Rolling CHALLENGING OPINIONS thread 2008

if you don't like the simple pleasures of a great shoegazy pfork hype band song, then you should just go back to listening to Strauss waltzes and stfu.

hahaha

truth bomb

valentines day is sort of a challops magnet isnt it

the challop has been made doubly redundant today imo

If you don't like the simple pleasures of a great pop song, then you should just go back to listening to your hard bop jazz and stfu.

― Mahatma Blagojevich (redmond), Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:37 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark

― devin harris with an appletini (call all destroyer), Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:19 PM (6 hours ago) Bookmark

I would much rather listen to hard bop jazz and stfu than enjoy what this guy most likely thinks of as a great pop song.

http://the217.com/site_media/images/2007/11/media-1193969034-2205.jpg

I would much rather listen to hard bop jazz and stfu

lol

Dubstep very much the The Thrills of the late 2000s, tbh

xp

― Limoncello Carlin (The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics), Thursday, February 5, 2009 12:57 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

― special guest stars mark bronson, Thursday, February 5, 2009 12:00 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark

Great moment in challop history, we were there.

....can anyone still enjoy listening to songs that have become all-time-classic-Dave-Marsh-Heart-Of-Rock-n-Roll-classic-hits-radio classic rock classics? i mean, "I Heard It Thru the Grapevine" or "I can't get no satisfaction", those're actually good songs, right?
― duane zarakov, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 01:00 (7 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

That's not very challop-y because it's a question, not even particularly rhetorical, as in, it seems the dude sort of wants an answer, wants to discuss the possibility or impossibility of liking songs one has heard a billion times. Why is that off limits to discuss?

Or, why is it challop-y, I should say.

yeah why IS that challopy dom

it would be wrong for this to turn into simply "ilm posts we think are retarded"

there is another thread for that

the stickman just didnt like seeing his name at the end of the thread imo

isnt that the dude who called that shoegazy pfork hype band 'fucking awesome'

― LOOK WHAT I BRING TO THE TABLA (deej), Saturday, February 14, 2009 5:34 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark

not that is probably needs to be answered at this point but yes and the challops was from the same thread.

kenan w/r/t fight club

its not really challopsy that one, but it is fun to see him bang his head against the wall about it

anyway there is nothing challopy about preferring the vastly superior joan jett.

― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Friday, March 13, 2009 9:34 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

to... whom

Patti Smith.

wth do they have to do with each other

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9274/womenwhorockmf6.png

its like saying i prefer the vastly superior izzy stradlin to richard hell or sometihng

that probably has been polled tho. i smell double-standard.

see the thread itself for more "why compare these two TOTALLY DIFFERENT FEMALE AMERICAN ROCK PERFORMERS FROM AMERICA FROM THE LATE SEVENTIES? WHAT COULD POSSIBLY JUSTIFY THIS SEXIST POLL??" answers.

gosh dude

its less sexist than it is just plain dumb imo

im ok with that

1976 Oscar Nominees

^^ like a mfing challops factory, and kjb is the foreman

those "film" dudes are like a fucking rat king of challops

I feel like there's an ongoing behind-the-scenes bet about how can take the most ridiculously contrary position in any discussion.

yeah i used to be annoyed by it but now i think i "get" it and its sort of fun & sweet

i still get annoyed by it tbh

oh

yah *sigh*

morbs and eric h are a+++. "great acting is so 2008" is maybe the most annoying sentence ever, though.

those "film" dudes are like a fucking rat king of challops

― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:12 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I feel like there's an ongoing behind-the-scenes bet about how can take the most ridiculously contrary position in any discussion.

― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:13 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol @ both of these posts

i agree tho, it is kind of funny to see them try and outdo each other with the most casually tossed off contrarianism.

it helps if you mentally add "if you know what i mean" to the end of each post as you read it

btw my favorite film geek zing of all-time remains the "his Palpatine"/Al Soto one, believe that was you mr s1ocki

remind me?q

oh nm it was nrq

posts very much in character

i agree tho, it is kind of funny to see them try and outdo each other with the most casually tossed off contrarianism.

― s1ocki, Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:54 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

the casual-ness of the whole affair is the most lol-tastic part imo

it comes w/ an implied "o u disagree? how 2008 of u"

it's like a weird mutant strain of challops developed from being in such close contact with rock crit

R M thinks you're a douche if you wear Ed Hardy clothes
2 hours ago · Comment · Like

hahaha

BR: Used to live there, and I hope those backwards ballcap boys waking up hungover amid the pizza boxes and beer bottles realize ["Get Up, Stand Up" is] an anthem of the underdog and revolution, and not just a a party song about entitled college boys. Dude!
20 minutes ago

This is actually a decent question and y'all have already fucked it up with ironic bullshit answers

― nutzhak perlman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, July 20, 2009 11:03 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

As big dumb riffs go, I always thought the riff in Limp Bizkit's "Break Stuff" was pretty quality.

― nutzhak perlman (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, July 20, 2009 11:05 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark