Is making weak jokes at semi-popular ILX posters now considered "meta"?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I ask this because half the threads on COGH have been deleted due to this magic "meta" rules because they had some weak jokes aimed at the likes of Bimble and l0u1s jagg3r. Which could be considered a meta joke in itself, so maybe you might want to delete this thread?

Thanks for reading!

Everybody Wants To Shag King Boy Pato (King Boy Pato), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:38 (fourteen years ago) link

phil don't be thick

jump in the looool (electricsound), Friday, 15 May 2009 15:04 (fourteen years ago) link

but its so hard for him to be thin!!

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 15 May 2009 15:07 (fourteen years ago) link

I lost 12kg in the last four months!

But I would like to know what the rules are. If I am to post a thread that mentions any ILX poster living or dead in any context, should I expect said thread to be deleted and myself shipping off to gulag?

Everybody Wants To Shag King Boy Pato (King Boy Pato), Friday, 15 May 2009 15:16 (fourteen years ago) link

There is an outline of the rules here. Essentially, if you start a thread that isn't obviously complimentary about another ILXer (eg Estela appreciation thread), you have to be prepared for the possibility of it being deleted. Not least because the poster in question has requested it. This doesn't necessarily mean it WILL be deleted, but it might well happen, depending on content.

Enormous Epic (Matt DC), Friday, 15 May 2009 23:18 (fourteen years ago) link

but its so hard for him to be thin!!

― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 15 May 2009 15:07 (8 hours ago)

This is now considered meta. Yellow carding you for this.

Enormous Epic (Matt DC), Friday, 15 May 2009 23:21 (fourteen years ago) link

I remember when Buttez was quite funny.

― Toad Roundgrin (noodle vague)

velko, Saturday, 16 May 2009 01:26 (fourteen years ago) link

ilx poster [redacted] is [redacted] lol

ice cr?m, Saturday, 16 May 2009 01:41 (fourteen years ago) link

ban^

redacted (ice cr?m), Saturday, 16 May 2009 01:43 (fourteen years ago) link

There is an outline of the rules here. Essentially, if you start a thread that isn't obviously complimentary about another ILXer (eg Estela appreciation thread), you have to be prepared for the possibility of it being deleted. Not least because the poster in question has requested it. This doesn't necessarily mean it WILL be deleted, but it might well happen, depending on content.

Can you tell me where on the linked thread can I find this exciting new rule that all new threads that may or may not mention other ILX posters need to be complimentary and positive and congratulate said poster on their obvious wit and charm? Or is this another exciting admin development that the admins have conveniently forgotten to tell anyone about?

I'm all for clamping down on crepeness and OTT board drama, but deleting a few minor zings that nobody is going to read anyway is really just a waste of time and utterly pointless. And if you start deleting threads with light references to ILX, you might as well go back and delete all threads with "C/D" or "POX" in the title because those are just horrible in-house references that will confuse people so much and drive them away because maybe "POX" means "a pox on your house, newbie"?

In other words: lighten up, guys.

Everybody Wants To Shag King Boy Pato (King Boy Pato), Saturday, 16 May 2009 03:14 (fourteen years ago) link

PS: I am not taking this too seriously.

Everybody Wants To Shag King Boy Pato (King Boy Pato), Saturday, 16 May 2009 03:14 (fourteen years ago) link

chill phil, you'll have ample scope to get the zingometer clocking crazy dollars come the ashes

fwiw i have 0 problem with KBP's zings, they are muscular and jaunty, like a piquant little fibre snack to the constitution

sorry for british (country matters), Saturday, 16 May 2009 03:18 (fourteen years ago) link

If you can sum up COGH in one word, that word would be "jaunty".

Everybody Wants To Shag King Boy Pato (King Boy Pato), Saturday, 16 May 2009 03:26 (fourteen years ago) link

i was going for "empty" but i like "jaunty"

k3vin k., Saturday, 16 May 2009 05:47 (fourteen years ago) link

l0u1s jagg3r

oj da hoosman (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 16 May 2009 05:48 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.