is banning posters for beefing with mods really what we want to do?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (626 of them)

chaki walked right back in the front door

D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 01:37 (ten years ago)

that wasn't what got him banned. Some of his CSS bombs are still there, waiting to explode! The problem was he was - repeatedly - taking advantage of security holes for hijinx, and defending it on the grounds that security holes just had to be exposed. We'd asked him a few times to be constructive and tell us about bugs he found rather than being all "Keith you suck have you even read the regex book here look at what I can do to mess with you now" and he never would because he was Loki or some shit.

The last straw was when he used the feature-not-a-bug of admins being able to post any html they want in yellow-cards to hassle a couple of posters, destroy the admin log and cause a general freak-out, the fallout from and cleanup of which took up a chunk of my holiday -- I was trying to fix that one from the airport bus, ffs -- and also cost a chunk of Keith's billable time.

Allowing someone here who just wants to fuck with stuff and repeatedly didn't care how much grief it caused people left me not seeing the funny side.

anybody who reads this and thinks anything other than "yeah, ok, fair enough" is a a very funny person. jw has totally matured and seems like a very solid dude, I dig him, and he totally earned his lifetime ban

Joan Crawford Loves Chachi, Friday, 24 July 2015 01:39 (ten years ago)

lag∞n just wants to observe chaos. not enough to personally cause it or be responsible for cleaning it up, but to be close enough to cheer it on and call ppl affected by it humorless fuddy-duddies

it's generally nagl

mookieproof, Friday, 24 July 2015 01:49 (ten years ago)

some posters just want to watch the board burn

Mordy, Friday, 24 July 2015 01:50 (ten years ago)

oh come on jw did more than chaos!

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 01:51 (ten years ago)

ITYM some posters just want to grab their willies and wave them in the air, spraying the rest of us with their teenagey piss.

I checked Snoops , and it is for real (Trayce), Friday, 24 July 2015 01:56 (ten years ago)

matlock is on soon folks

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 01:59 (ten years ago)

c'mon goon you can do a better "omg olds" joke than that you're a clever guy

extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:03 (ten years ago)

lol all the old ppl who watched matlock r prob dead now

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:05 (ten years ago)

making the joke itself... a signifier of age

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:05 (ten years ago)

lagunther, central prick

oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:06 (ten years ago)

exactly. gotta know your demographics. the olds watch NCIS and big bang theory I think

extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:06 (ten years ago)

for those old friends fans

oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:06 (ten years ago)

now that we've banned deej and alienated max and jord forever, lagoon counts as an ilx teenager cause no one is left

iatee, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:07 (ten years ago)

baz∞nga.

D-30 (gr8080), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:08 (ten years ago)

in terms of borad tenure, attitude or actual age? xp

extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:09 (ten years ago)

actual age he is now actually 16

iatee, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:09 (ten years ago)

cool dude [dubsteps into sunset]

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:11 (ten years ago)

that darn dubstep

extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:13 (ten years ago)

if having jw back would make the board more fun and he wouldn't do terrorism on ilx again, what's the benefit of keeping him out? i see 2 possible explanations

1 ppl are still mad about it - understandable from their perspective (and "they" include mods so \o/) but their grudge shouldn't outweigh the benefit everyone else could enjoy

2 we need to be tough on board terrorism & strictly enforce permaban to set precedent and ensure it doesn't happen again - this would be a good reason if there was still a threat of this happening again. also he's been banned for like what, nine years?

if this had come up two weeks ago the same exact ppl would be like "chaki comes back... over my dead body" but now he's back and everyone's happy

flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:37 (ten years ago)

maybe he wasn't even being malicious. maybe he was jw.

oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:44 (ten years ago)

on the grounds that security holes just had to be exposed.

this 'tude is the worst, though

oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 24 July 2015 02:46 (ten years ago)

yeah he cldve just sent an email

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:47 (ten years ago)

kinda think "ppl are still mad about it" minimizes the fact that his actions actively fucked up the site admin's real lives.

i also don't think anyone two weeks ago would have flipped out about the prospect of chaki coming back.

call all destroyer, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:50 (ten years ago)

sometimes, having extremely immature judgment produces results indistinguishable from malice. for example, three year olds are often known to bite their playmates until they learn that this is completely unacceptable behavior.

the question is, when a putative adult displays extremely immature judgment that is indistinguishable from malice, how do you teach them that this is wholly unacceptable behavior, apart from treating them much as you would a three year old who bites, and if they reached adulthood not knowing how to act, what are the odds they'll learn.

