can gr80 be unbanned

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

mistakes were made, videos were deleted, apologies were made and accepted. can we possibly move forward now and not in 59 days?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 14:47 (eight years ago) Permalink

cosign

markers, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 14:48 (eight years ago) Permalink

^^

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile (dayo), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 14:48 (eight years ago) Permalink

.

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 14:48 (eight years ago) Permalink

/

The Managing Director of Being (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 14:49 (eight years ago) Permalink

yes.

haircrüt 100 (kkvgz), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 14:50 (eight years ago) Permalink

I have no idea what this is about (77 mischief, I imagine), but gr80 is gr8 , please unban.

StanM, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:01 (eight years ago) Permalink

hey I like gr80 as much as the next guy but it's kinda lame when somebody does something 100% banworthy and everybody gets all "aww c'mon, he's a bro, he gets to do bullshit things we wouldn't tolerate from other people"

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:08 (eight years ago) Permalink

the no non-77 stuff on 77 rule i totally understand and it should be enforced.

the no 77 stuff on non-77 is really only of concern to the kind of zingers that post on 77, most of whom have a pretty thick skin. so i'm not really clear on who this kind of extreme punishment is supposed to benefit.

and if the offense is weird off-ilx crepeness, this seems like a totally ott trigger-finger bedwetty definition of crepeness (esp. given the posters involved), unless something else happened.

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:08 (eight years ago) Permalink

xp yeah i mean i kind of argued that very point elsewhere but i think it may be appropriate to at least bring this down from 60

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:10 (eight years ago) Permalink

[Removed Illegal Link]

^^ admin log - explains it neatly

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:11 (eight years ago) Permalink

You can't make this dude miss Rocktober 4.

http://tinyurl.com/vrrr0000m (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:11 (eight years ago) Permalink

Grady has not been intolerable to 51 people though, or even to markers. Markers is totally cool now that gr80 has been offboard apologetic about the thing.

haircrüt 100 (kkvgz), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:11 (eight years ago) Permalink

lol well you can find the admin log I guess

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:12 (eight years ago) Permalink

what that explains is that the unknown anonymous poster gets tempbanned for a few days, and when they figure out who did it, they change that to 60 days?

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:12 (eight years ago) Permalink

I think I made it clear on 77 that this is 100% cleared up as far as I'm concerned and that I personally think gr8080 should be unbanned immediately.

markers, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:14 (eight years ago) Permalink

a regular posing as "anonymous poster" does add something - idk seems kinda extra-nefarious to me

maybe tho we should just buy gr80 a snidely whiplash disguise and force him to wear it on the wdyll thread - should I poll this idea

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:14 (eight years ago) Permalink

don't think we need a poll to know where we stand on that idea

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:15 (eight years ago) Permalink

xxpost: ... if he does 80 push-ups and uploads video proof to youtube.

StanM, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:16 (eight years ago) Permalink

the principle of putting ilx (esp 77) stuff on youtube is wrong but the content was innocuous enough to let it pass w/ a warning rly

The Managing Director of Being (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:19 (eight years ago) Permalink

don't think we need a poll to know where we stand on that idea

fantastic, the motion passes

gr80 if yr reading you can buy the disguise yrself and bill the thread or let us know where to send it

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:20 (eight years ago) Permalink

I have no idea what happened but can't you make youtube vids private-ish?

ಠ_ಠ (bnw), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:21 (eight years ago) Permalink

since gr8080 seems to have some weird ilx vendetta against me, i want to start this out by saying that i was not the one who made the call on the length of the ban. that being said, i think theres some stuff that isnt really being addressed by people here.

1. the no 77 off 77 needs to either be a hard and fast rule or not. tbh a private board is kind of a massive mod policy headache as i think yall know, but there have been enough good arguments for it and uses of it that it is pretty entrenched right now imo. if thats the case, stuff like this where 77 stuff gets reposted off ilx entirely needs to be like 1000% off limits.

2. its pretty obvious that gr80 knew it was off limits, because he used a sock puppet to make the post. so it isnt as if he didnt think it was objectionable, he just thought he could find a way to do it without being caught.

