Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

in the worst case they might be afraid to say anything that might be in any way considered "controversial"

This is the best possible outcome, actually.

Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Monday, 10 August 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

btw i finally read momuss post--lot of a+ stuff going on there but i think the best part is at the end when he champions the exoticization and romanticization of gypsies as being good for their community and their tourism dollars

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

I'm getting better. I just managed to control myself and not post something that probably would have got me a SB, even by mine own criteria.

hüzün (Masonic Boom), Monday, 10 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)

I like the idea of giving someone banned some idea of the context behind their banning. I also like the idea of having an automatic unban counter because sometimes I/we forget exactly when someone was banned and don't unban them immediately on the day their ban should be up. I also like the idea of the system notifying the moderators that someone has crossed the threshold rather than automatically banning them.

people got really pissed when non-mods said this :P

bnw, Monday, 10 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

People can change their minds!

I am over wieght and I have angelical quilities (HI DERE), Monday, 10 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

(although in this case, I always thought those were good ideas but I did not like the way they were presented)

I am over wieght and I have angelical quilities (HI DERE), Monday, 10 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

just wanted to offer my support for a system that lets the user know if they are getting SBs...

if it's too difficult to write code that will tell people what specific posts got them banned, even just having the system display a running tally of SBs to the account might be good. so, someone is grouchy and drunk, and posts a bunch of bile to a few threads, and then logs in the next day and sees 15 SBs on the 'boards' front page, and it's pretty obvious to that person why. doesn't have to be post specific. ILX users say, "you were an asshole last night", person corrects behavior, maybe puts more thought before trolling or being abusive next time.

I also think it would be great if there were a way to make it so that every 7, or maybe 14, days someone doesn't get a SB, an SB drops off their tally. so, basically one person's SB counts for 14 days if the target doesn't accumulate another during that time.

I would also love to see if I have any SBs. ;)

Highly trained BBQ chef (rockapads), Monday, 10 August 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)

I know that I probably have loads, and I just don't want to know.

:-(

hüzün (Masonic Boom), Monday, 10 August 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

I also think it would be great if there were a way to make it so that every 7, or maybe 14, days someone doesn't get a SB, an SB drops off their tally. so, basically one person's SB counts for 14 days if the target doesn't accumulate another during that time.

^^^this

cockles (country matters), Monday, 10 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

btw not enough has been said about the graphixx on momuss blog post

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

(Thanks/sorry WmC 3 hours ago)

Trying to find anything in those LJ comments makes me totally glad ILX is non-threading. Which I guess is a good sign to stop caring about them and find something better to do.

a passing spacecadet, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y296/imomus/more/exclu1.jpg

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y296/imomus/more/exclu2.jpg

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y296/imomus/more/exclu4.jpg

i mean i want to say this is the best one, for the excellent hyperbole, but theres something so sweet and touching about the stock photos

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

really makes you think

Mr. Que, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y296/imomus/more/exclu0.jpg

of course this is the real winner, because you can hear momus saying to himself, whats the best way to illustrate my challopsy point--why of course, a stock photo of paper people superimposed over ATHENS... DEMOCRACY... EXCLUSION... DO U SEE

DO U SEE

max, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

he left himself out as the figure above all the others scratching his chin while pissing on them

bnw, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

That gummi bear pic makes me sad, I hope we aren't doing that to the poor gummi bear. :(

Tuomas, Monday, 10 August 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

http://i28.tinypic.com/inqwqg.jpg

StanM, Monday, 10 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

i think a better image analogy is that comical illustration some guy did in which IE6 is not allowed in the other browsers treehouse because it's so shit

unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 10 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

how about this. when you SB someone, the system sends an email to a random ilxer telling that ilxer the name of the person who got the s-ban, and for what post. the person who receives the email may then contact the SBannee if he/she likes, or may simply choose to just drop hints here and there - "I feel obligated to let the thread know that a certain someone might be interested in knowing what sort of response his postings are getting from one or more members of the community," etc. in addition, a person who believes his postings are getting him s-bans left and right might start writing to random ilxers: "do you know something? are you getting notifications about me?" no-one ever has to answer these emails, but it is important that they get written, and sent. I know that this suggestion is nowhere near the triumph that was my earlier proposal, but that one didn't get implemented, and I felt I had to continue the important work that that suggestion began, at whatever cost and against whatever odds.

Let's address this important proposal at the next meeting.

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)

i like this scheme, can i suggest also that every time one of these emails gets sent the sender should say to the recipient on a thread, poster x, i just webmailed you, so everyone can know someone has contacted someone.

estela, Monday, 10 August 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

Momus can provide pictures for the powerpoint.

Detroit Metal City (Nicole), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

blamus

estela, Monday, 10 August 2009 22:26 (sixteen years ago)

shit sounds absurd b/c original idea was absurd, just sayin'

bnw, Monday, 10 August 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

I'm with Tuomas, feeling bad for the gummi bear ...

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

tbh i wouldn't mind a more kafkaesque approach for the lolz

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:40 (sixteen years ago)

suggest bear

bnw, Monday, 10 August 2009 22:42 (sixteen years ago)

id like everyone who sb me to send me a note y then when i eventually (lol) get sb'd ill make a HAUL vid reading each of them aloud to the camera and put it up on youtube

♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:42 (sixteen years ago)

<3 Lamp!

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:44 (sixteen years ago)

sb'd u 4 that

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

id like everyone who sb me to send me a note y then when i eventually (lol) get sb'd ill make a HAUL vid reading each of them aloud to the camera and put it up on youtube

now we're talkin and then everybody who posts in the comments section must also post their own individual sb #s and people must give them thumbs up or thumbs down

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)

tbh ive trolled the youtube thumbs on more than one occasion

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

dude I strongly feel that the best comedy to be had in these times lies in the fertile compost of the youtube comments sections

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:00 (sixteen years ago)

also tbh have also thus trolled, it can't be helped

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:00 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:30 AM Site candice spergin (cankles) has been banned permanently. 52 suggest bans

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

Permanently? I thought "Suggest Ban"-related bans were temporary.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

(Just curious, anyway)

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

the admin log always adds "permanent" when someone is sb'd because in the system it is permanent (the unbans are manual intervention)

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

how long is he banned for?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

This is the second time he was SBed, wasn't it? As far as I know there's no clear policy what happens when someone gets SBed twice. Or maybe the mods could tell us if there is a policy?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

I've tried searching to no avail - how long does it take for sb's to expire?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

only temp bans expire. mod bans and sbs are "permanent" until the mods agree to let someone back in

if you're talking individual sb's i think stet or keith said one year, but then it seems like they said somewhere else that it was 6 months

velko, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

i'm asking about individual sb's, yes ... as well as whether someone would be let back in if they got 51-ed twice.

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

(the neb)

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

the theory is that each sb would result in a longer suspension. i think the first one is supposed to be 30 days.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

but how long is the 2nd one? or is it permanent?

my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

there aren't really any rules, it's only happened once

goole, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.