High hopes for this turning out a smart and civil discussion like the horror films why not thread, deep fears that it will descend into madness fyi
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:32 (nine years ago) link
i think it's bc games are competitive experiences and competition brings out the worst in human beings
― Mordy, Wednesday, April 4, 2012 4:30 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Mordy, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:34 (nine years ago) link
idk i obv have some pretty strong concerns abt that wrt online FPS screaming idiots and the like, but i dont think that has as much to do with the games themselves (i mean obv its part of the experience but it isnt internalized content per se)
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:36 (nine years ago) link
some of it is cultural differences/lack of knowledge between Asia and the West.
― bnw, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:39 (nine years ago) link
do you guys mean disgusting behavior in players or the games?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:40 (nine years ago) link
i mean ive heard some commentary on this but a lot of the big arguments are a little facile and outsidery to me, like the idea that games are a juvenilized form of entertainment and thus more prone to juvenile thinking
xxpost yeah bnw that is def one of the things that i think factors in
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:41 (nine years ago) link
the sexism is definitely audience targeting. and it is depressingly dead on.
― bnw, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:41 (nine years ago) link
i am talking abt the games, not the players, but obv there is going to be some reflection there wrt consumers influencing content etc
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:42 (nine years ago) link
it's not just that consumers influence the content, it's also that game creators are gamers themselves and exist in the gaming community. they play on the same multiplayer servers and their customers, they're influenced by the same games...
― Mordy, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:43 (nine years ago) link
-demographics.-the fact that computer games, for fairly obvious reasons, attract less sophisticated writers than other forms of media.
― zverotic discourse (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:43 (nine years ago) link
was the new deus ex french? or french canadian? because thats def one of the weirdest examples of this - fairly thoughtful intellectual game and then whoa whats up with this homeless lady
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:44 (nine years ago) link
to be perjorative a bit, nerds' poor socialization extends to society broadly, not just socializing. and they get reeeaaally defensive when called on their shit.
combined with a post-rockstar "it's supposed to be funny!" attitude w/r/t this kind of shit and it's a toxic brew
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:45 (nine years ago) link
A big hook for many games is "by gamers, for gamers"; this means almost by design that a good chunk of regressive content is going to be present in the games since they are operating in this feedback loop where the social environment these games are created in is normalized to be incredibly shitty in a lot of ways.
For all of the equality for things like, say, making your character be male or female is a cosmetic change that doesn't affect your stats, you have things like all of the female iterations of the WoW races being as close to "busty cutie-pie" as the baseline skin will allow them to be (the undead and dwarf races are particularly comical re: this, but even the frickin' minotaur race has "sexy" female forms with cow heads).
xposts basically covered all of this but I am inflicting the concept of sexy cows on y'all anyway
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:46 (nine years ago) link
some of it is sort of legacy racism from the earlier forms of media that fed VGs? D&D, action movies, etc
xp oh god WoW haha
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:47 (nine years ago) link
how do you guys rank sexism/racism by systems? nintendo (the most juvenile) should come out looking better I'd think.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:48 (nine years ago) link
also, game content really not as important as ludic components (the best story can just barely redeem a game with terrible gameplay sometimes, while tons of beloved games have amazing gameplay and no story to speak of, or a really shitty story), so it's less important to designers to get stuff right with the content - which is where the racist/sexist stuff primarily exists
― Mordy, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:49 (nine years ago) link
I mean... come on
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:49 (nine years ago) link
actually feel like WoW held back a lot compared to some other games.
― bnw, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:50 (nine years ago) link
Skyrim has the same sort of issues. Like ... why does my lizard lady have tits.
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:51 (nine years ago) link
nintendo (the most juvenile) should come out looking better I'd think.
have you ever played a Mario game??? also Punchout lololol.
