WE DO NOT INVEST IN OUTDATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: REAL ESTATE, COMMODITIES, BONDS, STOCKS
― Brakhage, Saturday, 6 April 2013 16:05 (thirteen years ago)
As far as I know, fractional reserve lending actually *creates* money which is then loaned - so I have cash in the bank at the same time that cash is travelling around. Some good comment threads around this
Here's a 'lender' right here - which I'd imagine is a transfer house rather than an actual lender
― Brakhage, Saturday, 6 April 2013 16:10 (thirteen years ago)
Just a reminder, fellas: Mother's Day is May 12.
― del griffith, Saturday, 6 April 2013 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
lots of loans aren't fractional reserve actually! if i'm a private lender funding some business with a private loan, there's no fractional reserve component. fractional reserve isn't about loans (which involve actual cash transfer one way, then back the other) at all.
fractional reserve is about bank deposits and that's it. i deposit $100 in a bank. that bank then loans out e.g 90$. I still account for myself as having 100$, and the person that borrowed 90$ also now has 90$. They also have an obligation to pay that back in the future, but that doesn't net out from total money supply. So now there are $190 dollars circulating, effectively, since I can spend my money at any time, and the person with the 90$ can spend it too. This works because not everyone with deposits in a bank will be spending them at once. (sorry, econ 101 here). The same effect happens with any loan in fact. The difference is that if I hold a $90 IOU we don't count that as circulating currency, but my 90$ in the bank does count as such (because it is more fungible) even though effectively in both cases I don't have the actual physical cash but some financial obligation representing it. If I leant to a party whose IOU scrip was as good as currency, and freely exchangeable, then the same effect would occur with or without any government intervention or magic or anything. The crazies mystify the process so much that lots of misconceptions fly around regarding it.
There's no reason bitcoin is better or worse than dollars or gold or w/e else in being able to be banked fractional-reserve style.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Sunday, 7 April 2013 00:21 (thirteen years ago)
Anyone could start a fractional reserve bitcoin bank tomorrow. The only problem is that people would have to trust them.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Sunday, 7 April 2013 00:22 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/WYNgcYP.png
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Sunday, 7 April 2013 02:10 (thirteen years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-NMag6mhoh90/Te7LUEniH8I/AAAAAAAAfcg/WFAey0N8FBA/s640/BitCoin+vs.+Future+of+Online+Currency+1.jpg
― pplains, Sunday, 7 April 2013 02:53 (thirteen years ago)
http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Layout_BitInstant_Card-640x787.png
http://printcoins.com/images/gallery/ron_paul_bill.jpg
― pplains, Sunday, 7 April 2013 02:54 (thirteen years ago)
back on track
― I, rrational (mh), Sunday, 7 April 2013 03:20 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.listentobitcoin.com/
― I offer about as much diversity as a saltine cracker. (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 7 April 2013 20:05 (thirteen years ago)
Felix Salmon on the bitcoin bubble: says bitcoin's effectively a commodity, not really a currency
https://medium.com/money-banking/2b5ef79482cb
― dow, Sunday, 7 April 2013 23:01 (thirteen years ago)
"Early last week the value of Bitcoins soared past $100 each. This week, it went past $200. If you want a Bitcoin today, it will cost you about $235, and if you wait till tomorrow, it will be more."
http://bitcoinpride.com/media/queldorei/shopper/logo.png
― witepriv and i (buzza), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/b2w7tzR.png
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 19:01 (thirteen years ago)
buh-oh
― zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 19:10 (thirteen years ago)
the 10,000 BTC pizza order
― diamonddave85, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 19:15 (thirteen years ago)
print edition header of the chicago tribune business section today has a huge bitcoin symbol on it, will try and snap a pic
― jokestoldforu (gr8080), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 19:16 (thirteen years ago)
1.4 million dollar pizza order in today's bitcoin: http://blockchain.info/address/17SkEw2md5avVNyYgj6RiXuQKNwkXaxFyQ
― diamonddave85, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 19:17 (thirteen years ago)
Financial Times calls this '#000000 Wednesday'
― Brakhage, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 20:50 (thirteen years ago)
that is really funny
― frogbs, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 20:57 (thirteen years ago)
so, what caused this crash? i know there was a programming hiccup that caused a slump some time ago
― goole, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:05 (thirteen years ago)
Rory R. O'Rourke @Mejwell 1h
YO DUDES major bitcoin traders are attempting to stabilize market by buying huge swaths of bitcoin, like that FILTHY FED #bitcoin #btc
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:07 (thirteen years ago)
DDOS apparentlyhttp://techcrunch.com/2013/04/10/bitcoin-crash/
― gr8 tr∞lls i have known (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:36 (thirteen years ago)
The Tokyo-based exchange said last week that hackers are engaging in a strategy to manipulate the price of the currency: “Attackers wait until the price of Bitcoins reaches a certain value, sell, destabilize the exchange, wait for everybody to panic-sell their Bitcoins, wait for the price to drop to a certain amount, then stop the attack and start buying as much as they can. Repeat this two or three times like we saw over the past few days and they profit.”
