Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

that was originally for a diff. post to be clear but then I figured what's the diff

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

what is ilx but a filter that catches the wheat of society but lets the chaff fall through?

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

having an option to automatically ignore all posts from certain posters has worked well on other boards, maybe that could work. anyone have a problem with that?

iiiijjjj, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

killfile? we have that

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)


having an option to automatically ignore all posts from certain posters has worked well on other boards, maybe that could work. anyone have a problem with that?

works less well when other people who are engaging with the ignored poster are c/p'ing his/her remarks. best solution imo is a "suggest ignore" system where clicking SI sends an email to the user advising them to ignore the person who sent it

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

best solution imo is a "suggest ignore" system where clicking SI sends an email to the user advising them to ignore the person who sent it

ok i just lost my shit

alien vs the smiths (country matters), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

or folks could just deal with the fact that as we're all a bunch of aspies, we're gonna get offended by dumb shit and it's much more classy not to escalate under any circumstances.
live and let live on the internets is highly underrated

a random googler, ripe for clowning (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)

live and let live on the internets is highly underrated

1,000,000x otm and I say this as a guy who still flies on the fuckin handle but less than I used to

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:19 (sixteen years ago)

exactly why a kudos/props button doesn't work/exactly why I'm pro-SB

― the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, August 5, 2009 10:44 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark

bnw, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:31 (sixteen years ago)

facebook adds a dislike button and ilx brings back all banned legends - this is my dream for the internet

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:33 (sixteen years ago)

^^^^ yes.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:34 (sixteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Sine_cosine_plot.svg/800px-Sine_cosine_plot.svg.png

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:36 (sixteen years ago)

live & let live includes let ppl SB when they are sick of some fuckin dude acting a fool imho

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:37 (sixteen years ago)

not cosining on that; live and let live covers aggressive and passive aggressive axes to grind

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:40 (sixteen years ago)

i enjoy sbin as much as the next guy and im not totally opposed to an occasional judicious time out but there are some important posters who are gone forever~~

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:44 (sixteen years ago)

I agree w/ice cr?am for maybe the first time ever but some of them dudes were pretty much tattoooing BAN ME on their chests

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:46 (sixteen years ago)

I know I said it before but so glad this conversation is happening again because it's all v fresh and exciting.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:47 (sixteen years ago)

I know right

SB'd you for that btw

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:49 (sixteen years ago)

i wonder how much pmsbing goes on, that is usually when i feel most tempted.

estela, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:50 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/54/115673331_71be4e65e5.jpg?v=0

velko, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:51 (sixteen years ago)

xx-post Of course you did!

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:52 (sixteen years ago)

lol john we used to be such buddies when i had my other login - a compelling study perhaps of the conditional nature of opinions

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:53 (sixteen years ago)

I should probably not be nice to you now Mr. D. but I will anyway. A friend of mine was playing some music the other day and I was like oh this song is alright what's this then and it turned out it was you! I then said oh I know who he is on the internet. ha.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:54 (sixteen years ago)

who could sb such an innocent? u should all be ashamed

niggardly tribute (Lamp), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

just hope they have better animes in heaven

niggardly tribute (Lamp), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:26 (sixteen years ago)

i think that the mods have been pretty clear on all this actually, weve pretty much said from the beginning that sb reversals are going to be up to moderator discretion, which means that there isnt going to be a hard and fast rule. cankles racked up 49 of his sbs in the past three months, and the posts that got him sbs wouldn't really be very surprising. if someone else gets 102ed but has a bunch of bans for saying that blur sucked or whatever, or it took them far longer to hit the mark, it just isn't the same situation. if yall want a set in stone procedure, we might as well just code it into the system, but i (for one) think that is a pretty bad idea.

speaking for me, not mods in general btw.

also, to quell the raging against secretive conspiratorial mods, i think the reason no one has stepped up to give a concrete answer to the various specifics people are asking for is because a couple of the site wides are busy with other things at the moment, so it wouldnt exactly be accurate or fair to nail this stuff down without all of them having their say.

