Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

plus ethan who opted to not return xp

and dom sort of

unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:02 (sixteen years ago)

o rite

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:02 (sixteen years ago)

dom (controversial...)

xps

bodied peanuts (goole), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:02 (sixteen years ago)

surely stanton has returned tho, under a new name?

unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)

3 suspected trolls, 1 occasional concern troll, 1 nudge nudge wink wink brit, 4 controversial yet beloved regs, 1 controversial and unloved reg

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:04 (sixteen years ago)

Bimble?

Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:04 (sixteen years ago)

bimble was mod-banned iirc

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)

yes but the concept is that suggest bans are suppose to reduce board drama. but they don't; they just deprive interesting people of the privilege to post because some people can't take their personalities for some weird reason.

I disagree with this - I think people are a lot less aggro with each other now than they were a year ago. You're kind of painting everything in a very favorable light - "people can't take their personalities" = "people don't like being called names and spoken to abusively & hounded from threads & trolled relentlessly" etc. I understand that your position is "if a person can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen," but you have got to understand, don't you, that not everyone shares your survival-of-the-most-aggro view?

Not trying to be combative with you, I dig you & respect your position, it just seems like your vision of how ilx ought to work is distinctively yours - for me, it seems clear that things are less unwelcoming than they were, and I view this as a positive development

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)

1 nudge nudge wink wink brit

why single out from contro-beloved regs?

unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)

Dom could have been banned without the suggest ban system.

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)

if that's who you're talking about, j0hn

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)

who are you talking about Crut among the SBd that you can only see "weird reasons" for not wanting them to behave the way they did?

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:08 (sixteen years ago)

I mean there are always exceptional cases, but:

gabbneb
morbs
tuomas
LJ
deeznuts
burt stanton
capn lorax
ade

these people were never really abusive

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)

xpost!

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)

The problem is many of us have stayed on the board for 6 years or more w/out paying thorough attention to all this micromanagement, and we didn't get the memo that a cadre of reformers was changing the ILX cultcha.

Dude how can you be a place SIX YEARS and not notice any changes?

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)

Crut deeznuts was abusive and a pervy fuck to me on and off board.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

half of them had it coming and the other half, well, i disagree but i can see why people might click SB

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

these people were never really abusive

ok lol get the fuck out

bodied peanuts (goole), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

Crut deeznuts was abusive and a pervy fuck to me on and off board.

oh

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:11 (sixteen years ago)

lorax has done his share of pervertalizing posts that got deleted too

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb
morbs
tuomas
LJ
deeznuts
burt stanton
capn lorax
ade

And Jesus how many people from this list are back right now!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

Answer = ALMOST ALL OF THEM.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas still probably the least abusive ilxor (along with ned i guess)

unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

Abbott, did i say ANY changes?! i meant formal, decided-upon, here's-how-we're-running-things changes.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

The bulk of the unbanned people didn't show up immediately banging pans with conspiratorial complaints of some six-year coup that has been boiling in the underbelly of ILX h8rdom behind everyone's backs.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

Morbs all the threads about new mods, SB systems, whatevs were classic clusterfucks that wld be pretty damn hard not to notice!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

why was ethan suggest banned exactly

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

Ask 52 people!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

I just did.

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

went on an image-blast suicide-by-SB iirc.

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

why is that bannable behavior

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

ethan doesn't seem to mind it, from what i hear.

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

why does shooting yourself in the head cause you to be dead?

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

what about imagebombing is inherently "suicide by SB"

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

Are we just mad that SBs have taken away the name of a strawman to type in all caps?

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

btw is it possible to have all the sbs I did removed? I did not actually realise what it meant when I used it, except in the case of Vision (this is the only one I remember doing and possibly the only one I actually did but definitely the only one I would stick by, doubt he'll be back to troll again tho)

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

Guys how did any of you not know what wld happen if you used a suggest ban?

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

The message that comes up when you click Suggest Ban is:

Please be aware that by confirming this action, you are registering your wish to see this user removed from the site.

NOT

Lols!

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously, Crut? imagebombing pisses ppl off to high fuck. You suddenly go on an imagebombing (or a "I've got a hot chick waiting" posting) rampage even in the non-SB era and you're looking at some sort of ban.

stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)

Abbott, BECAUSE WE JUST SAW A THING THAT SAID "SUGGEST BAN," DIDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A NUMBER TO BE REACHED, ETC. Why do you assume everybody who is not jaymc knows everything about this place?

Morbs all the threads about new mods, SB systems, whatevs were classic clusterfucks that wld be pretty damn hard not to notice!

If you want no part of em, it's easy.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

hey mods how many SBs do i have?

omar little, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

You said you knew about it anyway, through whatever Cassandra you were talking to at 77; you can't play ignernt here.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

xp

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously, Crut?

Seriously, Stet. I never knew imagebombing was on the same level as making pervy comments on and offboard.

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

I tend to be online at different times than most ppl and only really read threads about music so I wouldn't really know. And I thought we were just putting in a request for Mod approval you know?

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

what about imagebombing is inherently "suicide by SB"

oh come on man. "it's not inherently courting suggest-ban to be incredibly disruptive"? really?

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

Abb, that was in the last month! Before that I was happily ig'nant.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

Crut he was SUGGEST BANNED a mod can't tell you the whys & wherefores! stet ≠ 52 ILXors who decided that was the straw

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

Morbs you know if you don't know something you can always ask.

a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

exactly, so people like tuomas & LJ are suggest banned without any legitimate reason. xpost

51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.