i prob have some details of that wrong maybe everyone who has bitcoins got bitcoin cash idk
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 December 2017 20:11 (eight years ago)
That doesn't make any sense to me and I'm guessing that's because it doesn't make any sense.
― IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Friday, 22 December 2017 20:15 (eight years ago)
Its ok guys. Totally normal. I have a healthy investment attitude.
Bitcoin has "crashed" 30% SIX TIMES in 2017. Each "crash" has been followed by an increase of: 76%, 237%, 183%, 165%, 152%. Bitcoin takes 7 steps forward, 2 steps back, 7 steps forward, 2 steps back. Every 2 steps back is heralded as the end of #bitcoin. Relax! pic.twitter.com/bV5ZFeucTp— Robert Reid (@robertreidmd) December 22, 2017
― how's life, Friday, 22 December 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
i think the reasoning was if they made something that was better technically for mining and transactions and pegged it to bitcoin then u ppl cld switch over to the technically superior platform without any disruption to the bitcoin price but then the price wasnt really pegged to bitcoin and it crashed idk, was prob just some arbitrage scam from the beginning xp
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 December 2017 20:19 (eight years ago)
don't think that ~i'm from the internet and i'm here to help~ Reid dude is wrong tbh. a lot of early adapters are prob cashing out. except now it's in the mainstream limelight. more fools than ever will still buy, especially buy after this 'crash'.
― ♫ very clever with maracas.jpg ♫ (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 22 December 2017 20:29 (eight years ago)
how tf was that not 0-2
― ♫ very clever with maracas.jpg ♫ (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 22 December 2017 20:30 (eight years ago)
Bitcoin cash has settles faster than bitcoin proper. But transactions are still instantaneous.
― calstars, Friday, 22 December 2017 20:30 (eight years ago)
rong thread
― ♫ very clever with maracas.jpg ♫ (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 22 December 2017 20:31 (eight years ago)
― ♫ very clever with maracas.jpg ♫ (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, December 22, 2017 3:29 PM (twenty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
the real reckoning with bitcoins price will only happen when market manipulation is sorted out, a big part if not all of bitcoins ~value~ is currently being driven by very obviously illegal techniques (read up on tethers for instance) ppl are going to jail for sure, but it wont stop until the exchanges etc are legitimately regulated/run by reputable companies, which is pretty funny when u think abt bitcoins charter to create a new fair financial system
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 December 2017 21:01 (eight years ago)
But transactions are still instantaneous.
― calstars, Friday, December 22, 2017 3:30 PM (thirty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
*manually sets transaction fee, waits for someone to process it*
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 December 2017 21:03 (eight years ago)
satochi unmasked
Yes. I AM the inventor of the bit coin.— ErykahBadoula (@fatbellybella) December 23, 2017
― lag∞n, Saturday, 23 December 2017 19:01 (eight years ago)
the bitcoin blockchain has consumed almost a billion dollars worth of electricity to hash an amount of data equivalent to about a sixth of what I get for my ten dollar a month dropbox subscription.
https://hackernoon.com/ten-years-in-nobody-has-come-up-with-a-use-case-for-blockchain-ee98c180100
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 27 December 2017 20:08 (eight years ago)
otm re the blockchains irrevocability being marketed as a feature when its a bug, tho arguing that banking costs are just fair payment for services rendered is dumb, but of course the problems with the banks is political not technological in nature
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 27 December 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
there’s no reason to not have a chain of blockchains with significantly fewer entries, not requiring lots of computational power to track stuff. there are other possibilities but it’s a good argument why it’s a good tech for tracking assets but really bad for a single, scarcity-based value system
― mh, Wednesday, 27 December 2017 20:50 (eight years ago)
Blockchain needs about 20 more years before it starts enabling anything legit. This is consistent with history, not sure why patterns keep surprising everyone oh wait old stuff is boring
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 27 December 2017 21:47 (eight years ago)
"old stuff is boring" is one of the Three Programmer Diseases, I forget the other two
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 27 December 2017 21:50 (eight years ago)
yea Blockchain seems like the textbook solution in search of a problem
― frogbs, Wednesday, 27 December 2017 21:57 (eight years ago)
1. you cant make a chain out of blocks2.programmers plz learn abt stuff
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 27 December 2017 22:13 (eight years ago)
that was kind of the gist of an another software development anecdote I heard this year: if you want to know what is going to be big really soon, look at what academic research was into 15 - 20 years ago
― mh, Thursday, 28 December 2017 02:22 (eight years ago)
biomed was big in 1998 i think?