3. i have no idea whether the mods as a whole are interested in any relaxation of the length of the site wide ban. i am sure that this sort of behavior (no matter who the poster in question is) will result in an absolute and irreversible ban from 77.

the great aussie ballkicking vids (jjjusten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:23 (eight years ago) Permalink

I have no idea what happened but can't you make youtube vids private-ish?

not if you wanna post 'em inline on a thread.

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:24 (eight years ago) Permalink

I don't have a problem with a single post of mine or whatever being quoted somewhere outside of ILX if it's about something non-77 and non-personal, like music or whatever. I've seen critics link to and discuss ILM offboard before, and I've paraphrased music-related stuff people have said on ILM offboard before too. It was just the context of the whole thing. But that's all I have to say, really. Unban gr8080.

markers, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:25 (eight years ago) Permalink

You guys realize that you are arguing that creating a sockpuppet account, putting it on a private board, pulling information targeted at one poster including said poster's home town and compiling it into a Youtube video that is later reposted to the board shouldn't be a bannable offense because the guy who did it is your friend, right?

Monkeys? Um, no. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:27 (eight years ago) Permalink

markers is being pathetic imo

l'avventura: pet detective (history mayne), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:28 (eight years ago) Permalink

not my friend

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:28 (eight years ago) Permalink

xxp yes? that's kind of the point?

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:29 (eight years ago) Permalink

I'm just going to quote what I wrote on 77:

I had no idea gr8080 made that video until later in the day.

Basically, I checked 77, and a user I didn't recognize at all had posted a YouTube video that was comprised of a bunch of posts of mine, a lot, if not all, of which I had posted to 77. I wasn't comfortable with all of those posts being taken off board and made into a video, especially by someone I didn't know and without my permission. So, I wrote the following request to the mods, which I think was reasonable: 77 posts used outside of ILX

That was it. I didn't ask for anyone to be banned, and I would've been totally cool with gr8080 just taking down the video.

― markers, Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:23 AM (1 hour ago)

and

Dudes, I totally agree that my posting about junk food so much was completely tedious, and I'll drop it. I'm working on cutting back on bullshit, extraneous posts in general. But as far as my reaction goes, there was a pretty specific context to it that I already explained, and I don't think I overreacted.

I just got a really nice message from gr8080 off board and, anyway, I'm a fan of him and don't think he should be banned either.

― markers, Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:34 AM (54 minutes ago)

markers, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:29 (eight years ago) Permalink

just to be clear, markers, no one thinks that gr8080 is banned because of you. or if they do they are being a little dense about the whole thing.

the great aussie ballkicking vids (jjjusten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:32 (eight years ago) Permalink

the way I break it down is that there was no malicious intent. to me (and I saw the original) it was done just for cheap lols (and in hindsight, misguided). no harm, no foul, imo, even if rules were broken and it was knowingly done in violation of the rules.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile (dayo), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:34 (eight years ago) Permalink

nah, gr80 isn't rly my friend and i'm sure we could get someone else to cover for his tropical bro schtick, but i think the content was pretty inoffensive (and i don't think 'someone who eats high carb foodstuffs' in x town is incriminatory information)

now it's off youtube, the precedent of no 77 content offsite is reaffirmed pretty clearly and gr80 presumably recognizes it was a shit idea, 60 days seems excessive

The Managing Director of Being (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:34 (eight years ago) Permalink

to clarify, markers is being pathetic with all this special pleading for grady to be unbanned

it's 60 days, who gives a shit?

cankles, jw, and dom were 86'd for ever

l'avventura: pet detective (history mayne), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:34 (eight years ago) Permalink

seriously, jon's offense was exponentially less egregious and he was banned forever

fuck noOoOO (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:36 (eight years ago) Permalink

i'm sure we could get someone else to cover for his tropical bro schtick

lol

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:36 (eight years ago) Permalink

cankles is gone for good?

fuck noOoOO (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:37 (eight years ago) Permalink

What exactly did jon do, anyway? I know he hacked ilx somehow, but what?