― am0n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:41 (thirteen years ago)
"hackers"
― am0n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:42 (thirteen years ago)
im not sure that explanation makes any sense
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
sounds like basically just the shit that happens when you have a relatively liquidity but overcapitalized commodity. stockpiling, manipulation, etc.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:44 (thirteen years ago)
not even necessarily intentional. price hits a certain amount and some big holders decide to take profits. maybe the downturn causes a few other people to act more quickly and dump their coins too. typically in a major market there are lots of other orders and algos and bots that tend to even things out and take advantage of these moves before they just throw everything around so wildly (which works until those algos all line up and multiply effects instead of mitigating them). but this isn't a major market with all those institutions trying to bleed out arbitrage and regulate movements and etc, and so when people act, it has sharp and catastrophic affects on the market.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:47 (thirteen years ago)
noted leet haxor George Soros
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:53 (thirteen years ago)
It's really not a "hack" at all, it's more like penny stock manipulation
― --808 542137 (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 21:58 (thirteen years ago)
im not sure that explanation makes any sense― lag∞n, Wednesday, April 10, 2013 5:43 PM
this should clear things up
http://siliconangle.com/files/2011/08/bitcoin-crash.png
― am0n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:03 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/300x250/Money/Coins-Crash-Money.jpg
― Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:04 (thirteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2013/4/10/1365626013983/Bitcoin-010.jpg
problem is you can hold it imho
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:05 (thirteen years ago)
http://siliconangle.com/files/2013/01/bitcoin-hand-drop.jpg
― Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:06 (thirteen years ago)
that seems like a pretty good scam, brb, buying a few grand in bitcoins
― I, rrational (mh), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:40 (thirteen years ago)
buy low sell high breh
― --808 542137 (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:44 (thirteen years ago)
then dump enough of your stock to tank the market considerably and make people rush, then buy up more of them. rinse, repeat
― I, rrational (mh), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:45 (thirteen years ago)
what could go wrong
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:46 (thirteen years ago)
idk, people do this in Diablo 3 all the time
― I, rrational (mh), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:46 (thirteen years ago)
yo... anybody wanna trade some bitcoins
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:50 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/gdURUT9.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/gdURUT9.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/gdURUT9.png i got 3 bitcoins right here... will sell them for 20$ each
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:52 (thirteen years ago)
i have a 2010 silver bitcoin stashed in case everything goes 'the road'
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:53 (thirteen years ago)
oh nice... i missed out on the reservation list for those... still kicking myself...
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:54 (thirteen years ago)
i'm trying to remember if i heard of these before today.
― Pope Rusty I (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:57 (thirteen years ago)
I've been wondering a lot whether it would be possible to create a bitcoin that didn't have a fixed supply, like that self-expanded and contracted its supply according to some kind of algorithms/data. IDK what that would be based on, production in the economy? Value of transactions in Bitcoin?
― --808 542137 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 11 April 2013 02:21 (thirteen years ago)
There could be a long-running thing but such algorithmic finds are hard to balance. You could make a central bank, encode arbitrary strings, and award tokens to whoever decrypts them. That is usually a product of chance rather than a known unit of work, though.
― I, rrational (mh), Thursday, 11 April 2013 02:32 (thirteen years ago)
http://bit.ly/11Wz5X0
― markers, Thursday, 11 April 2013 02:38 (thirteen years ago)
fishing 4 bitc0ins http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/11/mt-gox-cross-site-scripting-attack-wipes-out-bitcoin-accounts/
― lag∞n, Thursday, 11 April 2013 14:34 (thirteen years ago)
Being a techie, I started researching.
― I, rrational (mh), Thursday, 11 April 2013 14:39 (thirteen years ago)
ha yes
― lag∞n, Thursday, 11 April 2013 14:45 (thirteen years ago)