facebook wants me to become a fan of a particular brand of deodorant, if I'm a fan of people wearing deodorant ... and over 133,000 people are fans of this brand of deodorant. I'm a fan of not having waxy gunk in my ears, and Qtips are pretty good for removing waxy gunk from ears, but I'm not going to "become a fan" of Qtips ...
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:18 (sixteen years ago)
I just wonder is this fandom authentic or ironic. Is it an attempt to make the ad go away and see what comes next? I'm fascinated by this, because it is thoroughly baffling to me.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:28 (sixteen years ago)
declaration of allegiance to a particular product is a declaration of individuality
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:30 (sixteen years ago)
if I'm a fan of people wearing deodorant
how did facebook posit the question? "If you looooove wearing deodorant, join Arrid today!"?
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)
xp - The thing that gets me the most about the deodorant thing is that it's a product that isn't a traditional "I buy this, I'm a this kind of person" type of product.
the question was literally, "if you're a fan of people wearing deodorant, become a fan of (brand name) deodorant..." then under the picture, "133,xxx people are fans of (brand name) deodorant"
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:36 (sixteen years ago)
haha what a weird way of phrasing the question. "if you like to eat, join the McDonald's Facebook group..."
I do think deodorant brands do make an effort to map themselves onto different personality types: Axe is for, well, it's obvious, Old Spice has the stink of old money, Mitchum is for no-nonsense people who want no odors.
in many ways, deodorants are just practical perfumes
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:42 (sixteen years ago)
so do brands of tampons, but unless the type you buy are organic or something special and virtuous, I just don't see the appeal of advertising one's fandom of a product that is functional and corrective of bodily functions one doesn't want to advertise. ...
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:46 (sixteen years ago)
facebook isn't really too surprising a venue for this type of behavior, as its success lies in the ability for its users to concoct the perfect admixture of movies, TV shows, music, quotes, religious views, blood type, etc. to stand in place as their avatar online. stanning for a particular brand of deodorant to me seems like a natural extension; you could probably start a deodorant poll on ILE right now and get 100 new replies in 24 hours.
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:49 (sixteen years ago)
it totally makes sense for this type of advertising to exist on facebook for the reasons you mention, but the way the question was posed and the particular product and the 133,000 + fans made me go wtf
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:50 (sixteen years ago)
xxp I dunno, I can't tell what kind of tampons are in use when walking on the street, but I certainly can tell when someone walks by who has just liberally applied Axe all across the chest of their open faced polo.
to me, deodorants are a way of aspiring to the use of a perfume as identifying marker without actually admitting that it is one's purpose; i.e. someone for whatever reason doesn't feel comfortable with the idea of buying a perfume or cologne to give themselves a distinctive scent, thinking it's too forward, or foppish, or whatever, but feels perfectly alright with buying a deodorant with a distinctive scent since it's for a 'practical' purpose, and well one has to use deodorant anyway so why not choose a brand one likes?
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:53 (sixteen years ago)
^^ sounds like that's more of a guy thing then?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:54 (sixteen years ago)
open faced polo? I meant to say popped collar. I guess open faced was my way of describing the accompanying look of not having any of the buttons fastened.
I roomed with a guy for a summer program once whose toiletry kit consisted entirely of Gillette products. Gillette razor, shaving cream AND shaving gel, aftershave, deodorant, body wash, probably some other products I am forgetting. he would also bring back all the bottles of beer he had drunk and line them up next to his bed. he was part of a fraternity.
xp yeah, it's a way for guys to have a 'scent' without being accused of foppish tendencies.
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:56 (sixteen years ago)
this was a deodorant for women ... or at least the ad had a woman in it with her arms outstretched. I think I used said brand for a little while as a teenager.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:00 (sixteen years ago)
hah, then I have no idea. oddly enough this discussion has given rise to the desire to proclaim what deodorant I use, which is Gatsby Unscented.
― a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful (dyao), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:01 (sixteen years ago)
I have no brand loyalty for products like that ...
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:04 (sixteen years ago)
takin it way back to croquet and use of the word "baby"
i call my BF baby sometimes, is this bad? i dont think i do it in an annoying way. no one has ever really called me that, though i did date a guy who said "babe". i was ambivalent about it tbh
my current boyfriend went to a Grey Gardens-themed croquet party thrown by our very flamboyant friend and he got mad and hammered the ground with the mallet
lol
― in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Friday, 21 August 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)
No, I don't think it is bad ... it's one of those things I'm ambivalent about, because on one hand you have the "infantilization" thing, but it has become so ingrained in culture, that there are other signifiers as well that cloak it.
croquet story is lol ... did he make a hole?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Friday, 21 August 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
okay - I've been thinking some more about what I find weird about the woman's deodorant fandom on facebook thing:
Historically, the objects of fandom were aspirational: sports teams/athletes; cultural works/artists, authors, musicians, actors; political parties/politicians; religious movements and figures. Other historically common objects were things that were associated with pleasure: food/alcohol, architecture, nature, sexual practices. With further advances in capitalism, people became fans of particular brands of goods - though these were generally associated with public display and/or leisure, fashion and cars, to name two obvious categories.
