K4te, you keep leaving ilx and returning to ilx and leaving ilx and returning to ilx, and I truly am glad you are here (again), I truly am. But it's a bit of a stretch to make a fuss about ppl using your first name on threads like these to determine you are, indeed, the same person.
― I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 16 January 2012 21:45 (fourteen years ago)
People sometimes have reasons for wanting their IRL identities obscured online for entirely legitimate reasons that have simply never dawned on you. I am involved in one of those kinds of situations.
This curtain-twitching meta BS is one of the things I find most distasteful about ILX. If you know someone well enough to recognise their taste or posting style, good for you.
But if someone says repeatedly that they don't want their government name used and you keep trying to dig it up, I find *that* really unsettling.
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:45 (fourteen years ago)
Did it possibly occur to you that I might be involved in some legal shit and your insistence on revealing the truuuuuuth might actually lead to some IRL consequences when all I really want to do is talk about Radiohead b-sides?
Your sense of entitlement to people's identities is really ugly and can be damaging to people
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:50 (fourteen years ago)
it isn't like people here are citing your full name, and your first name is relatively common. i think everyone posting about you on this thread has good intentions and doesn't intend to be hurtful.
― sarahel, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
Those reasons have dawned on me, though. They dawn on me at least 10 times every single day in these complicated times of work/personal life getting entwined, times of forums and twitter and facebook etc. It's complicated being online, it really is. I know that because my profession prevents me to be myself on twitter, fb etc. This forum is the only safe haven, as I think is what you are getting at.
But I don't think this is about "digging up" one's gov name (well at least it's not for me); however being part of a community like this, I do like to know White Chocolate Cheesecake is Fothering Thomas, or all the aliases before, as I *engaged* with that person - being you - before. And your gov name is the only name that strings those aliases together.
― I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 16 January 2012 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
Hi, my name is Mike. There are at least five other Mikes on ilx. Like I said, I didn't realize it was an actual first name thing, but that is not.. a really specific name
― mh, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
like there are at least three individuals with a certain female name beginning with k that I am aware of, and at least one of them used that as part of her actual screen name!
― mh, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
Ok, I now know this cannot be directed at me. We all rallied here to help you with your legal problems, ilx even created a seperate board for it! And ilx *did* help you, a lot! Soon after you quit ilx, disillusioned...
― I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 16 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
shit got heated
― human trash (buzza), Monday, 16 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
This is impossible. I ask you several times NOT to do a specific thing, and you just carry on telling me why it's OK for you to do the thing I have specifically asked you not to do.
I knew this was a bad idea, and the hell with this
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:57 (fourteen years ago)
I think I overstepped in a comment on the sandbox. Which is down, and I didn't use even a first name, just referenced something that had been said in the past. If any of this actually entails legally linkable material, I apologize, but I really don't think that is the case.
― mh, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:57 (fourteen years ago)
Am I the "you" in this? Because I believe there was a comment about "government names" on the sbx but I didn't take that to mean first name.
― mh, Monday, 16 January 2012 21:58 (fourteen years ago)
This still can't be directed at me, for I did not do what you insinuate I did..
― I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 16 January 2012 21:58 (fourteen years ago)
WCC: it probably didn't occur to them, no. But I have to say that it would be pretty much of a long shot to expect that to occur to anyone who doesn't already know. Problem is that you've used your first name as a display name here before and have previously not minded people using it (I know I have in the past) - so you can't expect people to automatically know not to do so now. And I'm aware that you've asked for it not to be used before, so I'm not saying you're in the wrong at all, just pointing out that not everyone will have seen every post.
Guys: now you are aware, apologise, stop using it, call for a mod to purge those posts? That would be much more constructive than carrying on a theoretical/hypothetical discussion that WCC doesn't want to be involved in - all they want is a change of behaviour!
― emil.y, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)
mods need to institute an auto-replace for certain names that begin with the 11th letter of the alphabet
perhaps a gif of thom y. dancing or something
― mookieproof, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:01 (fourteen years ago)
Do you know why I quit ILX? Because a bunch of meta assholes bullied me into a mental hospital. That is why. I thought after talking thru a bunch of stuff on Sandbox that it could be resolved. I guess I was wrong.
