gotta say i find the skater helmet somewhat displeasing to the eye
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
^^^
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
it's the same reaction i get when people are so turned off by lycra like it's AIDS
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
suggested to my sister (who's just borrowed a bike off her boyfriend's mum) that she may want to invest in some knicks for longer rides. "OH I'D RATHER DIE." whatever, chafe on then!
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
exactly. wtf?
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:51 (sixteen years ago)
it's like there's a fear that you look like you're trying, or something!
also i am a happy convert to the bibs lately.
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:56 (sixteen years ago)
I really want to get a summer bib, I love my winter bib tights.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:04 (sixteen years ago)
http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/b/0/0/13/6/AAAAC6BbWHkAAAAAABNliQ.jpg
does this count?
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:05 (sixteen years ago)
that lazer commuter helmet is pretty weird looking imo.
― cialis morissette (goole), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)
some ppl need to avoid lycra like its aids rly
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)
totally
― how rad bandit (gbx), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
cycling outfits are some of the most ridiculous looking clothes ever in the history of civilization - totally fine w/me if you want to wear them for the functionality - my running shoes look like spaceships - but pretending that you have no idea why someone might not want to look like that to the point that you need to impugn their motivation is just willfully clueless
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)
how are they ridiculous? shorts and a jersey. basketball uniforms are less ridiculous because they are baggy and not form fitting?
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
football uniforms are less ridiculous how? they wear tights.
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
most ridiculous looking clothes ever in the history of civilization
also watch your hyperbole dude
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
i only impugn the motivation of people that want to go on long, exercisey bike rides but then don't like it because they got sweaty in their normal clothes and under their unventilated helmet
also, w/r/t helmets specifically: yeah, i sorta ~do think that choosing between skate/normal helmet on the grounds of looks is a decision that hinges on whether or not someone wants to look like a "biker," not that skate helmets are inherently less ridiculous looking. because, as demonstrated here, bikers are snobby tools who don't want you in their club, and if you've got an areo-looking speed helmet you'd better be able to match it with SPEED and SERIOUSNESS
no matter what, you're going to end up with some plasticky blob on your head, may as well get the one that FEELS the least like you've got a plasticky blob on your head
― how rad bandit (gbx), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:10 (sixteen years ago)
making the choice to wear a helmet in general is a big step. but once that decision is made, i am amazed that some people are just like--"YEAH, I'LL START WEARING A HELMET-BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL I WEAR A CYCLING HELMET. TAKE THAT!"
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R2yHiPgsajA/SVEwIO69-DI/AAAAAAAAAlM/2h6DcfkkQS0/s400/wampum,pa+basketball+uniform+1957.jpg
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)
skate helmets: meant to withstand multiple impacts because u r crashin all the time
bike helmets: meant to withstand ONE much, much more massive impact
if your doing tricks and falling over or generally just ringing your bell a lot, get a skate helmet
if you want to be comfortable on the way to work, get a bike helmet. they're both gonna fuck up your hair, and make you look like a spaceman when you go into the store, who cares
― how rad bandit (gbx), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)
maybe all the nyc fixies are on their way to an imaginary halfpipe
― am0n, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)
if your doing tricks and falling over or generally just ringing your bell a lot, stop riding a bike
^ fixed
― am0n, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
lol
― how rad bandit (gbx), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
loved it when the womens' b-ball league out here mandated the use of lycra suits
my friend who played in the leage at that time, i think she was loving it a good deal less
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
Spandex" is a generic name and not derived from the chemical name of the fiber, as are most manufactured fibers, but an anagram of the word expands.[1] "Spandex" is the preferred name in North America; in many European countries it is referred to as "elastane".
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)
omg surfers look sooooooooo ridiculous. i'm totally going surfing this weekend, but you sure as shit ain't gonna find me in a fucking wetsuit.
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
Apparel and clothing articles where stretch is desired, generally for comfort and fit, such as: athletic, aerobic, and exercise apparel wetsuits swimsuits/bathing suits competitive swimwear netball bodysuits bra straps and side panels ski pants disco jeansslacks hosiery leggings socks diapers skinny jeans belts underwear dance belts worn by male ballet dancers and others
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
guys, competitive swimmers wear lycra bikini bottoms and shave their entire body.
(not really true they wear those "controversial" body suits now)
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
are they for real with 'disco jeans', please say yes
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
mind blown:
In comic books, superheroes and superheroines commonly wear costumes thought to be made of spandex. However, early superhero comics predate the invention of spandex (Superman: 1938; Batman: 1939; Captain America: 1941). Printing processes for early color comics only rendered images with distinctly separate solid blocks of color well, because overprinting and color mixing yielded inconsistent results and bad looking muddy colors. Because spandex is skintight, as many superhero costumes appear to be drawn, and because spandex is almost exclusively made in similarly bright solid colors, the after-the-fact assumption of spandex composition was made. The same assumption of costume composition is also made for latex and rubber garments, which are also typically solid in color and skin-tight.