A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)

Someone asked this on another thread but I guess there was some confusion as to what exactly a 102 means. Is it an automatic permanent ban for all time or something that is subject to mod reversal somewhere down the line? That seemed to be what ppl wanted clarification on (see sarahel's thread about that specifically).

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)

ENBB no offense but im pretty sure i just answered that in the first paragraph i wrote right above your post

A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)

Sorry will reread - am pretty tired so perhaps reading comprehension skills not the best right now. :-(

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:52 (sixteen years ago)

The short version is "a 102 means the same thing as a 51, ie the poster returns at the mods' discretion, usually in 30 days".

sturdy, ultra-light, under-the-pants moneybelt (HI DERE), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 04:01 (sixteen years ago)

Dan I keeees you! That is, in fact, how I read it but there was a lot of chatter earlier in which it was obvious that people were not clear on that. Hopefully yr v helpful and clear answer will end some of that. :D

btw - Check boston dirty water thread. We gonna FAP.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 04:03 (sixteen years ago)

"I then said oh I know who he is on the internet. ha."

I have to avoid saying this at least once a day.

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 04:06 (sixteen years ago)

do u know a lot of mt gts fans then

cankles appears to have just been posting on i love nfl for the past week. maybe it was all very offensive to people who understand american sport

thomp, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 05:41 (sixteen years ago)

FWIW: I would wholly support a unbanning of cankles on I Love Baseball if acceptable by da modz.

Change Display Name: (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 05:43 (sixteen years ago)

also on ILNFL

omar little, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 05:45 (sixteen years ago)

I would bet good money that canks acquired NO sbs on ILNFL

Thomp, not just for John D, for all kindsa people.

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)

i preferred my idea

the identity of the people reading week-old cankles posts and thinking "i must protest" are the real mystery here tbh. unless he went on a real trolling spree somewhere and the thread got deleted : /

thomp, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

maybe it was angry, angry juno fans

Is this the Juno thread?

this should've ended with j jonah jameson bashing her to death with her faggot burgerphone

― candice spergin (cankles), Saturday, 19 September 2009 07:29 (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

thomp, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)

do you guys really have nothing better to do than to ponder the mystery of why people would click "suggest ban" for a guy who liked to post sexist, racist and homophobic stuff in the name of posting style

sturdy, ultra-light, under-the-pants moneybelt (HI DERE), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

poll

What are the benefits of dating a younger guy, better erections? (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

huge lols @ the proposal of an offensive word filter as if that would have any effect on creative neologisms like "niglord"

uh oh I'm having a baby (some dude), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

get the scribblenauts team on this project asap

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)

damn this is hittin me hard... miss ya till im with ya dom ;_;

― s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, March 5, 2009 9:18 AM (6 months ago)

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

HI DERE i am not remotely surprised that cankles accrued 51 suggest bans again; i'm just slightly bemused that he reached the total in a period of time where he didn't seem to have posted anything particularly in-character in 72 hours or so, because it suggests users whose mode of catching up on ilx involves looking at days of recent posts at a time

thomp, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

He could've already had something like 50 SBs before his temp ban was lifted - all it would've taken then is one person to SB him, for example because of his post on the Juno thread.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

The moral of the story might be "don't make posts like that to random people who do not appreciate them"; I am 100% certain that if cankles confined that style to ILNFL, fewer people would have a problem with him.

sturdy, ultra-light, under-the-pants moneybelt (HI DERE), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

ban him from all the other boards?

caek, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

I think cankles can be an interesting dude, but seriously, anyone who can't refrain from racial/etc. slurs should be permabanned. the fact that this is even a subject of debate is absurd.

iatee, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 22:11 (sixteen years ago)

maybe if mods want to keep him banned but would allow him to return to the nfl and mlb boards that would be a good compromise...

omar little, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

Cankles was sitting on 50 SBs during his temp ban, it did indeed only take one person to push him over the threshold.

He was accumulating SBs pretty consistently since the previous time we let him back in, and from a much wider cross-section of posters than the particularly thin-skinned ones. I think I've only ever seen Gabbneb accumulate SBs that quickly, which makes me think Cankles was either outright trolling for them, didn't care whether he got SB'ed or not, or was just a complete idiot. Leaning towards option 2.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 September 2009 09:16 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.