: KalloyComputer: n/a
Very important upgrade recently: saddle changed from a Selle Italia butt-numb-a-thon to a Specialized Phenom SL. Night and day.
I'm wondering if sinking a couple hundred bucks into lighter wheels would be worth doing, given my frame and group.
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 09:18 (thirteen years ago) link
Actually fuck that -- I'm fine with the frame and group. I'm not racing this thing. I'm wondering if new wheels are worth the effort in general. Does taking a couple pounds off of the wheels make a significant difference in the ease and quality of the ride?
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 10:09 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: one and onlyFrame: Retrovelo Paul Modern, steel, 59 cmFork: Retrovelo steel, really bitchin' (see http://retrovelo.de/forkcrown.html)Gruppo: Shimano Alfine 8-speed (hub, Avid BB7 disc brakesWheels: Retrovelo, alu -- Shimano hub generatorTyres: Schwalbe Table Top, I keep them at 60 PSI (4 bar) on the road.Handlebars: alu, old-fashioned mountain bike (somewhere between modern flat bar and cruiser bar)Pedals: MKSStem: says Matrix on it, is in fact Chinese and CrMo. Kind of long to get me less upright.Saddle: Brooks B17 Speciallights: Busch & Müller front and rearcomputer: not yet, looking for a good iPhone app.
― Three Word Username, Monday, 19 July 2010 11:29 (thirteen years ago) link
Does taking a couple pounds off of the wheels make a significant difference in the ease and quality of the ride?
Yes - lighter wheels make a significant difference due to some science-y stuff I don't really understand about the further the weight is from the bike's centre of gravity, the more of an effect it has. How much do they weigh, though? Dropping a couple of pounds is likely to be tricky unless you have $$$.
― Mark C, Monday, 19 July 2010 12:23 (thirteen years ago) link
3WU:
How do you like the Alfine internal hub?
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 19 July 2010 12:59 (thirteen years ago) link
So far so good -- it took some learning, as it is slow to change if you are working it hard, so I downshift earlier for steep hills, and I can't really zoom away instantly when upshifting after said hill -- but the ability to shift while standing still or skip a couple gears is really very useful, and the thing is pretty quiet. The gear range is useful. No problems with it yet, and my LBS guy says he has had good experiences with the things (and his hate for Shimano stuff borders on obsession), but it's still pretty new. I wouldn't recommend the cheaper Shimano hubs.
― Three Word Username, Monday, 19 July 2010 13:43 (thirteen years ago) link
Makes more sense for the city than the mountain, I think. Have friends who swear by the Rohloff for both.
― Three Word Username, Monday, 19 July 2010 13:44 (thirteen years ago) link
Dropping a couple of pounds is likely to be tricky unless you have $$$.
A couple pounds might be an ounce or two more ambitious than I need to be, but you'd be surprised how heavy these wheels are. I don't know exactly what they weigh, but they're clearly one of the things the manufacturer cheaped-out on in order to make it a more affordable bike. Looks like I can get a wheelset that's about 1700g-1900g for in the neighborhood of $200 online, and I have no doubt at all that they will be significantly lighter.
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 13:46 (thirteen years ago) link
Kenan, a trade up to Mavic Aksium, Fulcrum Racing 7, Easton EA50could definitely make the bike feel better. The weight might not be that much less but the bearings may well be a good deal better. couple of hundred well spent imo.
Worth checking eBay etc. for last years models.
Do you know what model of selle italia it is, I might be interested in it.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 19 July 2010 13:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Do you mean my old seat? I'm not sure what the model is, but you really don't want it. It's completely solid front to back. Not even so much as a groove in the thing. Designed especially to make your toes go numb.
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 13:55 (thirteen years ago) link
But maybe it's fine for something less leany-over-y. It's this:
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/selle_seat.jpg
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 14:09 (thirteen years ago) link
That doesn't look that great. I like Selle italias in general but mainly the ones with the slot.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 19 July 2010 14:10 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah, it creates constant pressure on just about everything you don't want pressure on.
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 14:12 (thirteen years ago) link
lighter wheels make a significant difference due to some science-y stuff I don't really understand about the further the weight is from the bike's centre of gravity, the more of an effect it has
What I learned from googling a bit was that it's about the center of gravity of the wheel itself, not the bike overall, so you want not only a light wheel, but a light rim compared to the hub, to minimize *rotational* mass. Although you still want a light wheel. It's all torque and acceleration, and acceleration counts for a whole lot on a bike, because you'll likely have to apply that force a great deal.
At bottom, F=ma.
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 14:52 (thirteen years ago) link
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/0/3/0038e89803b9aeefad5b1fc299b0d086.png
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 19 July 2010 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link
If I were going to buy wheels one at a time, though, would it be more important for my rear or front wheel to be lighter?
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 15:03 (thirteen years ago) link
Or is there any difference, even though the rear wheel is the one the force is directly applied to? Is that force applied equally to both wheels just by virtue of their both touching the ground?
