exactly. gotta know your demographics. the olds watch NCIS and big bang theory I think
― extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:06 (ten years ago)
for those old friends fans
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:06 (ten years ago)
now that we've banned deej and alienated max and jord forever, lagoon counts as an ilx teenager cause no one is left
― iatee, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:07 (ten years ago)
baz∞nga.
― D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:08 (ten years ago)
in terms of borad tenure, attitude or actual age? xp
― extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:09 (ten years ago)
actual age he is now actually 16
― iatee, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:09 (ten years ago)
cool dude [dubsteps into sunset]
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:11 (ten years ago)
that darn dubstep
― extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:13 (ten years ago)
if having jw back would make the board more fun and he wouldn't do terrorism on ilx again, what's the benefit of keeping him out? i see 2 possible explanations
1 ppl are still mad about it - understandable from their perspective (and "they" include mods so \o/) but their grudge shouldn't outweigh the benefit everyone else could enjoy
2 we need to be tough on board terrorism & strictly enforce permaban to set precedent and ensure it doesn't happen again - this would be a good reason if there was still a threat of this happening again. also he's been banned for like what, nine years?
if this had come up two weeks ago the same exact ppl would be like "chaki comes back... over my dead body" but now he's back and everyone's happy
― flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:37 (ten years ago)
maybe he wasn't even being malicious. maybe he was jw.
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:44 (ten years ago)
on the grounds that security holes just had to be exposed.
this 'tude is the worst, though
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:46 (ten years ago)
yeah he cldve just sent an email
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:47 (ten years ago)
kinda think "ppl are still mad about it" minimizes the fact that his actions actively fucked up the site admin's real lives.
i also don't think anyone two weeks ago would have flipped out about the prospect of chaki coming back.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:50 (ten years ago)
sometimes, having extremely immature judgment produces results indistinguishable from malice. for example, three year olds are often known to bite their playmates until they learn that this is completely unacceptable behavior.
the question is, when a putative adult displays extremely immature judgment that is indistinguishable from malice, how do you teach them that this is wholly unacceptable behavior, apart from treating them much as you would a three year old who bites, and if they reached adulthood not knowing how to act, what are the odds they'll learn.
― Aimless, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:51 (ten years ago)
xp cad- eh i'm sure joan crawford would've taken his sanctimonious hardline on it
― flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:53 (ten years ago)
pretty sure jw has moved on with his life and is doing fine without ilx; tbh it's a little pathetic that many of you are still carrying a torch for him after seven years or whatever it is
― mookieproof, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:01 (ten years ago)
kinda think "ppl are still mad about it" minimizes the fact that his actions actively fucked up the site admin's real lives. --call all destroyer
i mean, use whatever language is sufficient to express how they feel, the point still stands: if unbanning leaves probability of it ever happening again unchanged, who loses?
― flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:02 (ten years ago)
last time i saw him he told me he thought he shd be unbanned, that was a couple years ago tho xp
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:02 (ten years ago)
who loses?
and where could we find an instrument sensitive enough to measure the size of the loss?
― Aimless, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)
gawker controversy -> jw unbanned would be an interesting narrative
― chinavision!, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)
life is a journey
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)
he posts funny things on facebook
was the uppers thread his doing? if so, we will always have the uppers thread to remember him by
― sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)
ethan had the right idea. He peaced out and didnt come back and seems not to care less. I envy the man.
― I checked Snoops , and it is for real (Trayce), Friday, 24 July 2015 03:29 (ten years ago)
fezaffe started uppers
― the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:33 (ten years ago)
did he get permabanned too?
― sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:34 (ten years ago)
no idea
― the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:35 (ten years ago)
probably not
we need an oral history of the noise board
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:36 (ten years ago)
i think fezaffe turned into some sort of crescent symbol, and then disappeared into the ether.
― the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:37 (ten years ago)
i thought crescent symbol got banned for some tasteless post in re a dead ilxor?
― sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:39 (ten years ago)
linked this on ilx eras yesterday: http://www.scribd.com/doc/21797466/Confessions-Of-A-Moderator
<3 tom ewing's perspective on noize board:
However, these grafts were themselves small and tended to occur while ILX was still a small community. The larger the community, the more significantly different in-groups may be able to form within it rather than arrive as immigrants. A turning point in the history of ILX came with the formation in 2004 of the ‘Noize Board’, a separate message board set up by a group of newer, mostly younger regular posters who wanted their own space within the ILX set-up.‘Noize Board’ threads were more anarchic and often a lot funnier and more vibrant than other ILX threads, with shorter responses and a much higher proportion of pictures and cutting one-liners. The new board had a divisive effect – almost all of its members still posted on the main boards, which gradually became closer in style to the ‘Noize Board’. But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters.The ‘Noize Board’ is also a collective example of the “loose cannon” contributor who can effect change in a community. They set up their board in a brief period when any ILX member could start a whole new sub-forum, rather than simply new threads. I know of no other online community that has tried this and I wouldn’t recommend it. But the “Noize Dudes” are only unusual in that they were allowed to successfully formalise their status as an alternative in-group: such groups are likely to arise in any community that reaches a certain size. Alternative in-groups, whether internal or grafted, can have immense benefits in terms of keeping dialogue fresh and questioning in-group thinking, but they also carry risks. In-group thinking, alternative in-groups, and the potential distortions and disputes that arise are issues a community moderator needs to deal with.
‘Noize Board’ threads were more anarchic and often a lot funnier and more vibrant than other ILX threads, with shorter responses and a much higher proportion of pictures and cutting one-liners. The new board had a divisive effect – almost all of its members still posted on the main boards, which gradually became closer in style to the ‘Noize Board’. But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters.
The ‘Noize Board’ is also a collective example of the “loose cannon” contributor who can effect change in a community. They set up their board in a brief period when any ILX member could start a whole new sub-forum, rather than simply new threads. I know of no other online community that has tried this and I wouldn’t recommend it. But the “Noize Dudes” are only unusual in that they were allowed to successfully formalise their status as an alternative in-group: such groups are likely to arise in any community that reaches a certain size. Alternative in-groups, whether internal or grafted, can have immense benefits in terms of keeping dialogue fresh and questioning in-group thinking, but they also carry risks. In-group thinking, alternative in-groups, and the potential distortions and disputes that arise are issues a community moderator needs to deal with.
― drash, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:40 (ten years ago)
lol @ I know of no other online community that has tried this and I wouldn’t recommend it.
― sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:42 (ten years ago)
...reddit...
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:42 (ten years ago)
ha ive read that before and the deadpan tone is so perfect
But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters.
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:43 (ten years ago)
xps iirc and what was permabanned and when invited back, he passed on it
― just1n3, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:43 (ten years ago)
and what just got 30 days, like our pal deej
― sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:45 (ten years ago)
i don't feel like there are many clearly delineated in-groups now. there are also too few mavericks. imo.
― Treeship, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:57 (ten years ago)
But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters who kinda sucked anyway
― the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 04:41 (ten years ago)
In the old days noize dudes would stand with the mods around flaming barrels and they would beef together in harmony.
― Meaty Mitts (Old Lunch), Friday, 24 July 2015 04:50 (ten years ago)
Respect to Treeship for answering my post on the wrong damn thread as if I hadn't posted on the wrong damn thread.
― Three Word Username, Friday, 24 July 2015 09:56 (ten years ago)
One problem with sitewide bannings is that they are always listed on the Admin Log as "x has been banned permanently", even when they are intended to be the shorter stints, so unless a mod puts in a qualifier it looks more dramatic than it is. This could maybe be changed to just "x has been banned"?
― emil.y, Friday, 24 July 2015 11:37 (ten years ago)
^^ I'm not entirely sure how this is relevant to the current discussion, but people sometimes seem confused about it. Obv difficult to tell actual reactions from the OMGDRAMAOPPORTUNITY reactions, though.
― emil.y, Friday, 24 July 2015 11:39 (ten years ago)
xposts thanks for posting that drash, i'd never seen it! even though i've been posting since 2006-ish or so i totally missed some of the things he discusses. like the influx of posters from the matador board. when was that? did anyone that posts now come during that wave?
― 1992 ball boy (Karl Malone), Friday, 24 July 2015 14:47 (ten years ago)
nm - there was a footnote that linked to a representative thread (indie guilt c/d)
― 1992 ball boy (Karl Malone), Friday, 24 July 2015 14:49 (ten years ago)
lol
― lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 15:15 (ten years ago)
feel like I asked a pertinent question right at the beginning of this thread that could have been illuminating if answered
― D-4(y)0 (wins), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:18 (ten years ago)
chaki walked right back in the front door― D-30 (gr8080), Friday, July 24, 2015 1:37 AM (15 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― D-30 (gr8080), Friday, July 24, 2015 1:37 AM (15 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
dude don't blow up my spot jeeze
― chaki (kurt schwitterz), Friday, 24 July 2015 16:49 (ten years ago)
did we ever sort this out btw
― irl lol (darraghmac), Wednesday, 12 August 2015 23:49 (ten years ago)
we ended up all being good with it
― Meta Forksclove-Liebeskind (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 13 August 2015 04:32 (ten years ago)