haircrüt 100 (kkvgz), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:37 (eight years ago) Permalink

if "he's a bro" means "the board likes his posts" means "quality content" then I don't think its some miscarriage of justice to consider that as a factor. but how much of a factor when you break borad policy is up to mods.

xposts r.i.p. the big 3

ಠ_ಠ (bnw), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:38 (eight years ago) Permalink

xxp: cankles had like 8 chances and kept getting 51'd!

haircrüt 100 (kkvgz), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:38 (eight years ago) Permalink

to clarify, markers is being pathetic with all this special pleading for grady to be unbanned

it's 60 days, who gives a shit?

cankles, jw, and dom were 86'd for ever

the "why are we invading iraq, we should be invading north korea first" of concern trolling

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:38 (eight years ago) Permalink

gone for good:

dom, jw, cankles, chaki, gabbneb, luna

('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:38 (eight years ago) Permalink

i just had the realization that now that Dom, Ethan, JW and cankles are all gone, I'm the board asshole now :(

fuck noOoOO (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:39 (eight years ago) Permalink

oh like you don't love it

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:39 (eight years ago) Permalink

;)

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:39 (eight years ago) Permalink

no! it makes me think i'm next!

fuck noOoOO (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:40 (eight years ago) Permalink

I would be much more amenable to shortening the ban had gr8080 posted under his actual name when he put up that Youtube video; it's not like he isn't known for doing creepy weird things off-board with other ILXors names anyway (I'm sure most of you are friends with him on Facebook; ever notice the URL he chose for his profile?). The fact that he did this under a sockpuppet account shows either a stunning lack of judgment or recognition that what he was doing could most charitably be described as "shady".

People have done things like making Red Meat or Xtranormal movies out of posts on regular, googlable ILX for years; it's not particularly nice but it's never been information that was intentionally hidden from general public consumption and, as such, hasn't been acted on by any of the site's moderators. If there are more instances of 77 information being spread around the Internet without poster consent, please let us know.

Also, the original conversation among the mods was "permaban or 60 days?"

xp: lol Whiney/cad

Monkeys? Um, no. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:40 (eight years ago) Permalink

whiney you're WAY too thin-skinned to be the board asshole and I mean that as a compliment

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:40 (eight years ago) Permalink

The two constant governing principles of 77 have always been "what happens on 77 stays on 77," and "no using 77 as a private place to talk about non-77ers behind their back." Since the earliest days of that board, there have been little transgressions of these rules and it's never clear whether they're simple mistakes or somebody saying "fuck it, I'm doing this thing and if I get called on it, I get called on it and what are they going to do, ban me?" Here's the deal -- it's not okay -- not even when you do it, whoever you are, even though you're a total bro, don't mean ill to anybody and don't hate fun. You just can't do it without a ban! And it's going to be an attention-getting ban, not a couple of days.

In "Bob" There Is No East or West (WmC), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:41 (eight years ago) Permalink

(I'm sure most of you are friends with him on Facebook; ever notice the URL he chose for his profile?).

ILX has a board moderator who's done the same thing? Is that person creepy and weird?

Besides, anyone who believes that 77 is hidden from the outside world in the first place is absolutely clueless.

http://tinyurl.com/vrrr0000m (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:41 (eight years ago) Permalink

other people are against making 77 public because what will be next, 78? it's a slippery slope

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:55 (eight years ago) Permalink

chaki's on 77?

I find this kind of unsurprising tbh

Monkeys? Um, no. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:55 (eight years ago) Permalink

I WRITE FOR GWRAWKR SO ALL MY LAUNDRY IS PUBELIC, IT IS 2010, READ YOUR EMILY GOULD BLOG

― fuck noOoOO (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:53 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i dont even know what this means

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:56 (eight years ago) Permalink

Within the first month, mods were moving 77 threads over to ILE to prove a point after a non-77er got mentioned. For me, that was the precedent that 77 was never going to be some sort of private vacuum.

http://tinyurl.com/vrrr0000m (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:56 (eight years ago) Permalink

to clarify, markers is being pathetic pretty nice with all this special pleading for grady to be unbanned

it's 60 days, who gives a shit?

cankles, jw, and dom were 86'd for ever

― l'avventura: pet detective (history mayne), Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:34 AM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

master of retardment (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:56 (eight years ago) Permalink

btw for a private board with people posting shit they don't want others to see:

Could I possibly see 77 please?

