posts very much in character

lol @ morbs and shakey double-feature

Guys I don't think I still have those LeCoq videos. ;_;

I did find a video of an awesome airplane crash though.

Hottest Disney male.

Poll Closing Date: Sunday, June 17, 2007 11:00 PM

For equality's sake.

Lilo's sister's boyfriend
Aladdin
Jeff Bridges (Tron)
Taran
The Lion King (whatever his name was)
Dick van Dyke
Peter MacNicol (Ally McBeal... nah, Dragonslayer)
Donald Duck
The prince from Sleeping Beauty
Christopher Lee (Return from Witch Mountain)
The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Captain Hook
Maximilian Schell (The Black Hole)
Beast
Rick Moranis (Honey, I Shrunk the Kids)
Jack Skellington
The dark-haired guy from Emperor's Lost Groove
Bambi (eh?)
Dumbo (jeez!)
Tim Curry (The Three Musketeers)
Mowgli
Tarzan
Brendan Fraser (George of the Jungle)
Robin Hood
Richard Farnsworth (The Straight Story)
Stitch
James McAvoy (the faun from Narnia)
The bad guy from Mulan

-- Tuomas, Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:45 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Link

all tombot posts

all tuomas posts to be fair

i started to believe in fake tuomas when i saw that disney male headline.
it's too perfect an imitation.

the student has become the master

A perfect simulacrum such as Tuomas, the robot child, can become real only if it exhibits the most human characteristic: the ability to dream, to wish for impossible things. By dreaming about the blue fairy who will turn him into a real boy, David has already become real or human (the two are considered identical in the film). What makes the simulated being real is its desire to be real: the desire to be real cannot itself be simulated, which proves that it is a reliable criterion for differentiating between the real and the simulated. However, the positing of the desire to be real as the distinguishing mark of the real makes the real lacking in itself. The real is defined as that which lacks reality, that which wants to become real.

OH FUCK TELEVISION

-- Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, June 14, 2007 2:07 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

I'm just mildly intrigued by how someone can tell me to calm down whilst simultaneously giving their own (wildly inaccurate and unfair) character assassination. You seem to have set yourself against a certain type, and for the purposes of convenience have made me adhere to that type come hell or high water. I don't aim to bring pleasure here, I aim to let off steam and air my opinions so that others might contend them. Instead of contending, you've aimed cheap shots ('Oxbridge whimsy' indeed, o thou frightful nincompoop) at the speaker. If I was trying to patronise you, I'd do it so much better, my dear fellow. You'd barely notice.

Anyway, I'm off for a bit. Lurk away.

-- Just got offed, Thursday, 14 June 2007 15:27 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

he* was the best Batman (since Adam West)

-- Dr Morbius, Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:02 PM

* referring to val kilmer.

thoughts:
wow, just wow.

Who is better? KEATON? no.

btw I would be a better fucking Batman than any of em.

except adam west

Christian Bale, obv

Adam West is a better crazy mayor of Quahog than he was a Batman.

Who are you to disagree with Dr. M???

There is no such town as Quahog.

Whereas Gotham City is real.

laurel on the money-mark

BUSTER keaton may have had a shot

/morbs

That would have been a great batman

I know my summer film project

I didn't even see the Bale Batman but I have every faith in him.

I am woman watch me grow
See me standing toe to toe
As I spread my lovin' arms across the land
But I'm still an embryo
With a long long way to go
Until I make my brother understand

Oh yes I am wise
But it's wisdom born of pain
Yes, I've paid the price
But look how much I gained
If I have to I can face anything
I am strong (strong)
I am invincible (invincible)
I am woman
Oh, I am woman
I am invincible
I am strong

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 19:28 (2 days ago) Bookmark Link

looking at this: why exactly does she have a career and/or reputation again?

-- strongohulkington, Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:14 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

is it just because of jimmymod type dudes with a fixation on saucer-orbed rory gilmore knock-offs?

-- strongohulkington, Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:14 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yes, but the mumbly voice helps.

-- Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:15 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

also her name is zooey which reminds me of zoobilee zoo

-- strongohulkington, Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:16 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I liked Keaton as Batman.

me too

don't step to my poll thread, biter

-- Wrinklepaws, Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:42 PM (57 minutes ago)

vaginas are for sharing

-- kenan, Friday, 15 June 2007 17:20 (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

like a big bowl of Fritos

-- kenan, Friday, 15 June 2007 17:21 (32 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

kenan throws a superbowl party at hedonism every year.
word to the wise, stay away from the dip.

there's no excuse to use the word 'vagina' so exclusively as kenan does when there are so many more expressive synonyms

Yeah, like "gash".

precisely.

http://www.blackchampagne.com/slang-dirty.shtml#vagina

"Panty hamster" (!!!!!)

They missed out Lab Kebab.

ILXOR Gallery

When I was eleven I wanted to be a JEM doll.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, June 15, 2007 8:08 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

A perfect simulacrum such as Tuomas, the robot child, can become real only if it exhibits the most human characteristic: the ability to dream, to wish for impossible things. By dreaming about the blue fairy who will turn him into a real boy, David has already become real or human (the two are considered identical in the film). What makes the simulated being real is its desire to be real: the desire to be real cannot itself be simulated, which proves that it is a reliable criterion for differentiating between the real and the simulated. However, the positing of the desire to be real as the distinguishing mark of the real makes the real lacking in itself. The real is defined as that which lacks reality, that which wants to become real.

I thought you were quoting Sebastien Chikara at first.

Sebastian is <3

strongo, it's basically the platinum breakz II of comedy

-- The Macallan 18 Year, Friday, June 15, 2007 6:31 PM (4 hours ago)

me trying to reach 1st base w/ strongo. always failing. ;_;

Louis Jagger (Cambridge) replied to Dan's post on May 2, 2007 at 5:39 PM
Actually, Dan, I just wanted to say that the current Orbital thread on ILX just warmed my heart like you wouldn't believe. Orbital are one of the few bands in existence whose best music I can love without compunction, without any sort of qualifier or 'yeah, but...' to force doubt into my mind. There's just no baggage with them, no need to conform to certain regulations; to me, they just seem to make astoundingly brilliant head-music without being a) wankers, b) scenesters, c) up their own behinds or d) at all constricted by any conventional notions of propriety. Their music is as refreshing and natural as it is (conversely) sequenced and electronic (a paradox that increases their achievement yet further). I know I was a total ass to create a 'pantheon' of instrumental music including Bach, Mozart, Davis and Orbital, but I stand by the point that only certain people can create a complex, flowing piece of instrumental (i.e. non-lyrical) music that doesn't sound in the slightest bit contrived, and fewer still can create such music and make it improve, progress, and grow exponentially upon the crest of its own increasing awesomeness (I'm rambling, but I hope you catch my drift). Orbital are one of the few acts who can do such a thing to me (oh, and just for Jon, The Boredoms are up there too).

And when Enrique says 'OUT THERE SOMEWHERE FFS PEOPLE', he is right. So, so right. I have a friend here at uni, a very intelligent architect with a penchant for classical music and good comedy, and 'Out There Somewhere' is probably the one piece of music we see 100% totally eye-to-eye on. Taken as a whole, it is masterful, perfect, amazing etc, but the last four minutes fifty seconds might actually be the definition of music for me. That little synth change-up 10:38 into Part 2 is...just...well, it's one of the very very few things I reckon couldn't actually have been improved upon.

Back to the whole 'liking without qualifier' thing...I reckon the new band whom I'll feel that way about are Working For A Nuclear Free City. There's a thread about them somewhere. I think they're an absolute breath of fresh air in British indie, there's nothing whatsoever to dislike about them, and everyone with more than a passing interest in electronic, shoegaze, or other alternative music really must check them out sooner rather than later.

If the goodfolk of ILX could be alerted to these messages, I'd be grateful. I mean, there's a helluva lot more I could talk about, but at this moment in time, what I've just said felt right. One thing: no new Electric Soft Parade album thread? :-( It's pretty damn good!

OK, over and out, LJ

And when Enrique says 'OUT THERE SOMEWHERE FFS PEOPLE', he is right. So, so right.

qft

oh for the days of changeable usernames.

penis not in vagina = still a virgin
post-coitus = not a virgin

More like

has a hymen = virgin
bloody spot on the sheets = not a virgin

Virginity is a social construct created solely for women, and men don't need to worry about it. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying.

-- sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Sunday, May 21, 2006 12:26 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

Louis keep ya head up

-- Wrinklepaws, Saturday, June 16, 2007 6:01 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

If that Kenan post is very much in character, it's only because he's right.

oh for the days of changeable usernames!