SUPER BOWL EXTRA LARGE

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
DISCUS

gear (gear), Thursday, 26 January 2006 07:58 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah!

van igloo (van smack), Thursday, 26 January 2006 11:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Those are some raggedy ass cheerleaders.

adam (adam), Thursday, 26 January 2006 16:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Wait, are the Steelers one of the few teams who refuse to stoop to hiring torn up strippersprofessional cheerleaders??

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 16:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah the Steelerettes were disbanded after 1969 apparently.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:14 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah they had the steelerettes in the 60s but that got scrapped. apparently the rooneys think it's corny. one thing i never quite get is how they almost never show nfl cheerleaders on tv (and it's not just some anti-cheerleader cuz they show them plenty during college games)(maybe they're just pervs - 'them chix is old enough to drink - GROSS!').

xpost

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:14 (eighteen years ago) link

do the chargers still dress their cheerleaders like actual cheerleaders (sweaters, pleated skirts, etc)? i mean i don't mind the 'waitress at a c&w stripjoint' look (i really really don't mind it) but i always admired that about the chargers.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:16 (eighteen years ago) link

The Lions used to use honest-to-goodess high school cheerleaders and they still might.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

one thing i never quite get is how they almost never show nfl cheerleaders on tv

what?!?! guess we're not watching the same games or something.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

ok they show them but NOT NEARLY ENOUGH. and there's usually fucking graphics on the screen obstructing shit. also when they show the guys in the booth to show 'yes they're really at the game - and they wore ties!' they could use that time to show the cheerleaders. also during the pregames leave the audio of the analysts on but show the cheerleaders, i know what jimmy johnson looks like already.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:46 (eighteen years ago) link

I would really rather not see 99% of the cheerleaders. I've been to games in person. Creepy assless middle aged genetic copies. Maybe that's just the Redskins and Cardinals cheerleaders.

So Steelers, Giants, who else doesn't deem the girls worth the field???

Green Bay also does the "real" cheerleader unis things. Jimmy Mod and I discussed once how that's actually more pervy than the "traditional" Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders rip off gear.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:54 (eighteen years ago) link

Hahaha I just realized, what kind of sad, lame person is an Arizona Cardinals cheerleader? No wonder they looked so beat up.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Browns = no cheeleaders, no logo, no wins.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:56 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah teh Lions don't have them cuz the Fords think it is "anti-family values" or something

so yeah, like laurence said .. they used to have high-school baton twirlers that would go into each end-zone during time-outs and twirl away ... I don't even think they have that anymore at Ford Field.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Thursday, 26 January 2006 18:13 (eighteen years ago) link

The Jets have "flag boys" who run across the field after a td or pat.
LAMEZ

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 January 2006 18:24 (eighteen years ago) link

That's really tremendously gay.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 18:34 (eighteen years ago) link

also when they show the guys in the booth to show 'yes they're really at the game - and they wore ties!'

Watching Joe Buck and Troy Aikman stand there in front of the FOX logo during the Seattle game made me think, "Hell, they could be in Burbank for all I know."

And ever since Peter Jennings freaked me out at one of the political conventions by turning off the arena crowd and showing the blue weatherman wall behind him, I don't trust any of those fuckers anymore.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 26 January 2006 18:39 (eighteen years ago) link

THEY ARE PROBABLY STANDING IN FRONT OF HOT BLUE-SCREEN COVERED CHEERLEADERS!!

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Thursday, 26 January 2006 19:21 (eighteen years ago) link

The Saintsations are the saddest cheerleaders in the NFL. They're always out of sync, sometimes one is facing the wrong way, they all look like they've got a couple kids at home.

adam (adam), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Like it's not bad enough you've had to have the Saints for these years, you have to have those women as well. OTOH you do have a logo, unlike the Browns.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Are the Ben-Gals still around?

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:41 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/44839

Report: Colts Poised For Biggest Upset In Super Bowl History

DETROIT—Coaches, front-office executives, and players around the NFL all agree that an Indianapolis victory in Detroit next Sunday would result in the greatest underdog story in Super Bowl history, if not in all of sports. "After losing to Pittsburgh in the second round of the playoffs, for the Colts to come into Detroit and beat them—as well as the Panthers, their nominal opponent—that would almost certainly be the comeback of the century," said Bills general manager Marv Levy. "No one would ever dare say that Manning or Dungy couldn't win the big one after that. Yes, it's a long shot—the longest—but with the Steelers and Carolina concentrating on beating each other, Indy is perfectly poised to come from literally out of nowhere to complete their all-time greatest triumph." At press time, no member of the Colts would comment on the possibility of a Super Bowl victory, further fueling speculation of a colossal upset in the making.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Carolina?

polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 26 January 2006 20:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Nation's Snowmen March Against Global Warming is the weakest one yet.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:18 (eighteen years ago) link

falcons cheerleaders are hot. eagles cheerleaders are hot too, i like that the eagles site makes you click 'you must be age appropriate etc.' before you can get to the cheerleader part (for good reason). even skins cheerleaders are hotter than jimmy johnson.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:37 (eighteen years ago) link

dear god i need to get laid SOON.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:38 (eighteen years ago) link

ally or daver or whoever maybe just delete all my posts on this thread.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:38 (eighteen years ago) link

i know a couple of ex-carolina cheerleaders that might be down for something

gear (gear), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:40 (eighteen years ago) link

they might even get down for something.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago) link

or go down.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago) link

gear if you're talking about jaymc i'm not so interested. ymmv obv.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:54 (eighteen years ago) link

:)

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:54 (eighteen years ago) link

If we're comparing cheerleaders to JIMMY JOHNSON, then yes, obv, cheerleaders win.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 21:57 (eighteen years ago) link

you've never seen jaymc holding a pair of pom poms and wearing pale blue hot pants obv

gear (gear), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:01 (eighteen years ago) link

I am honored that Blount thought I was actually an admin on this board.

I am also in the "need some" market as well - any eager Eaglets out there on the prowl for some IT meat, please drive up I-95 to my palatial estate, and I will romance you w/ some hott comic book chat and Arizona Green Tea.

Hello.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:19 (eighteen years ago) link

alright guys, this isn't craigslist casual encounters.

gear (gear), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:20 (eighteen years ago) link

MISSED CONNECTION, DEC 24:

YOU: ON YOUR OWN 17 YD LINE, THROWING A FOOTBALL, WEARING #10. YOU GOT INTERCEPTED BY A REDSKIN AND I FELT REAL BAD FOR YOU.

ME: GIRL IN SECT 113, ROW 12, KIND OF GETTING A BIT SICK AFTER HALFTIME, RED HAIR.

I REALLY LIKED U. IF U SAW ME U SHOULD EMAIL ME! LIKE, GET SOME COFFEE TOGETHER?? OK.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:24 (eighteen years ago) link

jay schroeder just caught wood

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:28 (eighteen years ago) link

Skip Bayless' new column. I hate this fucking guy!

DETROIT -- I'm writing this as I travel to my 31st consecutive Super Bowl.

This has always been my second favorite sports event -- The Masters wins by a single blade of Augusta National grass. But this year, the Super Bowl is beginning to feel like the Indy 500 without Danica.

Super Bowl XL is anything but Extra Large. For most fans who aren't Seahawks or Steelers fans, this matchup seems like it should be returned and exchanged.

If you love your Seahawks or your Steelers, please quit reading now. This isn't for you. This is for everyone else out there who is trying -- and trying -- to get excited about the NFL's showcase game. I sense less buzz about this Super Bowl than any I've attended. If any Roman-numeral game has ever deserved only one week of buildup, it was this one.

Super Bowl life ends at 40?

While Seahawks fans are sleepless in Seattle, media members are sleepy in Detroit. Somehow, the Seahawks and Steelers in Detroit seems like a consolation game. After three sensational weekends of playoffs, this is an anticlimax. Now we're paying the price for all those upsets.

How can these teams ever generate enough star power to live up to the telecast's Oscar-worthy commercials?

No Peyton or Brady or Vick or buzz.

No rivalry or bad blood or controversy or buzz.

Only zzz.

These Super Bowl highlights shouldn't be immortalized by the towering tones of John Facenda. Shelley Duval should narrate: "Once upon a time, there were two teams..."

The problem here is that, for the first time, the Super Bowl features two underdogs, two Cinderellas, two teams that came from nowhere on destiny-kissed rolls. One underdog can make for a can't-put-it-down script -- see some kid named Brady vs. Kurt Warner's "unstoppable" St. Louis Rams four years ago. But though this year's point spread is Pittsburgh by 4½, this feels like a game without a favorite.

The Steelers, the first sixth seed to make it to the Super Bowl, barely made the playoffs thanks to a fairly easy closing schedule. They beat Kyle Orton's Bears in a snowstorm in Pittsburgh, then took care of Minnesota, Cleveland and Detroit.

