Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

it's admittedly not a lot like that, though

thomp, Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:15 (sixteen years ago)

http://dub-connection.net/images/BanduluDub_SpiritualEvolution.jpg

Ward Fowler, Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:17 (sixteen years ago)

Thank you Tuomas, we will certainly bear that in mind when exercising moderator discretion in future. A graph would be nice though, if you have time.

I'm sure coding a program that automatically counts the number of days to subtract from the SB should be pretty easy. All it requires is that a mod marks the post(s) he's temp banning someone for, and the rest should happen automatically.

If no one has the time to program that sort of thing, I can volunteer to count the number myself every time a SB and a temp ban overlap. Just email me the relevant information, and I'll do it.

Tuomas, Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:41 (sixteen years ago)

Matt I was actually just making a funny because it was clear that the whole "a person can still acquire SBs while banned" deal would almost surely be something that would inspire our leading researcher in the field of Suggest Ban Theory to possible new heights of accomplishment

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:48 (sixteen years ago)

if yr SBed & sum1 lands on 1 of ur properties do u still get rent

thomp, Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:51 (sixteen years ago)

i must be completely worn down because i ghoulishly enjoyed the simple arithmetic and the voila! which i don't think i would normally.

estela, Thursday, 24 September 2009 12:57 (sixteen years ago)

your SBs are deposited in escrow and tallied upon your return

steamed hams (harbl), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:04 (sixteen years ago)

Okay, here's a simple arithmetic to determine the punishment in a case where someone gets both temp banned and SBed due to the same post(s):

I can't decide if this is self-parody, or if you're serious about Chapter XI Section 3 of the ILX Penal Code, and that we should do everything possible to ensure that people who have, in one way or another, been dickish enough to earn themselves bans don't have to spend a second more off the boards than required to mete out just enough "punishment" so that they'll never change.

stet, Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:29 (sixteen years ago)

dude, it's self-parody

sturdy, ultra-light, under-the-pants moneybelt (HI DERE), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:35 (sixteen years ago)

more like self-parroty

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:43 (sixteen years ago)

more like self-sbanny amirite

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)

I have this vision of a Finnish socialist paradise where all of our actions are determined by complex and yet efficient mathematics that control and shape every aspect of our lives.

(I do not apologise for being one of the people who banhammered Cankles in the 72 hours before his Suggest Ban - for his utterly infantile and gross interjections on the Cosmetic Surgery thread, IIRC.)

I Like Daydreams, I've Had Enough Reality (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)

if tuomas exists, i'm pretty sure he's serious.

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a clog stamping on a human face... forever.

ENBB Otter's Pug Band Christmas (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)

a clog?

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:51 (sixteen years ago)

surely a nokia ringing out in interminable silence

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:53 (sixteen years ago)

into silence

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:54 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.giftsfromholland.com/catalog/images/klomp_blank_punt.png

ENBB Otter's Pug Band Christmas (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)

i think we all know what the footwear emblem of dutch culture looks like

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)

i know he's finnish, not dutch, but the joke works better if you just follow me on this

ENBB Otter's Pug Band Christmas (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:56 (sixteen years ago)

maybe the joke is that i'm confused. it's like an unscripted homage to our mutual friend.

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)

perhaps cankles greatest contribution to ilx not on a sports board:
For example, I've noticed many girls tend to treat the penis a bit too gently, which can be a problem if you want to make the guy come.
this is actually the central point of my thesis on gender relations, which is that ppl project their needs onto their partners and u end up w/women all tenderly makin love to your dong when u just want it to get beat the fuck up, and meanwhile dudes are all trying to jackhammer cervixes and fingerblast a broad with a hand covered in superbowl rings

― a narwhal done gored my sister nell (cankles), Thursday, August 6, 2009 2:48 PM

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Thursday, 24 September 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

trying to jackhammer cervixes and fingerblast a broad with a hand covered in superbowl rings

as lamentations go, uh

Bacon is the new Pirates (onimo), Thursday, 24 September 2009 22:40 (sixteen years ago)

otoh, the moderator-imposed temp ban could actually prevent a poster from accruing more sb's, or at least accruing them at a slower rate.

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:20 (sixteen years ago)

isn't a mod ban normally imposed for one-off way over the line behaviour? doesn't overlap with sb low level irritation quotient at all in my opinion.

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:22 (sixteen years ago)

wasn't that what cankles' most recent temp ban for? The racist display name thing?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:23 (sixteen years ago)

if he hadn't been temp-banned, he could have posted more with that display name and gotten more sb's out of it.

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:26 (sixteen years ago)

what a disaster for london

there's a blap for that (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:29 (sixteen years ago)

was louis sb'd too??

don't blame pitchfork, blame america (call all destroyer), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)

spellbanned

estela, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)

on this magical day

estela, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)

what the fuck

pariah carey (Mr. Que), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)

is louis our first 153?

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)

whoa

omar little, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)

:(

wilter, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jason-meyer-funeral-photo-02.jpg

it takes a nation of 51 to hold us back (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)

is there any good reason for lj's ban or is it just 51 more people doing it cause they thought it was funny?

iatee, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)

adjectives fail me.

estela, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:44 (sixteen years ago)

lj should be unbannable

pariah carey (Mr. Que), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)

i think i sb'ed him last winter because i didn't know he had a new name. i thought "country matters" was a sock. oops.

steamed hams (harbl), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)

unlike harbl i don't have any blood on my hands

wilter, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)

i am reckless :(((((

steamed hams (harbl), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)

'tis deplorable in such a fair maiden.

estela, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)

terrible system still terrible

bnw, Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)

great system, terrible users

steamed hams (harbl), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:54 (sixteen years ago)

the contenderizers of the world slip through the net while the ljs are ensnared like dolphins in six-pack holders.

omar little, Friday, 9 October 2009 00:00 (sixteen years ago)

my sb for ashes gloating finally pays off

N-N-Nineteen Not Out (King Boy Pato), Friday, 9 October 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)

when i find out who was the last to hit suggest ban, i will atone by suggest banning that person

steamed hams (harbl), Friday, 9 October 2009 00:06 (sixteen years ago)

seriously--i want names

pariah carey (Mr. Que), Friday, 9 October 2009 00:07 (sixteen years ago)

uhhh unless there is some extenuating circumstance i am not aware of this is pretty indefensible

don't blame pitchfork, blame america (call all destroyer), Friday, 9 October 2009 00:09 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.