only the non-transparent bit is clickable??! this is MENTAL!
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 4 December 2008 02:42 (fourteen years ago) link
Mac OS X = nightmare
― I'm Ted Bell (libcrypt), Thursday, 4 December 2008 03:21 (fourteen years ago) link
i'm talking about IE6 on windows, there is no IE6 for mac
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 4 December 2008 15:55 (fourteen years ago) link
I've stopped using transparent pngs as I've not been able to make them truly transparent without an IE6 work around stylesheet.
How are you doing it?
― La Push It (Susan), Thursday, 4 December 2008 15:57 (fourteen years ago) link
with an IE6 workaround stylesheet :(
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 4 December 2008 17:04 (fourteen years ago) link
i should stop being stubborn, i'm using a .png just because i feel like i Should Be Able To
i mean fuck, they were talking about integrating pngs into browser specs in NINETY NINETY SIX
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 4 December 2008 17:05 (fourteen years ago) link
I meant that OS X has a similar UI philosophy with regard to transparency and clickability.
― ＰＡＮＴＹＭＡＮ (libcrypt), Thursday, 4 December 2008 17:32 (fourteen years ago) link
which browser?
― La Push It (Susan), Thursday, 4 December 2008 18:24 (fourteen years ago) link
i never use .png. fuck a ie hack
― craig sager (eman), Thursday, 4 December 2008 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link
wait are you talking about a button using a transparent png for background? you could try styling the anchor tag with a height and width and position:relative http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=530067
― craig sager (eman), Thursday, 4 December 2008 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link
Really, way too much trouble.
― La Push It (Susan), Thursday, 4 December 2008 22:11 (fourteen years ago) link
no, it's just a normal image in HTML, surrounded by an anchor tag. thanks for the good idea though!
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 7 December 2008 02:07 (fourteen years ago) link