― zappi, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:52 (nine years ago) link
― Lamp, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:53 (nine years ago) link
mario racist against turtles?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:53 (nine years ago) link
well sure, WoW isn't like Duke Nukem, but the point is more that the whole "moving comic book" medium that their art direction is based upon is super normalized in how the genders should be represented, to the point where even for races where it doesn't make sense for the males to be burly he-men and the women to be curvy sexpots, they still are
also, there's the female night elf dance (which is based on the famous Alizee clips that were zooming around the Internet in the early 00s):
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:56 (nine years ago) link
copying this over from the other thread because i thinks it a very interesting and good point to think abt
i wonder if part of it is because games are often a solo experience (though not always of course) whereas movies, at some point in their release cycle at least, are experienced collectively? in other words, because the casual racism is easier for people to swallow by themselves as opposed to in a group?― 1986 tallest hair contest (Z S), Wednesday, April 4, 2012 8:29 PM (25 minutes ago)
― 1986 tallest hair contest (Z S), Wednesday, April 4, 2012 8:29 PM (25 minutes ago)
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:56 (nine years ago) link
okay lol @ Mario being so mainstreamed that all of the "MAMA MIA" and "IT'SA ME, MARIO!" interjections don't even register as caricature anymore
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:57 (nine years ago) link
i disagree w/ ZS's assertion esp bc i think the most racist/sexist behavior re video games happens in their most collective experience (multiplayer)
― Mordy, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:57 (nine years ago) link
Yeah I think this is pretty easily chalked up to creators pandering to (and being born of) the overwhelmingly 15-35 male demographics of AAA game buyers. The women and men who like and play AAA games but don't like sexualized representations of women in these games (and also comic books) make their voices heard but the majority of the audience would be bummed if you took away their lizardwoman tits.
― raw feel vegan (silby), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:57 (nine years ago) link
duh DJP you cant be racist against italians anymore, the godfather fixed that forever
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:58 (nine years ago) link
it's well documented that gaming community demographics are a) incredibly skewed towards white males and b) fairly skewed towards people with poor social skills, which seems like a believable cause of misogyny and just general misanthropy all around
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 20:59 (nine years ago) link
did Mario ever say those lines or are we forcing racism on the poor guy? are we blaming his video game char for his cartoon version? important issues in my work day
― bnw, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:00 (nine years ago) link
"it's a-me, Mario!" the sound of booting up Super Mario 64 iirc.
― raw feel vegan (silby), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:01 (nine years ago) link
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:02 (nine years ago) link
lol gg then
― bnw, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:02 (nine years ago) link
fyi listening to that may drive you crazy
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:03 (nine years ago) link
the Mario Kart one is also insane
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:05 (nine years ago) link
"So long, gay Bowser!"
― beanz meanz lulz (snoball), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:05 (nine years ago) link
Alot of this sounds like hes sleeping with someone. *barfs*PeachyzeldagirlXD 3 weeks ago
― og (admrl), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:06 (nine years ago) link
Do u say "ravioli!" when u fuckin?
― og (admrl), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:07 (nine years ago) link
did they really get roberto benigni to do the voices?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:07 (nine years ago) link
Everybody knows that Mario's wet dreams involve pasta and Bowser.
― beanz meanz lulz (snoball), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:08 (nine years ago) link
I worked at a gaming geek/comic book store for a couple years and this kind of stuff is everywhere. the idea that females without massive bobs existed at some point is lost on these people
― Estimate the percent chance that a whale has ever been to the moon? (frogbs), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:11 (nine years ago) link
haha awesome typo
"I like the writer but does the artist have to make every female character's hair so big?"
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:12 (nine years ago) link
i'ma luigi. nambar wan.
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:14 (nine years ago) link
oh man my old college roommate used to say "yeah, peach has got it" in a squeaky ass voice all the time. mad nostalgia.
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:15 (nine years ago) link
― og (admrl), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:15 (nine years ago) link
I never played the Horde side of WoW with any regularity so I didn't realize that the trolls were all Jamaican until way way late in the game when I started a troll character because I was bored. Reading the quest text for most of the starter area was PAINFUL.
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:16 (nine years ago) link
there's a ton of gender normalization in movies too, yeah?
― dayo, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:16 (nine years ago) link
im def not saying that movies are immune but i dont think you can make the argument that movies even approach the overt O_O aspects of video games wrt either of these
― sfdgafhtehw (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:18 (nine years ago) link
(I also used to play WoW with the sound off and either Vent or iTunes going, so I missed a good chunk of the voice acting)
― God, Music and Romeo and Juliet (DJP), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:19 (nine years ago) link
oh yeah for sure, and movies as a genre are much more mature. but it seems to me that anytime you throw a lot of money at a project (either a blockbuster movie or a blockbuster game) you're gonna end up w/ some pretty unreasonable gender representations
― dayo, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 21:20 (nine years ago) link
The allegations covered a few people - the composer Jeremy Soule was also one of them - which is to say that they were unrelated but the release of some of them caused/inspired the release of others - games has never really had a #MeToo, but this might have (or still might) be the start of one.
Considering that call-outs (even when well-intentioned and well executed) are troll bait, I'm sure the gaming community will have a wonderful time screaming "rapist!" at each other for the next two years.
