2017 NBA OFFSEASON

yeah maybe there's a slight reduction of leverage since teams know ainge has to do something. then again they could trade a team 4 first round picks over the next two years and still have the normal number of first round picks after that so i think they can make something happen if they want.

yeah if i had to bet id say they have a big trade in the pipeline right now

this seems bad

Clarification on deal: Besides its 2017 FRP, Philly sends '18 Lakers pick w/ protections. If it doesn't convey, 76ers send 2019 Kings pick.

— Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA) June 18, 2017

thats only two picks folks

sixers did well here i think

just gonna wait til all the facts r in i guess

two picks is not enough tho

a lot is gonna depend on what the protections are

even w no protections two is not enough, theres gotta be more

Celtics will get Lakers pick if it falls between 2 and 5 in the 2018 draft, per league source. If not, the Celtics will get the Kings in '19

— Derek Bodner (@DerekBodnerNBA) June 18, 2017

prediction: they'll get that lakers pick

Adam Himmelsbach‏Verified account
@AdamHimmelsbach
Follow
More
The Celtics' overflowing backcourt also factored into their decision to pass on Fultz, sources say.

uhhh this is so depressing

dislike

guess this means they're all-in on isaiah?

danny believes terry rozier will be mvp within the next five years

this seems bad

it cld def still workout for them like they cld get the 1 and two picks in next years draft or make some sweet trades but in isolation it seems bad

Fultz will be a monster. This trade makes 0 sense.

ainge loves too do picks

i think he might have a gambling problem

after 5 minutes of thinking about it on a short night's sleep this is a p. clear sign that taking the pick had been a fallback option for a long time. they want to sign one all-star and trade for another before they need to extend isaiah. whether the trade is now with the #3 pick+ or next trade deadline with choice of brown/jackson plus other picks that's the plan.

problem is the only guy who is worth it and in a bad situation is davis and if he's actually available it means everyone in new orleans has gotten fired.

draft xpress has the celtics taking tatum http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2017/

i actually think that's likely, but only if the lakers take jackson.

i think i like tatum more than jackson

feel like this trade must just come down to ainge didnt believe fultz has superstar potential, seed him as more of a solid allstar ceiling guy

i've verbalized this to varying degrees over the past 3-4 years but there's a good chance we're gonna look back at the process and think of it beignets wildly successful

*as being* wildly successful

It will be a v bad take tho. Lots of teams have piled on young talent after years of terribleness without spending years deliberately sabotaging the team and making a completely unwatchable product to get there.

gotta crack some eggs to make an omelette

Uh that's five years or so of bad eggs

it's 4 years where their chances of being contenders dropped from 5% to 0%

and now look nicely positioned to wait out lebron in the east

the problem w/ the process was not the process but the picks

basically every lottery pick in the 2015 draft aside from mario hezonja has more trade value than okafor right now

even a fully healthy core of fultz-simmons-saric-embiid doesn't make sense

embiid is probably not tradable and they're not gonna move simmons or fultz so i guess the clock is ticking on saric already? the entire thing is a mess honestly

i think i like tatum more than jackson

― lag∞n, Sunday, June 18, 2017 10:10 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark

jackson seems more like what the alleged ainge player has been recently in that he's a great athlete with tons of defensive potential who can't really shoot. him and jaylen brown would be terrors on the wing but tatum is prob more complimentary. personally i hate jackson's shot and would prob take tatum yeah.

it's 4 years where their chances of being contenders dropped from 5% to 0%

― k3vin k., Sunday, June 18, 2017 11:30 AM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

uh basketball teams are businesses that needed to sell tickets and merch and they put an absolutely garbage product out for years, that needs to go on the L side of the column and be accounted for in assessing hinkie.

gonna assume ownership understood this up front

seems like most sixers fans view hinkie pretty fondly. they were chanting "trust the process" at home games last year.

stockholm syndrome

i think the point of the process was communicated to the fans and accepted by them. i have no real issues on that front. i just think "pick a bunch of similar players because we can trade the ones we don't want at some later point" was very faulty logic for several reasons.

they were chanting "trust the process" at home games last year.

But were they chanting it ironically during blowout losses, or approvingly during impressive wins? Or just randomly because they were bored?

it's one thing to say "hey we're rebuilding" and another to say that having one of the worst teams in the history of the nba for years was a good strategy just cos they have some good prospects now. iow if they draft well like gsw or okc or even mil, theyll still get top talent without needing so many top 3 picks and without being an embarrassing non-entity.

it's one thing to say "hey we're rebuilding" and another to say that having one of the worst teams in the history of the nba for years was a good strategy just cos they have some good prospects now. iow if they draft well like gsw or okc or even mil, theyll still get top talent without needing so many top 3 picks and without being an embarrassing non-entity.

― nice cage (m bison), Sunday, June 18, 2017 1:01 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark

steph curry, klay thompson and giannis are historical outliers tho. "draft the best players in the draft outside the top 5" is not really a plan for success.

& with the thunder, "draft three all stars inside the top 3 picks" which is what the sixers were trying to do, and in the seasons before they picked durant, westbrook and harden they were 30, 40, and then 30 games under .500 respectively. what's the difference?

we're talking about the sonics/thunder having won 23 and 20 games and the sixers having won 18 and 19 games

if anyone wants conclusive proof that hinkie's process is the wrong way to go about winning, one has only to look at the spurs. but the spurs's formula isn't really a formula in the sense that one can follow it like a diagram or a flow chart. it requires an organization filled with talented and intelligent people who know more about how to do their jobs than the competition does.

be the spurs isn't a plan!

but there is a lot to be said about the culture cultivated by hinkie. def in the negative column for the process.