But would they have won their first playoff game, in Cincinnati, if Bengals quarterback Carson Palmer hadn't been hurt on his second play? Doubtful. Would they have finished off the season's most shocking upset, in Indianapolis, if Colts cornerback Nick Harper hadn't weaved back into a sprawling ankle tackle by Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger? No. Would the Steelers have been able to win in Foxborough if the Broncos hadn't upset the Patriots the week before in Denver? Highly doubtful. Would the Steelers have won in Denver if an early poor pass by Roethlisberger had been picked off in the flat by Champ Bailey and returned for a stadium-rocking touchdown? Probably not.

And now the AFC's sixth seed is favored over the NFC's top seed? This feels like a moderately interesting, Week 9 nonconference game.

Would the Seahawks have risen from 2-2 to home-field playoff advantage if Terrell Owens hadn't torn apart the Eagles? If Michael Vick hadn't regressed? If the Giants, Redskins and Cowboys hadn't been forced to do battle twice in the East and the Panthers, Bucs and Falcons hadn't beaten each other up in the South?

Things just kept breaking right for the Seahawks. Without bye weeks, the Redskins and Panthers were banged up before playoff games in Seattle -- where the Seahawks' 12th Man gives them the NFL's loudest and strongest home-field advantage.

Now we should write odes to a team whose MVP just might have been its fans? Who won't be much of a factor in Detroit?

A year ago, we had enough subplots to last us three weeks. We had the Belichick-Brady dynasty vs. the T.O.-McNabb Eagles. Would Owens' ankle and fibula miraculously heal in time for the game? Would Patriots enforcer Rodney Harrison separate Freddie Mitchell's head from his body after FredEx couldn't even remember his name?

I can't believe I'm writing this, but I'm starting to miss T.O.

This is a game without an established superstar -- unless you count Seattle left tackle Walter Jones, the lone cinch Hall of Famer. Pittsburgh's Jerome Bettis is not -- not after never leading his league in rushing and never having transcendent postseason impact. Bettis, a six-time Pro Bowl player, has been very good. Not great.

Bettis' returning to his hometown to play in his first Super Bowl in what probably is his final game is a nice story. But that doesn't make him Jim Brown or Walter Payton or O.J. Simpson or Emmitt Smith.

As much as I respect the Rooney family, I couldn't help chuckling the other day when Steelers owner Dan Rooney compared this team to the Terry Bradshaw team that won its first of four Super Bowls. Come on. That team had nine future Hall of Famers -- Bradshaw at that point being the least likely candidate.

Best case, this Steelers team has three candidates -- Bettis, Roethlisberger and Troy Polamalu.

Roethlisberger has the best chance of becoming this game's breakout Madison Avenue star. But as good as he is in his second season, it's laughable to hear angle-starved commentators already reaching to compare him with a young Marino or Elway. Calm down. Roethlisberger doesn't have Marino's trigger or Elway's mobility or either one's velocity. First let's see if Big Ben can beat the Seahawks.

Strictly from a football standpoint, this matchup is pretty intriguing. You have two pretty good, very hot teams that didn't play each other. Will the Seahawks be able to stand up to the spotlight and play as fast and furiously as they did at home? Will the "new" Steelers continue to be pass-first?

Whoops, another puncture in our Super Bowl balloon. The black-jerseyed, mud-and-blood Steelers often abandoned their running game early in their playoff road wins and opened up the offense and even resorted to trick plays. Though they're the Super Bowl home team, they've chosen to wear their white road jerseys. Now we don't even have a vaunted bully.

We have two very likable teams and coaches. We have Steelers coach Bill Cowher doing what a desperate, couldn't-win-the-big-one Mack Brown did at Texas -- backing off, loosening up, letting his young quarterback throw the ball. We have Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren, slipping off an early-season hot seat and now admitting he was beginning to doubt his ability.

You can't wait for Sunday, can you.

That's why I'm rooting for Steelers linebacker Joey Porter. Not in Sunday's game, but during Tuesday's media day. Porter is the only player on either team whose mouth is big enough to launch this game back into watercooler America's consciousness.

Please, Joey, say: "It's hard to get excited about playing the Seahawks. They wouldn't have made the playoffs in the AFC."

Please say: "Matt Hasselbeck has a lot of Jake Plummer in him. He rattles in big games."

Please say: "I guarantee we'll win by three touchdowns."