I believe Zoë, I don't believe call-outs are the right approach but I respect what she did regardless, and it's a tragedy about Alec.
I don't at all believe the Jeremy Soule story, though. All that detail and endless screenshots to describe a shitty work situation, but zero evidence or detail surrounding the "rape"? My intuition states that Soule's accuser will be facing a lawsuit.
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 2 September 2019 00:37 (one year ago) link
*they, that is
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 2 September 2019 00:38 (one year ago) link
which one of Soule's accusers?
― quelle sprocket damage (sic), Monday, 2 September 2019 02:22 (one year ago) link
I thought it was clear I was referring to the woman who has alleged that Soule raped her, not the other woman who describes having received an unwanted explicit video from him
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 2 September 2019 03:05 (one year ago) link
sorry! I googled in order to keep up with the thread and found an article with three (or 2.5) accusers and no screenshots of anything, was just trying to orient myself with what ppl are talking about
― quelle sprocket damage (sic), Monday, 2 September 2019 04:41 (one year ago) link
I don’t understand why anyone’s still defaulting to a position of “this person can’t produce any hard evidence so I don’t believe them”. Sexual assault is really fucking common, people lying about sexual assault is really fucking rare, and jesus, no, rapists don’t tend to send emails mentioning the fact they’re rapists. Believe the victim.
Engadget’s take on recent events was actually quite an optimistic one and I’d like to think they’re right.
― JimD, Monday, 2 September 2019 09:33 (one year ago) link
I understand where fgti is coming from. I fully acknowledge that sometimes people make false accusations and that those false accusations hurt people who are falsely accused. I do still take the position of defaulting to believing accusers until or unless I have reason not to.
Speaking up about abuse, for me, is a powerful step towards breaking the cycle of abuse, even though frequently it leads one to be dismissed and not believed.
― sock fingering, baby (rushomancy), Monday, 2 September 2019 12:49 (one year ago) link
I do not let my mandate to "believe survivors" evaporate my critical facilities. And: it's not that I disbelieve Soule's accuser, it is simply that her account of Soule's rape of her does not read to me, in its current state, as being credible. Considering that civil cases (such as defamation) are decided by who appears to be more credible-- the plaintiff or the defendant-- I am concerned that Soule's accuser may lose, in the event of a defamation suit, which I intuit will be Soule's response. And regardless of the veracity of her allegation of rape, it is clear from the rest of her post that she is absolutely the victim of a toxic work environment, where she was belittled and left unpaid and not given credit for the work she did. I think she is a victim and deserves justice; I intuit that her allegation of rape, as it currently has been stated, may currently succeed in the court of public opinion, but will not succeed under legal scrutiny, and a woman who has been victimized (via a toxic work environment) will not receive justice because her complaint about her workplace has been coloured by a rape allegation that may be determined, in the future, to lack credibility. (I do not relish reading Twitter in the event that this turns out to be the case, and I will pray every night to be rendered illiterate.)
I read the article you posted, JimD, and I am frustrated with its inaccuracies and fallacies. In the first paragraph alone, the author states that "Soule has denied [both] allegations", but this is false; Soule did not deny the allegation that he'd sent explicit video to his second accuser, he simply stated that the context in which the video was sent differed, in his memory, from the context that his accuser described. As his second accuser is not apparently engaging in defamation-- she is not lying, i.e., she is credibly describing something that happened, and speaking about her feelings toward what happened, and Soule seems to tacitly confirm that the facts of her account are correct-- I do not intuit that Soule will press for legal action against his second accuser, as he has no grounds for it; it makes no sense to sue somebody who is telling the truth. Either way, the Engadget article is incorrect, and it is worth noting, journalistically, that Soule has tacitly confirmed the facts of the second accuser's account, as it demonstrates that he's willing to publicly acknowledge the facts of his behaviour. Omitting this detail misrepresents Soule, and portrays him as an individual who issues blanket denials, with no capacity toward self-examination.
I too believe it is important to speak up about abuse, but I personally believe that all possible avenues of resolution should be explored before making public call-outs. I say not as a criticism of individuals who choose to make public call-outs, but as an observation of the inefficacy and, well, danger of making them; Quinn's abuser killed himself, and I intuit that Soule's accuser will be facing legal action-- no justice will be served in either scenario.