Aimless, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:51 (ten years ago)

xp cad- eh i'm sure joan crawford would've taken his sanctimonious hardline on it

flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 02:53 (ten years ago)

pretty sure jw has moved on with his life and is doing fine without ilx; tbh it's a little pathetic that many of you are still carrying a torch for him after seven years or whatever it is

mookieproof, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:01 (ten years ago)

kinda think "ppl are still mad about it" minimizes the fact that his actions actively fucked up the site admin's real lives.
--call all destroyer

i mean, use whatever language is sufficient to express how they feel, the point still stands: if unbanning leaves probability of it ever happening again unchanged, who loses?

flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:02 (ten years ago)

last time i saw him he told me he thought he shd be unbanned, that was a couple years ago tho xp

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:02 (ten years ago)

who loses?

and where could we find an instrument sensitive enough to measure the size of the loss?

Aimless, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)

gawker controversy -> jw unbanned would be an interesting narrative

chinavision!, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)

life is a journey

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)

he posts funny things on facebook

was the uppers thread his doing? if so, we will always have the uppers thread to remember him by

sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:06 (ten years ago)

ethan had the right idea. He peaced out and didnt come back and seems not to care less. I envy the man.

I checked Snoops , and it is for real (Trayce), Friday, 24 July 2015 03:29 (ten years ago)

fezaffe started uppers

the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:33 (ten years ago)

did he get permabanned too?

sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:34 (ten years ago)

no idea

the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:35 (ten years ago)

probably not

the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:35 (ten years ago)

we need an oral history of the noise board

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:36 (ten years ago)

i think fezaffe turned into some sort of crescent symbol, and then disappeared into the ether.

the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:37 (ten years ago)

i thought crescent symbol got banned for some tasteless post in re a dead ilxor?

sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:39 (ten years ago)

linked this on ilx eras yesterday: http://www.scribd.com/doc/21797466/Confessions-Of-A-Moderator

<3 tom ewing's perspective on noize board:

However, these grafts were themselves small and tended to occur while ILX was still a small community. The larger the community, the more significantly different in-groups may be able to form within it rather than arrive as immigrants. A turning point in the history of ILX came with the formation in 2004 of the ‘Noize Board’, a separate message board set up by a group of newer, mostly younger regular posters who wanted their own space within the ILX set-up.

‘Noize Board’ threads were more anarchic and often a lot funnier and more vibrant than other ILX threads, with shorter responses and a much higher proportion of pictures and cutting one-liners. The new board had a divisive effect – almost all of its members still posted on the main boards, which gradually became closer in style to the ‘Noize Board’. But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters.

The ‘Noize Board’ is also a collective example of the “loose cannon” contributor who can effect change in a community. They set up their board in a brief period when any ILX member could start a whole new sub-forum, rather than simply new threads. I know of no other online community that has tried this and I wouldn’t recommend it. But the “Noize Dudes” are only unusual in that they were allowed to successfully formalise their status as an alternative in-group: such groups are likely to arise in any community that reaches a certain size. Alternative in-groups, whether internal or grafted, can have immense benefits in terms of keeping dialogue fresh and questioning in-group thinking, but they also carry risks. In-group thinking, alternative in-groups, and the potential distortions and disputes that arise are issues a community moderator needs to deal with.

drash, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:40 (ten years ago)

lol @
I know of no other online community that has tried this and I wouldn’t recommend it.

sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:42 (ten years ago)

...reddit...

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:42 (ten years ago)

ha ive read that before and the deadpan tone is so perfect

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:42 (ten years ago)

But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters.

lag∞n, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:43 (ten years ago)

xps iirc and what was permabanned and when invited back, he passed on it

just1n3, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:43 (ten years ago)

and what just got 30 days, like our pal deej

sarahell, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:45 (ten years ago)

i don't feel like there are many clearly delineated in-groups now. there are also too few mavericks. imo.

Treeship, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:57 (ten years ago)

But at the same time several threads on the new board were devoted to mockery of activities and posters from the main boards, which upset a lot of other regular posters who kinda sucked anyway

the late great, Friday, 24 July 2015 04:41 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.