posts very much in character

l∞l

that's an amazing post, admittedly

curiously, bob dylan appeared on the forrest gump soundtrack

wonder if aero had a lex moment when he heard CCR on the soundtrack

omg @ lorax w the lorax!

omg @ lorax w the lorax!

― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:31 PM (6 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the forrest gump film

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/11/12/what-does-a-goatee-say-about-you.html

the forrest gump film

http://www.baumanrarebooks.com/BookImages/77670f.jpg

what-does-goatse-say-about-you.html

Larry grew a full beard, but that was a smidge too country—“I looked like an Oak Ridge Boy”—so he pruned it down into a goatee. Paired with a baseball cap and sleeveless shirt, these days Larry looks like he has just exited a Golden Corral buffet. He has redneck gravitas.

well sometimes the "X" really isn't designed to hurt anybody and almost all these posters who are dialing up the outrage meter are not part of that minority anyway, so it just devolves into self-congratulatory "you are so stupid and a horrible person" for 1000 posts

― frogbs, Wednesday, July 11, 2012 3:07 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Just putting this here as a reminder, of whenever this bloke complains he's unfairly persecuted, hateful assumptions and shit EXACTLY LIKE THIS is the ~actual reason~ why he gets called on stuff so often.

(And holy shit, I did not even see the "joke" he made 2 posts later.)

hateful assumptions like what, WCC? please elaborate :)

if you need help, I think the "anyone who uses the word 'uppity' is definitely making a racial slur" hardman stance so many posters were taking several months ago is a pretty good example of what I was talking about

1) making assumptions about what people "get" to be outraged about. Not your call to make.
2) making assumptions about what minorities people on ILX, that you have never met, belong to. Also not your call to make.
3) the big one: That only people who are members of minorities are "allowed" to call out hateful shit as opposed to, y'know, anyone who is a decent human being has not just a right but a moral duty to address inequality when they see fit.

I keep hitting flag post but you just don't go away. You have officially made me regret ever asking for the change to be made.

http://www.decibel-design.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/uppity_frog.jpg

I'm not telling anyone what they should and should not be outraged about or what they are allowed to call out. I'm just saying that it doesn't lead to intelligent discussion. We've gone over this plenty of times and hasn't led to ANYTHING but a bunch of people feeling hurt and vowing to never post again (that's you, btw) (okay, I did legitimately learn about why there's a "certain word" you shouldn't say, so thank you guys for that). Also I'm not sure you understand what the word "almost" means so at this point I'm just going to say your reading comprehension sucks. At least am0n is on the ball!

http://www.apartment48.com/shop/frog-playground-ball.jpg

lol at the uppity frog

Your idea of "intelligent discussion" seems "everyone always agrees with Frogbs and no one ever calls him on the offensive and untrue shit he comes out with."

I don't often say things like this, but seriously. If you don't think that the discussion on ILX that you get involved with is intelligent, you might want to look in the mirror.

Now here is my funny gif, and I'm done.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxkb2hjTyM1qjp4z6o1_500.gif

That's not true. There's plenty of intelligent discussion on here and people rarely agree with me on anything. I've learned a few things along the way. However there are a lot of posters who just straight-up aren't willing to accept that other viewpoints exist or use THAT as a springboard for massive character judgements on issues that they barely understand themselves. Not "here's what's wrong with what you said" but rather "here's what's wrong with what I hope you meant".

is it just me or does this feel like some sort of marvel dc xover battle

As I see it, Frogbs, there are two things going on here:

1) There is a difference between a Viewpoint and a Prejudice. The difference is that a Viewpoint is usually accompanied by either direct personal experience of an issue, or study and careful interpretation of evidence relating to that issue. A Prejudice has no basis except "Well, I believe that..." People on ILX are often accepting of multiple Viewpoints, but they do not have a duty to accept Prejudices.

2) You do not seem to understand that there is a difference between "You need to check your Privilege" and "You are the worst person forever." The former is a nice way of saying "of the people in this debate, one is speaking from a Viewpoint based on direct personal experience and the other is not. You might want to examine if you have a Viewpoint or a Prejudice before you go making any further assertions about things they have experienced and you have not."