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)
i think i told this story before on ILX but my tri uniform (way back when) bottoms were navy blue speedos that had the Bud Light logo across the crotch and I asked my coach if I he had any regular Bud ones.
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)
mind blown:In comic books, superheroes and superheroines commonly wear costumes thought to be made of spandex. However, early superhero comics predate the invention of spandex (Superman: 1938; Batman: 1939; Captain America: 1941). Printing processes for early color comics only rendered images with distinctly separate solid blocks of color well, because overprinting and color mixing yielded inconsistent results and bad looking muddy colors. Because spandex is skintight, as many superhero costumes appear to be drawn, and because spandex is almost exclusively made in similarly bright solid colors, the after-the-fact assumption of spandex composition was made. The same assumption of costume composition is also made for latex and rubber garments, which are also typically solid in color and skin-tight.― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 11:30 (53 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 11:30 (53 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Surely they wore wool, just like cyclists and swimmers of the day.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:32 (sixteen years ago)
people seem to arc up about the colour when discussing jerseys and stuff - always going on about fluoro and sponsors logos. possibly more so than the tightness issue!
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:09 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol watch yr editing "some of the most ridiculous"
and yeah football uniforms are also pretty funny but i only ever see those on tv not on middle aged dudes in prospect park so its just not on an in yr face reality level
its really fine w/me if u love yr cycling outfits - but pretending that people dont find them hilarious will not make it so
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
in which case i can show critics to the local shopping strip where tasteless tracksuits on the less fit are worn with gay abandon if they want a real horror show (xp)
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.rapha.cc
yeah these clothes look so ridiculous
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
too hilarious 4 me
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
i dont know if i have the words to describe what it is abt cycling gear - its not just the tightness - but its def one of the most universal derided looks out there
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
yeah it's that same mentality that forces motorists to break in front of cyclist and throw shit at them
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
just a messenger here cuts - pretty much everyone who doesnt wear the stuff finds it at least silly ime
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:40 PM (23 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i really dont think thts it - i dont own a car - i like to ride my bike - but i find cycling gear goofy lookin
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.spandex-party.com/
sort of NSFW
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)
im having a hard time believing that youre not aware that its not a popular look
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2009/03/anti-veloism-weird-creepy-bike-hate.html
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
hmm, i like non-technical looking semi-technical gear, but that $300 bomber srsly makes me wanna puke. preferably on a rapha bomber jacket.
xpost
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
im having a hard time believing that you subscribe to such ignorance and would use the term goofy
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
am thinking of breaking the personal 'no race jerseys until you actually start racing' rule with the la vie claire retro styles, i reckon that's a good look
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
― cutty, Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:44 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
ignorance of... the beauty of cycling gear?
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)
that its not a popular look
it is popular. with real cyclists who understand function over form.
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
'no race jerseys until you actually start racing'
smore like, 'no team kit unless its your team kit' rule, and its a good rule
exception: "andrea peron gave me this csc jersey at a fundraiser, im wearing it."
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
Old timey simple cycling jerseys are great but the all-over printed goofball PRIMAL WEAR or NASCAR-looking ones are lame.
The "screw you I ain't wearing a BIKE helmet" thing is kind of hilarious on stubborn motorcyclists in helmet law states when they wear those ridiculous little Ming the Merciless skullcaps that apparently meet the bare minimum required by law. You both look incredibly stupid and should you fall you have no head protection so you fail on all counts. It's like a five year old throwing a tantrum.
― joygoat, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
nope, i was riding a brakeless track bike without a helmet through red lights wearing jeans
then i joined fixed-gear anonymous, a recovery group for idiots
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:38 (sixteen years ago)
in clipless pedals iirc
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)
without a helmet through red lights wearing jeans
lol that's me except i have brakes n gears ;)
― am0n, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)
yeah. i came from recreational MTB so i was already used to clipless pedals and found clips and straps didn't give me the power or control i wanted.
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)
http://star.txstate.edu/content/fixed-gear-biking-just-useless-fad
― cutty, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)
that is gold
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)
as much as i enjoy baggin on some fixies
hey GET OFF MY LAWN!
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)
Is fixed gear so bad? The trends are horrible, but you don't have to wear all the crap. And there's no reason not to have two brakes. I know we've had the discussion elsewhere, but I find mine nice to ride and relatively low maintenance. And it leaves my road bike nice and fresh for out of town rides on my days off.
