Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

sb'd u 4 that

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

id like everyone who sb me to send me a note y then when i eventually (lol) get sb'd ill make a HAUL vid reading each of them aloud to the camera and put it up on youtube

now we're talkin and then everybody who posts in the comments section must also post their own individual sb #s and people must give them thumbs up or thumbs down

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)

tbh ive trolled the youtube thumbs on more than one occasion

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

dude I strongly feel that the best comedy to be had in these times lies in the fertile compost of the youtube comments sections

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:00 (sixteen years ago)

also tbh have also thus trolled, it can't be helped

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:00 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:30 AM Site candice spergin (cankles) has been banned permanently. 52 suggest bans

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

Permanently? I thought "Suggest Ban"-related bans were temporary.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

(Just curious, anyway)

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

the admin log always adds "permanent" when someone is sb'd because in the system it is permanent (the unbans are manual intervention)

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

how long is he banned for?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

This is the second time he was SBed, wasn't it? As far as I know there's no clear policy what happens when someone gets SBed twice. Or maybe the mods could tell us if there is a policy?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

I've tried searching to no avail - how long does it take for sb's to expire?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

only temp bans expire. mod bans and sbs are "permanent" until the mods agree to let someone back in

if you're talking individual sb's i think stet or keith said one year, but then it seems like they said somewhere else that it was 6 months

velko, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

i'm asking about individual sb's, yes ... as well as whether someone would be let back in if they got 51-ed twice.

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

(the neb)

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

the theory is that each sb would result in a longer suspension. i think the first one is supposed to be 30 days.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

but how long is the 2nd one? or is it permanent?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

there aren't really any rules, it's only happened once

goole, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

Somone needs to write a policy on this and put it in a FAQ somewhere if only so ppl know the score and this conversation doesn't need to keep happening. You know? Mods can you please make that happen. It seems fair that such a thing should exist tbh.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

I'm totally serious btw. Too much confusion and clusterfuck around this whole system. Just clear it up please once and for all.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

^^ please!

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

i think they don't want to give board lawyers anything to work with tbh

velko, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

I am afraid that request is going to get lost in the midst of another blah blah blah I don't agree with SBs thread. Maybe I should make an official request?

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

idk it just seems really weird to me that there is no official line on this sorta thing.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

I'm with you all the way.

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

Me too.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

Ditto.

jaymc, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)

i think every non-mod on this site is with you

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

christ. ade got himself banned? again?

thomp, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

can we take this here?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)

In all honesty, the mods are also in agreement on putting a policy in the FAQ but no one has had the time to sit down and write something out.

sturdy, ultra-light, under-the-pants moneybelt (HI DERE), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)

btw i am opposed to an official policy on SBs

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)

i like a little mystery in my life

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

That's understandable, but maybe just answer Sarahel's question up there? It shouldn't take more than a few sentences.

(x-post to Dan)

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:43 (sixteen years ago)

DP - I don't really have much of a reason to care about this but the confusion that it seems to repeatedly cause just seems silly and unfair. Maybe someone should either find that time or suspend SBs until the time is found.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)

pretty sure the SB policy has been explained previously as an automatic ban which will be then examined by mods on a case by case basis?

ian, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, but so far almost every SBed person has been allowed to return after 30 days, which also seems to be an official policy.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I gathered that was the case, rather than a One-size-fits-all style ruling

xpost to Ian

I am using your worlds, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)

it's not confusing.

goole, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)

Some of the FAQ is hilariously outdated, esp. the bit about ILX slang being "picked up from bastardised hackerspeak and Molesworth books," which probably hasn't been true since Mark S. last posted.

jaymc, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)

That isn't what I'm asking about ... I'm asking about two-time offenders and the expiration of individual sb's ...

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)

i think we are also asking that this all be written down someplace permanent so we don't have to have this thread happen over and over.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i don't think that's going to stop this thread from happening over and over

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)

a guy can dream

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)

Come on, people love posting on this type of thread, otherwise why would they repeatedly do so every time an opportunity arises?

I am using your worlds, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

i would volunteer myself to write it. i am almost a lawyer, also an excellent technical writer. i bet u don't believe that do u

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

i du

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

let harbl write the fucking thing. if people keep up these threads after such a thing exists then they're even more retarded than I thought.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

if a mod sent me a disorganized list of things to be included i would do it, as a community service

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)

NA could be write though. I'm probably being too optimistic in thinking that would actually do anything.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.