an open letter to the mods from Whiney G. Weingarten

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (462 of them)

j/k <3 u dogg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)

http://faculty.virginia.edu/MyTube/fall2009_adspotlights/files/2009/09/Willie-Horton.jpg

steamed hams (harbl), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.nhtsa.gov/buckleup/ciot-planner/planner07/resources/creative/general/Posters/NoExcept-72dpi.jpg

access flap (omar little), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

maybe we can let him back but before and after each post he gets a badge like

ATTENTION THIS POSTER RECEIVED 52 SUGGEST BANS READ AT UR OWN PERIL

Bobby Wo (max), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)

the most likely outcome of this is either:

- ppl will start posting/crossposting comments to Idolator, as I suggested on the F2K thread
- J0rdan or another kind proxy will post Whiney's responses on that thread when appropriate

the blackest thing ever seen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

I support this proposal, but I'm a bleeding heart like that.

sarahel, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

parole hearing

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

it's his first offense, come on.

sarahel, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

he's been offending me forever

cutty, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, don't see this happening. In what way would it be fair to other people who've just sucked up their SBs?
(Whiney: semantics aside, mods didn't decide to ban you, you were SBd). If you get a friendly poster to post for you on the thread those posts can stay, but otherwise, month's a month.

stet, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, don't see this happening. In what way would it be fair to other people who've just sucked up their SBs?

You could unban L0u1s and confine him to Cape of Good Hope?

sarahel, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

no.

tehresa, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

it was worth a shot.

sarahel, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)

wait louis is banned?? i never know

surm, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

u guys were wasting time here when we should all be saying mean things abt whiney in the F2k thread

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://i742.photobucket.com/albums/xx65/jenn8865/Decorated%20images/true-love.jpg

mookieproof, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)

not an obstical

tehresa, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)

nothing an obstitrician couldn't fix

sarahel, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

You could unban L0u1s and confine him to Cape of Good Hope?

not until the Australian cricket season starts to pick up

"i find your antics mirthful and infectious" (King Boy Pato), Friday, 23 October 2009 05:15 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.spiritlink.com/first30days.gif

velko, Friday, 23 October 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)

he'll be back by then anyway

undergrad lovers (electricsound), Friday, 23 October 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)

only if he publicly renounces his (Maura's?) Moldy Peaches h8ration on Idolator...via web-cam--i wanna savor the bitter tears of remorse dammit!

the not-fun one (Ioannis), Friday, 23 October 2009 07:53 (sixteen years ago)

what is the difference between a sockpuppet/ip runaround and a posting proxy? i think any whiney proxy should also be banned. this is serious business!

richard belzer (jeff), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:44 (sixteen years ago)

so are you saying anyone who posts something by a currently banned user should also be banned?

sarahel, Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)

KRAMER: You know this whole place is going vrrrrrrrrrrrrt, downhill. I could have come in here last week with a bad plum but I let it go.

JOE: Well let me put a solution for you: do your business elsewhere, I don't want your business.

KRAMER: Oh now you don't want my business.

JOE: No, I don't want your business and from this moment you're banned from the store, you're banned!

KRAMER: But what am I gonna do for fruit?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.spiritlink.com/first30days.gif

we should have another fundraising drive so we can buy up like 15-20 copies of this book and mail it to those that are sb'd

a goon boy (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

who would keep them in their house i would volunteer bcos it would be a good talking point when visitors come by

plax (I know, right?), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

^^great idea

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

have you shagged ariane de bonvoisin yet?

velko, Tuesday, 27 October 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)

so are you saying anyone who posts something by a currently banned user should also be banned?

ab-so-lutely

richard belzer (jeff), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)

belzer otm

lad: "et tu, lady?" (haitch), Wednesday, 28 October 2009 00:22 (sixteen years ago)

Dear Whiney,

http://i17.tinypic.com/6ptj2ua.gif

am0n, Friday, 30 October 2009 04:39 (sixteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

Dear Roxy,

Why did you lock the diarrhea diarrhea thread on 1p3 iirc?

~Whiney

airin' brrr (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

why does Roxy lock any thread?

sarahel, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.cozykittens.com/Herbie101.jpg

airin' brrr (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

one of my favorite locks

did we ever do a best thread locks poll

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

xp - precisely - if you gaze into the smoke persian's face, you will discover why roxy locked the diarrhea diarrhea thread.

sarahel, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)

i need some place to tell rox that this thread:

Now this is how it started: THE ILX 1980s ALBUM POLL RESULTS!!

I don't know what the title is reference to, but every time i see it, i sing the "origins of the addamms family" song from third grade

airin' brrr (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)

Do you have weird alternative lyrics for songs that play in your head?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

THEY ALL BECAME RETARDED

airin' brrr (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

xp Edward - best thread locks nominee - see today's new COGH thread.

sarahel, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,190 for "THEY ALL BECAME RETARDED"

airin' brrr (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

kinda think his temp ban was a bit harsh

sarahel, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

don't speak of it or you'll get tempbanned

51 tyson (crüt), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

first rule of tempban

bowlin' wolf (Edward III), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno why he was banned, if it was just a case of being overly whiney then it seems a bit much. he does give a pointer, what wth the DN and all

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

sb?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

That will happen soon enough.

lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

okay i read that thread - basically he was making a complaining joke about the non-77 poster's display name discussion that got those threads moved to ILE - and he got banned for that? or was it that he didn't stop when Dan warned him to stop?

sarahel, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

see you in 27 days, dumbass

harsh. i like that guy; what'd he do?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

j0rdan that might have been a bad system game tho because this is whineys 2nd sb which is supposed to be a 60 day ban.

