danny believes terry rozier will be mvp within the next five years
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 04:12 (nine years ago)
this seems bad
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 June 2017 04:15 (nine years ago)
it cld def still workout for them like they cld get the 1 and two picks in next years draft or make some sweet trades but in isolation it seems bad
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 04:16 (nine years ago)
Fultz will be a monster. This trade makes 0 sense.
― Allen (etaeoe), Sunday, 18 June 2017 04:40 (nine years ago)
ainge loves too do picks
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 04:43 (nine years ago)
i think he might have a gambling problem
after 5 minutes of thinking about it on a short night's sleep this is a p. clear sign that taking the pick had been a fallback option for a long time. they want to sign one all-star and trade for another before they need to extend isaiah. whether the trade is now with the #3 pick+ or next trade deadline with choice of brown/jackson plus other picks that's the plan.
problem is the only guy who is worth it and in a bad situation is davis and if he's actually available it means everyone in new orleans has gotten fired.
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 18 June 2017 04:44 (nine years ago)
draft xpress has the celtics taking tatum http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2017/
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 12:58 (nine years ago)
i actually think that's likely, but only if the lakers take jackson.
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 18 June 2017 13:26 (nine years ago)
i think i like tatum more than jackson
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 14:10 (nine years ago)
feel like this trade must just come down to ainge didnt believe fultz has superstar potential, seed him as more of a solid allstar ceiling guy
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 15:01 (nine years ago)
i've verbalized this to varying degrees over the past 3-4 years but there's a good chance we're gonna look back at the process and think of it beignets wildly successful
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 June 2017 15:38 (nine years ago)
*as being* wildly successful
It will be a v bad take tho. Lots of teams have piled on young talent after years of terribleness without spending years deliberately sabotaging the team and making a completely unwatchable product to get there.
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 15:40 (nine years ago)
gotta crack some eggs to make an omelette
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 June 2017 15:55 (nine years ago)
Uh that's five years or so of bad eggs
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:07 (nine years ago)
it's 4 years where their chances of being contenders dropped from 5% to 0%
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:30 (nine years ago)
and now look nicely positioned to wait out lebron in the east
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:31 (nine years ago)
the problem w/ the process was not the process but the picks
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:33 (nine years ago)
basically every lottery pick in the 2015 draft aside from mario hezonja has more trade value than okafor right now
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:34 (nine years ago)
even a fully healthy core of fultz-simmons-saric-embiid doesn't make sense
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:35 (nine years ago)
embiid is probably not tradable and they're not gonna move simmons or fultz so i guess the clock is ticking on saric already? the entire thing is a mess honestly
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:36 (nine years ago)
― lag∞n, Sunday, June 18, 2017 10:10 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark
jackson seems more like what the alleged ainge player has been recently in that he's a great athlete with tons of defensive potential who can't really shoot. him and jaylen brown would be terrors on the wing but tatum is prob more complimentary. personally i hate jackson's shot and would prob take tatum yeah.
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:43 (nine years ago)
― k3vin k., Sunday, June 18, 2017 11:30 AM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
uh basketball teams are businesses that needed to sell tickets and merch and they put an absolutely garbage product out for years, that needs to go on the L side of the column and be accounted for in assessing hinkie.
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:44 (nine years ago)
gonna assume ownership understood this up front
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:53 (nine years ago)
seems like most sixers fans view hinkie pretty fondly. they were chanting "trust the process" at home games last year.
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:55 (nine years ago)
stockholm syndrome
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:57 (nine years ago)
i think the point of the process was communicated to the fans and accepted by them. i have no real issues on that front. i just think "pick a bunch of similar players because we can trade the ones we don't want at some later point" was very faulty logic for several reasons.
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 16:59 (nine years ago)
they were chanting "trust the process" at home games last year.
But were they chanting it ironically during blowout losses, or approvingly during impressive wins? Or just randomly because they were bored?
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:01 (nine years ago)
it's one thing to say "hey we're rebuilding" and another to say that having one of the worst teams in the history of the nba for years was a good strategy just cos they have some good prospects now. iow if they draft well like gsw or okc or even mil, theyll still get top talent without needing so many top 3 picks and without being an embarrassing non-entity.
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:01 (nine years ago)
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, June 18, 2017 1:01 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark
steph curry, klay thompson and giannis are historical outliers tho. "draft the best players in the draft outside the top 5" is not really a plan for success.
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:06 (nine years ago)
& with the thunder, "draft three all stars inside the top 3 picks" which is what the sixers were trying to do, and in the seasons before they picked durant, westbrook and harden they were 30, 40, and then 30 games under .500 respectively. what's the difference?
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:10 (nine years ago)
we're talking about the sonics/thunder having won 23 and 20 games and the sixers having won 18 and 19 games
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:11 (nine years ago)
if anyone wants conclusive proof that hinkie's process is the wrong way to go about winning, one has only to look at the spurs. but the spurs's formula isn't really a formula in the sense that one can follow it like a diagram or a flow chart. it requires an organization filled with talented and intelligent people who know more about how to do their jobs than the competition does.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:17 (nine years ago)
be the spurs isn't a plan!
but there is a lot to be said about the culture cultivated by hinkie. def in the negative column for the process.
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:20 (nine years ago)
tell that to all the teams that eagerly hire ex-spurs staff
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:27 (nine years ago)
um be the spurs is literally one of the best plans, the spurs are doing an excellent job of following this plan
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:31 (nine years ago)
― J0rdan S., Sunday, June 18, 2017 12:11 PM (nineteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
conveniently leaving out the sixers winning 10 games the following season. and then winning 28 in their best season in 4 years.
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:33 (nine years ago)
the team who has tried to be the spurs is the hawks, and i'd prob rather be a hawks fan than a sixers fan, but the hawks have topped out as a second round playoff team in the bud era and are now sort of at a crossroads so... xp
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:34 (nine years ago)
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, June 18, 2017 1:33 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark
well yes one team picked kevin durant, russell wesbtrook, serge ibaka and james harden while the other picked michael carter williams, joel embiid, dario saric and jahlil okafor. which circles back to my thing that the problem w/ the process was not the process but the picks.
but i don't see how winning 74 games in three seasons and getting three top 3 picks in a row is meaningfully different than winning 47 games over three seasons and getting three top 3 picks in a row
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:38 (nine years ago)
it is 9 wins a year different
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:39 (nine years ago)
and if the end result is the same what does that matter
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:40 (nine years ago)
i...dont think we disagree on the main pts lol. i just dont think we should give hinkie credit for intentionally shitting the bed.
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:40 (nine years ago)
but also 9 wins more a season is not nothing!
i'm not giving credit to hinkie for anything other than not pretending
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:42 (nine years ago)
and btw we should note that despite drafting steph curry and klay thompson the warriors embarked on one of the most shameless tanking campaigns in NBA history to draft harrison barnes
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:44 (nine years ago)
hahaha true
― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:46 (nine years ago)
― J0rdan S., Sunday, June 18, 2017 12:55 PM (fifty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is the biggest problem w the process, never snitch on yrself, other than that it was a pretty typical rebuilding process, well a rebuilding process that thought players were fungible when theyre not and was run by someone who didnt really understand basketball
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:49 (nine years ago)
seems p clear hinkie did it that was cause he thought it wld protect him but instead it drew unnecessary attention an hes long gone now
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:50 (nine years ago)
thwy currently have zero players who can be reliably forecast to make an allstar game too fwiw
― lag∞n, Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:52 (nine years ago)