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 28 December 2017 03:55 (eight years ago)
most academic research will go nowhere but then some of it will be a big deal its just pretty much impossible to figure out what will pan out, blockchain on the other hand is just some weird left field shit created by like one to five guys who may or may not be academics that caught the fancy of VCs and online thought leaders professional and otherwise, seems unlikely if it cant find a use beyond pretend currencies with all the resources thatve been pumped into it that its going to emerge from hibernation in 20 years to be useful to someone, interesting tho that its creators were really just in it for the currency aspect and all the visionary free associating was grafted on by ppl looking for the next big thing, but not looking that hard
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 December 2017 04:27 (eight years ago)
its basically the google glass of data storage schemes
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 December 2017 04:29 (eight years ago)
The tulips of distributed hash tables
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 28 December 2017 04:39 (eight years ago)
Like ppl already make lots of money off data structures it’s called AWS
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 28 December 2017 04:40 (eight years ago)
tbh i do find one thing abt it compelling: crime, especially as technology facilitates more more the global surveillance state
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 December 2017 04:43 (eight years ago)
the problem is u still have to cash out some how and that interface with the accredited financial system is always going to be a pain point, the whole crypto currency scenario doesnt really work unless u can spend them, which will never happen because a. its a terrible product b. if it did become popular itd just be regulated anyway
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 December 2017 04:45 (eight years ago)
imo the big win of machine learning stuff is going to be training people that data retention is important, and that there is no _bad data_the last point is hard to convince people of, even scientists want to delete failed experiments, botched lab stuff (forgot to set a thermometer, whatever) when you should just flag it accordingly and document a reason. if you want processes to get better, you have to document how your process failed and ppl hate that
― mh, Thursday, 28 December 2017 05:01 (eight years ago)
imo the blockchain is good because data can’t be removed, but the mechanism is horrible
― mh, Thursday, 28 December 2017 05:02 (eight years ago)
everything can be deleted --game of thrones
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 December 2017 15:15 (eight years ago)
Head of Exmo has been kidnapped:
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/business-42505261
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 28 December 2017 17:41 (eight years ago)
The reports said he was dragged into a black Mercedes-Benz by men wearing balaclavas.
hell yea
― lag∞n, Thursday, 28 December 2017 17:43 (eight years ago)
Yr man was released after paying $1m in Bitcoins as a ransom. Shame the police can’t trace them now, eh?
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 29 December 2017 20:52 (eight years ago)
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/02/ceo-of-soaring-blockchain-stock-sells-about-870000-worth-of-the-shares.html
looooool
― 龜, Wednesday, 3 January 2018 19:05 (eight years ago)
salute lol
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 3 January 2018 19:09 (eight years ago)
https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/01/02/104924577-Screen-Shot-2018-01-02-at-4.01.34-PM.1910x1000.jpg?v=1514926990
― IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Wednesday, 3 January 2018 19:17 (eight years ago)
That means O'Rourke received a gross payout of $869,256 and made at least $712,000 on Riot's 600-plus percent price surge in the last few months on a name change that added the word "blockchain."Announcements tying companies to the blockchain technology that also backs bitcoin have caused several tiny stocks to soar dramatically in the last several months. In December, bitcoin itself had briefly surged about 1,900 percent for the year.
― pee-wee and the power men (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 3 January 2018 19:26 (eight years ago)
def normal stuff insane price volatility in online money u cant spend anywhere + other insanely obvious signs of market manipulation https://hackernoon.com/tether-the-tail-wagging-the-dog-3ebfd4640825
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 3 January 2018 19:46 (eight years ago)
A co worker bought ripple at 16 cents and now its fucking $2.70
― calstars, Wednesday, 3 January 2018 23:20 (eight years ago)
That’s a 1600% gain in two months or soBut it ain’t a profit unless he sells that’ shit
xp
i mentioned buying ripple wld be good a couple weeks ago in the other bitcoin thread since it is so cheap and was the non-mining cryptocurrency that saw the biggest increase in value plus bank thing etc
anyway it's all pretty volatile/unstable now so it's anybody's guess as to which ones will be of any value in the future
― infinity (∞), Wednesday, 3 January 2018 23:29 (eight years ago)
https://gizmodo.com/chinas-crackdown-on-crypto-mining-threatens-bitcoins-fu-1821820017
oh man how is it possible that governments could ever control this that isn't possible nakamoto said so
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 6 January 2018 22:08 (eight years ago)
bitcoin is the cia do yr research
― lag∞n, Saturday, 6 January 2018 22:39 (eight years ago)
I’m hearing from a few people with bitcoins (yes, plural) and other cryptocurrencies that mining is no longer where the money isThe article seems to be conflating mining cryptcurrencies with all cryptocurrencies
― infinity (∞), Saturday, 6 January 2018 22:43 (eight years ago)
Tempted to either:1. Buy a tonne of different cheap cryptoc and risk gaining/losing a bit with whichever increases/decreases in value2. Buy ethereum3. Buy ripple
― infinity (∞), Saturday, 6 January 2018 22:45 (eight years ago)
Just imagine the run when this shit is revealed to be nothing.
― calstars, Saturday, 6 January 2018 22:54 (eight years ago)
It's been fun to see how my dad suddenly got sucked up into cryptocurrency. I've only seen him like this 25 years ago when stocks suddenly drew his attention in a mad way. He's got Ethereum now and knows more about blockchains etc than I do. He feels so fucking cutting edge lol.
― ♫ very clever with maracas.jpg ♫ (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 6 January 2018 23:04 (eight years ago)
Eth is so ‘16
― calstars, Saturday, 6 January 2018 23:07 (eight years ago)
Sorry for bumping thoughThis thread deserves to die
― calstars, Saturday, 6 January 2018 23:08 (eight years ago)
I take this as another form of gambling which i tend not to do but meh a couple thousand is like a trip to vegas
― infinity (∞), Saturday, 6 January 2018 23:08 (eight years ago)
Ok except is Vegas is leagues more fun than this shit
― calstars, Saturday, 6 January 2018 23:11 (eight years ago)