valuable new posters

Creames Fartpoop wrote this on thread we never polled the fanta girls on board 7Curtis's 7borad on Oct 28, 2012

That is really interesting !

Creames Fartpoop wrote this on thread Martin Scorsese's George Harrison documentary 'Living In The Material World' on board I Love Everything on Nov 13, 2012

wow!

Creames Fartpoop wrote this on thread Azealia Banks on board I Love Music on Nov 14, 2012

great video!

Creames Fartpoop wrote this on thread "hi where?" "hi dere."--a thread to be hi here on board 1 pWN 3v3Ry+h1n G!!!1 on Nov 19, 2012

that's what's up!

Creames Fartpoop wrote this on thread I have never had sex. on board I Love Everything on Dec 7, 2012

Welcome! :)

Creames Fartpoop wrote this on thread are the rolling hip-hop threads racist? on board I Love Music on Jan 8, 2013

Cool!!

lmao

the return of dave cool

that's what's up!

Oh, did I touch a nerve?

'Many' has the fortune to be ambiguous. So if I talk for a handful of bandmates and bands I've been in, it can qualify as talking for many of them, because I've had this conversation with nearly all the bands I've been in (in over 15 years). Of course, it has to do with surrounding yourself with 'like-minded' people.

Like anything in the arts and conversations in ILM, it is anecdotal. There is no real meaningful data that can be extrapolate from anecdotes.

I actually have been frequenting the Sigur Rós message board on their official site since about 2002 (in its older permutation, too, when it was 18 seconds before sunrise and 'unofficial') and people talked about Sigur Rós's reticence about talking to interviewers in those early days, too.

But I shall cut it here, as I surmise you are trolling.

So, touché, I guess!

― kafkaesque (c21m50nh3x460n), Friday, February 15, 2013 12:42 PM (1 hour ago)

do we have a "i am using this word in a special way that isn't in the dictionary" thread?

don't know but, as an aside to that question, that thread could potentially be pretty.....................
........
......
.....
....
...
..
.

kafkaesque

supercoolcow

OutdoorFish

http://i49.tinypic.com/wgvqew.jpg

I'm a leprauchan, gree hee hee hee!

Slash N Burn, gentleman music fan

quick sweepstake on who he supports

i'm thinking united, leeds or idk leicester

Stoke please. Stoke.

Barnsley, Burnley, Donny

nahh forget stoke he'd only be a patsy. imo balance dictates... a bluenose

i'm thinking united, leeds or idk leicester

― r|t|c, Monday, 18 March 2013 20:12 (1 hour ago) Bookmark

commentator's eye

I Love 'Footie'

That's a toughie; who would H&O's peers from the 80's be? The aforementioned Lionel Ritchie? Culture Club? Abba? Also, i'm not a pop hater; radio can make any type of music unlistenable if they play it too often; i mean, flip through the dial of your areas classic rock stations and you can pretty much guarantee that you'll find one of a very short list of Zeppelin/Floyd/AD-DC tracks (seriously, does it ALWAYS have to be "Wish You Were Here" and "Money")? Pop music in itself is not dis-satisfying, but i tend to feel that it best serves children, the infirm, and neophytes.

― suspecterrain

the patch adams theory of pop fandom

Pop music in itself is not dis-satisfying, but i tend to feel that it best serves children, the infirm, and neophytes.
Pop music in itself is not dis-satisfying, but i tend to feel that it best serves children, the infirm, and neophytes.

basically

Thought this revive would be for crimson hexagon.

title says "valuable"

no wait, he got enrolled on here a month ago

enjoying the work of bananaman begins, wins of late, idk if they're new or what tho

surely not.

Are we talking about Hipsters, or "Hipsters"?

Hipsters, as in, the people who read Pitchfork, go to ATP and listen to bands that most people genuinely haven't heard of, or the people who spend their lives tweeting about how much they love Arctic Monkeys and Nandos?

― Slash N Burn, Saturday, 13 April 2013 01:58 (2 minutes ago)

are we talking valuable or "valuable?"

hipsters, or idk craig gardner

valuable

out of the slash into the snakepit

its called standards yo. some things are better than others, unles you don't agree that those tracks are higher level than your average music. if you think pharrell is already on the same level as daft punk than i can understand how that would work in your mind
anyway
still excited: obviously

― dojo, Sunday, April 14, 2013 12:49 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

now it's just getting painful

beeok live tweeting the cochella feed is pretty funny

haha, yes

yes. sarge rolling in at the end all 'put the phone DOWN' was p classic

love that dojo post

was just coming in here for dojo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BgzrfUA8lo

hmmm, was he definitely white?

yeah i was wondering

cos otherwise

i mean, my white radar pinged strong... but u never kno

maybe he was japanese?

I can always profess my love for Loveless. it's a mystifying piece of music. sure, there are other "spiritual" albums that can take you to a different plane of consciousness or dream reality. I know that, it's just that Loveless, beyond that aspect, also performs on many other levels. it's a great pop record, it's a marvelous production, it's a drone album, it's experimental (Rhys Chatham style drone), it's inspired by Indian mantras and Buddhist cosmic realms (in my opinion). It's noisier than Brainbombs or Swans. It's louder and more abstract and furious than some free jazz. All while being delicate, loving, and soft. Open, composed. I mean, Slowdive and all those bands totally miss that aspect. And it's not surprising.

fuck collaborations and fuck anyone who would say fuck anyone who doesn't say fuck collaborations and visa versa

this is hard to parse but involves fucking everyone if I have it right

http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/fuck-everything-and-listen-to-music.png

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1340302779_black-card-visa.jpg

I can always profess my love for Loveless. it's a mystifying piece of music. sure, there are other "spiritual" albums that can take you to a different plane of consciousness or dream reality. I know that, it's just that Loveless, beyond that aspect, also performs on many other levels. it's a great pop record, it's a marvelous production, it's a drone album, it's experimental (Rhys Chatham style drone), it's inspired by Indian mantras and Buddhist cosmic realms (in my opinion). It's noisier than Brainbombs or Swans. It's louder and more abstract and furious than some free jazz. All while being delicate, loving, and soft. Open, composed. I mean, Slowdive and all those bands totally miss that aspect. And it's not surprising.

― clouds, Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:51 PM (3 hours ago)

Ned Raggett has been here for 13 years, dude, and you're just noticing him now?