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

you will rue the terrible day whiney returns to speak the truth before the ppl

death panel of the mods (Edward III), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

nah, it was to prevent him from possibly serving concurrent sentences

...

Did you mean "consecutive"? Because otherwise you are still not making any sense.

lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, consecutive

ain't no half-trollin (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

only whiney could parlay a 3 day ban into a 63 day ban, I gotta admit the guy goes big

death panel of the mods (Edward III), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

j0rdan that might have been a bad system game tho because this is whineys 2nd sb which is supposed to be a 60 day ban.

― O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:49 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

well at that point it had been established that neither l0u1s jagg3r nor kate served 60 days

plz point out where i was wrongly characterizing whiney in this quote

― O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:47 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

i didn't realize that whiney had made a specific note about you guys in his letter

ain't no half-trollin (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

This is only Whiney's 2nd sb? for real?

What if mod was one of us? (kkvgz), Thursday, 4 November 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

:3

am0n, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

Well actually what Sarahel did was revive this thread to say the temp ban was harsh and THEN go and read the Rollins thread to find out why he was tempbanned. Disingenuous as hell.

― Matt DC, Thursday, November 4, 2010 3:15 AM (8 hours ago)

I beg your pardon, what? This came up on a different thread, and Dan had said that basically Whiney got banned for pissing him off. I understand the increasing length of temp ban thing that's built into the system, and that that's why it was 27 days, but not overriding the system, which Dan has done in the past, seemed harsh.

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

When did omar little become such a policy lovin pussy? shameful, bro.

the questeon, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

we're all rollins imo

am0n, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

Wait who cares if I registered today and asked for an invite? What exactly are you guys protecting? So I have to like know some of you guys personally if I want to read the super secret elite board everyone talks about?

― the questeon, Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:55 PM

am0n, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

it's just kinda hard to have a rational discussion with mods about this kinda thing, when it feels like, as a poster, when you do bring stuff up, you get accused of "meta snark" or "concern trolling" or have your motives questioned. It's kinda the equivalent of when posters accuse mods of conspiring or all posting from the same slumber party.

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

oh shit i misread the questeon as "the question"!

i <3 the questeon

call all destroyer, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

where was all this mods rapey stuff going on, obviously thats uncool but i didnt see it at all which is why i was all why did whiney get banned

max, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

When did omar little become such a policy lovin pussy? shameful, bro.

― the questeon, Thursday, November 4, 2010 3:07 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

max, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

xp the instances i found were in the rollins thread and the k. wiig thread

call all destroyer, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

omar gone soft, better watch his back in corner delis.

String Yr BLOBs (bnw), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

o i didnt read the kristen wiig thread

max, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

also in the 77 beatles thread

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

whiney got banned for the exchange in the rollins thread

ain't no half-trollin (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

When did omar little become such a policy lovin pussy? shameful, bro.

― the questeon, Thursday, November 4, 2010 3:07 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

― max

¯\(°_o)/¯

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

it is a message board on the internet, i think it's all lol

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

some of you people seem to think this is actually important, which is more lol

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

whiney will be back soon, ready to roll. he's probably out there enjoying the lovely nyc weather, having a break from the ilx lyfe.

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

it is important enough to discuss on a message board on the internet

String Yr BLOBs (bnw), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

it's good times

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

so, will Whiney get unbanned after his 30 days for being sb-ed are over, or what?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

http://i56.tinypic.com/ao5g21.gif

romoing my damn eyes (Nicole), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

frankly most of the mods have been on this thread so we havent really discussed it yet

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

this is whineys 2nd sb which is supposed to be a 60 day ban.

he can make a plea for leniency but his cotton mather act might put a kink in those plans

death panel of the mods (Edward III), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

thanks, jjj - i know i've trolled you in the past, but i appreciate your transparency and candor in mod-related issues.

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

whiney is always a hard case to defend in board lawyering

String Yr BLOBs (bnw), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

compared to cankles?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

madoff vs manson

death panel of the mods (Edward III), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

mods should have a pre-determined annual bank of ban days for whiney and just use a few up whenever he is overheating.

Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

maybe we should put these bans in some kind of lockbox

death panel of the mods (Edward III), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

whiney is the bob probert of ilx, his job simply involves spending a decent amount of time in the penalty box.

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

That is such blasphemy.

romoing my damn eyes (Nicole), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

Ty Domi, maybe.

romoing my damn eyes (Nicole), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

an open letter to the mods from Whiney G. Weingarten

my "i'm only gonna come back stronger" post was made when I was under the assumption that I was banned for 27 days over pointless, arbitrary dan perry beef. If it was a three-day comedy ban, I would have honestly laughed along with Dan about the whole thing. However I will gladly take my democratically decided 30-day 51-suggban sentence like a man, as it is clearly what the people want.

Also, sincere, non-snarky apology to Abbbott or if anyone who got legitimately offended by my 2 or 3 posts re mod/rape/phil. It was an admittedly dickish way to point out what I felt was a hypocrisy of mod action being "ruin the best thread on 77" instead of "confront a dude about his rapey display name."

That is all.

ain't no half-trollin (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7gkD5uyl-U

death panel of the mods (Edward III), Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

had subway for lunch in his memory

am0n, Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

drowned a doe eyed girl while sobbing uncontrollably

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

pulled out the tablecloth and upset the pussy buffet

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

wrapped a keffiyeh around a puppy's neck

omar little, Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

argued with a mod today in his memory

wakafledia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

OK, cool, everybody seems to have successfully had their say, so --

Unfrozen Caveman Board-Lawyer (WmC), Thursday, 4 November 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.