sharting irl / sweatpants imo
― ice cr?m, Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
dont shart yr jorts bro
― farting irl (cankles), Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
didnt u get temp banned 4 making rape jokes a couple of weeks ago????
yellow carded for assuming ilx poster suzy had a sense of humor :( :( (deserved as much I guess)
― iatee, Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
wait, whatr u complainin abt again?
― plaxico (I know, right?), Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:10 (sixteen years ago)
The Minutemen continued to tour even when Watt was suffering from chronic diarrhea. He simply duct-taped the leg openings of his sweatpants and sloshed onward.
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)
lool
― ice cr?m, Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)
"Maybe Shartying Will Help"
― Twisted Hipster (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
^^^ serious lol
― iatee, Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
amazing work!!
― afa the i can c (roxymuzak), Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
hahahahaha
― bear say hi to me (ENBB), Sunday, 29 November 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
omg
― tectonic p (latebloomer), Monday, 30 November 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
kind of tired of normal relatively smart cats thinking it's so adorable to play act at being inarticulate archie bunkers
^^fwiw i agree with this
― jØrdån (omar little), Monday, 30 November 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
i dont know anyone besides cankles who could be called an "archie bunker"--i always thought the constant use of abbrevs and elision of vowels was a jhoshea thing anyway
― max, Monday, 30 November 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
sharting econo
― mookieproof, Monday, 30 November 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
sharty sharty sharty let's all get nasty
― ilx mooncup (forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 November 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
don't be sharty to the party
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 30 November 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
this is as good a place as any to say that i think the SB system is bad.
i've argued in favor of it before, or at least, argued against whatever dimwit arguments tuomas was coming up with. and don't get me started on momus. don't get me started!
but it's lame. i liked the idea of 'community policing' cos it seemed more fair, decentralized and uh organic than relying on mod actions alone, but this has not been the result. so here we are, another SB discussion.
i'm in favor of scrapping the system altogether. if there is a mobilization of ilx public opinion to make this change, then i am behind that.
― goole, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
It seems that mods (or at least the ones who've commented on the subject) feel SB is here to stay, no matter what the public opinion is. I find it kinda sad, I thought the pre-SB moderation system worked fine as it was (and in my opinion almost all ILX mods have been fair and just in their moderation), so it didn't seem like there was any real need for this feature. Why hold on to a system that has obviously caused more problems and bad blood than the one we had before?
― Tuomas, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
i should totally be a mod, btw
― mookieproof, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
you should!
― sarahel, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)
i should totally get ILC mod rights for this login because i had them on my old one pwetty pwease
― a. cole, u thic (acoleuthic), Monday, 30 November 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)
bring back ban {x} threads
― ice cr?m, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
xp - probably should post that on mod request rather than here.
― sarahel, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
absolutely not
― lift this towel, its just a nipple (HI DERE), Monday, 30 November 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)
canks' grams
just to clarify, cankles is quoting a classic ILX post by ethan with the macaroni thing
― angels we have heard while high (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 30 November 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)
ban de Soleil
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Monday, 30 November 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
i would rather see it gone too, but i don't think it is going to go. therefore i think people should only be allowed to give out a limited number of suggest bans. maybe 10, though even that seems high. anyone who truly wants more than 10 people banned from ilx might want to look at their own attitudes and expectations.
― estela, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
― a. cole, u thic (acoleuthic), Monday, November 30, 2009 3:28 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
just login w/yr old account if u need to mod - das what i do
― ice cr?m, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
I think this would be a definite improvement, it should discourage SBing for for no good reason.
― Tuomas, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
i guess jho, it is not much of a sacrifice
haha you're given 7 but you can use all 7 up on one poster if you like? cue mayhem
― a. cole, u thic (acoleuthic), Monday, 30 November 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
you should be given 51 to use as you please
― harbl, Monday, 30 November 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)
what if you got 1 sb to use each time you got sb'd? (that seemed to work pretty well in the movie 'pay it forward')
― iatee, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)
so any time i want to sb someone i start acting like an asshole?
― harbl, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
I think it would be safer to act like an asshole ahead of time
― iatee, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)
what if no one acted like an asshole or sb-ed anyone?
― sarahel, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)
that means your modem is not plugged in
― bnw, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)
i don't know how keith wld code that neway
― plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 30 November 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)
this guy in a Staples parking lot near my work was trying to sell me some cologne out of his car that he said came with a high APR
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
I thought it was just some chemical content shit but at some point the dude let me know that APR stood for automatic panty removal
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:16 (sixteen years ago)
uh oh i'm having a fantasy, a new scent by calvin klein
― jØrdån (omar little), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:17 (sixteen years ago)
itt a strange man asks if you saw the ass on that one
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:18 (sixteen years ago)
those two posts were supposed to go in the api thread
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 30 November 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)
― sarahel, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:31 (Yesterday) [IP:]
― bnw, Monday, 30 November 2009 22:32 (Yesterday) [IP:]
Hahahahaha bnw.
― mu-mu (Pashmina), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:30 (sixteen years ago)
― estela, Monday, November 30, 2009 12:38 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
I strongly agree with this idea.
― sleeve, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:33 (sixteen years ago)
yeah lets start an sb black market
― super sexy psycho fantasy world (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
ban and trade
― ‹◦‗‗‗‗‗•› (Lamp), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:52 (sixteen years ago)
fyi SBs have started to expire. the poster closest to 51 had 44 SBs, and that's dropped to 18.
― stet, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:00 (sixteen years ago)
max?
― ice cr?m hand job (deej), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:00 (sixteen years ago)
I bet that wasn't a zing, and was instead an honest and slightly concerned inquiry
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:05 (sixteen years ago)
ok expiry is going to make a big difference. the previous top three (all more than 41 SBs) are now back into single figures
― stet, Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:07 (sixteen years ago)