Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1325 of them)

xpost
it's the sexy curves in the 0s and 8s

I am not an animal, I'm a human SBing (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 9 October 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

I guess one problem with that is that with certain posts (like an argument w/ somebody) it'd be pretty obvious who that ban came from?

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

not when more than one poster can click on the SB link for a particular post

as strikingly artificial and perfect as a wizard's cap (HI DERE), Friday, 9 October 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)

right I just meant certain situations, not the majority of them

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, pretty sure that when cankles made that "mudflappers" post to Kate, she wasn't the only one to sb him for being totally out of line.

sarahel, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

guys demanding a list of posts is kind of going against the month of self reflection you're given to figure this all out!

tehresa, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

I think a lot of problems could be solved if mods just had a policy to email sbanners whenever they see a sb that doesn't seem to have an obvious purpose (someone being a dick)

if people knew they might theoretically have to justify their actions, I imagine people would very quickly be shamed out of lolsbs?

I guess that's based on an assumption that most people here are capable of being shamed, which might not be the case...

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

xp - i thought that was Yom Kippur?

sarahel, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

I think a lot of problems could be solved if mods just had a policy to email sbanners whenever they see a sb that doesn't seem to have an obvious purpose

i for one think this would be a highly effective use of their time

thomp, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

well, one would hope that the threat alone would change the way people used sbs pretty quickly

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

(and so there would be substantially fewer to deal w/)

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

the mods could actually just have a policy to email people whenever they see they've made an obnoxious post - then people would feel shamed out of being obnoxious

thomp, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

yeah maybe the shame thing isn't a good angle

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

maybe the mods could crochet "bad" users an SB to wear on their chest at home, around the office, etc

pariah carey (Mr. Que), Friday, 9 October 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

any sb-ed post should automatically generate its own poll thread.

sarahel, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

i would sb in order to generate mod email

ice cr?m, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

I'm sure Gandhi is a million times more respected these days than the guy who invented Suggest Ban.

poll please

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Friday, 9 October 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

Not fair, there isn't a million posters on ILX.

Tuomas, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

Yes there am.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 October 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

I for one know that I respect Gandhi a lot, but the inventor of Suggest Ban has given me lols that will never end so long as SB continues & Tuomas from Finland still lives. Mohandas K., luv u boo but I have to follow my heart.

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Friday, 9 October 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)

if i were to set the Suggest Ban link to "display: none;" in caek2.css (i.e. remove the ability to SB someone for the non-SBing Gandhis), would the mods accept it?

caek, Friday, 9 October 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)

Who do you respect more

pariah carey (Mr. Que), Friday, 9 October 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)

I wish I had 10,000 socks

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Friday, 9 October 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.sockdreams.com/_shop/edit/index.php

pariah carey (Mr. Que), Friday, 9 October 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)

possible caek.css enhancement:

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f325/caek/Picture1-15.png

caek, Friday, 9 October 2009 20:15 (sixteen years ago)

that'd be a pretty good background pattern

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

I think a lot of problems could be solved if mods just had a policy to email sbanners whenever they see a sb that doesn't seem to have an obvious purpose (someone being a dick)

if people knew they might theoretically have to justify their actions, I imagine people would very quickly be shamed out of lolsbs?

I guess that's based on an assumption that most people here are capable of being shamed, which might not be the case...

― iatee, Friday, October 9, 2009 7:22 PM (1 hour ago)

actually the bigger problem is that it's based on the assumption that lolsbs are common, and they aren't

FCK R VWLS (jjjusten), Friday, 9 October 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)

The killfile extension still works, right? I don't get why people don't just do that instead. "I won't see this person's posts anymore" seems much less intrusive than "I don't want to see this person's posts anymore, and I don't want other people to be able to either."

I Am Curious (The Yellow Kid), Friday, 9 October 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

actually the bigger problem is that it's based on the assumption that lolsbs are common, and they aren't

fair enough

iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

actually the bigger problem is that it's based on the assumption that lolsbs are common, and they aren't

― FCK R VWLS (jjjusten), Friday, October 9, 2009 3:34 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

You know what post prompted it. You're inferring the reason behind it. :/ don't worry, that's all my tuomasing on the subject for now.

bnw, Friday, 9 October 2009 21:47 (sixteen years ago)

I think the mods have (if by implication only) made it pretty plain that people are EARNING THEIR SUGGEST BANS CONSISTENTLY, regardless of what people want to bitch.

ceci n'est pas une pipecock (Trayce), Friday, 9 October 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)

so really we should just stop having this same argument over and over again, and the two most recent victims will be back as of November 7th?

sarahel, Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:00 (sixteen years ago)

so really we should just stop having this same argument over and over again

NEVER

THE ARGUMENT MUST GO ON FOREVER

FOREVER

a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:01 (sixteen years ago)

is there some "in every suggest ban thread ever" thread that we can revive?

sarahel, Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:07 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSYV-nEE300

¯ ϖ ¯ (Dr. Phil), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:07 (sixteen years ago)

never been clear on who loujagg is.

system is still rotten shit, obv.

Your Favorite Saturday Night Thing (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:12 (sixteen years ago)

is there some "in every suggest ban thread ever" thread that we can revive?

― sarahel, Friday, October 9, 2009 10:07 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark

just so long as the 'i clicked on a thread about suggest bans to tell people to stop discussing them' is well represented

bnw, Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)

Underlying problem of the SB system:

Trying to quantify something, using SBs, that is extremely hard to quantify (the amount of people/instances that someone has legitimately acted out of line and/or been really fucking annoying, a number that will differ according to who you ask).

Our own justice system the US combines some quantification (3 DUIs and your license is taken away, more than 5 grams of weed and you were apparently intending to sell rather than just get hang ten with your friends) with human judgment - the judge, lawyers, common sense. The problem on ILX, of course, is that if a mod makes a decision on a SB, yay or nay, it's probably going to be controversial and they'll take some heat. IRL the judge at least gets to make real cash money and wear that cool black outfit as a reward for having to make tough decisions. ILX mods only experience the negative end.

The only thing I can suggest is using the SB system as a way of flagging problematic users that everyone hates, but leaving the final ban up to the mods' judgment. If a user has 51 SBs within 6 months, take a look at them. If they're pulling gabbnebbs, give them the heave ho, if they're LJ mk. III, let them be. That's imperfect, but arguably less so than the current system.

The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)

pretty sure that's what we've been doing... AFTER each 51'd user has his/her 30 day time out. combines quantitative-based punishment with a human touch :)

tehresa, Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)

and you're all welcome to start paying the mods any time, too! (hah)

tehresa, Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:06 (sixteen years ago)

I just noticed that you can suggest ban 'system'

what happens if system gets 51 sbs??? poll results kept secret forever??

iatee, Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)

no poll results for 30 days

tehresa, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:02 (sixteen years ago)

kind of like this idea

thomp, Saturday, 10 October 2009 07:41 (sixteen years ago)

BELLYFAT ?

StanM, Saturday, 10 October 2009 09:30 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah it is you insensitive bastard.

My Way or the KSHighway (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 09:31 (sixteen years ago)

No, can't you see the first and the last letters are the same, it's BELLYFAB.

Tuomas, Saturday, 10 October 2009 09:31 (sixteen years ago)

tbh HELLYEAH are my new favourite band. I don't wanna spoil that by listening to them.

My Way or the KSHighway (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 09:33 (sixteen years ago)

OK I didn't spoil that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYEuWctr5no&feature=channel

My Way or the KSHighway (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 09:35 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.