Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB

i think the dude had 50 for a long time.

completely ridiculous imo

like punching kitten for peeing on your pillow

It's a kitten ffs

if he had 50 for a long time i bet some of those should have been dropped.....

like i think he was on 50 for several months ... pretty impressive actually.

I would definitely sb lj if he peed on my pillow tbh

like i think he was on 50 for several months ... pretty impressive actually.

this is because he never posts anything suggest bannable afaic--ppl probably just did it before because it's lou jag

Don't worry, he'll be back -- on that board Dom was running for two weeks.

i lost the URL for that board

i guess NRQ is the Farrah Fawcett to LJ's MJ ;_;

wait what louis got banned >:(

yeah i think the mods should just let him back, this was dumb

for all the talk about "30 days is the norm but it's ultimately left to the mods' discretion," they should be like yeah, this was funny but shouldnt have happened, sorry you 51 dorks

What did L0uis J. do?

I almost never interact with him, but that guy's gone through a remarkable change in his posting style. I almost never see him write anything objectionable these days.

^^^ding ding ding ding

wow, what a world. did lj get sb'd or was it something else? admin newsfeed is silent on the matter. miss u lou <3

i think nrq is a great poster despite being confrontational, hope he comes back to keep the brits honest.

Yuh unban louis

I kinda liked history mayne - why was he banned?

sb's over multiple accounts were over 51

it says in the admin log xp

ah I see - curious to know which posts got him sb'd, also who his socks were

Cos he's NRQ and he had 2 logins that accrued 51 across them (so sez the log).

xpo

ah see I don't know who NRQ is - I'll have to do some sarahel type digging

who is history mayne?

ah xp

also don't know who NRQ is

"special guest stars mark bronson"

it was the same dude?

i know that user name for sure but i can't link any specific posts to the anme

lol *name obv

he and history mayne, yes
xxp

for all the talk about "30 days is the norm but it's ultimately left to the mods' discretion," they should be like yeah, this was funny but shouldnt have happened, sorry you 51 dorks

― jackie off the chain (k3vin k.), Thursday, October 8, 2009 9:57 PM (37 minutes ago) Bookmark

^this

this is fucked up

i mean, i like both these guys. seems like sb's capture ppl who get in fights as much as anything

Jeez, unban LJ already, c'mon. Look at his posts over the past year, and compare them to any idea of what SBs are for. It doesn't line up.

Shit, give 30 of his SBs to me, I'll carry the weight for awhile.

Christ died for your SBs

i hereby swear that i would like lj to return to this board

http://i33.tinypic.com/2q3oqx3.gif

dudes i get what you are saying, but there have been people that wanted cankles back right away, or NRQ, or tuomas, or morbs. this isnt any different than those cases, other than the fact that lj (and yeah, i dont necc understand why) has gotten more sbs than any other person on the board at this point. my personal opinions dont outweigh the 52 people that sbed him this time, and neither does anyone elses.

also if you've sbed people, you kind of have to respect that other peeps get to do the same thing, and almost everyone on this thread has at least a few (sometimes a lot) of sbs they've thrown out there. if you are going to use the system, you cant complain when someone you would prefer to stay gets the 51.

make the LJ sb list public

JJJusten, I hear what you're saying, but let's not forget the famous verse "And then JC said 'Let your SBs disappear like dew at 10am - the time for retribution has long passed. Let us forgive. Your SBs should be as cotton, once thorny and the cause of bloody hands, and now a fundamental element of soft, comfortable t-shirts."

- JC 23:12

IT'S IN THE BIBLE PEOPLE

yeah, i'm not criticizing the sb system, just saying dudes should come back after a reasonable amount of time because they contribute a lot

But yeah, I hear what you're saying. I don't envy anyone who has to make mod decisions on the SB issue, it's not an easy position to be in.

still john, you (the mods) should be able to veto a dumb SB.

1) how old are some of the sb's

2) this is not really like a lot of those ppl because the point of sb is to indicate to posters that their behavior needs to change--as we all know lj is a totally different poster these days (having learned his lesson from 2 priors) and i haven't seen him be offensive or be a dick at all in recent memory (i mean maybe he has on threads i haven't opened). so he modified his behavior and this happened again anyway, and that has to be a result of "who he is" not "what he has posted"

come on guys, just think of all the great display names you can come up with. every cloud has its silver lining.

i feel comfortable saying that this is not going to become a permaban for lj (and def not for NRQ since its the first time its happened), but no matter what i think about either situation, it'll be a month for NRQ and at least a month for lj.

uh bunches of xposts

btw akaik there are lots of regular posters in the 40s right now who have NO habitual, repeated pattern of being offensive or dickish--we are going to get to have this conversation again pretty soon