I know that some of that argument is slightly disingenuous - clipless, brakeless cyclists weaving selfishly through understandably peeved pedestrians is the more usual look, but - there is another way.
As for clothing -
I used to treasure my long sleeved woollen CTC top, until it became unwearable. T-shirt and lycra shorts for long rides in the summer. Leggings/tights in the winter, and a peaked hat with ear flaps that makes me look like far more of an idiot than any helmet ever would, but which keeps my ears warm and most importantly, keeps the rain off my glasses. And a very nice long sleeve Rapha top that I got as a Christmas present a couple of years ago that is really warm but not sweaty.
Oh and a gore-tex jacket. And gloves. My hands get freezing. Overshoes for long rides. Because my toes get even colder than my fingers.
― GamalielRatsey, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)
cycling gear is goofy looking, no shit. big-ass helmets and tight lycra; hardly hitting the style blogs w/tht get up. but the rub is: ur exercising; if u care abt wht u look like while ur exercising then ur pretty silly
― pineapple expressionist (webinar), Thursday, 22 October 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
I think I look pretty good in lycra
/confession
― Mark C, Friday, 23 October 2009 10:23 (sixteen years ago)
today i rolled into downtown thinking on this, "i dont really think i see too much of this phenomenon. maybe its a nyc/big city thing. i'll keep my eyes out for it." the NEXT GUY I SAW, 15 secs later. flat bar fixie 20something.
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Friday, 23 October 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
ha!
― cutty, Friday, 23 October 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)
"cycling gear is goofy looking, no shit. big-ass helmets and tight lycra; hardly hitting the style blogs w/tht get up. but the rub is: ur exercising; if u care abt wht u look like while ur exercising then ur pretty silly"
This is the truth. But it's also why, when riding for the purpose of transportation around town, you're allowed to wear normal, good-looking clothes.
― lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 October 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
you've reversed the argument
― cutty, Friday, 23 October 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)
It's a rhetorical trick.
― lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 October 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
Er I mean, to be more serious, that I would understand there being different modes of riding, one of which is exclusively for exercise, over long distances, for which it's more important to be comfortable than stylish, and another is your basic short-distance, low-pressure around-town riding, for which you want to look good at your destination.I'm taking it as a given that most spandex riding gear is not stylish. The stuff on the link you posted above actually looked pretty good, but it's still "stylish biking clothing" and not "stylish clothing." Like I wouldn't just wear it out to the bar or whatever.And it's expensive!
― lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 October 2009 17:11 (sixteen years ago)
And yes, both modes of riding demand a helmet (at least in the city), and skate helmets seem like a weird bet-hedge.
― lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 October 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)
imo its ok to look sexy while exercising
― ice cr?m, Friday, 23 October 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
poxymoron
― coz (webinar), Friday, 23 October 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)
cycling gear is goofy looking, no shit. big-ass helmets and tight lycra; hardly hitting the style blogs w/tht get up.
i doubt you'll be hitting any style blog in the near future but yeah I'm rocking my new PAUL SMITH/RAPHA kit for tomorrow's century ride dawg.
titehttp://www.kitmeout.com/img_assets/paul-smith-jeans.jpg
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 23 October 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)
in black btw
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 23 October 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)
tht's me in the picture, so - pwned
― coz (webinar), Friday, 23 October 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
I'm white btw
(nice)
― coz (webinar), Friday, 23 October 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
rapha condor man and brit road race champ k. house was rocking the all-white kit last week. not down with the white shorts as a rule but it was working for him!
― lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Friday, 23 October 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)
eah I'm rocking my new PAUL SMITH/RAPHA kit for tomorrow's century ride dawg.
tite
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, October 23, 2009 1:41 PM
pink union jacks? cryingeagle.jpg
― am0n, Friday, 23 October 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
well its paul smith, i'm just happy there aren't tonal stripes everywhere tbh
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 23 October 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
fixed-gear-biking-just-useless-fad: "yeah no brakes, 1 gear, been there and done that when I was 3 whatever"ha!
― graaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaave architecture (jdchurchill), Friday, 23 October 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)
im sympathetic to the fixie hate but one cool thing is how easy they are to maintain
― ice cr?m, Friday, 23 October 2009 22:12 (sixteen years ago)
fixed gear bikes are great imo.
for one thing they've almost killed off ppl on mtn bikes in the city.
― honesty is not ordinary to the height of the bunny hop (Hunt3r), Friday, 23 October 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)
i aint tryin to hate on fixiesi just think thats funny
― graaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaave architecture (jdchurchill), Friday, 23 October 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)