itt a strange man asks if you saw the ass on that one
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:18 (sixteen years ago)
those two posts were supposed to go in the api thread
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)
what if no one acted like an asshole or sb-ed anyone?
― sarahel, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:31 (Yesterday) [IP:]
that means your modem is not plugged in
― bnw, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:32 (Yesterday) [IP:]
Hahahahaha bnw.
― mu-mu (Pashmina), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:30 (sixteen years ago)
i would rather see it gone too, but i don't think it is going to go. therefore i think people should only be allowed to give out a limited number of suggest bans. maybe 10, though even that seems high. anyone who truly wants more than 10 people banned from ilx might want to look at their own attitudes and expectations.
― estela, Monday, November 30, 2009 12:38 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
I strongly agree with this idea.
― sleeve, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:33 (sixteen years ago)
yeah lets start an sb black market
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
ban and trade
― ‹◦‗‗‗‗‗•› (Lamp), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:52 (sixteen years ago)
fyi SBs have started to expire. the poster closest to 51 had 44 SBs, and that's dropped to 18.
― stet, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:00 (sixteen years ago)
max?
― ice cr?m hand job (deej), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:00 (sixteen years ago)
I bet that wasn't a zing, and was instead an honest and slightly concerned inquiry
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:05 (sixteen years ago)
ok expiry is going to make a big difference. the previous top three (all more than 41 SBs) are now back into single figures
― stet, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:07 (sixteen years ago)
missed my window of infamy :/
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:12 (sixteen years ago)
so if j0rdan had held out a little bit longer - he would have been nowhere near getting banned?
― sarahel, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:15 (sixteen years ago)
haha im pretty sure some ppl sb'd him at the last minute just because it was inevitable & we figured this way he would return on christmas
― ice cr?m hand job (deej), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:17 (sixteen years ago)
"we"
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:17 (sixteen years ago)
not nowhere near -- he had a lot more recent SBs than these other three i've just done xp
― stet, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)
the system works imo.
however, i think that when u come back from the dead, you should get to sb people u already sb'd before getting 86'd.
because they all get a second crack at you (im assuming).
― history mayne, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:49 (sixteen years ago)
i like the idea of a finite # of SBs that can be passed around various users, and you can old spend ones you "earn" but you never know how many you have, if any
― T.M.I. Friday's (s1ocki), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 04:04 (sixteen years ago)
there should be a finite # of votes. or perhaps the more people you sb the more the weighting on those votes gets fractionally divided.
i say this because i really dont read ilx or participate anymore. but about a week ago i saw an old hstencil post and sb'd him for a laugh. then i searched for current user names of as many vile people here i could remember. only came up with 4 or 5.
kate was one of them and seeing just now she caught the ban i'm surprised. not taking responsibility as maybe i put her in the late 40s but still, my action had no justification. and i always just assumed the passive-aggressive folks here used the ban function for venal and petty purposes. i'd take it back if i could.
― sanskrit, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 04:27 (sixteen years ago)
THE SYSTEM WORKS
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:17 (sixteen years ago)
which is to say ppl who "dont read ilx or participate anymore" are suggest banning active posters!
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:18 (sixteen years ago)
lol @ sanskrit dropping in settling some old scores and peacing
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:18 (sixteen years ago)
― stet, Monday, November 30, 2009 8:00 PM (Yesterday)
this was almost certainly me, awesome
― brutt fartve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 06:09 (sixteen years ago)
http://img1.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/c1/c8210.jpg
― velko, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 06:23 (sixteen years ago)
it is funny how a combination of kshighway + actually being a good poster have made KK look like a good poster after all
― a. cole, u thic (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 07:32 (sixteen years ago)
This new expiry thing means we're all going to need to be a bit more carefree with the SBs or no-one will ever get the chop.
― nearly 50 in vagina years (onimo), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 10:14 (sixteen years ago)
SBd you for that
― George Mucus (ledge), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 10:16 (sixteen years ago)
It's been my line of thinking for a while that six-month expiry would solve the major structural problem in the way the SB system works (ie loads of people would get to 51 eventually).
I think part of the problem has been that, simply put, bans have been occurring too frequently. I think this new system should, hopefully, weed out the people that *really* wind people up while ensuring that we don't have to go through the SB argument seemingly every week.
It'd be good if people could see how this new system pans out before getting back into this argument. It's already had a major impact on the complexion of the list and will hopefully work a lot better.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 10:38 (sixteen years ago)
where do we go to complain that poster x hasn't been banned?
― Louis Cll (darraghmac), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 11:03 (sixteen years ago)
i hate that guy
― George Mucus (ledge), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 11:21 (sixteen years ago)
yeah but if he was banned- oh boy watch out for how he becomes everyone favourite poster all of a sudden
― Louis Cll (darraghmac), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 11:25 (sixteen years ago)
here's my q
u can only SB a person once right?
can u re-SB after the 6-month ban disappearance?
― T.M.I. Friday's (s1ocki), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)
y
― stet, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)
is it cool if i write a script that SBs my most hated posters on regular six-months intervals?
ideally it would be pegged to their birthday
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)
who r ur most hated posters u can webmail me if u want but not really
― plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)
i could've gone for a lazy zing there, but i'll just be frank with you:
maxeveryone from hastingscyclists/gays/anyone in tight clothes the entire country of englandaeon flux
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)
seems fair
― max, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)
we need a suggest ban england button
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)
suggest teabag
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)
gbx doesnt like max?????
― afa the i can c (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)
this is like when i found out that gear didnt like mark c
was that a secret btw
gbx's least favorite posters have two birthdays a year
― iatee, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)
a good reason to hate someone imo
― iatee, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
i also don't like bikers or anyone from the town i grew up in, yes
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
h8 yrself, u r max
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)
*_*
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)
two, the max
― ‹◦‗‗‗‗‗•› (Lamp), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)
fu im on nyquil and just woke up from a 16 hr hibernation
tbh i stopped reading your list after "max" to freeq out typing
― afa the i can c (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)
hey wait a minute!
― jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)
lol