i was so pissed after the 1st half that these clowns might beat new england and then lose the title game by 4 scores
― daria-g, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
Why is Nantz getting so uppity about kicking the PAT? They need to score a TD again either way, if it needs to be 27 instead of 26 then they'll adjust then.
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:37 (fifteen years ago)
i like tacos
― marios balls in 3d for 3ds (Princess TamTam), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:37 (fifteen years ago)
i thought eric gave u the creeps
Steelers if you don't break the hearts of Jets fans around the country then you are not the storied franchise that Raider fans know of old. FUCK. THEIR, SHIT, UP.
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:37 (fifteen years ago)
2 pt convers was a no brainer there imo im a bit baffled myself
― ice cr?m, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:38 (fifteen years ago)
24-19 is no different than 24-20.
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
mangold looks like a kate beaton drawing
― marios balls in 3d for 3ds (Princess TamTam), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
that jets TD looked like an nba pick-and-roll
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 January 2011 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
Mangold looks like an oversized Keebler elf, imo
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:40 (fifteen years ago)
diff is that 27-19 isn't recoverable...
― taiga mutha (nakhchivan), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:40 (fifteen years ago)
it just means that if the steelers kick a fg then the jets have to run the 2pt if they score again
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:40 (fifteen years ago)
VG, that works too
― marios balls in 3d for 3ds (Princess TamTam), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:40 (fifteen years ago)
That was gigantic.
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:41 (fifteen years ago)
i guess xxp
― taiga mutha (nakhchivan), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:41 (fifteen years ago)
27-19 is tieable. 27-18 isn't.
― C-L, Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:39 PM (50 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
well the only possible scenario where it matters is if jets get a td then pitt gets a fg - which is unlikely but its really the only thing you have to base yr decision on
― ice cr?m, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:41 (fifteen years ago)
g-d i really should have gone to bed at the half so tired
― taiga mutha (nakhchivan), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:42 (fifteen years ago)
I figure if the Jets went up 25-24 they would go for 2 because 25 is no different than 26.
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:42 (fifteen years ago)
THROW THE BALL imo
― wee-based god (J0rdan S.), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:44 (fifteen years ago)
haha i just realized ive been rooting for the jets for a while now - i dont really want them to win but i do want excitement
― ice cr?m, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:44 (fifteen years ago)
AND I AM SRY OK
not accepted
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 January 2011 02:45 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like the best way for this to go is for the Steelers to get like 2 yards on 3rd down and then the Jets get an offsides or running into the kicker or something on 4th and 4 to give the Steelers the first down.
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:45 (fifteen years ago)
sanchez int in the endzone as time expires
― ice cr?m, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:46 (fifteen years ago)
Basically I am content that my team is in the SB and now I wish for the other game to end as painfully as possible.
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:46 (fifteen years ago)
Icecr?m you may leave now
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:46 (fifteen years ago)
Oh man the Packers have had 3 of their past 4 games only officially settled on an INT with a minute left in the game, I am all for another one of those.
throw it
― daria-g, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:46 (fifteen years ago)
same here, and i actually have a tiny bit of money riding on the Steelers winning by 3
― get off my lawn (rockapads), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
g/o
― ice cr?m, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
SEE U
― wee-based god (J0rdan S.), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
LOLLL. stay in bounds you dick.
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
Haaaaaaaaa the Jets
― C-L, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
yessss at Rex Ryan's rage
HAHA RYAN TANTRUM
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
fuckkk
― fruit of the goon (k3vin k.), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
omg did you see mendenhall humping ben
― mookieproof, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
^^^
― bnw, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ ryan
― daria-g, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
WHAT'S UP, DENNIS?
― wee-based god (J0rdan S.), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
http://timenerdworld.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/what-star-wars-means-to-me-force-ghosts.jpg
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
Thank you for barely winning that Steelers you jerks
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
Show me crying Jets now
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:49 (fifteen years ago)
We need Rex tantrum gif action
http://www.thinkchristian.net/wp-content/godwins.jpg
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:50 (fifteen years ago)
http://grab.by/8xSh
― ice cr?m, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:50 (fifteen years ago)
PACK
STEELERS
AMERICA WINS
― VegemiteGrrrl, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:50 (fifteen years ago)
tamtam loses
― marios balls in 3d for 3ds (Princess TamTam), Monday, 24 January 2011 02:51 (fifteen years ago)
http://blogington.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Hitler-Newspaper.jpg
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 24 January 2011 02:51 (fifteen years ago)