The latter is what people say to you when you carry on insisting that you are being censured by "OMG the PC police" because you cannot tell the difference between your right to a Viewpoint and a Prejudice. Or because you persist in espousing the false belief that it is somehow making a "character judgement" about you, personally, to suggest that you might be the recipient of Privilege, rather than a statement about power dynamics within a society.

the false belief that it is somehow making a "character judgement" about you, personally, to suggest that you might be the recipient of Privilege, rather than a statement about power dynamics within a society.

To be fair A TON of basically nice people miss this point all the time. A ton. Possibly most. In all kinds of intersectionalities.

I'd love to discuss that at greater length, Laurel, if I didn't think it would turn into a giant clusterfuck instantly.

Everyone misses that from time to time, because people are human.

(another profound interjection from DJP)

Haha. I don't say that to undermine WCC's point, btw, I say it to reinforce that having someone point out that you can AFFORD not to be aware of things that hurt others, is not the same thing as being accused of hurting them yourself.

But if you CONTINUE to let them get hurt and not see them as part of your web, which is a web of everyone, THEN in the future you are increasingly complicit in their harm because you do benefit from people of other types/groups/populations being kept down. I mean almost everyone benefits somehow from someone else being kept back or kept down. All we are saying is, lift them up.

Yeah, I know, and I am not excepting myself from this.

some ppl seem to be confused + think that this thread is a place to post their own posts very much in character, when in fact - as i understand it - it's a place to post OTHER posters posts very much in character

people seem confused re the proper use of this thread altogether

There is a difference between a Viewpoint and a Prejudice. The difference is that a Viewpoint is usually accompanied by either direct personal experience of an issue, or study and careful interpretation of evidence relating to that issue. A Prejudice has no basis except "Well, I believe that..." People on ILX are often accepting of multiple Viewpoints, but they do not have a duty to accept Prejudices.

So you're just assuming that nothing I say is a "direct personal experience of an issue, or study and careful interpretation of evidence relating to that issue"? Is that a viewpoint, or a prejudice? I'm confused.

Or because you persist in espousing the false belief that it is somehow making a "character judgement" about you, personally, to suggest that you might be the recipient of Privilege, rather than a statement about power dynamics within a society.

People on here have been a tad bit meaner than "you might be the recipient of Privilege"

Here's a post in character for ya: go fuck yourself, Mordy.

maybe he wasnt talking about you?

strike that: more like an eclipse/first xover battle

(another profound interjection from DJP)

― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:39 AM (38 minutes ago

maybe he wasnt talking about you?

― O_o-O_O-o_O (jjjusten)

Mordy singled out WCC on the transgender thread (since locked) a few days ago, it's not jumping to conclusions that he probably IS talking about her. And me. And probably some other people too, but if you saw the other posts it would be p disingenuous to brush WCC off that way.

to be fair, WCC has also been very strong in advocating not judging posters based on their posting history, too, though.

lol forks

power rangers/beetle borgs imo

some ppl seem to be confused + think that this thread is a place to post their own posts very much in character, when in fact - as i understand it - it's a place to post OTHER posters posts very much in character

― Mordy, Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:50 PM (45 minutes ago)

Here's a post in character for ya: go fuck yourself, Mordy.

― Queue de Cheval (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:14 PM (21 minutes ago)

outrage ... privilege ... hateful shit ... power dynamics ... judging you ... i quit ... giant clusterfuck

- white chocolate cheesecake

http://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gifhttp://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gifhttp://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gif
http://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gifhttp://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gifhttp://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gif
http://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gifhttp://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gifhttp://www.webtopia.co.za/Images/head-banging.gif

r.i.p. noize borad

the enemy list runneth over

fwiw people who are taking life seriously:

Preferences -> View Options -> I Want to Change the Boards Shown on Site New Answers... -> Uncheck "Show?" for this board

I tried to find a picture of th0m y0rke in sexual congress with a frog but google is failing me :(

here's a serious question: can we add a killfile feature to ilx?