Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

lorax has done his share of pervertalizing posts that got deleted too

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb
morbs
tuomas
LJ
deeznuts
burt stanton
capn lorax
ade

And Jesus how many people from this list are back right now!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

Answer = ALMOST ALL OF THEM.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas still probably the least abusive ilxor (along with ned i guess)

unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

Abbott, did i say ANY changes?! i meant formal, decided-upon, here's-how-we're-running-things changes.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

The bulk of the unbanned people didn't show up immediately banging pans with conspiratorial complaints of some six-year coup that has been boiling in the underbelly of ILX h8rdom behind everyone's backs.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

Morbs all the threads about new mods, SB systems, whatevs were classic clusterfucks that wld be pretty damn hard not to notice!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

why was ethan suggest banned exactly

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

Ask 52 people!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

I just did.

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

went on an image-blast suicide-by-SB iirc.

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

why is that bannable behavior

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

ethan doesn't seem to mind it, from what i hear.

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

why does shooting yourself in the head cause you to be dead?

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

what about imagebombing is inherently "suicide by SB"

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

Are we just mad that SBs have taken away the name of a strawman to type in all caps?

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

btw is it possible to have all the sbs I did removed? I did not actually realise what it meant when I used it, except in the case of Vision (this is the only one I remember doing and possibly the only one I actually did but definitely the only one I would stick by, doubt he'll be back to troll again tho)

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

Guys how did any of you not know what wld happen if you used a suggest ban?

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

The message that comes up when you click Suggest Ban is:

Please be aware that by confirming this action, you are registering your wish to see this user removed from the site.

NOT

Lols!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously, Crut? imagebombing pisses ppl off to high fuck. You suddenly go on an imagebombing (or a "I've got a hot chick waiting" posting) rampage even in the non-SB era and you're looking at some sort of ban.

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)

Abbott, BECAUSE WE JUST SAW A THING THAT SAID "SUGGEST BAN," DIDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A NUMBER TO BE REACHED, ETC. Why do you assume everybody who is not jaymc knows everything about this place?

Morbs all the threads about new mods, SB systems, whatevs were classic clusterfucks that wld be pretty damn hard not to notice!

If you want no part of em, it's easy.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

hey mods how many SBs do i have?

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

You said you knew about it anyway, through whatever Cassandra you were talking to at 77; you can't play ignernt here.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

xp

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously, Crut?

Seriously, Stet. I never knew imagebombing was on the same level as making pervy comments on and offboard.

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

I tend to be online at different times than most ppl and only really read threads about music so I wouldn't really know. And I thought we were just putting in a request for Mod approval you know?

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

what about imagebombing is inherently "suicide by SB"

oh come on man. "it's not inherently courting suggest-ban to be incredibly disruptive"? really?

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

Abb, that was in the last month! Before that I was happily ig'nant.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

Crut he was SUGGEST BANNED a mod can't tell you the whys & wherefores! stet ≠ 52 ILXors who decided that was the straw

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

Morbs you know if you don't know something you can always ask.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

exactly, so people like tuomas & LJ are suggest banned without any legitimate reason. xpost

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

They post here now, don't they?

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

they can be really irritating, how is that not legitimate?

bodied peanuts (goole), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

the ire that tuomas invokes is pretty hard for me to comprehend

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

in re: suicide by image-bomb: think about it man. you & some friends are sitting at a table having a talk. I show up, I decide your talk has gone far enough, and start holding up pictures I think are funny in front of your face, one after another. you're still to free to talk! hey, don't let me stop you, you're not obliged to pay any attention - look around 'em! you'd give me a suggest-punch-in-the-face and I'd deserve it. most of the image-bombing was exactly like what I've described: "I don't like this thread any more, fuck any of you who do." suggest ban is a PERFECT solution for people who think their having become sick of a discussion is reason enough to fuck up others' right to have that discussion.

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

They're banned for at least 51 legitimate reasons!

Hugh Manatee (WmC), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

you can fucking ignore their posts xxxpost

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

or you can suggest that they be escorted out since they are being assholes. it's what you'd reasonably do at a party, and it makes sense to do it here.

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

I'm talking about LJ or Tuomas here

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

legitimate by what measure, though? There's two sides to this, for sure, but I think it's one of the strengths of SB that you can't go all legitimacy-lawyer about it. I watch what posts ppl click SB on, and it's almost universally stuff that boils down to "acting like a bit of a dick". For some people that's being creepy, for other people it's banging on and on about a topic and not actually engaging anyone else on it, for other people it's imagebombing.

Instead of a whole FAQ-load of "things that will get you banned", the threat of SB comes down to "don't act like a dick". You can say that you don't like the defintion of dickishness that the SBing masses are imposing, but I genuinely don't think it's an unreasonable or minority one, at least judging by how it's been used so far.

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

I know I'm being way more irritating than anyone on ILX ever btw

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

As for LJ: given that he's mostly stopped doing the things that got him SBs, and has stopped garnering SBs as a result and still seems to be a happy poster, that reads more like a success story than an argument for "SB MUST GO"

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

And it's nice to see that you've received zero SBs for it.

x-post.

Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

Not by my (legitimate) reasoning, b/c I haven't SB'd you.

Hugh Manatee (WmC), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

I know I'm being way more irritating than anyone on ILX ever btw

I find it lovable and have given you several lovingly-meant SBs in response

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

hahaha Keith!

Hugh Manatee (WmC), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

haha thanks keith that's a relief actually

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

And it might point out that arguing your point doesn't get you SBs. Generally being a dick to other posters does.

Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

anyway I guess I've made my ill-thought-out point about 5000 times on this thread, so I'm out till the next SB thread, catch u later

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:36 (sixteen years ago)

the point of SBs is to forgo argument about what is 'legitimate' and what isn't. there are no legitimacy standards anyone is beholden to, aside from blatant racism or personal attacks or whatever else the mods feel like enforcing. you can post whatever you want. you can be just as irritating to other people as you feel you should be. you can also move to bounce people for whatever standard of irritation they have met in your eyes. if 51 (fifty-one fucking people! that is a lot of people on a not-big board like this) agree with you, or did, at any time, that's as close to any 'community standard' ilx is likely to have.

xps, stet covered this basically

bodied peanuts (goole), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.