― kenan, Monday, 19 July 2010 15:11 (thirteen years ago) link
for some reason i wanna say "rear wheel" but i can't actually muster a decent rationale.
front would be cheaper, obv
― be told and get high on coconut (gbx), Monday, 19 July 2010 21:38 (thirteen years ago) link
What I learned from googling a bit was that it's about the center of gravity of the wheel itself, not the bike overall, so you want not only a light wheel, but a light rim compared to the hub, to minimize *rotational* mass. Although you still want a light wheel. It's all torque and acceleration, and acceleration counts for a whole lot on a bike, because you'll likely have to apply that force a great deal.At bottom, F=ma.― kenan, Monday, July 19, 2010 7:52 AM (Yesterday)
― kenan, Monday, July 19, 2010 7:52 AM (Yesterday)
Lots of myths and old wives tales being thrown around ITT.
IME and IMU, wheel weight/rotational mass is most significant in:1) pure climbing. riding solely uphill (ie, HC TTs with minimal flat/and zero descents)2) intial accleration (which actually matters little for 95% of bike riding)
also: re "torque", lightweight wheelsets are notoriously not stiff, so you run the risk of much of the torque that you want driving the bike up the hill dissipating laterally instead.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 20 July 2010 07:47 (thirteen years ago) link
intial accleration (which actually matters little for 95% of bike riding)
I do most of my riding in the city, though. So it does matter for, like, 60% of my bike riding.
Anyway, I don't need the world's most fantastic wheels, but some better ones would be nice.
― kenan, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 02:36 (thirteen years ago) link
was talking to this bro a few months back, who liked to go and do the shopping on an argon 18 with zipp 404s
i think maybe that's a bit of overkill, don't do that
― the polka-dot jersey shore (haitch), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 02:48 (thirteen years ago) link
ok i won't
― be told and get high on coconut (gbx), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 02:51 (thirteen years ago) link
~promise~
"are you not worried about them getting ripped off while you're in there?" i said
i think he had a 'lightbulb' moment
― the polka-dot jersey shore (haitch), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 02:56 (thirteen years ago) link
gbx u got some handbults, what did they cost? if kenan is riding in the city, a more trad wheel is probably a good idea to protect against potholes and the like.
― the polka-dot jersey shore (haitch), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 02:57 (thirteen years ago) link
i spent ~$400
kenan could def do cheaper. apparently marcus @ yojimbo's builds the best wheels in Chi but a) he takes forever (lol w33d!) and b) i'm not sure kenan would really enjoy the yojimbo's "experience"
― be told and get high on coconut (gbx), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 03:00 (thirteen years ago) link
lemme guess -- unchecked bike snobbery? It's not like I'm going to pull up in my SUV or anything.
― kenan, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 03:40 (thirteen years ago) link
I submit that quality of bearings is most important for in town riding. Bottom bracket and hub. Removing winter from both made my commute significantly better.
New bearings on hubs feel awesome.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 03:46 (thirteen years ago) link
if you're doing city riding you definitely do not want lightweight wheels as they probably would not last very long. The probably the most popular upgrade are (for good reason) mavic open pros rims laced to ultegra hubs with decent spokes (dt swiss?). In cycling, like most things, the 2/3 rule is in effect: cheap, light, strong (pick 2).
And no offense but initial acceleration is not a big deal compared to potholes, steel grates, rail tracks, shitty roads, etc. So yes, you may lose that precious 0.5 second on your commute to work but hey, at least your wheels will stay true year round!
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 04:15 (thirteen years ago) link
I AM OFFENDED!
Yeah, I don't hit too many honest-to-betsy potholes, but there are always roads that have been patched way too many times.
― kenan, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 05:48 (thirteen years ago) link
Also, accelerating is less about losing time on the way to work than it's about getting the hell out of the way. You ride in city traffic much?
― kenan, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 05:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Only about 2500 miles in the last year.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 21 July 2010 06:36 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah, I anticipated that answer. It's tough riding. I will never understand people riding down Broadway with earphones on.
If lighter wheels will be worse in the long run, then I've learned something new. I was just thinking that getting through intersections and up what few hills we have in the road a bit faster could only do me good.
― kenan, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 06:42 (thirteen years ago) link
Bike: yep. Ridgeback Comet 2004 (maybe 2003? Bought it new July '04 anyway)Frame: Aluminium, I guess.Forks: Yep.Gruppo: SS conversion with a Surly Singleator. The bike's original 48T chainring, and an 18T on the back.Wheels: Shimano R500. They were on offer and I thought they'd look cool, and be a bit faster, also spokes kept breaking on the originals.Tyres: Schwalbe Marathon Plus, 700x25. These are great.Pedals: Shimano PD-M520Handlebars: Yep. Flat ones, at that.Stem: Yep. The old-style kind.Computer: Nup.Also SKS mudguards and a Topeak luggage rack.
Can now add the following mod:Frame: Massive crack all around the base of the seat tube. RIP bicycle.
― useless chamber, Friday, 6 August 2010 11:30 (thirteen years ago) link
On the plus side, it's time to go shopping for a new frame! There are always awesome deals on frames, and they're a LOT cheaper than full bikes.
