Hey Keith

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I don't want to post on the latest clusterfuck thread but could you find out from the DB how many distinct users have posted on that thread as a ratio of all users who have made more than say 20 or 50 posts over the last month.

I'd be interested.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Friday, 1 May 2009 18:53 (nine years ago) Permalink

hello adowable kittie

Prince of Persia (Ed), Friday, 1 May 2009 18:57 (nine years ago) Permalink

http://i39.tinypic.com/167tssx.jpg

the innermost wee guy (onimo), Friday, 1 May 2009 23:13 (nine years ago) Permalink

tbh i think ed should be counted in keith's calculations.

what a hilariously self-important twat.

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Friday, 1 May 2009 23:16 (nine years ago) Permalink

It looks like a huge ratio but then how many irl lawyers are there compared to irl regular doms joes? Lawyers provide a necessary service to the community.

the innermost wee guy (onimo), Friday, 1 May 2009 23:19 (nine years ago) Permalink

yeah lawyers getting bad rep imo. imagine a world without lawyers

Old Big 'OOS (AKA the Cupwinner) (darraghmac), Friday, 1 May 2009 23:29 (nine years ago) Permalink

what a hilariously self-important twat.

― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson)

potkettle.jpg

***OSCARBAITS FURIOUSLY*** (jjjusten), Friday, 1 May 2009 23:45 (nine years ago) Permalink

Sorry, missed this. Pretty complicated to get accurately (well, the second bit if not the first bit), but there are about 40 people on that thread and about 300 regular posters, if that's roughly what you're looking for.

Regular users (rather than posters) is an entirely different thing; however, the system clears out accounts that haven't been logged into for six months, so the 10,000+ that are shown on the front page is pretty accurate, i.e. it doesn't include a bunch of accounts that were registered in 2000 that haven't been touched since then. Maybe I'll try and record this at some point in the future to find out. Best guess is that it'd be ten times posters, so 3,000 or so.

Keith, Sunday, 3 May 2009 10:25 (nine years ago) Permalink

Actually the bit about the clearing accounts is wrong; about 4,000 of them are about to get wiped in the next month or two.

Keith, Tuesday, 5 May 2009 18:54 (nine years ago) Permalink

so people log in but dont post - to check their bookmarks or

ice cr?m, Sunday, 17 May 2009 15:14 (nine years ago) Permalink

deleted log post in bookmarks if

Keith, Sunday, 17 May 2009 16:01 (nine years ago) Permalink

three months pass...

i'm not sure if webmail is working. i tried one and after i hit submit i got a white screen. i did a test webmail to myself and i don't think it went through.
same thing (white screen) happened the other day when i tried to sb someone but i can sb that person some other time.

harbl, Tuesday, 8 September 2009 01:55 (nine years ago) Permalink

i have a hypothesis why though: i know you now can't send webmail if you're banned. i am currently banned from 1p3. maybe you put the webmail restriction on anyone who's banned from any board?

harbl, Tuesday, 8 September 2009 01:56 (nine years ago) Permalink

but i can sb that person some other time.

idalol

bamcquern, Tuesday, 8 September 2009 01:57 (nine years ago) Permalink

dunno if this has been addressed (and i havent seen keith in a while so i assume he's busy - no rush) but i got the same white screen, only mine was after a SB, not a webmail

dorroughmac (k3vin k.), Monday, 14 September 2009 14:10 (nine years ago) Permalink

yeah and you're banned from IRE so my hypothesis is still good

harbl, Monday, 14 September 2009 14:32 (nine years ago) Permalink

don't remind me :(

but yeah good point

dorroughmac (k3vin k.), Monday, 14 September 2009 14:45 (nine years ago) Permalink

one month passes...

can someone tell me if my suggest ban button is working? i keep having the problem outline above, and since i'm on the way out myself, it's kinda unfair if i'm unable to use it

k3vin k., Friday, 23 October 2009 04:06 (nine years ago) Permalink

takin everyone down with you huh

call all destroyer, Friday, 23 October 2009 04:07 (nine years ago) Permalink

hey kev, the suggest ban button attached to your posts is working fine, from what i can tell. hope this clears up the issue.

everybody loves am0n (J0rdan S.), Friday, 23 October 2009 04:09 (nine years ago) Permalink

hi k3v, if you have attempted to SB anyone in the last week it hasn't worked

undergrad lovers (electricsound), Friday, 23 October 2009 04:12 (nine years ago) Permalink

ok that's definitely not right then and i think it's only fair that i'm immune to SB's until this is figured out

k3vin k., Friday, 23 October 2009 15:55 (nine years ago) Permalink

winky

k3vin k., Friday, 23 October 2009 15:56 (nine years ago) Permalink

now that i'm unbanned from 1p3 everything works btw

harbl, Friday, 23 October 2009 15:57 (nine years ago) Permalink

We're talking about this now; we'll keep you updated.

the blackest thing ever seen (HI DERE), Friday, 23 October 2009 15:58 (nine years ago) Permalink

FYI: this is being looked into on the technical side. We suspect there is a bug in the code but, until it is checked out, we won't be certain.

the blackest thing ever seen (HI DERE), Monday, 26 October 2009 18:29 (nine years ago) Permalink

one month passes...

hey keith: http://daringfireball.net/2009/11/liberal_regex_for_matching_urls

For example, it will correctly match the URL in the following example lines:

http://foo.com/blah_blah
http://foo.com/blah_blah/
(Something like http://foo.com/blah_blah)
http://foo.com/blah_blah_(wikipedia)
(Something like http://foo.com/blah_blah_(wikipedia))
http://foo.com/blah_blah.
http://foo.com/blah_blah/.
<http://foo.com/blah_blah>;
<http://foo.com/blah_blah/>;
http://foo.com/blah_blah,
http://www.example.com/wpstyle/?p=364.
http://✪df.ws/e7l
rdar://1234
rdar:/1234
x-yojimbo-item://6303E4C1-xxxx-45A6-AB9D-3A908F59AE0E
message://%3c330e7f8409726r6a4ba78dkf1fd71420c1bf✧✧✧@m✧✧✧.gm✧✧✧.c✧✧%3e
http://➡.ws/䨹
www.➡.ws/䨹
<tag>http://example.com<;/tag>
Just a www.example.com link.

caek, Friday, 27 November 2009 19:04 (nine years ago) Permalink

Is clever enough to look for a ) if it would match a ( in the URL and not otherwise = would totally be in favour of this (given a bit of testing/scrutiny, obv), neat.

(despite my day job involving the munging of CSV files, often with regexps, I am way too lazy to read other people's, so no scrutiny here)

subtyll cauillacyons (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 27 November 2009 20:57 (nine years ago) Permalink

four months pass...

^^^ good regexp ime. is keith still around?

caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 08:41 (eight years ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.