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:20 (one year ago) link
When I read about allegations of these sort, I typically choose to not use my critical faculties. I don't believe that I am competent, in most cases, to judge what actually happened in these contested cases, because typically I don't have access to sufficient evidence to make an objective judgment. When I choose who to believe - this is pretty much always "the victim" but I also, I find, have certain latitude to decide who I feel "the victim" is - this is very much a subjective judgment. That's my compromise. I don't feel comfortable choosing to abstain from all varieties of judgment, because of the environment I live in, because silence favors the oppressor.
I agree with your assessment that "naming and shaming" possesses certain dangers, that it is fallible, that it can lead to grave miscarriages of justice. I support it despite these dangers because, right now, it seems like this process is the best form of justice victims of abuse and/or assault have access to.
― sock fingering, baby (rushomancy), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:51 (one year ago) link
<3 very well said!
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 2 September 2019 16:01 (one year ago) link
it makes no sense to sue somebody who is telling the truth
It does when you have money to burn on lawyers, no? See Michael Jackson.
― Melon Musk (Leee), Monday, 2 September 2019 16:02 (one year ago) link
Good post flamoyant goon tie, but why do I feel like you're sercretly shilling for TurboTax?
― ☮ (peace, man), Monday, 2 September 2019 16:03 (one year ago) link
I just think it's worth approaching this kind of thing from a position of "what good or harm am I doing by publicly applying my critical facilities?". Your chances of impacting the specific case in question are effectively zero, so no good is coming of it in that sense. But other victims who haven't yet told their stories are possibly (probably!) hearing you, and the message you're giving them is "if you want the truth of what happened to you to be known and don't just want to be victimised further, you'd better make sure you tell the story in such a way that you meet *my* critical standards", and all that can do is make it harder for people to feel they can identify predators, which of course is actively helpful to those predators.
Like, the full version of "believe the victim" should probably go "believe the victim and state publicly that you do, OR feel free to not believe them but if that's your position then at least keep quiet about it because really, how is your voice helping anything otherwise?".
And ok I get that the answer to the last question is probably "it's helping protect people who might be falsely accused now or in the future" but a) that's a much tinier group of people than the group of people who have been victims of sexual misconduct and b) it's already a much better protected group of people too, and worst of all c) if it's a group that you feel you're potentially a member of yourself then that slips into the "my self preservation is more important to me than my compassion for people who have had been through traumatic experiences" zone.
― JimD, Tuesday, 3 September 2019 08:43 (one year ago) link
but I personally believe that all possible avenues of resolution should be explored before making public call-outs.
fwiw I do absolutely agree with you here, but I still can't bring myself to be critical of anyone who doesn't feel they can do that, and chooses the public callout route instead.
― JimD, Tuesday, 3 September 2019 08:46 (one year ago) link
(Which isn't to say you *are* being critical of those people, I mean you've specifically stated you aren't being, so I guess "but" was just a bad choice wrong word in that sentence).
― JimD, Tuesday, 3 September 2019 08:48 (one year ago) link
A good and powerful and grim post about the Night in the Woods developer: https://medium.com/@bombsfall/alec-2618dc1e23e
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 4 September 2019 10:28 (one year ago) link
he posted on reddit a few days ago, saying he would follow up with a detailed post - this was it. really sad, but very thoughtful and explains things pretty well
― Nhex, Wednesday, 4 September 2019 13:24 (one year ago) link
― ☮ (peace, man), Wednesday, 4 September 2019 13:48 (one year ago) link
That's an exceptionally heavy essay and very well written and compassionate as well. I have learned (too late, in one instance) that it's very good practice to stay far away from people who seem to have nothing but negative shit to say about their exes, or their former close friends.
@ JimD, I could type all day about my thoughts on this, but I don't have much luck communicating effectively my thoughts on this topic in forums. It's more of a conversation. In general, though, you're right, I'm not generally critical of the people who engage in call-outs, I am critical of the mechanism itself. (I say this, too, as somebody who has engaged in a call out, and found the experience to be exhausting, professionally harmful, and ineffective.) I don't think "callouts" generally have a good track record for helping survivors heal, or holding the accused accountable. Certainly, on social media, it's become more of a circus-of-bullying than anything even tangentially related to social justice.