― Nicholas Passant, Monday, September 27, 2010 3:30 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark

Similarly myself.

― Inspector Anthony Slade, Monday, September 27, 2010 3:30 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark

you're both on; inspector you're new to ilx?

― Muscus ex Craneo Humano (forksclovetofu), Monday, September 27, 2010 4:29 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark

Hi

― the questeon, Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:22 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

Hi, Could I please?

― yuoowemeone, Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:44 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark

May I? (I asked before... maybe I am on already, dunno how to tell?)

― Volvo Twilight (p-dog), Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:30 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark

who are these people?

('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:57 (eight years ago) Permalink

cops

aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:57 (eight years ago) Permalink

Like others said, I'm pretty sure Grady's not losing any sleep over this. It's not that big a deal. Jeez. He hinted recently that he was going to be taking another vacation from ILX so maybe that was sorta the plan all along.

master of retardment (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:58 (eight years ago) Permalink

I know who p-dog is, but no one after Inspector Anthony Slade has actually been added to 77 yet

Monkeys? Um, no. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:58 (eight years ago) Permalink

http://www.sheilaomalley.com/archives/cagney8.jpg

('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:59 (eight years ago) Permalink

Also - the only thing I care about on 77 being public is that thread I had discussing my last job. Now that I'm sort of realizing it's not as private as we thought (stupid to think it was but I'm gullible and trusting to a fault) I feel kind of weird about it.

master of retardment (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 15:59 (eight years ago) Permalink

who are these people?

― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:57 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dunno about the rest of them but anthony slade is an eccentric and well-regarded scotland yard detective inspector (played by leslie banks) who solved the famed "arsenal stadium mystery"

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:00 (eight years ago) Permalink

i missed u max

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:00 (eight years ago) Permalink

i thought the point of 77 wasnt that it was private just that it was ungoogleable

but wtf do i know

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:00 (eight years ago) Permalink

heres the double edged sword modwise about the who are these people question -

if we let everybody in, we get stuff like chaki reposting shit because he got in under an unknown sock or whatever.

if we lock the doors against anyone who asks that isnt a prominent known ilxor, we get an endless tedious shit fit about 77 as exclusive cool kids club

like i said, moderation issues wrt 77 are a pain in the ass

the great aussie ballkicking vids (jjjusten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:01 (eight years ago) Permalink

who are these people?

― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:57 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

cops

― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:57 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i laughed. out loud.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:01 (eight years ago) Permalink

also 77 max sucks now

world class wrecking (crüt), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:02 (eight years ago) Permalink

also thx to all this 77 is currently set to only admins can add users fyi

the great aussie ballkicking vids (jjjusten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:02 (eight years ago) Permalink

aw crut we don't want our youth brigade to schism at this delicate time :(

with gr8080 gone who will be our pied piper now

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:03 (eight years ago) Permalink

...

('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:03 (eight years ago) Permalink

jesus christ

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:04 (eight years ago) Permalink

i dont want to be anywhere near your schism louis

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:04 (eight years ago) Permalink

as for curtis, well, hes just jealous that I LOVE CRICKET: THE CHINATOWN OF ILX: THE CHINATOWN OF ILX is the facebook to 77s myspace

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:04 (eight years ago) Permalink

i say delete all of 77

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:04 (eight years ago) Permalink

lets start afresh

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:04 (eight years ago) Permalink

pure as newly-driven snow

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:05 (eight years ago) Permalink

The Secret Borad, coming to theaters near you

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:05 (eight years ago) Permalink

you're all running scared of ☰☰☭☰☰ SHEFFIELD UNITED ☰☰☭☰☰ THE OFFICIAL THREAD ☰☰☭☰☰

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:06 (eight years ago) Permalink

ilxor.com/sandbox still the secretest ILX borad

world class wrecking (crüt), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:07 (eight years ago) Permalink

and max doesn't really suck obv

world class wrecking (crüt), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:08 (eight years ago) Permalink

btw why wasnt i consulted on the formation of "i love soccer"

