you'll get yours.
my borad? sweet.
although tbh it would likely make cogh look like a thriving metropolis so i think i'll pass.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link
77 was and is owned by the people
― still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link
( <3 COGH btw )
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link
but I'd rather let kate have her forum where she feels she can express herself freely than do something that would run her off.
― a cross between lily allen and fetal alcohol syndrome (milo z), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link
Since people have contributed to the servers on the entire site, it seems a little wrong for someone to 'own' one board, non?
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, April 5, 2010 7:56 PM (1 hour ago)
i totes agree with this, and im all against the principal of board ownership but like, at the same time, lolbanning etc maybe requires like a partic type of ownership and i think like no boys allowed etc
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link
the noize board, for example, is owned by j0n willi@ms
― jeff, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link
I definitely think ownership is the wrong word to describe this thing -- "custodianship" is more like it.
― my full government name (WmC), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link
borad curator
― velko, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link
tbh no matter how u feel abt this theres no way to stop ppl thinking they own the place
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-06x19-Lisas-Wedding.jpg
― Aerosol, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link
"strut around" is cute imo
― mr. waffles (Nijoli), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:01 (fourteen years ago) link
thats like the most surmounter post ever to have been not posted by surmounter imo
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:02 (fourteen years ago) link
the way i personally see it is thus: Nobody owns a thread, nobody owns a board, the only people who own ILX are those who pay for it's servers. As long as everybody acts decent, it's cool. But even boards specifically made for people (77, 1p3, TMI, The Cape, heck I had the underused ILG Players Club) are not those people's boards. Mods aren't usurping anyone's power, they're serving to make an attempt to keep the dialogue neutral and open and posi and they'll prune anything/one required to keep that the status quo, up to and including board and site mods.
but i'm just a guy
― forksclovetofu, Monday, 5 April 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^this is fine and all but its kinda boring, mod terrorism on the subboards can b kinda fun. just feel like iltmi is a special case bc it has a specifici function wrt things ppl obviously wanna have real convs abt that other ppl might wanna avoid bc of nsfw/squeamish/prudishness w/e
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link
i owned a board once. i gave it away. we cool.
― ✌.✰|ʘ‿ʘ|✰.✌ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:15 (fourteen years ago) link
plax is right, no one talks about anything very serious on 1p3 and no one gets seriously butthurt when they are occasionally lolbanned or their threads are locked. on the other hand, for whatever reason, people really were into discussing the color of their poop, so kate's totaliatarian leanings are a little less endearing and she shouldn't be a mod unless she can chill out a little
― maderator (k3vin k.), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:29 (fourteen years ago) link
"Mod terrorism" as practiced on IRE, IP3, ITR, etc still promotes and encourages discourse and, as such, isn't contradictory towards anything Forks said.
I disagree that donating money buys you a stake in ILX btw.
― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link
serving to make an attempt to keep the dialogue neutral and open and posi
not even sure about this as a stated aim tbph
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:43 (fourteen years ago) link
nega 4 life
― rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:46 (fourteen years ago) link
I disagree that donating money buys you a stake in ILX btw
Damn straight and I don't feel it shd really be brought up to back any opinion ever
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:06 (fourteen years ago) link
^ did not give
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:09 (fourteen years ago) link
ilx plc.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link
iirc the last fundraiser we had happened real fast and some people who wanted to contribute didn't get a chance, but those issues aside it's an irrelevance - ILX has always been much more than the sum of the regrettably necessary dirty finance it occasionally has to dabble with
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link
ILX IS A FEELING
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:14 (fourteen years ago) link
You have tried to insert a duplicate message.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:14 (fourteen years ago) link
v did not give either, tbf v
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:15 (fourteen years ago) link
oh i missed your first ^ lol
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:16 (fourteen years ago) link
"You have tried to insert a duplicate message"
has potential as a meme, with the right decisions made early on in the effort
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:18 (fourteen years ago) link