― flamboyant goon tie included, Wednesday, 4 September 2019 21:42 (one year ago) link
Game publisher Nicalis, successful for smash hits like Cave Story and Binding of Isaac, has a dark side. A Kotaku investigation reveals employee exploitation, mismanagement, and a whole lot of workplace racism from founder Tyrone Rodriguez. My latest: https://t.co/S6U8RghwOO pic.twitter.com/btXZmWPPu8— Jason Schreier (@jasonschreier) September 12, 2019
― Evan, Thursday, 12 September 2019 16:25 (one year ago) link
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Thursday, 12 September 2019 16:35 (one year ago) link
"please enjoy the comedy racism of Tyrone Rodriguez"
― brigadier pudding (DJP), Thursday, 12 September 2019 16:55 (one year ago) link
that guy & nicalis in general has always been extremely shady
― ciderpress, Thursday, 12 September 2019 16:58 (one year ago) link
yeh not surprised that terribly run company is run by a terrible person
― ( X '____' )/ (zappi), Thursday, 12 September 2019 17:07 (one year ago) link
― Nhex, Wednesday, 24 June 2020 08:56 (one year ago) link
No surprise that he's still a piece of garbage.
― Nhex, Saturday, 11 July 2020 09:51 (one year ago) link
one of several original Earthworm Jim creators returning to work on a new exclusive entry in the series for the upcoming Intellivision Amico console
― sound of scampo talk to me (El Tomboto), Saturday, 11 July 2020 11:37 (one year ago) link
― peace, man, Saturday, 11 July 2020 11:42 (one year ago) link
Finally, cornhole the way YOU want it
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Saturday, 11 July 2020 15:03 (one year ago) link
surely GenXSys would've been the better name
― Mein Skampf (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 11 July 2020 15:07 (one year ago) link
― fkknutter, Saturday, 18 July 2020 21:58 (one year ago) link
― Nhex, Friday, 21 August 2020 05:56 (eleven months ago) link
― Nhex, Monday, 31 August 2020 04:28 (ten months ago) link
Ubisoft pulls Black Lives Matter raised fist from new Tom Clancy game following backlashAdmits it was "insensitive and harmful"
― オニモ (onimo), Tuesday, 1 September 2020 13:21 (ten months ago) link
Doesn't explain why they chose to go with the harmful image in the first place. They really can't claim ignorance to the symbolism of a raised black fist.
― オニモ (onimo), Tuesday, 1 September 2020 13:22 (ten months ago) link
they can replace it with a facepalm
― sound of scampo talk to me (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 1 September 2020 14:09 (ten months ago) link
shocked that a Tom Clancy adaptation could even be insensitive or harmful, what has the world come to?
― Anti-Cop Ponceortium (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 1 September 2020 14:14 (ten months ago) link
this is. a real good thread pic.twitter.com/X0zcL7oTmE— Nunki (@blodhundur) October 20, 2020
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Monday, 26 October 2020 19:31 (nine months ago) link
― Mike Mignola Electric Co. (Leee), Monday, 8 February 2021 06:03 (five months ago) link
― JimD, Wednesday, 10 February 2021 09:56 (five months ago) link
If you need another reason to avoid anything related to Harry Potter: https://kotaku.com/hogwarts-legacy-lead-designer-used-to-run-anti-social-j-1846316222
― RZA Minnelli (Leee), Sunday, 21 February 2021 20:24 (five months ago) link
this is just hands down the funniest image ive seen in a while. intel is making automated bleep software and im howling at the backend pic.twitter.com/w4fRq9qYIX— bea (@beesmygod_) April 7, 2021
― G.A.G.S. (Gophers Against Getting Stuffed) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 8 April 2021 19:14 (three months ago) link
"Just some misogyny and a few slices of apple servant. Perfection."
― G.A.G.S. (Gophers Against Getting Stuffed) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 8 April 2021 19:15 (three months ago) link
yeah that is achingly stupid
― rob, Thursday, 8 April 2021 19:17 (three months ago) link
I am wheezing
― Dana Jel Pey (DJP), Thursday, 8 April 2021 20:15 (three months ago) link
I have no appreciation for Five Nights at Freddy's so... yep, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
― Nhex, Thursday, 17 June 2021 14:21 (one month ago) link
Non-casual republicanism not accepted in video games
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Thursday, 17 June 2021 14:44 (one month ago) link
Hadn't seen this mentioned (the details of the case raised by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing can be pretty harrowing tbh)
The cherry on the cake is who put out the "nothing to see here" statement
*squints* wait the Bush-era torture lady is an exec at Activision? https://t.co/fiOJ8AnOIl— 10,000 Motivated Rats (@bombsfall) July 23, 2021
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 25 July 2021 16:18 (five days ago) link
― Yours in Sorrow, A Schoolboy: (forksclovetofu), Monday, 26 July 2021 19:15 (four days ago) link
― Action Bell (Leee), Tuesday, 27 July 2021 00:39 (three days ago) link