You're our only hope, Joey. Don't let us down.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 02:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Chuck Klosterman, i hate this guy too:

Monday, 1:54 p.m. ET
Something that's becoming clear (and perhaps predictably so) is the ferocity with which the NFL aspires to promote the concept of the Super Bowl, a goal that requires everyone involved (including you) to embrace a specific philosophical contradiction: On one hand, we are supposed to view Sunday's game as the most significant conflict since the Tet offensive, because only a game of that magnitude could warrant such an ostentatious display of hyper-accelerated Americanism; at the same time, we are forced to concede that the game itself is fundamentally meaningless, since nothing this mammoth and transcendent could possibly hinge on something as trivial as Hines Ward's proficiency at running the corner post. It's the kind of circular logic that drives the Patriot Act: This singular game is so important that it's (obviously) more important than any single game.

Here's (sort of) an example: There is a lot of Super Bowl merchandise available in this Renaissance Center, and throughout the city as a whole. This, obviously, is neither surprising nor problematic. But here's what always baffles me: Why would anyone buy a T-shirt (or a hat, or an ascot, or a waterproof matador cape) that merely promotes "Super Bowl XL"? An inordinate percentage of the available items in the Renaissance Center's gift kiosks do not feature the logos of the Seahawks or the Steelers; they generically advertise the abstract existence of a football game. This would be like going to see Marilyn Manson at Madison Square Garden and buying a $22 T-shirt that said, "THEATRICAL, DRUG-FUELED ROCK CONCERT." It reminds me of the nonspecific commercials TV networks like NBC run that promote the channel itself, almost as if they assume there are actually people who privately think, "I have no idea what's on television right now, but I better check NBC first. I get the impression they're especially confident about the quality of their current programming."

And yet ... I suppose all of this nondenominational Super Stuff inadvertently defines the aforementioned concept of the Super Bowl, unquestionably the most bipartisan athletic affair in modern culture. At every sporting event, there is a percentage of the audience who does not care who wins and who loses; the Super Bowl is probably the only major sporting event where this is true for the majority of its audience. Twenty minutes ago, I ran into a reporter named B.J. Reyes, a newspaper reporter from Hawaii who's working on a freelance story for That's Guangzhou magazine, an English language publication in China. Football is (apparently) growing in popularity over there, especially as a youth sport (although they don't play tackle, for some reason -- it's all flag). Weirdly, Philadelphia Eagle tight end Chad Lewis is the face of the NFL for the people of China. Lewis attended BYU (and because he subsequently did a Mormon missionary in Taiwan), he speaks Cantonese fluently. Consequently, Lewis has become the gridiron's Far East ambassador; when the Super Bowl was first broadcast in China, he simultaneously delivered both the play-by-play and the color commentary. Within the world's strongest socialist regime, Chad Lewis is Brent Musburger.

Reyes told me that -- for the third year in a row -- the Super Bowl is scheduled to be televised in Guangzhou on a one-hour delay, which means it's essentially live, but it's on the air at something like 7 a.m. I'm guessing the game will be watched by one percent of the local populace, which (though I could be wrong) is approximately 67 billion people. And I'm sure these people won't care what happens. But perhaps they'll understand the concept, even if I do not.

Monday, 10:23 a.m. ET
DETROIT -- I am currently typing in ESPN's Detroit command center, which essentially means I am on the 18th floor of a very confusing building that is (apparently) supposed to signify the city's renaissance, inasmuch as the facility is actively called The Renaissance Center. This is a universe without corners; The Renaissance Center is essentially four cylindrical skyscrapers that provide no sense of geometric order. I keep hoping to bump into Ron Jaworski; I have no doubt he could enthusiastically explain the logic of this structure, as well as detailing what I should do if I step out of an elevator and everyone in the food court has dropped into Cover 2.

It's oddly quiet here on the 18th floor; there are about 14 dudes in one room and all of them are staring at laptop computers. Two people are talking about Brett Favre's possible retirement, and I occasionally hear John Clayton's dulcet voice mention something abstract about free agency. Everyone is understated; somehow, I anticipated more physicality. Thus far, I have exchanged a playful forearm shiver with absolutely no one.

There is apparently an ESPN "Global Planning Meeting" at 11 a.m.; there are several sheets of paper on the walls proclaiming this event. I suspect this meeting will be where ESPN (a) plots how to cover the Super Bowl and (b) decides how it will respond to the Palestinian elections (I say we play hard to get). It's weird being here, because everybody knows each other, and I don't know anyone, and everyone has work to do, and I have nothing to offer; all I can really do is look at the Internet and check the results from the SAG awards. I see that the big winner was "Crash," a movie designed for people in Los Angeles who just figured out that racism was "complex" (and must therefore be secretly central to every conversation any two Americans ever have). I wish one of the bears from "Grizzly Man" would eat Matt Dillon and Ludacris.

