LAW THREAD OF BIKES

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

~~~~this is not a thread to ask for personal legal advice, as none will be given~~~~

so i've been following a discussion of this on another board, and some of yr more aggro fundie bikers are howling for blood, and saying the AG should be getting serious jailtime. i, on the other hand, think that from the picture described by the article, it sounds like the cyclist may have committed assault (just by being drunk and threatening) and that it was reasonable for the AG to want to get away from him, ASAP. should the cyclist have held on? no. should the AG have tried to aggressively shake the cyclist, instead of just slowing down? no. so clearly he's responsible for the cyclist's death, but not in a premeditated way.

here, it looks like this might catch an involuntary vehicular manslaughter charge. in canada, it looks like a culpable homicide charge (according to wikipedia), which is distinct from both manslaughter and murder.

what say you, board lawyers?

also ITT discussions of bike law in the news. NOT from yr personal life, u rube, get a lawyer

crabRCISE (gbx), Thursday, 3 September 2009 14:25 (nine years ago) Permalink

an assembleyman hit a biker here a few days ago and isn't being charged with anything (other than running a red light): http://www.dane101.com/current/2009/09/02/cyclist_and_driver_share_blame_in_hamiltonwebster_crash_but

video (not fun to watch) is in the comments.

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Thursday, 3 September 2009 14:57 (nine years ago) Permalink

gbx what are you asking? i think that would be more than involuntary ms but i dunno

harbl, Thursday, 3 September 2009 15:16 (nine years ago) Permalink

imo he should go to jail for a while

harbl, Thursday, 3 September 2009 15:18 (nine years ago) Permalink

i guess i'm not sure what i'm asking?

crabRCISE (gbx), Thursday, 3 September 2009 15:40 (nine years ago) Permalink

I think the AG might make a successful defence (I'm not a lawyer). But the cyclist was drunk, not wearing a helmet (which is the law in TO I think), and hanging onto the AG's car while he tried to drive away after some kind of argument. Unless I misread the paper yesterday, the cyclist has 61 charges against him in Alberta and had done prison time, though not for assault. Plenty of good material to claim self-defence.

everything, Thursday, 3 September 2009 17:09 (nine years ago) Permalink

Oh, and eye witnesses say that the cyclist grabbed the wheel of the car as it was driving along.

everything, Thursday, 3 September 2009 17:37 (nine years ago) Permalink

:-/

crabRCISE (gbx), Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:08 (nine years ago) Permalink

i'm confused, he wasn't even on his bike when he grabbed the car, right?

harbl, Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:09 (nine years ago) Permalink

he got "bumped" by the car, threw his bag down on the hood, and came around to the driver's side door and grabbed the hood while, yeah, presumably on foot.

:(

crabRCISE (gbx), Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:17 (nine years ago) Permalink

Plenty of good material to claim self-defence.

plenty of ways of "self-defence" without driving recklessly and killing someone

am0n, Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:21 (nine years ago) Permalink

also fwiw the victim's not wearing a helmet and having been to prison mean about 0 for self-defense purposes

harbl, Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:33 (nine years ago) Permalink

it's not like the AG looked up his record and decided he was dangerous before *dragging him behind a car*

harbl, Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:34 (nine years ago) Permalink

I kind of don't see how the AG can avoid jail time here. (Well, I can, but not without some fantastic Cochran-level character assassination of the dead guy.)

cherokee flux (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:36 (nine years ago) Permalink

Cochrane-level character assassination may not be very difficult to achieve. Driving recklessly while a drunk wrestles the wheel from you hands could be possible to excuse. The car was an open-top so I can see them characterizing the cyclists behaviour as an assault. The cops had already attended to the cyclist shortly before because of drunken behaviour. The AG (who was stone-cold sober) and his wife have, I presume, excellent character witnesses etc whereas what is being reported about they cyclist suggests the opposite.

The prosecuter in the case is going to be Richard Peck, the lead counsel for the defence of the Air India bomber.

everything, Thursday, 3 September 2009 18:55 (nine years ago) Permalink

I don't know, "I was scared" doesn't seem like a strong enough justification for dragging someone down the street and running them over. Then again, I don't know Canadian law.

cherokee flux (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 September 2009 19:00 (nine years ago) Permalink

Some more information here. This was the dude's third fight of the evening and he had been arrested 45 mins earlier but released without charge.

everything, Thursday, 3 September 2009 19:19 (nine years ago) Permalink

okay maybe "Cochran-level" was reaching

cherokee flux (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 September 2009 19:20 (nine years ago) Permalink

perhaps "Cousin Vinny-level"

cherokee flux (HI DERE), Thursday, 3 September 2009 19:21 (nine years ago) Permalink

The National Post (Canada's "Other" broadsheet of bullshit) is likening it to The Bonfire of the Vanities which sort of makes sense until you start questioning whether bikes vs. cars in the 00s is as politically charged as NYC race issues in the 80s.

everything, Thursday, 3 September 2009 19:24 (nine years ago) Permalink

one month passes...

lol lawyers

steamed hams (harbl), Wednesday, 21 October 2009 13:56 (nine years ago) Permalink

On Monday, Swarth finished Stoehr’s cross-examination, with questions largely centered on details of his cycling clothing.