And now you're starting up stupid meta bullshit yet again. This shit is poisonous and I'm sick of being subjected to it no matter what you think your motivations are. This meta BS is poison and you are bullies if you won't stop when asked
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:01 (fourteen years ago)
i've thought about this a while now -- esp. during the sandbox era -- where does it come from? I don't think it comes from a bad place, unless you (the general you) believe that people are inherently bad.
― sarahel, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:02 (fourteen years ago)
Emily 1000 times otm. I <3 you being back here WCC, is all I'm saying.
― I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 16 January 2012 22:02 (fourteen years ago)
Frankly, I think I made the mistake of stating an opinion on a sandbox individual's preferences that assumed past information, and was told off for it, possibly rightfully so?
Then there's this entire thing where I'm trying to get a read on where someone's opinions -- which I happen to enjoy reading -- align with what I've read from what I believe to be this person previously and I just wanted to know if it's the same person for purposes of discussion?
Not sure if this is coming from somewhere else but I'm getting the heck out of dodge because this seems like a lot to step in
― mh, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:03 (fourteen years ago)
omfg, amazing. I never saw a WCC post before this thread - I have a sixth sense for her flounces.
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Monday, 16 January 2012 22:08 (fourteen years ago)
Not to stir up any shit but until this very minute I didn't even know about this no-first-names thing. If it's this easy to get kludged shouldn't it go in a site faq or something?
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:24 (fourteen years ago)
well idk i doubt ned raggett minds
― judith, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
some ppl are fine w/ u using their first name on ilx -- this person isn't, and of course that's fine too!
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:26 (fourteen years ago)
there is no such thing, it's just a preference that some people express
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:27 (fourteen years ago)
In general there is no no first names thing tbh.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:27 (fourteen years ago)
like the veil of secrecy around markers -- I have heard who he might be irl, and it is a good thing most people don't know. you'd be surprised!
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:28 (fourteen years ago)
Are his initials JG?
― stet, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:29 (fourteen years ago)
people call me by my first name regularly enough considering i have a pretty unusual first name.
― judith, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
some ppl might have said, 'yes it is i, who have been posting here for a decade under various names including my real name. but i'd much prefer you no longer used my first name, thx.'
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
judith is an unusual first name for a boy
― sarahel, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
i meant plax
― judith, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
― stet
XD
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:36 (fourteen years ago)
― mookieproof, Monday, January 16, 2012 7:34 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Right but it's also very possible that not every single person on ILX saw that request, you know?
― ENBB, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:37 (fourteen years ago)
i like that i can come back to ilx after like, 2(?) years and everything is exactly the same.
i'm nick, and i approve of this message.
― NZA, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:39 (fourteen years ago)
that is true. some ppl might kindly reiterate their request rather than coin the phrase 'fucking curtain-twitching busybodies' tho
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:39 (fourteen years ago)
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 11:36 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
so is your first name xavier or
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
i came here intending to post a long list of names that i'm sure all other ilxors would recognize but i wouldn't after such a long absence and be like "lol, i got old". but that doesn't seem fum now.
― NZA, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
anyway, welcome back http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqfjpeUFBC1qmilapo1_500.gif
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:41 (fourteen years ago)
― mookieproof, Monday, January 16, 2012 7:39 PM (49 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Right that's what I'm saying. Maybe not everyone saw it so calling them "fucking curtain-twitching busybodies" seemed pretty harsh.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:42 (fourteen years ago)
YEah I'm confused. Are we all sposed to know about some "legal trouble" that happened? Is it fair to expect people to? I have nfi what any of this is about.
― thanks to denial, I'm immortal! (Trayce), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:44 (fourteen years ago)
Is markers Jake Gyllenhaal, guys?
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:57 (fourteen years ago)
reference --> http://daringfireball.net/colophon/
― markers, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:58 (fourteen years ago)
so every post with 'kate' in it is just gonna autocorrect to that gif?
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:58 (fourteen years ago)
o nm lol mooks
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:59 (fourteen years ago)
sucka
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:02 (fourteen years ago)
can someone explain curtain-twitching to me?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:02 (fourteen years ago)
rip polonius
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:04 (fourteen years ago)
being nosey/gosspiy/judgemental like a nasty neighbour basically.
― thanks to denial, I'm immortal! (Trayce), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:05 (fourteen years ago)
what a charming phrase
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:06 (fourteen years ago)
http://blogs.spotery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Mrs-kravitz-bewitched-300x232.jpg
― buzza, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:07 (fourteen years ago)