Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

xp this is why we need a policy--iirc mods have stated sb is not going anywhere and i think we have argued it to death off and on for like 9 months

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

I like cankles. If offensive words are the problem, what's wrong with a filter that turns offensive words into non-offensive words?

iiiijjjj, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

Fuck that tbh.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

uhhh to be perfectly fair cankles can be real tough to take sometimes--i mean if you aren't "in on the joke" the casual racism is not cool. even if you are it's not that cool.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)

... the casual racism, the casual sexism, and the casual homophobia ...

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

ok now we're talkin

what about, the filter is optional, if you don't want to see some guy lol'ing to himself w/racist or sexist or homophobic language, you can have those words filtered, and if you love those words, you have a different filter that changes all terms to racist or misogynist epithets

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

he used slurs against pretty much anyone ...

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously guys? Filters? You're kidding, right?

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

if it worked for DUMPLINGS! ...

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

n/m this debate is old. I'm jsut waiting for the policy tbh.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

and DUMPLINGS!

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

can some do a DUMPLINGS! for raviolis?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

i want a filter that turns all of sarahel's ellipses into "poop"

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

lolllllllll

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

... poop ... lol ... poop ....

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

the use of terms that gets filtered triggers an auto-SB. once you have 51 you are gone but you don't get to be mad at anybody about it. the name of this system is SSBcontrol

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

Filters are a wack idea just to be clear

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, I want a filter that transforms failed attempts at lolz into the phrase - malformed "joke"

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

what about disemvoweling or automatic translation into a dead language

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

you have a different filter that changes all terms to racist or misogynist epithets

Can you imagine Tuomas posts with that filter?

l'homme moderne: il forniquait et lisait des journaux (Michael White), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

^^^ post originally read "loveless is yoga flame for all time"

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

that was originally for a diff. post to be clear but then I figured what's the diff

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

what is ilx but a filter that catches the wheat of society but lets the chaff fall through?

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

having an option to automatically ignore all posts from certain posters has worked well on other boards, maybe that could work. anyone have a problem with that?

iiiijjjj, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

killfile? we have that

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)


having an option to automatically ignore all posts from certain posters has worked well on other boards, maybe that could work. anyone have a problem with that?

works less well when other people who are engaging with the ignored poster are c/p'ing his/her remarks. best solution imo is a "suggest ignore" system where clicking SI sends an email to the user advising them to ignore the person who sent it

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

best solution imo is a "suggest ignore" system where clicking SI sends an email to the user advising them to ignore the person who sent it

ok i just lost my shit

alien vs the smiths (country matters), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

or folks could just deal with the fact that as we're all a bunch of aspies, we're gonna get offended by dumb shit and it's much more classy not to escalate under any circumstances.
live and let live on the internets is highly underrated

a random googler, ripe for clowning (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)

live and let live on the internets is highly underrated

1,000,000x otm and I say this as a guy who still flies on the fuckin handle but less than I used to

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:19 (sixteen years ago)

exactly why a kudos/props button doesn't work/exactly why I'm pro-SB

― the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, August 5, 2009 10:44 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark

bnw, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:31 (sixteen years ago)

facebook adds a dislike button and ilx brings back all banned legends - this is my dream for the internet

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:33 (sixteen years ago)

^^^^ yes.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:34 (sixteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Sine_cosine_plot.svg/800px-Sine_cosine_plot.svg.png

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:36 (sixteen years ago)

live & let live includes let ppl SB when they are sick of some fuckin dude acting a fool imho

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:37 (sixteen years ago)

not cosining on that; live and let live covers aggressive and passive aggressive axes to grind

bring back all banned legends (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:40 (sixteen years ago)

i enjoy sbin as much as the next guy and im not totally opposed to an occasional judicious time out but there are some important posters who are gone forever~~

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:44 (sixteen years ago)

I agree w/ice cr?am for maybe the first time ever but some of them dudes were pretty much tattoooing BAN ME on their chests

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:46 (sixteen years ago)

I know I said it before but so glad this conversation is happening again because it's all v fresh and exciting.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:47 (sixteen years ago)

I know right

SB'd you for that btw

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:49 (sixteen years ago)

i wonder how much pmsbing goes on, that is usually when i feel most tempted.

estela, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:50 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/54/115673331_71be4e65e5.jpg?v=0

velko, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:51 (sixteen years ago)

xx-post Of course you did!

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:52 (sixteen years ago)

lol john we used to be such buddies when i had my other login - a compelling study perhaps of the conditional nature of opinions

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:53 (sixteen years ago)

I should probably not be nice to you now Mr. D. but I will anyway. A friend of mine was playing some music the other day and I was like oh this song is alright what's this then and it turned out it was you! I then said oh I know who he is on the internet. ha.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:54 (sixteen years ago)

who could sb such an innocent? u should all be ashamed

niggardly tribute (Lamp), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

just hope they have better animes in heaven

niggardly tribute (Lamp), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:26 (sixteen years ago)

i think that the mods have been pretty clear on all this actually, weve pretty much said from the beginning that sb reversals are going to be up to moderator discretion, which means that there isnt going to be a hard and fast rule. cankles racked up 49 of his sbs in the past three months, and the posts that got him sbs wouldn't really be very surprising. if someone else gets 102ed but has a bunch of bans for saying that blur sucked or whatever, or it took them far longer to hit the mark, it just isn't the same situation. if yall want a set in stone procedure, we might as well just code it into the system, but i (for one) think that is a pretty bad idea.

speaking for me, not mods in general btw.

also, to quell the raging against secretive conspiratorial mods, i think the reason no one has stepped up to give a concrete answer to the various specifics people are asking for is because a couple of the site wides are busy with other things at the moment, so it wouldnt exactly be accurate or fair to nail this stuff down without all of them having their say.

A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)

Someone asked this on another thread but I guess there was some confusion as to what exactly a 102 means. Is it an automatic permanent ban for all time or something that is subject to mod reversal somewhere down the line? That seemed to be what ppl wanted clarification on (see sarahel's thread about that specifically).

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)

ENBB no offense but im pretty sure i just answered that in the first paragraph i wrote right above your post

A DOG, A BARREL... RIDICULOUS! (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)

Sorry will reread - am pretty tired so perhaps reading comprehension skills not the best right now. :-(

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 03:52 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.