no boys allowed in the room!!!!

He looks like a combination of cute boys but I can't really think of which ones right now.

I bought a yarn project bag made from the Christmas version fabric of that pad.

You can get fireman and cowboy fabric, too!!

i love the "great outdoors" fabric

there is a guy at the show I'm at who looks so like bj Novak lol

http://24.media.tumblr.com/c72e78c57562fbda2e695c2efbb1a900/tumblr_mgfwezhJTd1qifly5o1_400.jpg

At first I was like oh this is interesting about giving the little girl and voice and all . . . oh but wait she's just telling all the boyz how much she loves them now. Awesome. ._. I totally had Poochie stuff. What the hell was Poochie anyway? Why is this ad bothering me so much? Can I go home now please?

Wow. That ad contains multitudes.

RIGHT?!

xp and the subtext that a girl can say what she feels as long as she dresses it up in socially acceptable femininity, or that a girl can say what she feels as long as what she feels coincides with a pre-printed Poochie stamp. So in that way, it's telling girls to express their feelings, but only if their feelings are appropriate per this consumer item.

Also LOL at how the girl in the ad looks twice as old as the boy.

I vaguely remember Poochie, but I can't remember whether I had any Poochie swag.

Yep to all that. And yeah why does the boy look so little? It's creepy in so many ways.

I think I had the Poochie doll and some of the stationary stuff too. Apparently there was a Poochie movie but I do not remember that at all. I probably just liked it because it was a dog and pink tbh.

A dog wearing sunglasses, even! If Poochie wasn't such a bossy, feelings-policing little shit, she'd be pretty cool.

Ahhh I remember that actual ad.

hahaha! i want a "you drive me crazy" stamp!!

I was just thinking about poochie recently and wtf it was. I had a stamp thing that was poochie. that ad...wow.

I know I had Poochie merch as a kid but I can't for the life of me remember what it was

But I have a feeling it was the notepad and stamp. "If it wasn't for Poochie I would never have been able to tell boys that they're cute. Thanks Poochie!'

Wait someone actually deleted that post? I thought it was nice! :(

is ward fowler a dude??

Yeah, I think so.

well,

has any dude post ever survived on this thread?

roxy for president

otm

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mollykateri/13-90s-teen-death-novels-that-actually-exist-421u

I feel like these would be of particular interest to La Lechera.

omg fucking cystic fibrosis -- i knew more about this dumb disease even though i didn't know ANYONE or anyone who knew anyone who had it.

One year for "dress up as a character from a book" day at school, I wore my jammies, coughed a lot, and told everyone I was Alex from Alex: Life of a Child.

Holy shit fucking Frank Deford wrote that!

(for those of you who do not read the Chicago Thread, I hate Frank Deford, he's such a grumpy old asshole.)

One of my best pals plays the title role in this:
http://www.cfvoice.com/info/becoming-christopher/index.jsp?usertrack.filter_applied=true&NovaId=4029462066891421904

POOCHIE

http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130211/NEWS/130211006/Sources-Shooter-was-father-of-ex-optometrist-who-kidnapped-kids

One of the women killed in this morning’s courthouse shooting was Christine Belford, a 39-year-old woman who was involved in a bitter custody dispute with her ex-husband, law enforcement and legal sources said.

Belford was at the center of a court fight with her ex-husband, David T. Matusiewicz, who kidnapped his three young daughters in August 2007 and took them on an 18-month odyssey to Panama, Costa Rica, Mexico and Nicaragua. In March 2009, authorities discovered Matusiewicz, his mother Lenore and the girls – then ages ages, 4, 6, and 7, one of whom is autistic -- living in a dirty and cramped trailer.

THE MAN KIDNAPPED HIS DAUGHTERS FOR TWO YEARS AND TOOK THEM TO LIVE IN A TRAILER IN PANAMA despite one of them needing medical/psych care, which presumably she was not getting. After being caught and doing time for that and for bank fraud, apparently he fell far enough behind in child support that he was due for a court visit to discuss it. Well, not anymore, because today David's FATHER went to the courthouse and shot Christine Belford (and another woman).

I can't distill want I want to say about this into a coherent post. Something about women's bodies and fertility and who controls those things, and the comparatively small number of men who feel entitled to those things and cheated when they don't control them, and how bitter and final their vengeance is when they've been thwarted.

greeeeeat
people are awful

sorry -- that's the outrage i can muster atm
not because it's not terrible, it's obviously terrible, but because i can't connect it to fertility and women's bodies any more than i can connect it to any other travesty of modern life
people are the worst

Also something about the vast majority of women homicide victims being killed by male family members (or ex-family members).

"the comparatively small number of men who feel entitled to those things and cheated when they don't control them, and how bitter and final their vengeance is when they've been thwarted."

Die in a fire, men's rights movement.

(Also, I posted this on the Chicago thread (because I did not expect anyone to be talking about this anywhere else), but Wilmington DE's chief of police was at a gun control round table with Joe Biden in Philadelphia when this happened.)

I saw that post-script in the version of the article that dayo posted this morning! Ironing.

yeah everything about that story is terrible.
i guess i am at max cap for horrible human behavior currently and cannot become outraged if i also want to get my laundry done and teach people how to describe things tomorrow

i didn't mean to be flip, just trying to conserve energy :(

i guess the current fashion for MRA rhetoric has made it seem like a new legitimacy is being given to such men's sense of entitlement over their offspring? even if the only "legitimacy" is that of a vocal hardcore, who can make the link to the question of individual liberty because the state tends to not be on their side.

I think the MRA stuff is obviously a backlash to the world changing toward incrementally greater parity for women, which is where the world should keep right on going, but the death throes of each stage are so explosively violent and damaging.

http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=347

lol

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/world/asia/zen-buddhists-roiled-by-accusations-against-teacher.html?hp&_r=1&

One monk, whom Ms. Stubbs said she told about the touching, was unsympathetic. “He believed in Roshi’s style, that sexualizing was teaching for particular women,” Ms. Stubbs said. The monk’s theory, common in Mr. Sasaki’s circle, was that such physicality could check a woman’s overly strong ego.

It seems to be the kind of thing that, you get the person as a whole, good and bad, just like you marry somebody and you get their strengths and wonderful qualities as well as their weaknesses.

You know, like how when you're assaulted, you get both the good AND bad qualities of your assailant!

this is like the feminist and the cowboy - the sequel

such physicality could check a woman’s overly strong ego

way to put uppity bitches in their place.

Women and their overly strong egos just need to be sexually assaulted into submission!

~zen~

happy valentine's day, ladies

http://s3-ak.buzzfeed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/2/8/15/enhanced-buzz-21889-1360354926-4.jpg

Long lost bros...

http://assets.thehollywoodgossip.com/photos/full/paul-ryan-time-magazine.jpg

I kiss you Roxy!

http://www.cbc.ca/live/images/michael-bolton-valentine.jpg

also

http://worldofwonder.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/tumblr_lze2qqIc7d1qg5hdfo1_5001.jpg