I knew this was a bad idea, and the hell with this
omfg, amazing. I never saw a WCC post before this thread - I have a sixth sense for her flounces.
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Monday, 16 January 2012 22:08 (fourteen years ago)
Not to stir up any shit but until this very minute I didn't even know about this no-first-names thing. If it's this easy to get kludged shouldn't it go in a site faq or something?
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:24 (fourteen years ago)
well idk i doubt ned raggett minds
― judith, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
some ppl are fine w/ u using their first name on ilx -- this person isn't, and of course that's fine too!
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:26 (fourteen years ago)
there is no such thing, it's just a preference that some people express
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:27 (fourteen years ago)
In general there is no no first names thing tbh.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:27 (fourteen years ago)
like the veil of secrecy around markers -- I have heard who he might be irl, and it is a good thing most people don't know. you'd be surprised!
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:28 (fourteen years ago)
Are his initials JG?
― stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:29 (fourteen years ago)
people call me by my first name regularly enough considering i have a pretty unusual first name.
― judith, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
some ppl might have said, 'yes it is i, who have been posting here for a decade under various names including my real name. but i'd much prefer you no longer used my first name, thx.'
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
judith is an unusual first name for a boy
― sarahel, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
i meant plax
― judith, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
― stet
XD
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:36 (fourteen years ago)
― mookieproof, Monday, January 16, 2012 7:34 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Right but it's also very possible that not every single person on ILX saw that request, you know?
― ENBB, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:37 (fourteen years ago)
i like that i can come back to ilx after like, 2(?) years and everything is exactly the same.
i'm nick, and i approve of this message.
― NZA, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:39 (fourteen years ago)
that is true. some ppl might kindly reiterate their request rather than coin the phrase 'fucking curtain-twitching busybodies' tho
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:39 (fourteen years ago)
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 11:36 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
so is your first name xavier or
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
i came here intending to post a long list of names that i'm sure all other ilxors would recognize but i wouldn't after such a long absence and be like "lol, i got old". but that doesn't seem fum now.
― NZA, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
anyway, welcome back http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqfjpeUFBC1qmilapo1_500.gif
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:41 (fourteen years ago)
― mookieproof, Monday, January 16, 2012 7:39 PM (49 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Right that's what I'm saying. Maybe not everyone saw it so calling them "fucking curtain-twitching busybodies" seemed pretty harsh.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:42 (fourteen years ago)
YEah I'm confused. Are we all sposed to know about some "legal trouble" that happened? Is it fair to expect people to? I have nfi what any of this is about.
― thanks to denial, I'm immortal! (Trayce), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:44 (fourteen years ago)
Is markers Jake Gyllenhaal, guys?
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:57 (fourteen years ago)
reference --> http://daringfireball.net/colophon/
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:58 (fourteen years ago)
so every post with 'kate' in it is just gonna autocorrect to that gif?
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:58 (fourteen years ago)
o nm lol mooks
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:59 (fourteen years ago)
sucka
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:02 (fourteen years ago)
can someone explain curtain-twitching to me?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:02 (fourteen years ago)
rip polonius
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:04 (fourteen years ago)
being nosey/gosspiy/judgemental like a nasty neighbour basically.
― thanks to denial, I'm immortal! (Trayce), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:05 (fourteen years ago)
what a charming phrase
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:06 (fourteen years ago)
http://blogs.spotery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Mrs-kravitz-bewitched-300x232.jpg
― buzza, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:07 (fourteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Monday, January 16, 2012 8:02 PM (1 minute ago)
it's like when your curtain like an inch or so too high or low, but it's perfectly unwrinkled, so you don't want to take it down and re-hang it or even pull on one end for fear that the whole thing'll get messed up, so you just grab the high end and sort of give it a little yank so it moves ever-so-slighly how you want it to. i guess it could be more accurately termed "curtain yanking" or "curtain tugging"
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:07 (fourteen years ago)
I was hoping this was a Willie Monks ref!
This song was composed in the flowery WestBy a man you may never have seen –––––Oh I'll tell you his name, but it is not in full,His initials are J.R.G.
― no more mr. nice girls (Abbbottt), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:08 (fourteen years ago)
I thought it referred to the specific motion of a curtain that someone is hiding behind and attempting to jerk off without being noticed
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:10 (fourteen years ago)
poll: have you ever jerked off behind a curtain y/n
i myself have not
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)
yet
lol, I thought it was re pulling back the wizard of oz's curtain rather twitchily
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)
how far behind the curtain
― virtual gape machine (electricsound), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)
the specific motion of a curtain that someone is hiding behind
the great + powerful OZ?
― no more mr. nice girls (Abbbottt), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:14 (fourteen years ago)
― markers, Monday, January 16, 2012 7:26 PM (46 minutes ago) Bookmark
this really. I mean we have accommodated other posters who have specifically asked (maybe in nicer terms) no gov names be used on ILX. so I don't see why we can't in this instance
― dayo, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:15 (fourteen years ago)
I thought it was re pulling back the wizard of oz's curtain rather twitchily
that would make mh toto and ____ the great and powerful oz, which doesn't seem to quite fit
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:16 (fourteen years ago)
"pulling back the wizard of oz's curtain" is my least favorite sex act
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:16 (fourteen years ago)
good lord
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:17 (fourteen years ago)
can a very common first name by itself be considered a 'govt name', just in general like, i always assumed 'govt name' referred to yr full name in googleable format tbh
― modric conservative (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:26 (fourteen years ago)
all (or most) kidding aside, i honestly value ____'s contributions when he/she does not have an itchy trigger finger. i thought some of the stuff he/she said on the sandbox girls thread was fantastic, i enjoy his/her take on various musics, and i thought his/her ws contributions were both spot-on and fun, for example.
interacting with ____ seems to be a question of when, not if, one offends him/her terribly, however. perhaps he/she is right to be offended, perhaps not, but its occurrence is depressingly inevitable. and that's too bad for everyone.
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:27 (fourteen years ago)
iirc 'judith' doesn't even spell their name properly irl, adding to the confusion
― modric conservative (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:29 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjsa4sDAQ6A
― buzza, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:34 (fourteen years ago)
this is not intended as a mod rule decision but if i am being honest the idea that posting a first name is in any way equatable to posting a government name is flat out ridiculous. i def try not to use first names unless its clearly ok with said poster, and def wont if it seems clear they prefer it otherwise (hi aero) but this was a bit of an overreaction in my book.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:35 (fourteen years ago)
MOD BRUTALITY i said
― modric conservative (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:36 (fourteen years ago)
STEVEN TYLER STEVEN TYLER STEVEN TYLER
if he doesn't show up in a few minutes all his claims are null and void
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:49 (fourteen years ago)