Breaking -- The human race has waived Josh Smith: 2014-15 regular season thread part 2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8564 of them)

from the fucking bargnani trade lol

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:30 (eleven years ago)

and the melo contract, tho his hands were kind of tied there

― k3vin k., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 9:20 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think it was still the right move, Melo's taking a season off and all but who cares

― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:24 PM (6 minutes ago)

well it's clearly a disastrous deal in hindsight, whether one thinks it was a good deal at the time or not. it's a 5 year near-max for a player who in all likelihood won't be worth that much in a few years, which since they're rebuilding is when they will supposedly start to contend

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:33 (eleven years ago)

i guess with the cap going up it might not be THAT bad but it still isn't great. tho again the options were melo or nothing i guess

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:33 (eleven years ago)

still think they could have at least gotten SOMETHING for shumpert. it's not like he's gonna command a huge paycheck after this season, is he?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:36 (eleven years ago)

shumpert and melo are sins of the previous regime

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:43 (eleven years ago)

they should've had a first for shumpert last year but the previous front office turned it down

the knicks were never not offering melo a contract, that's out of phil's hands

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:44 (eleven years ago)

right i agree about melo

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:46 (eleven years ago)

i guess phil felt that neither JR nor melo would ever be useful players. otherwise if the best you can get for the two of them is a second round pick, why not just roll the dice and hope they re-sign at a reasonable rate?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:49 (eleven years ago)

I think considering they don't have a 2016 pick keeping melo makes sense. Unless they could have swung a sign and trade or something.

What they do in free agency is really interesting, it's a great class.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:53 (eleven years ago)

it will be interesting if phil picks his spots instead of finding the free agent who is good enough to command max money but bad enough to only command max money from the knicks

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:11 (eleven years ago)

trade melo

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:37 (eleven years ago)

and while we're at it, ban wade

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:39 (eleven years ago)

Brian Robb ‏@CelticsHub 1m1 minute ago
Celtics are still trying to deal Austin Rivers, so the guess here is Nate Robinson and a draft pick are coming back in 3-team deal.

B-)

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:43 (eleven years ago)

wonder if phil and jeannie compare stories about how much they hate kobe/melo

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:48 (eleven years ago)

it will be interesting if phil picks his spots instead of finding the free agent who is good enough to command max money but bad enough to only command max money from the knicks

― J0rdan S., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 5:11 PM (35 minutes ago)

(greg monroe)

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:48 (eleven years ago)

:-/

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:53 (eleven years ago)

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 26s27 seconds ago
Boston is sending Jameer Nelson to Denver for Nate Robinson, source tells Yahoo.

im unclear what the point of this is but

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:55 (eleven years ago)

danny ainge is a goddamn dark mage if he can turn austin rivers into a draft pick

Clay, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:58 (eleven years ago)

Nelson has an option and Robinson doesn't

polyphonic, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:58 (eleven years ago)

jameer nelson isn't that good and nate rob is awesome, albeit not necessarily for objective basketball reasons

i'm tellin you it was kenard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:59 (eleven years ago)

guess nates gonna get bought out

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:02 (eleven years ago)

denver must be getting a pick or something or else there's no reason to do this

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:03 (eleven years ago)

aw man

i'm tellin you it was kenard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:09 (eleven years ago)

Woj sez maybe if Nate gets bought out clips will take him?

i'm tellin you it was kenard (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:10 (eleven years ago)

(greg monroe)

― k3vin k., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:48 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

:-/

― J0rdan S., Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:53 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

why don't you believe in greg

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:22 (eleven years ago)

it's a perfect fit

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:22 (eleven years ago)

only real issue I can see with it is that this is a bigman heavy draft but mudiay isn't chopped liver

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:22 (eleven years ago)

at what point do the knicks start playing defense tho

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:34 (eleven years ago)

okafor or mudiay should help the defense a lot right?

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:35 (eleven years ago)

obviously they'll have all the rookie defense issues

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:35 (eleven years ago)

i mean monroe is fine. maybe they will get him at a reasonable price! if i were a knicks fan would i want them to pay greg monroe $60 million for 4 years. i'm not sure.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:49 (eleven years ago)

I think you were right about a melo-monroe-okafor frontcourt probably being a mess defensively tho

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:52 (eleven years ago)

let's not dismiss the importance of being competent in one area of the game first tho!

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:53 (eleven years ago)

I think you were right about a melo-monroe-okafor frontcourt probably being a mess defensively tho

― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:52 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

any defense with okafor at center will probably be bad for the first year or two and then great after that regardless of who is around him

maybe this doesn't work for the knicks because of the triangle but if asik goes for half the price of monroe i think i'd rather sign up for that

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:58 (eleven years ago)

oh my assumption was that melo would be the 4 and monroe the 5, so they wouldn't go for okarfor. a melo-monroe-okafor front court would be pretty crowded

k3vin k., Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:59 (eleven years ago)

monroe is a weird player since he's a near-7 footer who can neither shoot nor defend the rim. not sure it's wise to be spending much on those kinds of guys. plus going with that frontcourt forces melo, their best and highest-paid player, to play the 3 again where he's less effective

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:01 (eleven years ago)

their future is weird because they want to win but also they're gonna be drafting a top 3 pick. it's hard to reconcile those two timelines.

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:03 (eleven years ago)

like how do you build up a playoff contender in one offseason while also thinking about how best to bring along your potential superstar draft pick? i honestly have no idea

the knicks could buy a decent starting 5 next season but then what do you do with your top 3 rookie? you could leave a spot open for him but then you might be wasting your money on presently good free agents whose team is dragged down by the presence of a raw rookie.

i don't really know

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:05 (eleven years ago)

the true answer is to trade melo and do a full on, donnie walsh-style rebuild. but that's not happening. so they're stuck b/w a rock and a hard place from what i can tell.

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:06 (eleven years ago)

monroe is a weird player since he's a near-7 footer who can neither shoot nor defend the rim. not sure it's wise to be spending much on those kinds of guys. plus going with that frontcourt forces melo, their best and highest-paid player, to play the 3 again where he's less effective

― k3vin k., Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:01 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the thing is he's a weird player who is perfect for the triangle

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 00:14 (eleven years ago)

lebron is playing tonight after all

break out your microscopes

Clay, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 01:08 (eleven years ago)

Horford close to a trip dub in 3Q apparently

, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 01:46 (eleven years ago)

Guess bron's done making trades for the moment

we just form a f#!king wall (agent hibachi), Wednesday, 14 January 2015 01:47 (eleven years ago)

Spurs wiz is a good game

Spottie, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 01:51 (eleven years ago)

big ups to Mo Williams

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 02:29 (eleven years ago)

delkesque

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 02:37 (eleven years ago)

attn treamers, the chromecast is the bomb

pursuit of happiness (art), Wednesday, 14 January 2015 02:40 (eleven years ago)

tried couple laptops, failed attempts at ps3, this is so far the best method

pursuit of happiness (art), Wednesday, 14 January 2015 02:41 (eleven years ago)

Lebro did not have time for a haircut b4 this game

Spottie, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 02:41 (eleven years ago)

Imagine taking a pj tucker elbow to the head like lebron just did

Spottie, Wednesday, 14 January 2015 02:46 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.