"serious" cyclists rocking skateboard helmets

mind blown:

In comic books, superheroes and superheroines commonly wear costumes thought to be made of spandex. However, early superhero comics predate the invention of spandex (Superman: 1938; Batman: 1939; Captain America: 1941). Printing processes for early color comics only rendered images with distinctly separate solid blocks of color well, because overprinting and color mixing yielded inconsistent results and bad looking muddy colors. Because spandex is skintight, as many superhero costumes appear to be drawn, and because spandex is almost exclusively made in similarly bright solid colors, the after-the-fact assumption of spandex composition was made. The same assumption of costume composition is also made for latex and rubber garments, which are also typically solid in color and skin-tight.

― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 11:30 (53 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Surely they wore wool, just like cyclists and swimmers of the day.

people seem to arc up about the colour when discussing jerseys and stuff - always going on about fluoro and sponsors logos. possibly more so than the tightness issue!

most ridiculous looking clothes ever in the history of civilization

also watch your hyperbole dude

― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:09 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol watch yr editing "some of the most ridiculous"

and yeah football uniforms are also pretty funny but i only ever see those on tv not on middle aged dudes in prospect park so its just not on an in yr face reality level

its really fine w/me if u love yr cycling outfits - but pretending that people dont find them hilarious will not make it so

in which case i can show critics to the local shopping strip where tasteless tracksuits on the less fit are worn with gay abandon if they want a real horror show (xp)

http://www.rapha.cc

yeah these clothes look so ridiculous

too hilarious 4 me

i dont know if i have the words to describe what it is abt cycling gear - its not just the tightness - but its def one of the most universal derided looks out there

yeah it's that same mentality that forces motorists to break in front of cyclist and throw shit at them

just a messenger here cuts - pretty much everyone who doesnt wear the stuff finds it at least silly ime

yeah it's that same mentality that forces motorists to break in front of cyclist and throw shit at them

― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:40 PM (23 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i really dont think thts it - i dont own a car - i like to ride my bike - but i find cycling gear goofy lookin

http://www.spandex-party.com/

sort of NSFW

im having a hard time believing that youre not aware that its not a popular look

http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2009/03/anti-veloism-weird-creepy-bike-hate.html

hmm, i like non-technical looking semi-technical gear, but that $300 bomber srsly makes me wanna puke. preferably on a rapha bomber jacket.

xpost

im having a hard time believing that you subscribe to such ignorance and would use the term goofy

am thinking of breaking the personal 'no race jerseys until you actually start racing' rule with the la vie claire retro styles, i reckon that's a good look

im having a hard time believing that you subscribe to such ignorance and would use the term goofy

― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ignorance of... the beauty of cycling gear?

that its not a popular look

it is popular. with real cyclists who understand function over form.

'no race jerseys until you actually start racing'

smore like, 'no team kit unless its your team kit' rule, and its a good rule

exception: "andrea peron gave me this csc jersey at a fundraiser, im wearing it."

Old timey simple cycling jerseys are great but the all-over printed goofball PRIMAL WEAR or NASCAR-looking ones are lame.

The "screw you I ain't wearing a BIKE helmet" thing is kind of hilarious on stubborn motorcyclists in helmet law states when they wear those ridiculous little Ming the Merciless skullcaps that apparently meet the bare minimum required by law. You both look incredibly stupid and should you fall you have no head protection so you fail on all counts. It's like a five year old throwing a tantrum.

I am prepared to feel shunned if I ever do drop the money on a replica wool molteni jersey.

it is popular. with real cyclists who understand function over form.

― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:47 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dude already gave u a pass for function ok

yeah i was gonna say, "no race jersey until i'm racing" is the same attitude as "no ~bike helmet until i'm a biker"

like ppl go xc skiing in stuff that isn't skinsuits, but yr a fool if you go in jeans and a sweatshirt

xps

Yeah but there's not really a halfway step for helmets where you don't feel/look pretentious.

oh, i mean that i have a couple jerseys, just not team-branded ones! what hunt3r said basically.