In other news, an intriguing dynamic is beginning to emerge within the hearts and minds of the Motor City. The local Detroit media appear obsessed with two diametrically opposed scenarios: The first is that Super Bowl XL is going to prove their community is a vibrant, dynamic metropolis with limitless resources and underrated energy; the second is that hosting this Super Bowl will prompt everyone in the national media to mercilessly criticize the totality of the metro area at every possible opportunity.

Detroit is like a 16-year-old girl who just paid $110 for the haircut she always wanted, but now she's driving to school and checking herself in the rearview mirror, and she's starting to suspect that she looks a little like Tawny Kitaen on the cover of "Out of the Cellar." Kids can be cruel, rockers.

Sunday, 11:30 p.m. ET
Here is a true story about Detroit that happened to somebody who isn't me: A man employed at one of the city's two major newspapers exited his downtown Detroit office to go home and drink a glass of wine; he worked the late shift, so it was already around midnight. The journalist adjusted his glasses and chatted on his cellular telephone, briskly striding down the sidewalk toward the company parking lot.

Suddenly, an unknown car pulled up beside the journalist, screeching to a halt; a large gentleman emerged from behind its steering wheel. This unknown gentleman walked over to the newspaperman and wordlessly punched him in the face, knocking him to the ground. "Get up," said the puncher. "Get up!" The newspaperman did not get up, as he suspected following these directions would result in more face punching. "Get up," the unknown assailant repeated. "Get up! You know what this is about! You know what this is about!"
The puncher kept making demands, but the victim's terror slowly morphed into mild confusion; to the best of his recollection, he had done nothing to warrant an unannounced pummeling.

"I think you have the wrong guy," he said, still crouching on the Michigan pavement. "I've never seen you before. I was just walking to my car. You are hitting the wrong guy." The journalist peered up at his attacker; the attacker looked down at his victim's face. It immediately became clear the puncher was, in fact, punching the wrong dude. Obviously, this was an awkward situation. The puncher uttered an expletive, returned to this vehicle, and fled the scene. The newspaperman found his cell phone, readjusted his glasses, and found himself oddly unsurprised by the event that had transpired. This, after all, was his hometown.

It's great to be in Detroit.

When ESPN asked me to cover Super Bowl XL, I was hesitant. I have a lot on my plate these days: I'm developing a sitcom for UPN about Antonio Davis' wife (it is tentatively titled "Oh No You Did Not Just Use The Metric System!" and is slated to star Wanda Sykes). I'm also trying to reenergize the tourist economy of New Orleans with "unconventional" humanitarian Anna Benson (she's like a cross between Thomas Paine and Albert Schweitzer, plus a killer rack). I enjoy watching football, but I also enjoy contributing to the actualization of society; in gambling terminology, this is what we refer to as a push. However, I eventually came to my senses: I simply could not pass up the chance to spend a week in hyper-sexy Detroit (the so-called "Houston of the North") in order to hear 140,000 sportswriters explain why Jerome Bettis is a class act.

The Super Bowl represents different things to different people. To some, it is akin to a secular holiday -- a drunken, three-hour Christmas for those who hate Jesus. To others, it is simply the annual matchup between the finest pro football team in the American Conference and the finest pro football team in the National Conference; mysteriously, that is not the case this season, as both teams are from the AFC.

But regardless of how you feel, one question demands consideration: What does the Super Bowl mean to me? What does the Super Bowl represent to Chuck Klosterman, a random writer you have never met and (in all likelihood) have never even heard of? That is the quandary that has America talking. And that is the quandary I will attempt to answer through this sporadically updated weblog, a process Arctic Monkeys fans like to call "blogging."

I have never "blogged" before, and people sometimes ask me why I do not have a "blog." The short answer is: "For pretty much the same reason I don't own a dog." If you're interested in the long answer as to why I do not "blog," you will have to read my blog, located at whyidonothaveablog@blogspot.gov (please leave comments and trackbacks!). As you might anticipate, I'm rather stoked about this new venture, as it will allow me to do the following "blog-o-centric" things:

Create useless slang for retarded hipsters.

Link to 70-track collections of Paul Stanley stage banter.

Post semi-nude photos of a young Cloris Leachman.

I guarantee this will be the greatest one-week sports blog ever written, or at least the best one since Jacqueline Susann's unforgettable blogging of the 1967 Ice Bowl. If this is not the best sports blog you have ever read, I will personally drive to your home, clean your garage, wash your car, shingle your doghouse with pancakes, and blow up your children with dynamite. That is my guarantee.