― Mark C, Friday, 6 August 2010 12:21 (thirteen years ago) link
6 years out of an aluminum frame seems pretty good. Sorry to hear about your crack though.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 6 August 2010 12:43 (thirteen years ago) link
A tasty 80% off?
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=50178
― Mark C, Friday, 6 August 2010 13:26 (thirteen years ago) link
Hmm. Really hadn't thought of building a bike like that. Was too blinkered by prospect of cycle2work goodness. Which bits would be worth keeping from the old bike? The wheels are half-decent, not sure if I'm going to stick with single-speed or not atm. I'd need new forks, stem and bars I guess. Also apparently Ridgeback have a lifetime guarantee on frames, so I might not even need one. Right now I'm still a bit distraught and can't even think properly about where to go next. Will hit ILTRMB for advice.
― useless chamber, Friday, 6 August 2010 13:45 (thirteen years ago) link
keep all components and transfer to the £35 frame mark posted above then use C2W goodness to bag a nice wee road bike : )
― cozen, Friday, 6 August 2010 14:16 (thirteen years ago) link
I think almost everything's worth keeping from the old bike, certainly the wheels, tyres, guards, drivetrain (if sticking with SS), pedals. Do you have the space to have two bikes? Rebuild this one for cheap as a hack/pub bike, and then C2W something shiny and lightweight for longer rides.
― Mark C, Friday, 6 August 2010 15:25 (thirteen years ago) link
full carbon + sram red for just over £1k ooofthttp://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/CBPXSLPR/sl-pro-carbon-sram-red
― cozen, Friday, 6 August 2010 17:34 (thirteen years ago) link
ah it's £1k for rival, £1.4k for red
― cozen, Friday, 6 August 2010 17:35 (thirteen years ago) link
Ridgeback are replacing the frame. Am pleasantly surprised, as I thought my singlespeed conversion would lead to some sort of small-print warranty-voiding, but they've said they'll give me a frame with horizontal dropouts instead. Presumably a Ridgeback Solo. So, not so bad, hopefully (I reserve the right to be too overjoyed until I have a working bicycle with all the bits I had before).
― useless chamber, Monday, 9 August 2010 12:09 (thirteen years ago) link
Meh. Replacement brand new Ridgeback Comet, they kept my pedals and lock, lost my rack (am picking up a free replacement later), tensioner and wheels.
Am going to flog this as soon as I've located a nice steel ss that will take rack and guards.
― useless chamber, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:29 (thirteen years ago) link
like the look of this ss as a commuterhttp://www.evanscycles.com/product_image/image/2dc/d13/944/33633/large/ridgeback-solo-2009-road-bike.jpg
― ultimusmoron (cozen), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:32 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah, that's the Solo isn't it? Evans have them on sale at £400, but I think they're out of my size, and I'm pretty loath to use them again (I swore I'd never use them again after I bought my bike there back in 2004).
There's really nothing else that comes close to my wants without being a Condor Tempo, and I don't actually have £900.
Gah, if they hadn't teased me with the promise of a nice replacement bike I could've just bought one of those already.
― useless chamber, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:38 (thirteen years ago) link
I'm almost back on the road. Some bits still to arrive, have raided E's bike temporarily, will slowly substitute back
Condor Bivio frameITM vista forksChorus 9 speed levers (from merckx)Tektro CR720 cross levers (lucky dip at Kraynicks)Tektro CR720 brakesKraynick's mystery cable housing and cablesTTT alloy bars (from merckx)Gossamer Triple chainset (from E's bike) (also I get to pick two out of three rings, this needs to go, quickly)Miche campy compatible 9 spee 13-28 cassetteChorus 10 speed front mech (from E's bike)Champ triple rear mech (from E's bike)90s campy chorus wheelset (from merckx via E's bike)big fat schwalbe marathon plus (from E's bike)
this puts me in a bit of a bind. I either put all the campy back on E's bike and have to get a whole gruppo when I replace, or put shimano/SRAM on E's bike and keep the campy on mine (not a problem as she is on bar end shifters anyway). The difficulty is new wheels and mainly because E would not be happy if I didn't give her back the yellow merckx v's. So either I spring for campy compatible hubs (expensive over here) or get her yellow velocities.
None of this is too much of a problem, just annoyed by the cost of campy and general incompatibility.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 12:35 (twelve years ago) link
Right now? 8 speed mongoose rigid bike shaped object. Heavy and slow as he'll, but not bad for pottering around center parcs. Didn't bring the felt in the end as we found that our borrowed bike rack didn't play nicely with our car.....about 10 minutes before we set off..... So bang went le tour de Lower Trent valley.
― problem chimp (Porkpie), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 12:43 (twelve years ago) link
i am getting the bartape re-done tomorrow. chrome tape looking rather un-chrome in various spots, time for a spring clean! (also need the brifters aligned a bit better, they're all over the shop atm.)
― the brostep hump (haitch), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 12:48 (twelve years ago) link
I just ordered glow in the dark bar tape, I hope it is actually cool rather than somewhat disappointing.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 12:51 (twelve years ago) link