cutty, Wednesday, 21 October 2009 14:01 (nine years ago) Permalink

some straight known to be gang-related assos shit, bitches

honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 21 October 2009 15:29 (nine years ago) Permalink

crips wear rapha

coz (webinar), Wednesday, 21 October 2009 16:29 (nine years ago) Permalink

According to Rodriguez, Thompson said, “I just live up the road. I was driving to go to work. The bikers were in front of me, three across. I honked my horn and yelled ‘ride single file.’ The bicyclists flipped me off and yelled back. I passed them up and stopped in front to teach them a lesson. I’m tired of them. I’ve lived here for years and they always ride like this.”

honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 October 2009 19:29 (nine years ago) Permalink

three weeks pass...

when the shoe is on a different wheel. but then, philly.

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 21:16 (nine years ago) Permalink

don't ride on the pavements.

Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 22:32 (nine years ago) Permalink

cyclists on sidewalks make me apoplectic

nearly shoved a guy once (in my imagination, at least), i was so irritated

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:45 (nine years ago) Permalink

mpls, fwiw, actually suffers from over-courteous drivers....or drivers who have been sensitized to horrible cyclists, maybe. i can be rolling up to a four-way stop sign and the car that is ~already there~ will wait as i slowly travel half a block, and then wave me through. i was gonna stop, lady! it's ok!

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:46 (nine years ago) Permalink

The Annoying Samaritan: "Motorized human that cedes right of way to a cyclist when said right of way should not be ceded. The annoying Samaritan does not please the cyclist, who was fully prepared to wait his turn, but rather annoys other motorized humans who direct their ire at the cyclist."

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:53 (nine years ago) Permalink

^^^

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:57 (nine years ago) Permalink

^^^^^^^ hate this.

i know most SF cyclists are dicks/douches but this gets TIRESOME.

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 19 November 2009 02:33 (nine years ago) Permalink

when this happens, i usually just give a tight smile and a curt wave, and go. otherwise it turns into a cold war of mn manners with ppl waving and dipping their heads, or the driver just gets back on the phone and mutters '...you try to be ~nice~' and shakes their damn head

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 02:43 (nine years ago) Permalink

really wish those proposed "stop signs are yield signs, and red lights are 2-ways" bike laws would actually make it into the books

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 02:44 (nine years ago) Permalink

^ this is the law in Idaho (where I ride somewhat frequently) and it's pretty great and makes a lot of sense. It's the only state in the country with this law, right?

I've never shoved anyone riding by me on the sidewalk but I have blatantly stopped walking and stood in the middle as bikers have approached me, forcing them to try to squeeze around me. Fucking heathens.

joygoat, Thursday, 19 November 2009 04:49 (nine years ago) Permalink

I occasionally position myself in such a way when walking to prevent red light jumpers. I'm a passive agressive douchebag.

Mark C, Thursday, 19 November 2009 12:41 (nine years ago) Permalink

oh cmon dont do that

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Thursday, 19 November 2009 14:21 (nine years ago) Permalink

shakin my damn head

itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Friday, 20 November 2009 01:02 (nine years ago) Permalink

waht an ahole

bitter about emo (Hunt3r), Friday, 20 November 2009 01:11 (nine years ago) Permalink

yup

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 20 November 2009 01:12 (nine years ago) Permalink

eleven months pass...

incredible:

http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20101104/NEWS/101109939/1078&ParentProfile=1062

caek, Saturday, 6 November 2010 11:58 (eight years ago) Permalink

incredible case. incredible impeneterable faux-legalese the story is written in.

xtc ep, etc (xp) (ledge), Saturday, 6 November 2010 18:53 (eight years ago) Permalink

lol. he filed this one on his own, right?

john water (harbl), Saturday, 20 November 2010 00:40 (eight years ago) Permalink

three weeks pass...

bomb vail

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 17 December 2010 15:48 (seven years ago) Permalink

pretty astonishing, imo.

kanellos (gbx), Friday, 17 December 2010 15:56 (seven years ago) Permalink

chances are good, however, that this will succeed in a civil court, i'd think? at least in a way that will allow dr milo to be loosed of the fetters of the thankless workaday world of anesthesiology in one of america's wealthiest towns

kanellos (gbx), Friday, 17 December 2010 16:05 (seven years ago) Permalink

j/k, it's outrageous imo, but mostly to my principles.

kanellos (gbx), Friday, 17 December 2010 16:06 (seven years ago) Permalink

Ed OTM.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Friday, 17 December 2010 16:27 (seven years ago) Permalink

http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/12/news/the-explainer-thoughts-on-erzinger-and-why-i-wont-boycott-vail_153394

holy shit victims father in law is tom marsico. he could just ruin erzinger and call it even.

rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Saturday, 18 December 2010 19:14 (seven years ago) Permalink

actually, the most amazing thing about this whole thing for me is the link to this:

http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_15043329

1) man, this da
2) omfg i dated that girl in the 90s

rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Saturday, 18 December 2010 19:27 (seven years ago) Permalink

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/landis-reported-to-have-worn-wire-in-meeting-with-michael-ball

floyds hijinks should be a movie imo

rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Sunday, 19 December 2010 17:02 (seven years ago) Permalink

waaaaau @ identity swap story!

cereal bad boy (haitch), Sunday, 19 December 2010 23:44 (seven years ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.