I shall not Vander-jack this opportunity; like Kobe against the Raptors, I am Napoleon Solo (i.e., unstoppable one-on-one). So, wassup, rockers? Do you (metaphorically) feel me? It's time we all embrace a little game I like to call North American football. It's time to make keen references to Shaun Alexander's addled skull. It's time to get punched by random strangers. This is Super Bowl XL. And I am ready.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 02:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah that Bayless column was total ass. I read that earlier and was just like, "there's 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back."

he tries to front like he's this massive football fan or something. dude, if you are a football fan, you are excited about the Super Bowl. period. the Super Bowl is the Super Bowl. He's just pissed because he actually has to try to think about something to write about -- o no! column doesn't write itself -- and so failing that, he just writes about how he can't think of anything to write about.

So proud that Chicago ran him out of town. everyone in this town threw a party when he took his ball and left.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 03:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Scrolling past those posts are 10 seconds of my life gone forever. THANKS GEAR!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 04:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Would JFK have lived had he not been shot three times in the head? Maybe. Would the crew of the Colombia had survived if their shuttle hadn't exploded? Somehow. Would jabbing a pair of scissors through my left eye blind me? Not absolutely. Would my aunt be my uncle if she had a dick between her legs? Probably.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 05:25 (eighteen years ago) link

next person who posts skip bayliss i'm posting colin cowhere transcripts. I AM NOT FUCKING AROUND HERE.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 05:45 (eighteen years ago) link

COWHERD

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 05:46 (eighteen years ago) link

For fuck's sake DON'T MAKE HIM DO IT. I have to hear Cowherd turn trucks for some landscaping company on ESPN Radio (because that loudmouth shitwit lives about 10 minutes from me) - I'd rather have Jim Rome palpating my testes.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 06:11 (eighteen years ago) link

TRICKS. Turn TRICKS.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 06:11 (eighteen years ago) link

"But would they have won their first playoff game, in Cincinnati, if Bengals quarterback Carson Palmer hadn't been hurt on his second play? Doubtful. Would they have finished off the season's most shocking upset, in Indianapolis, if Colts cornerback Nick Harper hadn't weaved back into a sprawling ankle tackle by Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger? No. Would the Steelers have been able to win in Foxborough if the Broncos hadn't upset the Patriots the week before in Denver? Highly doubtful. Would the Steelers have won in Denver if an early poor pass by Roethlisberger had been picked off in the flat by Champ Bailey and returned for a stadium-rocking touchdown? Probably not."

Ha ha ha holy fuck WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN. Would the Steelers have won all their playoff games if the other teams outscored them? Highly improbable!!

can we just rename this forum 'skip bayless - whatta cocksucker'

Milhouse is not a meme. But 'Milhouse is not a meme' IS a meme. (Adrian Langston, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 12:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Pittsburgh resorting to trick plays shockah!

Pittsburgh has ran a trick play in every game of Cowher's coaching career for heaven's sake.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I think Ally was mostly addressing peepee.

Dan (Never Thought I'd Type That) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 February 2006 20:40 (eighteen years ago) link

OMG THAT SENTENCE WINS ILNFL ILE ILX THE SUPER BOWL AND THE WORLD CUP

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 6 February 2006 20:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, seriously haiku, don't tell me I have to start putting names in front of all of my posts so you figure out I don't mean you, bub.

Anyway let's all be honest here. Thread connections reveal all:
# The real reason the Seahawks lost (28 new answers)
# Gareth (6 new answers)

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:21 (eighteen years ago) link

(and by "people" I actually meant the Seattle players/MIKE HOLMGREN who have gone out of their way to make allusions/ACTUALLY HAVE SAID that the refs costing them the game, and a couple sports writers, and not really anyone specifically here posting on this thread)

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Need to get some better zebras next year.

Yep.

steelerman, Monday, 6 February 2006 23:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Thanks. Helpful.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:30 (eighteen years ago) link

As someone who was rooting for the Steelers, I woke up this morning feeling like a 2000 Bush supporter, going "Look, it's the Electoral College, people!"

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:30 (eighteen years ago) link

That basically happens every year. Not to you specifically. I can't remember the last time I didn't see at least one columnist claiming the refs cost the Super Bowl. Christ somewhere in the archives I'm certain there is some sad Boston sportswriter who actually claimed that versus the Bears or some shit.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:33 (eighteen years ago) link

You know, if Gore had won Tennessee, he would've been president.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:43 (eighteen years ago) link

Are we getting back into that "Would the Steelers have made the Super Bowl if the Denver Broncos were entirely composed of DRAGONS instead of MEN? Probably not." territory?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Dragons would've totally burned the Steelers.

