the lakers have just pooped their big-boy pants: 2012-2013 NBA regular season thread (part 2)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6437 of them)

pelicans are a playoff team next year i'm calling it

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:34 (thirteen years ago)

who did they trade austin rivers for this summer?

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:41 (thirteen years ago)

i don't disagree though- i bet eric gordon gets rolled into some deal somewhere and the brow will be awesome with a year or two under his belt

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:43 (thirteen years ago)

$15,000 fine says otherwise. If it wasn't a big enough deal to merit a tech at the time then his only conceivable motivation is saltiness which qualifies as grade A snitching.

― tsrobodo, Tuesday, January 8, 2013 1:19 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

haha whatever. the rules say Rondo should have been ejected, it was bitching not snitching.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:44 (thirteen years ago)

west is still so crazy hard though. blazers and jazz are going to be better next year. houston might add a piece. lakers who knows. it's hard to make that top 8 in the west!

Clay, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:45 (thirteen years ago)

it's pretty good gamesmanship if it costs the c's a game and ends up affecting where the hawks land in the playoff seeding!

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:46 (thirteen years ago)

whoa brow

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:47 (thirteen years ago)

yeah clay you're right. west might have 10 of the top 13 teams

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 01:52 (thirteen years ago)

btw guys i have an interview with the blazers tomorrow, wish me luck!

Clay, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:00 (thirteen years ago)

whoa neat!

an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:04 (thirteen years ago)

dude sweet!

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:07 (thirteen years ago)

it's really no big deal, just a few hours a week of supplemental income. but i mean as i see it i'll prob be GM before long.

Clay, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:12 (thirteen years ago)

haha whatever. the rules say Rondo should have been ejected, it was bitching not snitching.

Matt, again, I wish to god you knew what you were talking about.

From the NBA rulebook:

d. A technical foul shall be assessed for unsportsmanlike tactics such as:
(1) Disrespectfully addressing an official
(2) Physically contacting an official
(3) Overt actions indicating resentment to a call

There is no mandatory ejection. These are discretionary calls by the referee.

However:

Any player or coach guilty of intentional physical contact with an official shall automatically be suspended without pay for one game. A fine and/or longer period of suspension will result if circumstances so dictate.

After the game, if the league finds the contact is intentional, the penalty explicit in the rule book and is enforced regardless of whatever action the referee took at the time.

Xposts, obv.

And good luck Clay!

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:13 (thirteen years ago)

thunder are down 5 with 3 to play, scotty putting a lineup featuring perk and thabo is definitely the way to go

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:15 (thirteen years ago)

lol whatever durant's just gonna make everything now

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:15 (thirteen years ago)

99-99 12 secs left wash/okc

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:21 (thirteen years ago)

BEAL

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:23 (thirteen years ago)

bradley the assassin!

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:24 (thirteen years ago)

"From the NBA rulebook:

d. A technical foul shall be assessed for unsportsmanlike tactics such as:
(1) Disrespectfully addressing an official
(2) Physically contacting an official
(3) Overt actions indicating resentment to a call

There is no mandatory ejection. These are discretionary calls by the referee."

Rondo didn't get a technical.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:24 (thirteen years ago)

are you just being deliberately dense or

an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:25 (thirteen years ago)

there's no autotechs other than throwing/kicking the ball in the stands, but bumping refs= technical and the ref here fucked up/let it slide and Ferry was right to bitch about it.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:25 (thirteen years ago)

Obviously the ref didn't feel it was disrespectful.

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:25 (thirteen years ago)

matt you can just say you were wrong about the rules, it's ok

an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:26 (thirteen years ago)

it doesn't say technicals shall be assessed for physical contact with a referee unless the ref thinks the player is cute

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:26 (thirteen years ago)

I was wrong that it's a tech, it can be just a tech yeah

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:27 (thirteen years ago)

yr all forgetting that stern hates rondo, let's be cool

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:27 (thirteen years ago)

and the point of the whole thing is that ferry wasn't "snitching" he was bitching that Rondo didn't get a technical for something that results in a suspension!

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:28 (thirteen years ago)

he wasn't going to the refs and saying "hey guys you should tell your bosses about this I think it's suspendable" he was saying why the fuck didn't you give him a T for something that got him ejected in the playoffs

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:29 (thirteen years ago)

but you're totally right, the rules say it results in a tech, not an ejection, I'm such a fool for conflating the two

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:30 (thirteen years ago)

Yes, in this case you are.

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:32 (thirteen years ago)

whether ferry was bitching about a technical or an ejection is a minor point

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:33 (thirteen years ago)

this is about you being a celtics homer sorry your PG is insane bro

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:34 (thirteen years ago)

it's as much about that as it is about you saying things that are wrong as if they're gospel

an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)

but whatever i'm done it's nbd

an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)

Re-read the article. He approached the refs after the game and game them a video of the play in question. I'm not a Celtics fan. That is snitching .

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:44 (thirteen years ago)

ftr ferry was absolutely right but he can still go screw

an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:45 (thirteen years ago)

Ferry's been around long enough to know that you send it to the league office, not the refs at the particular game. The only plausible explanation is that he was complaining about the no-call.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:47 (thirteen years ago)

sully + av bradley <3

moullet, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:48 (thirteen years ago)

it's as much about that as it is about you saying things that are wrong as if they're gospel

― an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Tuesday, January 8, 2013 2:42 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

whether it's a tech or an ejection is a pretty minor distinction and being wrong about it is pretty shruggoffable to me, but it was tangentially insulting to a Boston Celtic so EZ Snappin has to declare thermonuclear war

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:50 (thirteen years ago)

goddamn i forgot avery bradley is a real baller

matt let it go mang

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:51 (thirteen years ago)

You're being intentionally naive, it doesn't matter who he sent it to. By drawing attention to it he forces the assoc to act. Nothing would have happened otherwise.

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:51 (thirteen years ago)

Bradley's return is sparking effort and hustle from this C's team. Pleasure to see.

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:52 (thirteen years ago)

Melo shooting bum hand Kevin Love numbers - the rebounds.

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:52 (thirteen years ago)

spike i love some of yr movies but the beanie cap and orange bernard king jersey is testing my patience

questionable motor (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:53 (thirteen years ago)

And Pierce is uncharacteristically cold in the 4th

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:54 (thirteen years ago)

You're being intentionally naive, it doesn't matter who he sent it to. By drawing attention to it he forces the assoc to act. Nothing would have happened otherwise.

― tsrobodo, Tuesday, January 8, 2013 2:51 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he could have just said something at a press conference. If he sends a mpg in an email to the league office he gets the same response, especially considering Rondo's history. The idea that he breached the rules and confronted the refs personally just to force a response from the league office that very marginally impacts his team's playoff seeding is grassy knoll shit imo.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:55 (thirteen years ago)

And how about them Sonics?

This pretty much sums up the game
http://dailythunder.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/russibaka.gif

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:55 (thirteen years ago)

tbf to westbrook those uniforms are confusing

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 03:00 (thirteen years ago)

― tsrobodo, Tuesday, January 8, 2013 2:51 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he could have just said something at a press conference. If he sends a mpg in an email to the league office he gets the same response, especially considering Rondo's history. The idea that he breached the rules and confronted the refs personally just to force a response from the league office that very marginally impacts his team's playoff seeding is grassy knoll shit imo.

Dude put the speculation aside. What we know is he was fined 15,000 for approaching the refs, let's work with that.
http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/07/danny-ferry-gets-15000-fine-for-giving-video-of-rondo-to-official/

tsrobodo, Tuesday, 8 January 2013 03:00 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.