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:08 (eight years ago) Permalink

there was a vote in re: its creation, but all the ballots came with flyers saying "vote for ismael"

caek, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:09 (eight years ago) Permalink

someday well look back on the moment it was created as a turning point in the decline and fall of ilx

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:10 (eight years ago) Permalink

the trojan horse of ilx

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:10 (eight years ago) Permalink

I mourn the passing of Speakeasy: The Board For Appreciating Shed Seven, a board deliberately created with such an unappealing name that no one would ever click there and see what was going on.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:12 (eight years ago) Permalink

thought the point of 77 wasnt that it was private just that it was ungoogleable

but wtf do i know

― max, Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:00 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

this is the assumption that I've been working on, i.e. it's pretty clear that anybody with an e-mail address can find their way to 77 with a post on the request thread. the big comfort is knowing that my posting pics of avatar porn is not going to find its way into google (hello future employers)

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile (dayo), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:14 (eight years ago) Permalink

you know I cant help but think of harbl's post a few days before I made my way onto 77 that the big secret is that 77 just isn't very good. I had visions of homer in chocolateland but really it's like wandering into your uncle's damp and dark basement.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile (dayo), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:15 (eight years ago) Permalink

no opinion except using a sock was crappy

kind of think the access to 77 thread shld be locked so ppl can ask when it comes up in conversation, or ask abt it & be told they just have to ask. means u have to read the boards a bit, is all, maybe even take part in them.

i know ppl wanted my opinion on this urgently.

zvookster, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:16 (eight years ago) Permalink

need a suggest 77 button

ಠ_ಠ (bnw), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:16 (eight years ago) Permalink

it's pretty clear that anybody with an e-mail address can find their way to 77

yeah well this is def a policy that i think is about to come under extreme scrutiny.

the great aussie ballkicking vids (jjjusten), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:18 (eight years ago) Permalink

77 golden age seems over but i still like the residue

zvookster, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:18 (eight years ago) Permalink

As much comedy gold as this thread allows, it's getting locked shortly, so:

1) To answer the thread question: No, grady is serving out the 60. markers is not responsible for this; it's a mod decision. I like grady but even i think the youtube thing was crepey. That said, it wasn't actively malevolent and that's certainly the core reason he didn't pull a permaban.
2) 77 is, for the foreseeable future, remaining a "secret" board, i.e. invite only (though the bar for an invite, at least for the moment, isn't much higher than knowing enough to ask to get in and willingness to play by the rules) and ungooglable.
3) Whenever you post anything on the web, it is no longer secret.
4) It is a major dick move to reference or republish material posted in a board that you asked to enter with the understanding that no one wants you to reference or republish material from that board, regardless of whether it's about your eating habits or your finances.

Muscus ex Craneo Humano (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:19 (eight years ago) Permalink

The requirements should be a minimum of 100 posts, at least five albums YSI'ed, a +1 ranking of over 50 and a username registration over three months old.

And that's just to see the pic's.

http://tinyurl.com/vrrr0000m (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:19 (eight years ago) Permalink

lol

master of retardment (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:21 (eight years ago) Permalink

ps. Mod community is going to take a brief hiatus on accepting new 77 posters while we discus general guidelines that'll hopefully please the greatest number of people and best serve the borad.

Muscus ex Craneo Humano (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:23 (eight years ago) Permalink

feel like we all learned something here

max, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:23 (eight years ago) Permalink

i say delete all of 77

― max, Wednesday, September 29, 2010 5:04 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark

^^^^ i agree

delete it then make it public

l'avventura: pet detective (history mayne), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:24 (eight years ago) Permalink

Only the best 77 ILX posters should be on 77.

StanM, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:24 (eight years ago) Permalink

logan's ban

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:25 (eight years ago) Permalink

i think we're cool here, i'll be doing a post thread interview over at 77; diplo will be djing and there's free natty ice till 3am so we'll see you there.

Muscus ex Craneo Humano (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:26 (eight years ago) Permalink


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.