HIGH FIVE

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:48 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm partial to this reasoning:

# the 'fuck you' e-mail
# The real reason the Seahawks lost

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 February 2006 23:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Are we getting back into that "Would the Steelers have made the Super Bowl if the Denver Broncos were entirely composed of DRAGONS instead of MEN? Probably not." territory?

AHAHAHAHKAHAHGHAHFH I AM DYING

Milhouse is not a meme. But 'Milhouse is not a meme' IS a meme. (Adrian Langston, Tuesday, 7 February 2006 00:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Ease up, tough guys. I'm just sayin' that, as a football fan, I was disappointed with the game. I watched with a bunch of Steeler fans who couldn't hardly muster a "YEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAH"! at the end cuz they felt twas somewhat of a gift.

btw, what with the 108 new-ball-on-every-play deal? How many drops from the o and d of both sides? Its like they laced the things with Crisco (and which made that low catch by Ward(?) for a first down more impressive).

peepee (peepee), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 01:54 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah the dropped balls were really the lowlight of the game, if you ask me. What the hell? The whole league has been full of that this year though. At least all the games I've watched. It's like they're tossing around slugs or something instead of footballs.

http://www.footbec.com/dragon_logo_final.jpg

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 02:41 (eighteen years ago) link

(I honestly think that the officiating in that game was absolutely no worse than the officiating you see on any given Sunday and I just always get bristled up when people get really het up on it just cuz it's the Super Bowl. It ain't like that Testeverde last-play-of-teh-game phantom touchdown from years back. As long as something isn't as egregious as THAT I don't think it's game-destroying. UNLIKE DROPPED PASSES. LOOKIN AT YOU JEREMEY SHOCKEY)

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 02:43 (eighteen years ago) link

It's like they're tossing around slugs or something instead of footballs

if they had been tossing around slugs, there's no question which team would have won

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 03:30 (eighteen years ago) link

the squawks can drop anything, that was like the jake plummer we knew this was coming eventually memorial redux. it being sof' boy doing so much bibbity bibbity *drop* just added a rimshot. i'm not sure what was up with the 'new balls every single play of the first half' thing - they think that many hof worthy events might happen? tags trying to score some extra taco money on ebay? for a league that's about rigging it for hi-scores that does seem odd.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 03:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Steelers in hollow victory SHOCKAH!!!

Alex in Tupelo, Tuesday, 7 February 2006 10:27 (eighteen years ago) link

I would be worried, if they started tossing around slugs, for the safety of the slugs. They'd get squished.

I think every time from now on a team plays crap all of a sudden in the playoffs in exactly the manner you'd expect them to but thought they wouldn't, nay, couldn't, we should call it the Jake Plummer Memorial Redux. Because it doesn't have the same ring as the Peyton Manning Special Move.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 14:56 (eighteen years ago) link

Well the Super Bowl is finally over and I can now go back to hating the Steelers. I have touched a Terrible Towel for the last time.

They were mere pawns in my $ grab. Mercenaries to be used up and discarded.

Goodbye Pittsburgh, my Babylon.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:02 (eighteen years ago) link

guys...I've got to be honest...I am losing ALL respect (and I used to have a lot) for Holmgren. It's making me feel really bad for Alexander and Hasselbeck who have been utterly professional. Is it just me, or is it like, you EXPECT "We wuz robbed! Fire the refs! We ain't got no respect!" shouting from the players, who aren't exactly paid to be geniuses of marketing, but from the coach it's a little beyond the pale? Especially when the players kind of aren't doing it? I'm feeling really bad for the players!

I kind of want Holmgren's phone number so I can let him know that the refs didn't make him and his qb manage the game clock like they were playing in the Puppy Bowl. Someone give me a good reason why I shouldn't spend my evening tonight accomplishing this goal?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:53 (eighteen years ago) link

thank you for your support

http://www.lynetteeklund.com/Bartles%20and%20James%20Parrot.jpg

(xp)

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:55 (eighteen years ago) link

i lost more respect for holmgren when i saw his hissy fit on the sidelines after the steve smith punt return was allowed to stand. but by no means do i want to dissuade you from calling him up tonight.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:58 (eighteen years ago) link

haha there was one point during the game when they had a close-up on holmgren when he didn't have his playsheet in front of his face--he was asking (presumably of hasselbeck) "do you have a play?"