"pretentious!"

i want to live. so pretentious!

Mind you I like looking pretentious so so my fat arse in a TdF green jersey is entirely appropriate.

as long as it's not your fat ass in a KOM jersey

i rly dont care about helmets as long as you wear one, find one youll wear.

however theres plenty good lookin jerseys that arent mock team kit. i mean if you wanna go play pickup in your bird jersey its on you, but you got decent options man.

i will grant that a molteni throwback might garner exception to offered rule. i'll just amend to make it a blanket ed exception and be done with it.

i mean if you wanna go play pickup in your bird jersey its on you

lol

http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2008/11/how-to-look-pro/

DNFTT, dude is like Morbius on the Obama threads.

def agree that fluorescent spandex w/ sponsor logos all over looks ridiculous. there are some non-goofy cycling clothes tho. it's more the floro and the sponsor shit that looks dumb.

tho wrt helmets, they really don't look goofy at all imo. i had a hard time wearing one at first but then i realized that 1. i could die and 2. i don't give a second glance to anyone else wearing a helmet, so why should i feel ridiculous in it?

the real winners are the dudes riding around nyc, brakeless and helmetless

in tight jeans

running red lights

the thing that looks funny abt bicycle helmets is how theyre just sitting on the v top of yr head - someone should design one for the more casual user - most people prob dont give a shit abt the various aerodynamic benefits

in america in general i think the dream of mass bicycle adoption has been somewhat undermined by the fact that cycle design and culture is lead by the hardcore cohort - obvs there are more important factors too - like governmental indifference and aggression - but i do think more people would be amenable to getting into riding if almost everything wasnt abt going fast or riding over boulders and shit

naked dude on subway lycraman: i'm not ashamed of my body outfit!
seinfeld: THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM RIGHT THERE

I dunno if helmets are seen as "goofy" like spandex is, but they're def more common on novice riders and "pro" riders -- in the middle is where it gets confusing. Like, you're not going far and you're not concerned about traffic on your little sidestreets, but technically anything could happen so do you want to tempt fate to ride 5 blocks to your friend's house or is it just too ridic to worry about it?

i wear a bike helmet, but i think skater helmets look cool (didn't know they were less effective, if that's the case?).

nothing wrong with spandex i guess, but it definitely has the air of "seriousness" which prevents me from wearing it.

theres a study that shows that the barometer of a community's cycling friendliness is direct correlation w/ the % of women on bikes. if that's relevant to the point about ppl being averse to hardcore cyclists.

i dint state that at all well.

what i meant is that if we had better cycling infrastructure, more ppl would ride, not just a bunch of fringey weirdos who are mostly dudes

and helmets wld be nice?

i mean laurel i get that, and will zip to my sister's house v occasionally w/o helmet, but most of the time i'm like wait it is just not that onerous to wear a helmet for five minutes as i ride somewhere

i will make exceptions, tho: i live 50m from a cross-town bike path that runs pretty much to the door of a good venue (triple rock). if i didn't want to keep track of a helmet at a show, i'd feel OK going without

yeah on the one hand, there's a huge change with parenting and kids and helmet safety. my nieces don't get on the barbie bike to go up and down the block w/o the pink bell from target, whereas i went all over hell and gone on my haro fsx as a young lad w/o anything on my head but the sunshine.

on the other hand, this is what they always said about soccer. all the kids are playing it! it's gonna take over!! since the young end of today's hipsters were born in the EARLY 90s (this is somewhat horrifying to me btw) you'd think the change wd already be visible

anyway i guess i'm talking about helmet vs no helmet, no the wearing of skate helmets which is a fashiony cop-out obv

skate helmets are "i heard about that one guy who got clipped by a delivery van last fall, but i am definitely not one of those fakeass livestrong middle manager fuckfaces"

ice craem styles

lol i do luv the king of the mountains jersey