For something like a women's deodorant to command or demand fandom (which connotes a public display of appreciation/liking), is definitely a departure from these historical categories. Primarily, because it is what I would call a corrective product: something one would use to remove deficiencies in order to conform to societal norms. By expressing public appreciation for products like this is to the publicly admit that one has these deficiencies.
Granted, one of the trends of advertising is to more prominently and frankly discuss these deficiencies -- it wasn't until the 70s that feminine douches were advertised on American television, partly to make up for loss of revenue due to the ban of cigarette ads. However, these products tend to be things that people use and if they work, are grateful for, but aren't likely to publicly praise.
There are definitely products that are exceptions to this, though these tend to be things that are more uniquely liberating, in that the deficiencies they correct aren't universal. Contact lenses are a good example of this. I can understand someone being a fan of contact lenses, because they allow their users to appear like those fortunate to not require them. Deodorant, on the other hand, is not.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Saturday, 22 August 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v136/primrosehill/lolatlife.jpg
^^^the incident covered upthread
― in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Sunday, 23 August 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)
well, right after it tbh
guess I shouldn't be too harsh on croquet, since I'm entertained by mini-golf ...I think my problem with my ex being a croquet aficionado was that it was just another signifier of a certain sensibility that came to seriously annoy me.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
the word "momma" in songs. do you like it?
― mookieproof, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oiLfTnrC40
posted this in that thread, partly for cute animals, partly because due to years of going to loud shows my hearing is kinda fucked and I honestly mishear lyrics a lot.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
[brand name women's deodorant] is making sure all your hugs are the freshest. Give your BFF a hug today. (And smell great doing it.)
now up to 259,000+ fans ...
― what happened? i am confused. (sarahel), Friday, 28 August 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
which is better:http://startupblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/dyson-vacuum.jpg
or
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IEIb52dl720/SekjpU5-H2I/AAAAAAAAAF4/dTwwK-bBzp8/s400/dyson-vacuum.jpg
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:05 (sixteen years ago)
i saw some marmosets the other day
― CharlieS, Friday, 25 September 2009 09:17 (sixteen years ago)
the yellow one with no personality.
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 09:28 (sixteen years ago)
i'm kinda leaning towards the pink one because it's more dynamic
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:29 (sixteen years ago)
on the other hand the straight verticality of the yellow one signifies a firm no-nonsense appliance.
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:40 (sixteen years ago)
it looks hapless on youtube, you can't blame it though.
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 09:50 (sixteen years ago)
i think i came across the relevant thread during an insomniac random thread click.
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:51 (sixteen years ago)
i know those well.
how many post have you made now? this is 5192 for me.
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 09:56 (sixteen years ago)
s
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 09:57 (sixteen years ago)
uh oh 5202 for me
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:57 (sixteen years ago)
<3
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 09:59 (sixteen years ago)
thank you for indulging my vacuum cleaners
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 09:59 (sixteen years ago)
thank you for indulging my interest in your posting total.
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
Straight one is like a straight, "You suck."
Flying one is like someone in a sing-song voice, "You suuUUUuuuUuuck!"
― bamcquern, Friday, 25 September 2009 12:36 (sixteen years ago)
well, it has multiple connotations. It could be interpreted as "you suck," but as the vacuum cleaner is the thing doing the sucking, it could just as easily connote "i suck," or "this sucks"
― my other display name is a controversial mod edit (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)
pol·y·se·mous (pl-sms)adj.Having or characterized by many meanings:
― I ♠ my display name (sarahel), Friday, 25 September 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)
haha i love what bamcquern said
i saw that yellow dyson at the store this morning
― heave haw (roxymuzak), Friday, 25 September 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
i love it too.
― estela, Friday, 25 September 2009 22:48 (sixteen years ago)
meanwhile - over a million facebook users have become fans of vitaminwater
― sarahel, Monday, 19 October 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
damn them
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 19 October 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
apparently vitamin water is successful enough that some other company has come out with vitamintea
― sarahel, Monday, 19 October 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)
sue them
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 19 October 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
both products have the same sans-serif font product label thing going on. The vitamintea (one word) company is "Pureamerican" - which makes me wonder whether sans-serif fonts in food packaging and in supermarkets are supposed to connote organic-ness and purity or something.
― sarahel, Monday, 19 October 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
sure!
― e\m/ily (roxymuzak), Thursday, 22 October 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)
did innocent smoothies invent that thing where every product label acts like ur pal. kept expecting the directions on the frozen pizza box 2 call me "bro," prolly serves me right for reading them tho
― plaques (I know, right?), Saturday, 7 November 2009 21:29 (sixteen years ago)
i dunno - Odwalla juice did this quite a while ago. That was the first time I noticed it. I read these things as well.
― sarahel, Saturday, 7 November 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)