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:00 (eighteen years ago) link

If Pitt doesn't call a timeout at the end of the first half the clock would still be running.

mookie, you are to be pitied for one day the Browns will rise up and...(transmission ends)

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:03 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah yeah the Holmgren reacts to calls like a homo thing still stands but seriously this is like getting to be beyond hissy fit. Take it like a man, or a walrus, or whatever you are already, for christ's sake! I mean geez one comment would be one thing but every day since Sunday, come on, son. Who do you think you are, the coach of the Kansas City Chiefs?? THERE'S NO CRYING IN FOOTBALL.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:16 (eighteen years ago) link

I wish every team was just coached by Ditka, Cowher and Parcells already. What the hell is with whiny guys and nice dudes in the NFL?? I want heart attacks on the sideline, coaches punching coaches, drool. That's what football is about. This knitting circle nonsense must end.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:17 (eighteen years ago) link

I wish I could take back the things I said defending Peyton Manning's one weak ass diss about "protection problems," cos even though I still don't think it was that bad, I feel like by saying so I'm supporting this girlification of the NFL ranks.

I've convinced myself, phone calls all around!!

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

basically we need more juggaloos calling the plays

gear (gear), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I wish every team was just coached by Ditka, Cowher and Parcells already. What the hell is with whiny guys and nice dudes in the NFL?? I want heart attacks on the sideline, coaches punching coaches, drool. That's what football is about. This knitting circle nonsense must end.

the steve spurrier experiment was terrible.

basically we need more juggaloos calling the plays

not unless you wanna see shaun alexander get shot or shanked with a hatchet.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:25 (eighteen years ago) link

He's a clone, everyone knows that makes him invincible to hatchets.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Also Spurrier is not Parcells, Ditka, or Cowher. I don't want guys who are like those people coaching. I want only those three people coaching. And possibly myself but let's not get into that. Tho seriously can you imagine the press conferences??

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

We need Jim Mora to bridge the gap between emo girlydom and manly man shitfits.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:48 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah cmon stence, spurrier's no lombardi/ditka man's man type, dude's a dandy thru and thru.


daver otm re: both moras.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:06 (eighteen years ago) link

It's more about Spurrier being kinda crap and awful. HE'S NO JIMMY JOHNSON, EVEN.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Daver and blount OTM, particularly now that Vermeil has retired (again).

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:16 (eighteen years ago) link

This is one of the reasons why we weren't crying to see Holmgren go, he was kind of a weenie baby here but had the macho gunslinger players to watch his back.

(Of course, we then hired Ray "One and Out" Rhodes and Mike "Inexplicably High Winning Percentage Considering He's Just a Butter Statue" Sherman, and now Mike "Watch Out NFL I Was the Offensive Coordinator for the San Fran-fuckin'-cisco 49ers" McCarthy.)

But virtually all these boring technocrats are better than NBA coaches, who actually have to whine to get any calls at all, which is why the "great" ones are, well, Phil Jackson. What kind of Buddhist does all that wasteful face-contortion crap?

Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

Wow I don't know what to think about this, but almost all of the first page of GIS results for "Butter Statue" are paintings of the Buddha! What do you know that we don't?!

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:31 (eighteen years ago) link

But virtually all these boring technocrats are better than NBA coaches, who actually have to whine to get any calls at all, which is why the "great" ones are, well, Phil Jackson. What kind of Buddhist does all that wasteful face-contortion crap?

if phil jackson's a "buddhist" then dave raposer is a used-car salesman. just sayin'.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:34 (eighteen years ago) link

he meant butter statue though.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:43 (eighteen years ago) link

jim mora's an intense dude, i like him a lot. blount, gregg knapp - should he stay or should he go????

Milhouse is not a meme. But 'Milhouse is not a meme' IS a meme. (Adrian Langston, Tuesday, 7 February 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago) link

http://hoopchina.com/bbs/attachment/Mon_0510/39_937.jpg

Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 19:03 (eighteen years ago) link

Could someone please post a picture of Cowher making that face he makes as if he's about to start bawling his eyes out cuz his big brother took his happymeal toy?

peepee (peepee), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 20:06 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.camcojb.com/sbXVtd.jpg

mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 12 February 2006 01:36 (eighteen years ago) link

roffles @ murder

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Sunday, 12 February 2006 16:21 (eighteen years ago) link

thank u mookieproof

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Monday, 13 February 2006 02:34 (eighteen years ago) link

seventeen years pass...

Trying to deposit 100 into various online sports books but getting denied ahhh

calstars, Sunday, 11 February 2024 20:43 (two months ago) link

I’m all in on SF baby!

calstars, Sunday, 11 February 2024 20:43 (two months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.